Deepcool CG560 chassis review
Fractal Design Torrent Black RGB TG review
Core i9 12900K DDR4 3600 vs DDR5 5200 performance review
Corsair H150i Elite LCD review
Seasonic Syncro Q704 chassis + Connect PSU review
Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 860W PSU Review
Crucial P5 Plus PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Fractal Design Lumen S28 RGB review (LCS)
WD Red SN700 NVMe SSD review
Core i9 12900K processor review
Core i5-12400 Now leaks as well Beats Ryzen 5 5600X in Benchmarks
Intel's next Core i5-12400 "Alder Lake-S" processor, which is expected to ship in the second half of this year, could be a noteworthy processor as well
The top-end Core i5-12600K is expected to include six "Golden Cove" P cores and four "Gracemont" E cores. Here, the chip is 6-core/12-thread with just P cores; it has 1.5 MB of dedicated L2 cache per core and 18 MB of shared L3 cache; and 1.25 MB of dedicated L2 cache per core. You'll almost certainly receive all of the next-gen I/O, including a PCI-Express Gen 4 infrastructure
The Core i5-12400 is estimated to be less than $219 in price. The only projected negatives are a locked BClk multiplier and very low clock rates of 4.00 GHz. On Chinese social media, a person claimed to have shared alleged Cinebench R20 scores for the i5-12400. It receives 659 points on the single-threaded test and 4784 points on the multi-threaded test, according to the results. Wccftech compared this to known performance metrics of popular processors and discovered that the i5-12400 could wind up being somewhat faster than the Ryzen 5 5600X, which is presently available for $300.
Aside from that, the table includes leaked i9-12900K figures, which suggest why AMD is hurrying to release "Zen3+" with 3D Vertical Cache rather of the next-generation "Zen 4."
Core i5-12600K Beats Core i9-11900K (Alder Lake) - 09/27/2021 09:35 AM
New, let's call them the latest benchmark results for Intel's upcoming Alder Lake processors have been published on the internet. It covers alleged Cinebench scores for the Intel Core i5-12600K(F), ...
Review: Intel Core i5-11400F processor - 04/16/2021 11:57 AM
We again descend from eight towards six processor cores and twelve threads, this round with the Core i5 11400F, a processor that might be considered the most high-grade value for money in the Rocket L...
Intel Core i5-11600K processor review - 03/30/2021 03:32 PM
In this review, we drop from eight to six CPU cores and twelve threads. Yes, the tide turns towards the Core i5-11600K. The 11th generation Intel Core desktop processors, previously known as RKL, aka ...
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Beats Intel Core i5-10600K - 10/20/2020 08:53 AM
And before I continue the news item, that Core i5-10600Khas a 125W TDP, the AMD one ...65 Watts. Anyhow, meet the Ryzen 5 5600X CPU. TUM_APISAK stumbled into some entries at the SiSoftware Sandra ...
Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400 - 05/12/2020 03:51 PM
Processors like these could be good gaming CPUs, and yes once again in Asia on the ChipHell forums a leak occurred. This round the Core i5-10400 processor (6c/12t) listed for USD $184indicates it co...
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 6202
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 6202
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5954584 Posted on: 10/12/2021 03:59 PM
I'm confused by the price. Compared to the rumored prices of the 12700K and 12900K, the 12400 is very cheap. I don't get how 2 P-cores and some extra cache can nearly double the price. Sure, the 12700K can be overclocked, in theory. In practice, I doubt anybody will squeeze much performance in.
I'm confused by the price. Compared to the rumored prices of the 12700K and 12900K, the 12400 is very cheap. I don't get how 2 P-cores and some extra cache can nearly double the price. Sure, the 12700K can be overclocked, in theory. In practice, I doubt anybody will squeeze much performance in.
Makaveli
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2021-10-12
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2021-10-12
#5954704 Posted on: 10/12/2021 08:11 PM
It looks like a bare minimum, which is not too bad for $200.
The test was made holding a tower air cooler on it (no retention for lga1700).
Performance wise yea, faster than 5600x and only half the consumption@4ghz all core (5600x goes to around 140W+)
I'd say it looks great for a budget gaming with no significant cooling required.
I kind of have my doubts on that 70W in AIDA fpu avx2.
It might be possible though, it's only 6 cores probably running at low voltage to achieve only 4GHz.
If true, it means you can passively cool it in gaming (40W +/-)
In what application is a 5600X doing 140Watts?
It looks like a bare minimum, which is not too bad for $200.
The test was made holding a tower air cooler on it (no retention for lga1700).
Performance wise yea, faster than 5600x and only half the consumption@4ghz all core (5600x goes to around 140W+)
I'd say it looks great for a budget gaming with no significant cooling required.
I kind of have my doubts on that 70W in AIDA fpu avx2.
It might be possible though, it's only 6 cores probably running at low voltage to achieve only 4GHz.
If true, it means you can passively cool it in gaming (40W +/-)
In what application is a 5600X doing 140Watts?
kapu
Senior Member
Posts: 5012
Joined: 2006-12-22
Senior Member
Posts: 5012
Joined: 2006-12-22
#5954711 Posted on: 10/12/2021 08:19 PM
Its not doing. My is oced to 4650 no way it can do 100W even.
In what application is a 5600X doing 140Watts?
Its not doing. My is oced to 4650 no way it can do 100W even.
SamuelL421
Senior Member
Posts: 221
Joined: 2017-08-22
Senior Member
Posts: 221
Joined: 2017-08-22
#5954717 Posted on: 10/12/2021 08:26 PM
Wait for real benchmarks and ones that matter more than cinebench. That, and also efficiency is great if want it but not the all-important stat some make it out to be.
Case in point: I've got an "low-power" build with an underclocked 3950x running below eco mode. Drawing about 80-85w at 3.4-3.5 all core, it nets almost 8000 in R20 multi - sounds great on paper. In practice, not so good. Awesome efficiency for running some multicore, long-haul tasks but the tradeoff is that just about anything spanks it in single core performance and it feels slow if you try to use it as a daily driver.
Wait for real benchmarks and ones that matter more than cinebench. That, and also efficiency is great if want it but not the all-important stat some make it out to be.
Case in point: I've got an "low-power" build with an underclocked 3950x running below eco mode. Drawing about 80-85w at 3.4-3.5 all core, it nets almost 8000 in R20 multi - sounds great on paper. In practice, not so good. Awesome efficiency for running some multicore, long-haul tasks but the tradeoff is that just about anything spanks it in single core performance and it feels slow if you try to use it as a daily driver.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 589
Joined: 2007-09-24
Why "worry"??? - you have shares at AMD???
There is nothing to worry about - in fact there is something to be glad - we will have two companies competing for real in consumer CPU market!