TerraMaster F5-422 NAS Review
Radeon RX 6600 (Sapphire Pulse) review
Radeon RX 6600 (Gigabyte Eagle 8G) review
PowerColor Radeon RX 6900 XT Red Devil review
Corsair Sabre RGB Pro Wireless mouse review
Far Cry 6: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 Bilibili 12G review
ACER Predator GM7000 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
be quiet! Shadow Rock SLIM 2 review
Asrock B550 PG Riptide review
Computex 2017: Gigabyte X399 Aorus Gaming 7 Up Close and Personal
So I finally got around to visit the Taipei 101 suite that Gigabyte hires each year to display their products. X299 is nice, but the hottest topic and thing on Computex to see really are X399 motherboards. I got access to the product manager and have a couple of close-up photos in many angles of the Gigabyte X399 Aorus Gaming 7.
On Tuesday we already showed the ASUS X399 board, Gigabyte is fabbing the Gigabyte X399 Aorus Gaming 7. The board I had access to is still an in progress build as you can clearly see. It will get aesthetic improvements and obviously would look 10x better when powered up and some RGB LED lovin'
The AORUS Gaming 7 has 2x4 DIMM slots and thus offers quad-channel support. This 16 cores and 32 threaded Threadripper ready motherboard shows once again that massive SP3 slot. You will spot three M.2 slots (I probably should say 2 open and visible, and one is located under the heatsink being shielded), there is Realtek ALC 1220 for audio and Gigabyte seems to be embedding a Killer E2500 network NIC into the board and sure, RGB. The CPU can be powered by 8+4 pin power connectors. The board has five PCI-Express x16 slots and an array of OC buttons as well as a diagnostic POST LED. Since X399 will bring support of up-to 64 PCIe Gen3 lanes bringing anything and everything multi-GPU support multi-GPU into play, including full-on quad GPU support, the spacing on the mobo does support it.
Threadripper will likely see its official announcement late June already, with a release on likely August 10th (at least that is the chatter in the channel right now). Have a look at the photos, finally in a room with some proper lighting.
Tagged as:
Computex 2017
Computex 2017: Breaking News - Noctua First to not Offer RGB fans - 06/01/2017 05:02 AM
And pardon the headline pu, it is actually quite refreshing to see Noctua sticking to what they are really good at, designing extremely good heatsinks and fans. They have a couple of prototypes on dis...
Computex 2017: Phanteks Shows Impressive Evolv SHIFT // SHIFT X - 06/01/2017 02:16 AM
Phanteks is showing a new concept case at Computex. These units are getting close to final in the development cycle and are rather unique. The Evolv SHIFT and SHIFT X. The Evolv SHIFT (tower chassi...
Computex 2017: Phanteks Shows Wide Array of Liquid Cooling Gear - 06/01/2017 02:03 AM
We have a couple of things to cover for Phanteks, the company was located in a Hotel suite with a massive amount of new products. Their liquid cooling series already was announced though we now have h...
Computex 2017: Asustor NAS units Get ADM 3.0 and Apollo Lake CPUs - 06/01/2017 01:41 AM
Over the past year or two you have been able to see multiple Asustor NAS reviews here at the website, for good reason as we feel this company to build incredibly nice NAS units from top to bottom. Bel...
Computex 2017: ASUS Republic of Gamers Announces Rapture GT-AC5300 - 06/01/2017 01:28 AM
Here at Computex ASUS Republic of Gamers (ROG) today announced Rapture GT-AC5300, the first ROG router designed specifically for gaming. It's a bit of a thing to look at really....
Humanoid_1
Senior Member
Posts: 960
Joined: 2009-10-14
Senior Member
Posts: 960
Joined: 2009-10-14
#5438154 Posted on: 06/01/2017 02:01 PM
Still hoping these boards will be able to take the 32c EPYC chips too
Still hoping these boards will be able to take the 32c EPYC chips too
C-Power
Senior Member
Posts: 115
Joined: 2005-01-08
Senior Member
Posts: 115
Joined: 2005-01-08
#5438180 Posted on: 06/01/2017 03:00 PM
I am sure they can, the chips are based of the server CPU's/socket - and it's probably the same as with intel (Having an X99 chipset while using a Xeon cpu for example) - usually the those HEDT chipsets (and CPU's) are based of the Server chipsets so I can't imagine EPYC not to work on X399.
*Edit*
Actually, aren't the Threadrippers just EPYC's with disabled clusters?
(altho I havent checked on this - just assuming, so take it with a grain of salt
)
Still hoping these boards will be able to take the 32c EPYC chips too
I am sure they can, the chips are based of the server CPU's/socket - and it's probably the same as with intel (Having an X99 chipset while using a Xeon cpu for example) - usually the those HEDT chipsets (and CPU's) are based of the Server chipsets so I can't imagine EPYC not to work on X399.
*Edit*
Actually, aren't the Threadrippers just EPYC's with disabled clusters?
(altho I havent checked on this - just assuming, so take it with a grain of salt
)
DeskStar
Senior Member
Posts: 1280
Joined: 2011-01-11
Senior Member
Posts: 1280
Joined: 2011-01-11
#5438203 Posted on: 06/01/2017 03:51 PM
Getting that giddy feeling all over as these CPU wars heat up..... Love seeing new hardware between companies making things so competitive once again.
Now I just need to see AMD smash the doors off of Intels price points so that they may realize their true downfall. Price gouging over the years and that is/needs to stop.
If AMD can release their 16 core CPU's at or below a grand with performance on par if not surpassing that of Intels offerings then the proverbial "****e" would truly hit the fan...
OH I'M SO DAMN EXCITED.....!!!
Getting that giddy feeling all over as these CPU wars heat up..... Love seeing new hardware between companies making things so competitive once again.
Now I just need to see AMD smash the doors off of Intels price points so that they may realize their true downfall. Price gouging over the years and that is/needs to stop.
If AMD can release their 16 core CPU's at or below a grand with performance on par if not surpassing that of Intels offerings then the proverbial "****e" would truly hit the fan...
OH I'M SO DAMN EXCITED.....!!!
jortego128
Senior Member
Posts: 107
Joined: 2017-04-30
Senior Member
Posts: 107
Joined: 2017-04-30
#5438212 Posted on: 06/01/2017 04:06 PM
Getting that giddy feeling all over as these CPU wars heat up..... Love seeing new hardware between companies making things so competitive once again.
Now I just need to see AMD smash the doors off of Intels price points so that they may realize their true downfall. Price gouging over the years and that is/needs to stop.
If AMD can release their 16 core CPU's at or below a grand with performance on par if not surpassing that of Intels offerings then the proverbial "****e" would truly hit the fan...
OH I'M SO DAMN EXCITED.....!!!
Seeing as how the 1800X is $499 (or a little below) and the Threadripper is pretty much 2x 1800x for ultra premium use, I would think they would like a little more margin than what they get for 1800x. It depends a lot on performance vs. Intel though. If it trades blows with Intels 16 or especially their 18 core nicely, that will be the deciding factor.
If I had to guess, right now, realistically I'd say $1200 maybe at the most for 16 core TR, with 14 core at $1000, 12 at $800, 10 at $600 or so. That meets the 1800x at $450/500. All depends on performance vs Intel.
Getting that giddy feeling all over as these CPU wars heat up..... Love seeing new hardware between companies making things so competitive once again.
Now I just need to see AMD smash the doors off of Intels price points so that they may realize their true downfall. Price gouging over the years and that is/needs to stop.
If AMD can release their 16 core CPU's at or below a grand with performance on par if not surpassing that of Intels offerings then the proverbial "****e" would truly hit the fan...
OH I'M SO DAMN EXCITED.....!!!
Seeing as how the 1800X is $499 (or a little below) and the Threadripper is pretty much 2x 1800x for ultra premium use, I would think they would like a little more margin than what they get for 1800x. It depends a lot on performance vs. Intel though. If it trades blows with Intels 16 or especially their 18 core nicely, that will be the deciding factor.
If I had to guess, right now, realistically I'd say $1200 maybe at the most for 16 core TR, with 14 core at $1000, 12 at $800, 10 at $600 or so. That meets the 1800x at $450/500. All depends on performance vs Intel.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2619
Joined: 2013-03-10
It took me a while to realise where the third M.2 slot is because it had a card and a special heat sink preinstalled.
Real estate is really precious on these boards with the double amout of dimm slots and the huge CPU socket.