ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review
CPU-Z 1.91 has entry for 48-Core Threadripper 3980X
It's not a surprise really, in fact, we have been noting the 48-core part in our initial Threadripper 3000 reviews already, but yes next year (or this year depending on how late you read this) AMD will release a 64-core Threaqdripper, the 3990X and a 3980X as well, with 48-cores.
Chinese website MyDrivers mentions that CPU-Z contains references to the Threadripper 3980X. Officially, the changelog only mentions support for the other three Threadripper 3000 chips. The 3980X would be between the 32-core 3970X and the 64-beast 3990X with 48 cores and 96 threads.
It is expected to once again see a 280 Watt SKU.
| AMD Processor | Architecture | Cores | Threads | Freq. Base/Boost | TDP | USD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | ZEN2 | 64 | 128 | - | - | - |
| Ryzen Threadripper 3980X | ZEN2 | 48 | 96 | - | - | - |
| Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | ZEN2 | 32 | 64 | 3.7 - 4.5 GHz | 280W | 1999 |
| Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | ZEN2 | 24 | 48 | 3.8 - 4.5 GHz | 280W | 1399 |
| Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | ZEN+ | 32 | 64 | 3.0 - 4.2 GHz | 250W | 1979 |
| Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | ZEN+ | 24 | 48 | 3.0 - 4.2 GHz | 250W | 1299 |
| Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | ZEN+ | 16 | 32 | 3.5 - 4.4 GHz | 180W | 1189 |
| Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | ZEN | 16 | 32 | 3.7 - 4.0 GHz | 180W | 898 |
| Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | ZEN+ | 12 | 24 | 3.5 - 4.3 GHz | 180W | 589 |
| Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | ZEN | 12 | 24 | 3.5 - 4.0 GHz | 180W | 488 |
| Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | ZEN | 8 | 16 | 3.8 - 4.0 GHz | 140W | 389 |
CPU-Z 1.6.1 Download - 07/04/2012 01:03 PM
CPU-Z is a freeware that gathers information on some of the main devices of your system. CPU-Z is a diagnostic tool that provides information on your CPU, including: processor name and vendor, core s...
CPU-Z 1.6 Download - 03/03/2012 10:38 AM
CPU-Z is a freeware that gathers information on some of the main devices of your system.
CPU-Z 1.58 released - 06/25/2011 03:43 AM
CPU-Z is a freeware that gathers information on some of the main devices of your system. Download it here. CPU-Z is a diagnostic tool that provides information on your CPU, including: processor name a...
CPU-Z 1.55 Released - 07/10/2010 09:57 AM
CPU-Z is a freeware that gathers information on some of the main devices of your system. Download it here. CPU-Z is a diagnostic tool that provides information on your CPU, including: processor name a...
Download CPU-Z 1.54 - 03/25/2010 09:58 AM
CPU-Z is a diagnostic tool that provides information on your CPU, including: processor name and vendor, core stepping and process, processor package, internal and external clocks, clock multiplier, pa...
anticupidon
Senior Member
Posts: 7110
Joined: 2008-03-06
Senior Member
Posts: 7110
Joined: 2008-03-06
#5746512 Posted on: 12/31/2019 11:31 AM
There are factors contributing to this.
One Enterprise environment moves at its own pace. Sometimes infuriatingly slow, something to be aware. More, in large companies, the money invested has to return every ounce, penny possible with biggest revenue. So nobody will rush out to buy the latest just because... benchmarks.
Second In large corporations, there is the dreaded IT manager or a consortium of sort who gives or takes the funds for IT infrastructure. And by golly, nothing moves with proper paperwork and approvals. Slow? Burocracy? Whatever, everyone wants their back covered by paperwork and will NOT risk anything who can get back and bite them in the ass.
Third. Intel knows all the above, and knows how to "consolidate" some deals and how to please a CEO or small private firm IT managers.
Has money to pay some third world countries debt, so they make everything possible that EPYC doesn't get into data center environment.
Will take some guts and some bold, untamed IT companies who doesn't give a rat ass for Intel micromanagement and take action, so everyone will follow..
As a funny story, where I've worked, IT department still had some CoreDuo machines running Vista Enterprise. The hardware still works, why spend money?
There are factors contributing to this.
One Enterprise environment moves at its own pace. Sometimes infuriatingly slow, something to be aware. More, in large companies, the money invested has to return every ounce, penny possible with biggest revenue. So nobody will rush out to buy the latest just because... benchmarks.
Second In large corporations, there is the dreaded IT manager or a consortium of sort who gives or takes the funds for IT infrastructure. And by golly, nothing moves with proper paperwork and approvals. Slow? Burocracy? Whatever, everyone wants their back covered by paperwork and will NOT risk anything who can get back and bite them in the ass.
Third. Intel knows all the above, and knows how to "consolidate" some deals and how to please a CEO or small private firm IT managers.
Has money to pay some third world countries debt, so they make everything possible that EPYC doesn't get into data center environment.
Will take some guts and some bold, untamed IT companies who doesn't give a rat ass for Intel micromanagement and take action, so everyone will follow..
As a funny story, where I've worked, IT department still had some CoreDuo machines running Vista Enterprise. The hardware still works, why spend money?
Mundosold
Senior Member
Posts: 243
Joined: 2012-10-04
Senior Member
Posts: 243
Joined: 2012-10-04
#5746542 Posted on: 12/31/2019 01:57 PM
You could sum it all up with "Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM", but Intel instead of IBM.
A lot of tech executives are CLUELESS about technology. People like us who read guru3d and keep up to date on cpu technology are a small minority. Plus Intel always has their paid shills to spread FUD about AMD like the bogus "Ryzenfall" (rise and fall, get it??)
There's also the potential some backdoor deals are being made like Intel did last time when AMD pulled ahead with Opteron/Athlon 64. Though I won't speculate if that is happening again. But basically it was "don't sell any computers or servers with AMD and we will cut you a much better deal on our CPUs". Oems went with it which gave Intel enough time to jump ship from Netburst back to Pentium 3 and make Core, while AMD had very slow growth and never truly broke in to Enterprise despite having a better product. However this time, Intel does not have a backup plan and as AMD pulls further and further ahead, eventually these major Oems are going to give and start selling AMD.
You could sum it all up with "Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM", but Intel instead of IBM.
A lot of tech executives are CLUELESS about technology. People like us who read guru3d and keep up to date on cpu technology are a small minority. Plus Intel always has their paid shills to spread FUD about AMD like the bogus "Ryzenfall" (rise and fall, get it??)
There's also the potential some backdoor deals are being made like Intel did last time when AMD pulled ahead with Opteron/Athlon 64. Though I won't speculate if that is happening again. But basically it was "don't sell any computers or servers with AMD and we will cut you a much better deal on our CPUs". Oems went with it which gave Intel enough time to jump ship from Netburst back to Pentium 3 and make Core, while AMD had very slow growth and never truly broke in to Enterprise despite having a better product. However this time, Intel does not have a backup plan and as AMD pulls further and further ahead, eventually these major Oems are going to give and start selling AMD.
anticupidon
Senior Member
Posts: 7110
Joined: 2008-03-06
Senior Member
Posts: 7110
Joined: 2008-03-06
#5746551 Posted on: 12/31/2019 02:43 PM
You could sum it all up with "Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM", but Intel instead of IBM.
A lot of tech executives are CLUELESS about technology. .
This.
And it's worse in some areas. Likewise, the local town hall sports and youth activities chief in command is an 50 years 200 kg guy.
You could sum it all up with "Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM", but Intel instead of IBM.
A lot of tech executives are CLUELESS about technology. .
This.
And it's worse in some areas. Likewise, the local town hall sports and youth activities chief in command is an 50 years 200 kg guy.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1777
Joined: 2008-07-16
AMD is firing all cylinders, maximum throttle !!
Even if TR has a very niche market, the fact that it exists might convince a lot of other markets that they are now the LEADER and look into other products from their portfolio...
One year back I was talking to my hosting provider (for business) in the hope to get an Epyc computer running for us. They had none. NONE. Zero offers from AMD.
All DELL servers all Intel.
THAT is the problem with the market right now, these giants are slumbering and using Intel as if AMD doesn't even exist on the map...
I'm so pissed.
It's time for someone like Google and Amazon to take AMD seriously and deploy AMD servers on a massive scale and break the f*kin* Intel enterprise monopoly already...