Be Quiet! Pure Power 12 M - 850W ATX 3.0 PSU review
Corsair H170i Elite Capellix XT review
Forspoken: PC performance graphics benchmarks
ASRock Z790 Taichi review
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
Core i3 8300 with Four Cores and Eight Threads Spotted
We've stated a couple of times already that AMD is stirring up the market on every segment with a processor. The recent Ryzen 3 series for example are all quad-core processors, historically Intel always outted a 2-core model. Until now.
It seems Intel is prepping a Core i3-8300, as it has been spotted on Chinese forums with a screenshot, The interesting thing here is that it is a quad-core with hyper threading. this a 4:8 configuration. And that would be a direct response to AMDs Ryzen 3 alright, check the screenshots, as spotted by through the Anandtech forums at NGA.
Double the amount of cores/threads of the current Core i3 lineup if true (at least higher end models). That's Core i7-6700K level performance (if true).
Acer Launches C720 Chromebook with Intel Core i3 Processor - 07/11/2014 08:48 AM
Acer launches an industry's first Chromebook model using a 4th Generation Intel Core i3 processor. The award-winning Acer C720 Chromebook is now available in two models powered by the Intel Core i3 p...
Intel Haswell-E released in September Core i3 and Pentiums 20 july - 06/22/2014 03:38 PM
Some new info appeared on the much awaited Haswell-E lineup, a document leaked indicating that Haswell-E will be released in September and new Core i3 and Pentiums CPUs on July the 20th. Recently w...
Intel to cut Core i3 Ivy Bridge pricing? - 07/06/2012 11:58 AM
X-bit Labs explains that that Intel slashed the pricing of some of its ultra low-voltage processors by just over 10 percent to spur adoption of ultrabooks: All-in-all, Intel has reportedly decided to...
Intel "Ivy Bridge" Core i3 Processors ship 24th June - 06/15/2012 11:07 AM
Intel Corp reiterated Thursday that the entry-level model of its new Ivy Bridge processors will begin shipping as soon as this month, following media reports that the products are scheduled for delive...
Intel's desktop Ivy Bridge Core i3 processors pricing - 04/23/2012 10:51 AM
Despite the fact that Intel's upcoming Ivy Bridge based Core i3 processors aren't expected to arrive until early June, pricing for three of Intel's upcoming models have now made an appearance at sever...
D3M1G0D
Senior Member
Posts: 2068
Joined: 2017-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 2068
Joined: 2017-03-10
#5459046 Posted on: 08/03/2017 09:47 PM
I think this rumored i3 would be more like a rebrand rather than a genuine case of technology moving forward. In this case, people might get pissed. Just imagine how Titan XP customers would feel if Nvidia rebranded it to a 1080 Ti and slashed the price massively... oh, wait
Really because I bought a 1070 for half the price of a 980Ti a year and a half later. I didn't see 980ti owners getting pissed. It's the tech industry two years and the performance you have is half the price comes with the territory.
I think this rumored i3 would be more like a rebrand rather than a genuine case of technology moving forward. In this case, people might get pissed. Just imagine how Titan XP customers would feel if Nvidia rebranded it to a 1080 Ti and slashed the price massively... oh, wait
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9797
Joined: 2011-09-21
Senior Member
Posts: 9797
Joined: 2011-09-21
#5459060 Posted on: 08/03/2017 10:23 PM
Yet the only people that were "mad" about that would never buy a Titan or in some cases an Nvidia card.
I think this rumored i3 would be more like a rebrand rather than a genuine case of technology moving forward. In this case, people might get pissed. Just imagine how Titan XP customers would feel if Nvidia rebranded it to a 1080 Ti and slashed the price massively... oh, wait
Yet the only people that were "mad" about that would never buy a Titan or in some cases an Nvidia card.
WalterDasTrevas
Senior Member
Posts: 220
Joined: 2011-07-30
Senior Member
Posts: 220
Joined: 2011-07-30
#5459117 Posted on: 08/04/2017 03:57 AM
If this is not fake, it is the INTEL showing that explored users with overpriced products(now tell the news), and yet the "loyal to the brand" will say that Intel is the best of all and we need to ignore AMD, after all, AMD has finally begun to ensure a competitive market.
If that is true, I will still feel a huge desire to trade my i7 for an AMD in the next upgrade, and not allow the market to be destroyed again by the monopoly and disrespect to the general public with artificially elitist values.
I do not see anything good in the ethical sense, but of course for those who have not yet upgraded it would be great.
And of course some "loyal to the brand" will respond that "everything is right, everything is normal, this is how the market works, if you are poor, buy AMD.
Luckily Apple does not monopolize the market (I'm not talking about design)
If this is not fake, it is the INTEL showing that explored users with overpriced products(now tell the news), and yet the "loyal to the brand" will say that Intel is the best of all and we need to ignore AMD, after all, AMD has finally begun to ensure a competitive market.
If that is true, I will still feel a huge desire to trade my i7 for an AMD in the next upgrade, and not allow the market to be destroyed again by the monopoly and disrespect to the general public with artificially elitist values.
I do not see anything good in the ethical sense, but of course for those who have not yet upgraded it would be great.
And of course some "loyal to the brand" will respond that "everything is right, everything is normal, this is how the market works, if you are poor, buy AMD.
Luckily Apple does not monopolize the market (I'm not talking about design)
Andrew LB
Senior Member
Posts: 1238
Joined: 2012-05-22
Senior Member
Posts: 1238
Joined: 2012-05-22
#5459135 Posted on: 08/04/2017 06:08 AM
Exactly. All the anger came from the usual suspects that go out of their way to turn any article into a negative one if it's about either nVidia or Intel. If Intel solved world hunger, they'd be complaining about all the thousands of aid workers who are out of a job because Intel monopolized feeding the worlds hungry.
Yet the only people that were "mad" about that would never buy a Titan or in some cases an Nvidia card.
Exactly. All the anger came from the usual suspects that go out of their way to turn any article into a negative one if it's about either nVidia or Intel. If Intel solved world hunger, they'd be complaining about all the thousands of aid workers who are out of a job because Intel monopolized feeding the worlds hungry.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1433
Joined: 2014-07-22
Intel is a monopolist and the company sits on things until it's forced to pull them out and compete, or it senses a way to further monopolize the markets, like it saw (incorrectly) with Rdram and Itanium. Intel didn't do x86-64 (Core 2) until after Intel licensed x86-64 from AMD in one of their cross-licensing deals. IIRC, AMD got the Pentium bus (original Pentium) but had no use for it and never used it, interestingly enough. (I remember Jerry Sanders commenting on that long ago...