Scythe Mugen 5 Rev.C CPU Cooler review
be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review
Core i9-10900KF performance leaks in 3DMark Time Spy - Ryzen 9 3900X Level Perf
New performance numbers of the new Intel Core i9-10900KF have leaked, the 3DMark numbers score reveals about 12,400 points in the Time Spy CPU test.
The Core i9-10900KF will have 10 cores and 20 threads with a base frequency of 3700MHz, multi-core boost up to 4800Mhz and single-core boost of 5300 MHz. This will make it very competitive in tasks that do not use as many cores thanks to its high frequencies, but in tasks that can take advantage of all the cores it will likely fall behind Ryzen 3900X.
This new line from Intel is expected to arrive in early April, although due to all the problems currently being experienced it could be delayed for a few more months.
When we take that score and shart it up (with our own result set), you'll notice that's roughly the same perf as the Ryzen 3900X, which seems to be the aim for Intel to reach. We also need to note that Time Spy is limited towards 10 threads and that 3900X is a 12-core processor. Obviously the leaked numbers should be dealt with with care, we do not know how the PC was configured setup.
Comet Lake Core i9-10900T CPU at 35 Watt rating hits 123 watts in Sandra benchmark - 03/13/2020 10:33 AM
TDPs are often a very tricky thing, but this one definitely falls into the category, odd. In the SiSoft Sandra database, an entry appeared of a pending Core i9-10900T processor, that T in there is fo...
Corsair refreshes ONE PRO i200 Compact Workstation with Core i9-10940X (14C/28T, Up to 4.6GHz) - 02/27/2020 05:16 PM
Corsair announced the launch of the ONE PRO i200, the latest configuration of its most powerful workstation-class PC. The ONE PRO is powered by the latest Intel 10th Gen Core X high-end desktop proce...
Specifications Intel KF and F line for the tenth generation - Intel Core i9-10900KF - 02/20/2020 12:11 PM
Website informaticacero has been a source of several intel leaks, this round they have obtained and spread a slide on the Comet Lake-S KF series, KF simply means overclockable yes, but the processor ...
Intel Core i9-10900 10-core Processor Poses for Camera - 02/14/2020 03:34 PM
There are signs everywhere and almost on a daily basis that the new Comet Lake-S Core series processors from Intel are inbound. We've seen many leaks, today photos of a potential Core i9-10900 10-c...
Core i9-10900K CPU Score Spotted in 3DMark - let's chart that up - 02/05/2020 10:29 AM
The past few days a number of entries have been spotted for intel's pending 10 core Core i9-10900K. The numbers are very interesting to see back and forth....
asturur
Senior Member
Posts: 1220
Joined: 2010-05-12
Senior Member
Posts: 1220
Joined: 2010-05-12
#5771440 Posted on: 03/20/2020 12:37 PM
If it gets to 10% i think is a lot. I expect more or less 9900k + 3% in single thread.
If it gets to 10% i think is a lot. I expect more or less 9900k + 3% in single thread.
Evlmj
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2017-11-28
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2017-11-28
#5771447 Posted on: 03/20/2020 12:52 PM
What about them 9900K's that do 5300 all core? I wonder what OC is gonna look like for the 10900K, especially all core and AVX workloads... In games, because its harder to push frequency on 10 cores rather than 8, it might be worse than the 9900K, not to mention the cost of changing platforms again...
What about them 9900K's that do 5300 all core? I wonder what OC is gonna look like for the 10900K, especially all core and AVX workloads... In games, because its harder to push frequency on 10 cores rather than 8, it might be worse than the 9900K, not to mention the cost of changing platforms again...
tty8k
Senior Member
Posts: 755
Joined: 2011-05-02
Senior Member
Posts: 755
Joined: 2011-05-02
#5771456 Posted on: 03/20/2020 01:27 PM
It's definitely not a worthy upgrade for those already on 8xxx or 9xxx even if you think cpu only, let alone changing motherboard etc.
In my opinion upgrading to anything (Intel/AMD) from those mentioned above it's a waste of money. Unless you are a studio and deal with 3D render tasks, in which case Ryzen or Threadripper is the way for now.
It's definitely not a worthy upgrade for those already on 8xxx or 9xxx even if you think cpu only, let alone changing motherboard etc.
In my opinion upgrading to anything (Intel/AMD) from those mentioned above it's a waste of money. Unless you are a studio and deal with 3D render tasks, in which case Ryzen or Threadripper is the way for now.
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 11339
Joined: 2004-05-10
Senior Member
Posts: 11339
Joined: 2004-05-10
#5771461 Posted on: 03/20/2020 01:40 PM
There should be a vulnerabilities benchmark. The one with least exploits breached will be the one to buy.
There should be a vulnerabilities benchmark. The one with least exploits breached will be the one to buy.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 565
Joined: 2016-05-24
So its Core i9 9900K performance +10%, because of + 100 Mhz faster base clock, more agressive turbo clock, 2 more cores and probably TDP getting out of the roof..
Should we just stand up and clap our hands?