AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review
MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming X TRIO review
Core i7-10700F CineBench Scores spotted: lets chart that up
Intel's Core i7-10700F has been spotted, the 8-core/16-thread processor that is multiplier locked. It has a base clock of 2.90 GHz, and lacks integrated graphics "F" extension.
The turbo is expected to run to 4.7/4.8 GHz. The Korean based community from QuasarZone now has shared a screenshot of what is allegedly an i7-10700F run with Cinebench R20. The chip scores 4781 points in the multi-threaded test, and 492 points single-threaded. The scores position the processor at Ryzen 7 3700X processor level performance. When we chart that up with our results sets, this is where the processors end in the score:
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Cores/threads | Baseklok | Turbo 1T | Max Turbo 3.0 | All-core turbo | TDP |
| i9 10900K | 10C/20T | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz* | 4.8 GHz | 125W |
| i9 10900 | 10C/20T | 2.8 GHz | 5.0 GHz | 5.1 GHz* | 4.5 GHz | 65W |
| i7 10700K | 8C/16T | 3.8 GHz | 5.0 GHz | 5.3?? GHz | 4.7 GHz | 125W |
| i7 10700 | 8C/16T | 2.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz | 65W |
| i5 10600K | 6C/12T | 4.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz | - | 4.5 GHz | 125W |
| i5 10600 | 6C/12T | 3.3 GHz | 4.8 GHz | - | 4.4 GHz | 65W |
| i5 10500 | 6C/12T | 3.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz | - | 4.2 GHz | 65W |
| i5 10400 | 6C/12T | 2.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz | - | 4.0 GHz | 65W |
| i3 10320 | 4C/8T | 3.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz | - | 4.4 GHz | 65W |
| i3 10300 | 4C/8T | 3.7 GHz | 4.4 GHz | - | 4.2 GHz | 65W |
| i3 10100 | 4C/8T | 3.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz | - | 4.1 GHz | 65W |
| * Intel Thermal Velocity Boost (single-core / all core): 10900K: 5.3/4.9 GHz; 10900: 5.1/4.6 GHz | ||||||
Intel Core i7-10700K Spotted in UL 3DMark listing at 5.30 GHz Turbo Boost - 02/12/2020 03:33 PM
It seems the specs of Intel's upcoming processors might change a bit. A 3DMark benchmark was spotted, indicating a slightly higher Turbo clock at 5300 MHz....
First Benchmarks show AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS to be faster than Ryzen 7 2700X and Core i7-9700K - 02/12/2020 09:28 AM
A set of early benchmarks of the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS have appeared on the web, and as it seems the mobile CPU is faster than a Ryzen 7 2700X or a Core i7-9700K....
Intel Core i7-9750H and GeForce GTX 1650 Perfs leaks though marketing material - 04/08/2019 12:56 PM
In the Asia region, a number of presentation slides have leaked, they originate from MSI and shows some numbers based on a laptop with the pending Core i7-9750H and GeForce GTX 1650....
Intel Core i7-9750H and GeForce GTX 1650 say hi in 3DMark database - 03/05/2019 10:18 AM
Twitter user TUM_APISAK has once again spotted something in the 3DMark database. Two things actually as there is a still unannounced laptop which would come be released with the unannounced GeForce GT...
Spanish website posts Core i7-9700K Benchmarks - 09/10/2018 06:01 PM
A Spanish website just posted a near full review of the Intel Core i7-9700K processor, the review includes a wide selection of benchmarks....
metagamer
Senior Member
Posts: 2353
Joined: 2018-04-10
Senior Member
Posts: 2353
Joined: 2018-04-10
#5761951 Posted on: 02/20/2020 06:25 AM
Intel already countering AMD mainstream before they go 7nm. I like this. Intel clearly has a strong hand. Very aggressive. I like it. Let them battle it out.
I'll sit it out because I'm already getting good enough performance out of my cpu and I see no clear way to make things better value for money wise.
Hey, if this beats the 3700x in "productivity" that everyone suddenly cares about and obviously beats the 3700x in games, at similar price, great. Bring it on, let us consumers have some tasty products at good prices.
Intel already countering AMD mainstream before they go 7nm. I like this. Intel clearly has a strong hand. Very aggressive. I like it. Let them battle it out.
I'll sit it out because I'm already getting good enough performance out of my cpu and I see no clear way to make things better value for money wise.
Hey, if this beats the 3700x in "productivity" that everyone suddenly cares about and obviously beats the 3700x in games, at similar price, great. Bring it on, let us consumers have some tasty products at good prices.
vbetts
Moderator
Posts: 15139
Joined: 2006-07-04
Moderator
Posts: 15139
Joined: 2006-07-04
#5761959 Posted on: 02/20/2020 07:23 AM
Not really until we have solid prices. High end isn't what sells, usually it's mid range that sells the most.
They will, 10900k will be $499 and you can guess the rest.
Not really until we have solid prices. High end isn't what sells, usually it's mid range that sells the most.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 18431
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 18431
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5761965 Posted on: 02/20/2020 08:21 AM
Indeed. 3600 is the best selling not 3900. I hope intel have answer for that as well not only high end.
Not really until we have solid prices. High end isn't what sells, usually it's mid range that sells the most.
Indeed. 3600 is the best selling not 3900. I hope intel have answer for that as well not only high end.
Mundosold
Senior Member
Posts: 242
Joined: 2012-10-04
Senior Member
Posts: 242
Joined: 2012-10-04
#5761970 Posted on: 02/20/2020 08:42 AM
Intel already countering AMD mainstream before they go 7nm. I like this. Intel clearly has a strong hand. Very aggressive. I like it. Let them battle it out.
I'll sit it out because I'm already getting good enough performance out of my cpu and I see no clear way to make things better value for money wise.
Hey, if this beats the 3700x in "productivity" that everyone suddenly cares about and obviously beats the 3700x in games, at similar price, great. Bring it on, let us consumers have some tasty products at good prices.
No, the idea that productivity doesn't matter is what you Intel fanboys came up with within last two years. Because having 10% higher frames in games at 720P with a $1200 2080Ti...thats what truly counts.
Intel already countering AMD mainstream before they go 7nm. I like this. Intel clearly has a strong hand. Very aggressive. I like it. Let them battle it out.
I'll sit it out because I'm already getting good enough performance out of my cpu and I see no clear way to make things better value for money wise.
Hey, if this beats the 3700x in "productivity" that everyone suddenly cares about and obviously beats the 3700x in games, at similar price, great. Bring it on, let us consumers have some tasty products at good prices.
No, the idea that productivity doesn't matter is what you Intel fanboys came up with within last two years. Because having 10% higher frames in games at 720P with a $1200 2080Ti...thats what truly counts.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Moderator
Posts: 15139
Joined: 2006-07-04
Nice. If they can keep prices fair with the platform, be a nice competitor to Ryzen.