ASRock Z790 Taichi review
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
MSI Clutch GM31 Lightweight (+Wireless) mice review
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 processor review
Core i3 8300 with Four Cores and Eight Threads Spotted
We've stated a couple of times already that AMD is stirring up the market on every segment with a processor. The recent Ryzen 3 series for example are all quad-core processors, historically Intel always outted a 2-core model. Until now.
It seems Intel is prepping a Core i3-8300, as it has been spotted on Chinese forums with a screenshot, The interesting thing here is that it is a quad-core with hyper threading. this a 4:8 configuration. And that would be a direct response to AMDs Ryzen 3 alright, check the screenshots, as spotted by through the Anandtech forums at NGA.
Double the amount of cores/threads of the current Core i3 lineup if true (at least higher end models). That's Core i7-6700K level performance (if true).
Acer Launches C720 Chromebook with Intel Core i3 Processor - 07/11/2014 08:48 AM
Acer launches an industry's first Chromebook model using a 4th Generation Intel Core i3 processor. The award-winning Acer C720 Chromebook is now available in two models powered by the Intel Core i3 p...
Intel Haswell-E released in September Core i3 and Pentiums 20 july - 06/22/2014 03:38 PM
Some new info appeared on the much awaited Haswell-E lineup, a document leaked indicating that Haswell-E will be released in September and new Core i3 and Pentiums CPUs on July the 20th. Recently w...
Intel to cut Core i3 Ivy Bridge pricing? - 07/06/2012 11:58 AM
X-bit Labs explains that that Intel slashed the pricing of some of its ultra low-voltage processors by just over 10 percent to spur adoption of ultrabooks: All-in-all, Intel has reportedly decided to...
Intel "Ivy Bridge" Core i3 Processors ship 24th June - 06/15/2012 11:07 AM
Intel Corp reiterated Thursday that the entry-level model of its new Ivy Bridge processors will begin shipping as soon as this month, following media reports that the products are scheduled for delive...
Intel's desktop Ivy Bridge Core i3 processors pricing - 04/23/2012 10:51 AM
Despite the fact that Intel's upcoming Ivy Bridge based Core i3 processors aren't expected to arrive until early June, pricing for three of Intel's upcoming models have now made an appearance at sever...
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 8362
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 8362
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5459011 Posted on: 08/03/2017 08:06 PM
Far as been rumoured intels line up should look like this:
i3 4/4 and/or 4/8
i5 4/8 and/or 6/6
i7 6/12
I mean, with there being confirmed i9's with 4/8, i'm not sure how accurate that is. That'd essentially mean the lowest end i7s are better then the lowest end i9.
Far as been rumoured intels line up should look like this:
i3 4/4 and/or 4/8
i5 4/8 and/or 6/6
i7 6/12
I mean, with there being confirmed i9's with 4/8, i'm not sure how accurate that is. That'd essentially mean the lowest end i7s are better then the lowest end i9.
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9797
Joined: 2011-09-21
Senior Member
Posts: 9797
Joined: 2011-09-21
#5459012 Posted on: 08/03/2017 08:08 PM
Really because I bought a 1070 for half the price of a 980Ti a year and a half later. I didn't see 980ti owners getting pissed. It's the tech industry two years and the performance you have is half the price comes with the territory.
7900x 10 core is the lowest i9.
no i not advacting they keep sand bagg there cpu performance, but I dont think it good idea to pissed off people that spent 300+ for 6700k 2 years later by releasing a i3 with same performance for half that price, that to me they could been doing that all along but didnt cause they want to price gauge
Really because I bought a 1070 for half the price of a 980Ti a year and a half later. I didn't see 980ti owners getting pissed. It's the tech industry two years and the performance you have is half the price comes with the territory.
I mean, with there being confirmed i9's with 4/8, i'm not sure how accurate that is. That'd essentially mean the lowest end i7s are better then the lowest end i9.
7900x 10 core is the lowest i9.
Noisiv
Senior Member
Posts: 8192
Joined: 2010-11-16
Senior Member
Posts: 8192
Joined: 2010-11-16
#5459013 Posted on: 08/03/2017 08:09 PM
So which is it?
Do you want Intel to up their game and offer significantly more perf/$,
or not?
This train of thought is flawed. You are advocating they continue what they have been doing the last 5 years with this statement.
no i not advocating they keep sand bagg there cpu performance, but I dont think it good idea to pissed off people that spent 300+ for 6700k about 2 years later by releasing a i3 with same performance for half that price, that to me they could been doing that all along but didnt cause they wanted to price gauge.
So which is it?
Do you want Intel to up their game and offer significantly more perf/$,
or not?
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 13379
Joined: 2003-05-24
Senior Member
Posts: 13379
Joined: 2003-05-24
#5459019 Posted on: 08/03/2017 08:15 PM
So which is it?
Do you want Intel to up their game and offer significantly more perf/$,
or not?
Which part of them doing this proves they could of been doing this for years on i3 but didnt cause they want to price gauge it not hard to under stand it means they purposely sandbag performance, meaning the i5/i7 could been so much more for there price do not people get? that is enough to pissed off one with half brain.
Really because I bought a 1070 for half the price of a 980Ti a year and a half later. I didn't see 980ti owners getting pissed. It's the tech industry two years and the performance you have is half the price comes with the territory.
legitimate performance gain there vs what intel has been doing with performance by releasing cpu with lil gains over previous gen
So which is it?
Do you want Intel to up their game and offer significantly more perf/$,
or not?
Which part of them doing this proves they could of been doing this for years on i3 but didnt cause they want to price gauge it not hard to under stand it means they purposely sandbag performance, meaning the i5/i7 could been so much more for there price do not people get? that is enough to pissed off one with half brain.
Really because I bought a 1070 for half the price of a 980Ti a year and a half later. I didn't see 980ti owners getting pissed. It's the tech industry two years and the performance you have is half the price comes with the territory.
legitimate performance gain there vs what intel has been doing with performance by releasing cpu with lil gains over previous gen
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 13379
Joined: 2003-05-24
no i not advocating they keep sand bagg there cpu performance, but I dont think it good idea to pissed off people that spent 300+ for 6700k about 2 years later by releasing a i3 with same performance for half that price, that to me they could been doing that all along but didnt cause they wanted to price gauge.
And no one here can remotely deny intel has been price gauging for years. which where pissed off part come in, they could been making i3 that 4c/8t all this time for the prices they sell i3 for they just didnt want to cause they want to price gauge or (premium price) call it what you want it same thing.