Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
Core i5-12400 Now leaks as well Beats Ryzen 5 5600X in Benchmarks
Intel's next Core i5-12400 "Alder Lake-S" processor, which is expected to ship in the second half of this year, could be a noteworthy processor as well
The top-end Core i5-12600K is expected to include six "Golden Cove" P cores and four "Gracemont" E cores. Here, the chip is 6-core/12-thread with just P cores; it has 1.5 MB of dedicated L2 cache per core and 18 MB of shared L3 cache; and 1.25 MB of dedicated L2 cache per core. You'll almost certainly receive all of the next-gen I/O, including a PCI-Express Gen 4 infrastructure
The Core i5-12400 is estimated to be less than $219 in price. The only projected negatives are a locked BClk multiplier and very low clock rates of 4.00 GHz. On Chinese social media, a person claimed to have shared alleged Cinebench R20 scores for the i5-12400. It receives 659 points on the single-threaded test and 4784 points on the multi-threaded test, according to the results. Wccftech compared this to known performance metrics of popular processors and discovered that the i5-12400 could wind up being somewhat faster than the Ryzen 5 5600X, which is presently available for $300.
Aside from that, the table includes leaked i9-12900K figures, which suggest why AMD is hurrying to release "Zen3+" with 3D Vertical Cache rather of the next-generation "Zen 4."
Core i5-12600K Beats Core i9-11900K (Alder Lake) - 09/27/2021 09:35 AM
New, let's call them the latest benchmark results for Intel's upcoming Alder Lake processors have been published on the internet. It covers alleged Cinebench scores for the Intel Core i5-12600K(F), ...
Review: Intel Core i5-11400F processor - 04/16/2021 11:57 AM
We again descend from eight towards six processor cores and twelve threads, this round with the Core i5 11400F, a processor that might be considered the most high-grade value for money in the Rocket L...
Intel Core i5-11600K processor review - 03/30/2021 03:32 PM
In this review, we drop from eight to six CPU cores and twelve threads. Yes, the tide turns towards the Core i5-11600K. The 11th generation Intel Core desktop processors, previously known as RKL, aka ...
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Beats Intel Core i5-10600K - 10/20/2020 08:53 AM
And before I continue the news item, that Core i5-10600Khas a 125W TDP, the AMD one ...65 Watts. Anyhow, meet the Ryzen 5 5600X CPU. TUM_APISAK stumbled into some entries at the SiSoftware Sandra ...
Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400 - 05/12/2020 03:51 PM
Processors like these could be good gaming CPUs, and yes once again in Asia on the ChipHell forums a leak occurred. This round the Core i5-10400 processor (6c/12t) listed for USD $184indicates it co...
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 6493
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 6493
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5954584 Posted on: 10/12/2021 03:59 PM
I'm confused by the price. Compared to the rumored prices of the 12700K and 12900K, the 12400 is very cheap. I don't get how 2 P-cores and some extra cache can nearly double the price. Sure, the 12700K can be overclocked, in theory. In practice, I doubt anybody will squeeze much performance in.
I'm confused by the price. Compared to the rumored prices of the 12700K and 12900K, the 12400 is very cheap. I don't get how 2 P-cores and some extra cache can nearly double the price. Sure, the 12700K can be overclocked, in theory. In practice, I doubt anybody will squeeze much performance in.
Makaveli
Junior Member
Posts: 15
Joined: 2021-10-12
Junior Member
Posts: 15
Joined: 2021-10-12
#5954704 Posted on: 10/12/2021 08:11 PM
It looks like a bare minimum, which is not too bad for $200.
The test was made holding a tower air cooler on it (no retention for lga1700).
Performance wise yea, faster than 5600x and only half the consumption@4ghz all core (5600x goes to around 140W+)
I'd say it looks great for a budget gaming with no significant cooling required.
I kind of have my doubts on that 70W in AIDA fpu avx2.
It might be possible though, it's only 6 cores probably running at low voltage to achieve only 4GHz.
If true, it means you can passively cool it in gaming (40W +/-)
In what application is a 5600X doing 140Watts?
It looks like a bare minimum, which is not too bad for $200.
The test was made holding a tower air cooler on it (no retention for lga1700).
Performance wise yea, faster than 5600x and only half the consumption@4ghz all core (5600x goes to around 140W+)
I'd say it looks great for a budget gaming with no significant cooling required.
I kind of have my doubts on that 70W in AIDA fpu avx2.
It might be possible though, it's only 6 cores probably running at low voltage to achieve only 4GHz.
If true, it means you can passively cool it in gaming (40W +/-)
In what application is a 5600X doing 140Watts?
kapu
Senior Member
Posts: 5289
Joined: 2006-12-22
Senior Member
Posts: 5289
Joined: 2006-12-22
#5954711 Posted on: 10/12/2021 08:19 PM
Its not doing. My is oced to 4650 no way it can do 100W even.
In what application is a 5600X doing 140Watts?
Its not doing. My is oced to 4650 no way it can do 100W even.
SamuelL421
Senior Member
Posts: 240
Joined: 2017-08-22
Senior Member
Posts: 240
Joined: 2017-08-22
#5954717 Posted on: 10/12/2021 08:26 PM
Wait for real benchmarks and ones that matter more than cinebench. That, and also efficiency is great if want it but not the all-important stat some make it out to be.
Case in point: I've got an "low-power" build with an underclocked 3950x running below eco mode. Drawing about 80-85w at 3.4-3.5 all core, it nets almost 8000 in R20 multi - sounds great on paper. In practice, not so good. Awesome efficiency for running some multicore, long-haul tasks but the tradeoff is that just about anything spanks it in single core performance and it feels slow if you try to use it as a daily driver.
Wait for real benchmarks and ones that matter more than cinebench. That, and also efficiency is great if want it but not the all-important stat some make it out to be.
Case in point: I've got an "low-power" build with an underclocked 3950x running below eco mode. Drawing about 80-85w at 3.4-3.5 all core, it nets almost 8000 in R20 multi - sounds great on paper. In practice, not so good. Awesome efficiency for running some multicore, long-haul tasks but the tradeoff is that just about anything spanks it in single core performance and it feels slow if you try to use it as a daily driver.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 611
Joined: 2007-09-24
Why "worry"??? - you have shares at AMD???
There is nothing to worry about - in fact there is something to be glad - we will have two companies competing for real in consumer CPU market!