Palit GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GamingPro review
Team Group T-Force DarkZα 3600 MHz DDR4 review
Corsair Scimitar Elite RGB gaming mouse review
Cougar 700K Evo keyboard review
Aorus Liquid Cooler 360 review
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X review
Corsair A500 CPU air cooler review
Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GamingPRO review
Lamptron SM436 PCI fan/RGB controller review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora 360 review
Core i9-10900K can boost to 5.3 GHz, more specifications of 10th Gen Core Comet Lake-S leak
One more Intel related post today as a heavy on impact series of slides just leaked including information on the Core i9-10900K CPU with 10 cores and 20 threads. Indeed 125W but it clocks at 3.7 GHz base towards a 5.2 GHz in boost. A new feature called Velocity Boost will unlock clock speeds up to 5.3 GHz, but only for two SKUs: 10900K and 10900 non-K.
The information leaked at Informatica Cero, and shows Intel Comet Lake-S Gen 10 to arrive in 2020 again using the refined 14nm fabrication node. This range includes the flagship Intel Core i9-10900K. This processor has a Turbo Boost frequency of 5.2GHz and also is listing a 5.3GHz thanks to what is called Intel Thermal Velocity Boost technology. The processor is tagged once again at a TDP of 125W, 10 cores, and 20 threads and a 20MB cache.
Further down on the listing you will find the i7-10700K. This processor would replace the i9-9900K and consists of 8 cores / 16 threads with a base frequency of 3.8GHz and a Turbo Boost of 5.1GHz. It also has a TDP of 125W and supports DDR4 memory at 2933MHz natively.
And finishing the K processors, we see the i5-10600K, which comes with 6 cores and 12 threads with a base frequency of 4.1GHz and a boost of 4.5GHz for all cores. These CPUs will rely on the LGA1200 Socket (Not Confirmed) and will use the new Intel 400 Series chipset. As new, this chipset supports more Cores (10), supports Intel Wi-Fi 6 and Intel Rapid Storage. No exact date of release of these CPUs is known but rumored is April.
| Mainstream Intel Core 10000-processors | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Cores/threads | Baseklok | Turbo 1T | Max Turbo 3.0 | All-core turbo | TDP |
| i9 10900K | 10C/20T | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz* | 4.8 GHz | 125W |
| i9 10900 | 10C/20T | 2.8 GHz | 5.0 GHz | 5.1 GHz* | 4.5 GHz | 65W |
| i7 10700K | 8C/16T | 3.8 GHz | 5.0 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 4.7 GHz | 125W |
| i7 10700 | 8C/16T | 2.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz | 65W |
| i5 10600K | 6C/12T | 4.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz | - | 4.5 GHz | 125W |
| i5 10600 | 6C/12T | 3.3 GHz | 4.8 GHz | - | 4.4 GHz | 65W |
| i5 10500 | 6C/12T | 3.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz | - | 4.2 GHz | 65W |
| i5 10400 | 6C/12T | 2.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz | - | 4.0 GHz | 65W |
| i3 10320 | 4C/8T | 3.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz | - | 4.4 GHz | 65W |
| i3 10300 | 4C/8T | 3.7 GHz | 4.4 GHz | - | 4.2 GHz | 65W |
| i3 10100 | 4C/8T | 3.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz | - | 4.1 GHz | 65W |
| * Intel Thermal Velocity Boost (single core / all core): 10900K: 5.3/4.9 GHz; 10900: 5.1/4.6 GHz | ||||||
Intel Core i9-10900K 10-core Processor and Z490 Chipset Rumored to be released April 2020 - 12/10/2019 08:36 AM
Intel Generation 10 Comet Lake processors, based on Intel's 14nm process and an underlying microarchitecture that is Skylake is next year's desktop processor series from Intel. It makes a step towar...
ASUS to release X299 BIOS Updates for Intel Core i9-10980XE, 10940X, 10920X and 10900X - 12/02/2019 08:26 AM
Much like MSI, ASUS as well will be releasing new firmware updates soon for their X299 motherboards, specifically for Intel Core i9-10980XE, 10940X, 10920X and 10900X, and an effort to make them over...
Core i9-9900KS chips further binned to 5200 MHz - Sells for $1200 - 11/05/2019 08:23 AM
Remember the Silicon Lottery?, they bin processor for the fastest operation that and then re-sell them. Well, he has posted prices for the 8-core Core i9-9900KS as well. For the Intel Core i9 9900KS @...
Intel Core i9-10980XE Cascade Lake-X Benchmarks - 10/25/2019 01:30 PM
The way Intel distributed samples on processors to media remains a mystery, however over in Romania the first review on the Core i9-10980XE, surfaced. It's written by our colleage Tudo who tested Ca...
Core i9-9900KS Spotted at etailer costs 679 euros (updated) - 10/02/2019 09:07 AM
In the land down under the Core i9-9900KS has appeared in a webshop, the all-core 5 GHz processor is converted back to EUR almost 679 EUR, with likely something similar in USD....
Mpampis
Member
Posts: 72
Joined: 2018-04-12
Member
Posts: 72
Joined: 2018-04-12
#5745813 Posted on: 12/28/2019 11:07 AM
Until we see prices, Intel remains not interesting in my eyes.
Until we see prices, Intel remains not interesting in my eyes.
nevcairiel
Senior Member
Posts: 651
Joined: 2015-05-19
Senior Member
Posts: 651
Joined: 2015-05-19
#5745817 Posted on: 12/28/2019 11:42 AM
Here's a game for 2020:
Each time Intel adds a "+" to their 14nm tech process, take a shot.
Must be a boring game, since they don't do that anymore. Only trolls invent those names at this point.
Here's a game for 2020:
Each time Intel adds a "+" to their 14nm tech process, take a shot.
Must be a boring game, since they don't do that anymore. Only trolls invent those names at this point.
anticupidon
Senior Member
Posts: 4588
Joined: 2008-03-06
Senior Member
Posts: 4588
Joined: 2008-03-06
#5745820 Posted on: 12/28/2019 12:05 PM
Will unlock clock speed only on two SKUs.
And 5,3Ghz is nothing to sneer at, trouble is that apart from the high clock speed, there aren't many things in Intel's favour as a overall platform.
And there is no mention of disable HT, or performance loss by applying the vulnerability patches.
TL;DR too little, too late, IMHO.
Here is an idea Intel: get your head out of your butt, hire people who can open-source and develop better your Management Engine, add more security layers without performance loss and adjust prices.
Yes, there will be an uphill battle, but you spent too much time sleeping on your laurels.
But hey, feel free to ignore my opinion.
Will unlock clock speed only on two SKUs.
And 5,3Ghz is nothing to sneer at, trouble is that apart from the high clock speed, there aren't many things in Intel's favour as a overall platform.
And there is no mention of disable HT, or performance loss by applying the vulnerability patches.
TL;DR too little, too late, IMHO.
Here is an idea Intel: get your head out of your butt, hire people who can open-source and develop better your Management Engine, add more security layers without performance loss and adjust prices.
Yes, there will be an uphill battle, but you spent too much time sleeping on your laurels.
But hey, feel free to ignore my opinion.
chrislondon
Junior Member
Posts: 18
Joined: 2017-08-18
Junior Member
Posts: 18
Joined: 2017-08-18
#5745827 Posted on: 12/28/2019 12:27 PM
Not very interesting to begin with but when nVidia finally moves its cards to PCIE 4 (probably around June) Intel will be completely dead on the desktop. No one will want to buy obsolete tech.
Not very interesting to begin with but when nVidia finally moves its cards to PCIE 4 (probably around June) Intel will be completely dead on the desktop. No one will want to buy obsolete tech.
oxidized
Senior Member
Posts: 219
Joined: 2017-08-22
Senior Member
Posts: 219
Joined: 2017-08-22
#5745830 Posted on: 12/28/2019 12:30 PM
ROFL, videocards nowadys don't even manage to completely busy PCIe 3.0 x8 lanes also intel will be completely dead on the desktop, this made my day. But then again you have 16 messages you're probably new to this world.
Not very interesting to begin with but when nVidia finally moves its cards to PCIE 4 (probably around June) Intel will be completely dead on the desktop. No one will want to buy obsolete tech.
ROFL, videocards nowadys don't even manage to completely busy PCIe 3.0 x8 lanes also intel will be completely dead on the desktop, this made my day. But then again you have 16 messages you're probably new to this world.
anticupidon
Senior Member
Posts: 4588
Joined: 2008-03-06
Senior Member
Posts: 4588
Joined: 2008-03-06
#5745833 Posted on: 12/28/2019 12:37 PM
Let's have a certain tolerance to certain ideas
Intel dead on desktop?
Well, bring more arguments and see how far can you go.
Let's have a certain tolerance to certain ideas
Intel dead on desktop?
Well, bring more arguments and see how far can you go.
squalles
Senior Member
Posts: 754
Joined: 2003-06-10
Senior Member
Posts: 754
Joined: 2003-06-10
#5745834 Posted on: 12/28/2019 12:56 PM
amazing, i will wait to buy one
i see with my own eyes a i9 9900k vs ryzen 3700x (my friends had both) and ryzen 3700x are really weak and i9 is soo stronger but heat like a hell
so i choose wait next generation
amazing, i will wait to buy one
i see with my own eyes a i9 9900k vs ryzen 3700x (my friends had both) and ryzen 3700x are really weak and i9 is soo stronger but heat like a hell
so i choose wait next generation
rl66
Senior Member
Posts: 2284
Joined: 2007-05-31
Senior Member
Posts: 2284
Joined: 2007-05-31
#5745836 Posted on: 12/28/2019 01:02 PM
ROFL, videocards nowadys don't even manage to completely busy PCIe 3.0 x8 lanes also intel will be completely dead on the desktop, this made my day. But then again you have 16 messages you're probably new to this world.
Totaly agree, i have a X16 bus that can move to X8 (that is standard for most server card), there is zero effect on the GPU, i mean not even 0,01%.
PCIe 4.0 will be great (same as the 5.0 that seem more close than i was thinking) of course there will be a lot of card in this standard that might use this, but will you have the computer to fully use this bandwith? and will the program (or game) that you use will fill it to bottleneck (a word to use in gaming post
)?
Let's have a certain tolerance to certain ideas
Intel dead on desktop?
Well, bring more arguments and see how far can you go.
I was on Intel and i have get 2 AMD, because i think AMD is better for my use right now...
But i don't see Intel dead at all on desktop segment, they still sell more (just less), have more machine already sold that are still online, and they still have preference of the customer in high end segment.
It doesn't mean that they are better, it mean that they just have the favor of the customer, it's like Pepsi Vs Coca Cola, even when they had bad time, it is good at the end...
ROFL, videocards nowadys don't even manage to completely busy PCIe 3.0 x8 lanes also intel will be completely dead on the desktop, this made my day. But then again you have 16 messages you're probably new to this world.
Totaly agree, i have a X16 bus that can move to X8 (that is standard for most server card), there is zero effect on the GPU, i mean not even 0,01%.
PCIe 4.0 will be great (same as the 5.0 that seem more close than i was thinking) of course there will be a lot of card in this standard that might use this, but will you have the computer to fully use this bandwith? and will the program (or game) that you use will fill it to bottleneck (a word to use in gaming post
)?Let's have a certain tolerance to certain ideas
Intel dead on desktop?
Well, bring more arguments and see how far can you go.
I was on Intel and i have get 2 AMD, because i think AMD is better for my use right now...
But i don't see Intel dead at all on desktop segment, they still sell more (just less), have more machine already sold that are still online, and they still have preference of the customer in high end segment.
It doesn't mean that they are better, it mean that they just have the favor of the customer, it's like Pepsi Vs Coca Cola, even when they had bad time, it is good at the end...
anticupidon
Senior Member
Posts: 4588
Joined: 2008-03-06
Senior Member
Posts: 4588
Joined: 2008-03-06
#5745837 Posted on: 12/28/2019 01:02 PM
@squalles Pray, can you describe the 3700X weakness?
And what makes Intel 9900K "soo strong"?
@squalles Pray, can you describe the 3700X weakness?
And what makes Intel 9900K "soo strong"?
oxidized
Senior Member
Posts: 219
Joined: 2017-08-22
Senior Member
Posts: 219
Joined: 2017-08-22
#5745841 Posted on: 12/28/2019 01:15 PM
Totaly agree, i have a X16 bus that can move to X8 (that is standard for most server card), there is zero effect on the GPU, i mean not even 0,01%.
PCIe 4.0 will be great (same as the 5.0 that seem more close than i was thinking) of course there will be a lot of card in this standard that might use this, but will you have the computer to fully use this bandwith? and will the program (or game) that you use will fill it to bottleneck (a word to use in gaming post )?
I was on Intel and i have get 2 AMD, because i think AMD is better for my use right now...
But i don't see Intel dead at all on desktop segment, they still sell more (just less), have more machine already sold that are still online, and they still have preference of the customer in high end segment.
It doesn't mean that they are better, it mean that they just have the favor of the customer, it's like Pepsi Vs Coca Cola, even when they had bad time, it is good at the end...
I mean regarding usage of PCIe bandwidth it's not my opinion, it's just facts, even the fastest card on the planet won't occupy 8 lanes of Gen 3 PCIe.
AMD made insane products, as a matter of facts i've been building several PCs to people i know with ryzen, because it's really good and it's much more worth the price compared to intel's CPU as of now, and often they're overall more powerful CPUs, but this has nothing to do with market share or dominance.
Totaly agree, i have a X16 bus that can move to X8 (that is standard for most server card), there is zero effect on the GPU, i mean not even 0,01%.
PCIe 4.0 will be great (same as the 5.0 that seem more close than i was thinking) of course there will be a lot of card in this standard that might use this, but will you have the computer to fully use this bandwith? and will the program (or game) that you use will fill it to bottleneck (a word to use in gaming post
)?I was on Intel and i have get 2 AMD, because i think AMD is better for my use right now...
But i don't see Intel dead at all on desktop segment, they still sell more (just less), have more machine already sold that are still online, and they still have preference of the customer in high end segment.
It doesn't mean that they are better, it mean that they just have the favor of the customer, it's like Pepsi Vs Coca Cola, even when they had bad time, it is good at the end...
I mean regarding usage of PCIe bandwidth it's not my opinion, it's just facts, even the fastest card on the planet won't occupy 8 lanes of Gen 3 PCIe.
AMD made insane products, as a matter of facts i've been building several PCs to people i know with ryzen, because it's really good and it's much more worth the price compared to intel's CPU as of now, and often they're overall more powerful CPUs, but this has nothing to do with market share or dominance.
omagic
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: 2013-09-29
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: 2013-09-29
#5745842 Posted on: 12/28/2019 01:19 PM
My yawnometer just hit the red area. I still hope for good competition tho... We need it for reasonable 4xxx Ryzen prices
@squalles Pray, can you describe the 3700X weakness?
And what makes Intel 9900K "soo strong"?
Ye, I compared my 3900x(my home rig) to 9900k(in my office) and with Ryzen the system is way more responsive while using multiple apps. No compare here. I didnt check the 9900k for gaming tbh, but yes the wave of hot air is so much stronger
My yawnometer just hit the red area. I still hope for good competition tho... We need it for reasonable 4xxx Ryzen prices
@squalles Pray, can you describe the 3700X weakness?
And what makes Intel 9900K "soo strong"?
Ye, I compared my 3900x(my home rig) to 9900k(in my office) and with Ryzen the system is way more responsive while using multiple apps. No compare here. I didnt check the 9900k for gaming tbh, but yes the wave of hot air is so much stronger
buhehe
Senior Member
Posts: 201
Joined: 2016-07-25
Senior Member
Posts: 201
Joined: 2016-07-25
#5745845 Posted on: 12/28/2019 01:28 PM
Remember, don't benchmark and drive!
with Ryzen the system is way more responsible while using multiple apps.
Remember, don't benchmark and drive!
Corbus
Senior Member
Posts: 2363
Joined: 2009-04-27
Senior Member
Posts: 2363
Joined: 2009-04-27
#5745849 Posted on: 12/28/2019 01:35 PM
Damn,so intel turned out like AMD after all when it comes to overclocking. Manual oc is dying fast.
Damn,so intel turned out like AMD after all when it comes to overclocking. Manual oc is dying fast.
anticupidon
Senior Member
Posts: 4588
Joined: 2008-03-06
Senior Member
Posts: 4588
Joined: 2008-03-06
#5745851 Posted on: 12/28/2019 01:43 PM
My yawnometer just hit the red area. I still hope for good competition tho... We need it for reasonable 4xxx Ryzen prices
Ye, I compared my 3900x(my home rig) to 9900k(in my office) and with Ryzen the system is way more responsive while using multiple apps. No compare here. I didnt check the 9900k for gaming tbh, but yes the wave of hot air is so much stronger
And with only that you made your decision and opinion.
Yeah, nevermind logic, certain benchmark details and specifications.
And whole world of rigourously transparent benchmarks.
Your feeling, your results are what you perceive.
But whatever floats your boat.
My yawnometer just hit the red area. I still hope for good competition tho... We need it for reasonable 4xxx Ryzen prices
Ye, I compared my 3900x(my home rig) to 9900k(in my office) and with Ryzen the system is way more responsive while using multiple apps. No compare here. I didnt check the 9900k for gaming tbh, but yes the wave of hot air is so much stronger
And with only that you made your decision and opinion.
Yeah, nevermind logic, certain benchmark details and specifications.
And whole world of rigourously transparent benchmarks.
Your feeling, your results are what you perceive.
But whatever floats your boat.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2903
Joined: 2014-10-20
Here's a game for 2020:
Each time Intel adds a "+" to their 14nm tech process, take a shot.