Corsair H170i Elite Capellix XT review
Forspoken: PC performance graphics benchmarks
ASRock Z790 Taichi review
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Cinebench R20 Score for AMD Zen 4 Ryzen 7 7700X Processor Leaked
Extreme Player, a tech news publication on Bili Bili, apparently leaked the Cinebench R20 score of an AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Zen 4 processor (probably engineering sample).
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X processor has 8 cores and 16 processing threads, a base/turbo frequency of 4.50/5.40 GHz, 40 MB of cache (32 MB L3 + 8 MB L2), and a TDP of 105W. (142W PPT).
In the single-thread test, the 8-core/16-thread CPU was demonstrated to achieve 773 points, while the multi-threaded test achieved 7701. Compared to the current Ryzen 7 5800X, these data show a performance boost of 25%, as pointed. This chip's multi-threaded performance is almost equivalent to the 5900X.
Extrapolating the 25% increase in single-core performance over the 5800X to other, less-parallelized applications like gaming suggests this CPU maybe 5-10% faster than the 5800X3D and the Core i9-12900K.
AMD Threadripper PRO 5995WX overclocks to 5.15 GHz, breaks Cinebench R23 record - 08/04/2022 08:46 AM
A Taiwanese overclocker overclocked an AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 64-core/128-thread workstation CPU to 5.15 GHz all-core, crushing the Cinebench R23 world-record. The chip achieved 116142 on t...
Intel Core i9-12900KS just 9% in faster Cinebench R23 Multi-Core compared to 5950X - 03/18/2022 11:44 AM
Intel's hand-picked Core i9-12900KS might not yet be available. However, some companies began shipping the limited edition Alder Lake chip to clients. Seby9123 of Reddit was one of the lucky few who ...
An AIDA64 and Cinebench R15 Sapphire Rapids Xeon with DDR5 Memory - 02/14/2022 09:40 AM
Intel's Sapphire Rapids Xeon CPUs are due out this year. These new CPUs will deliver new and improved functionality, as well as an opportunity for Intel to showcase its 10 nm SuperFin manufacturing p...
In Alleged Cinebench R23 Tests, the Core i9-12900KS Outperforms the Ryzen 9 5950X - 01/31/2022 10:07 AM
The Core i9-12900KS processor was teased by Intel at CES 2022, but no formal announcements have been made about its release date or availability....
Intel Core i9-12900K roughly 35% faster in Cinebench R20 using Maximum Turbo Power (PL2) state - 11/01/2021 10:08 AM
The Intel Core i9-12900K will be introduced on November 4th, along with the i7-12700K and i5-12600K.The base processing power and the maximum turbo power van be different per motherboard manufacturer....
TLD LARS
Senior Member
Posts: 492
Joined: 2017-03-01
Senior Member
Posts: 492
Joined: 2017-03-01
#6045217 Posted on: 08/25/2022 10:36 AM
Some years ago when there were just 5% improvements gen to gen, the word around was that "all low hanging fruits have been picked", and there won't ever be large jumps in performance anymore.
Yet, somehow, these days, both companies manage to jump 15-20% gen to gen in both single and multithreaded.
Looks like there are plenty more fruits to be picked...
When you run out of low hanging fruits you just invent new low hanging fruits.
Programs and rules change all the time, programs get more complex and suddenly more cache helps more now then it did 1-2 years ago, so that is now a low hanging fruit compared to last year.
Filling a 13900k with E-cores was something that did not make sense 2 years ago because schedulers and programs got confused by different core speeds and instruction sets.
AMD has now changed socket, so they are free to change the rules that previously was locked with the old socket, for example higher power usage is now allowed, so ramping up the CPU power is now a low hanging fruit, that previously was locked by max socket power and maybe also a better thermal transfer on the new heatspreader compared to the old design.
Also AMD chiplet design suddenly opened up for other things that previously was not so easy to do.
Intel does the same with the new 350W boost mode, easy performance by breaking the rules they themselves have set.
Threadripper came with performance that was not possible before and the only reason it exists is because they had excess EPIC server production capabilities, so that was suddenly a low hanging fruit to sell something they already produce to new customers they did not deliver to before.
New generations of memory and PCI also opens up for extra performance and change the rules a little.
There is also the small tricks they do in the CPU like predicting what you do next and things like that to increase performance, it was a low hanging fruit at the time, but the security holes that was discovered later points to it not being a low hanging fruit afterall.
Some years ago when there were just 5% improvements gen to gen, the word around was that "all low hanging fruits have been picked", and there won't ever be large jumps in performance anymore.
Yet, somehow, these days, both companies manage to jump 15-20% gen to gen in both single and multithreaded.
Looks like there are plenty more fruits to be picked...
When you run out of low hanging fruits you just invent new low hanging fruits.
Programs and rules change all the time, programs get more complex and suddenly more cache helps more now then it did 1-2 years ago, so that is now a low hanging fruit compared to last year.
Filling a 13900k with E-cores was something that did not make sense 2 years ago because schedulers and programs got confused by different core speeds and instruction sets.
AMD has now changed socket, so they are free to change the rules that previously was locked with the old socket, for example higher power usage is now allowed, so ramping up the CPU power is now a low hanging fruit, that previously was locked by max socket power and maybe also a better thermal transfer on the new heatspreader compared to the old design.
Also AMD chiplet design suddenly opened up for other things that previously was not so easy to do.
Intel does the same with the new 350W boost mode, easy performance by breaking the rules they themselves have set.
Threadripper came with performance that was not possible before and the only reason it exists is because they had excess EPIC server production capabilities, so that was suddenly a low hanging fruit to sell something they already produce to new customers they did not deliver to before.
New generations of memory and PCI also opens up for extra performance and change the rules a little.
There is also the small tricks they do in the CPU like predicting what you do next and things like that to increase performance, it was a low hanging fruit at the time, but the security holes that was discovered later points to it not being a low hanging fruit afterall.
Horus-Anhur
Senior Member
Posts: 5904
Joined: 2013-02-05
Senior Member
Posts: 5904
Joined: 2013-02-05
#6045228 Posted on: 08/25/2022 11:01 AM
Some years ago when there were just 5% improvements gen to gen, the word around was that "all low hanging fruits have been picked", and there won't ever be large jumps in performance anymore.
Yet, somehow, these days, both companies manage to jump 15-20% gen to gen in both single and multithreaded.
Looks like there are plenty more fruits to be picked...
Amazing what real competition can do to benefit consumers.
It's because of this, that we need both AMD and Intel to be strong and competitive.
If just one completely just dominates the market, performance stagnates.
Some years ago when there were just 5% improvements gen to gen, the word around was that "all low hanging fruits have been picked", and there won't ever be large jumps in performance anymore.
Yet, somehow, these days, both companies manage to jump 15-20% gen to gen in both single and multithreaded.
Looks like there are plenty more fruits to be picked...
Amazing what real competition can do to benefit consumers.
It's because of this, that we need both AMD and Intel to be strong and competitive.
If just one completely just dominates the market, performance stagnates.
tty8k
Senior Member
Posts: 1049
Joined: 2011-05-02
Senior Member
Posts: 1049
Joined: 2011-05-02
#6045245 Posted on: 08/25/2022 11:36 AM
Since multithread is what matters in 3D render, this 7700x gets literally destroyed by its counterpart the 13700k as well as 12700k.
But hey it finally beats i5 12600k!
12955
Lol.
Since multithread is what matters in 3D render, this 7700x gets literally destroyed by its counterpart the 13700k as well as 12700k.
But hey it finally beats i5 12600k!
12955
Lol.
Horus-Anhur
Senior Member
Posts: 5904
Joined: 2013-02-05
Senior Member
Posts: 5904
Joined: 2013-02-05
#6045246 Posted on: 08/25/2022 11:39 AM
Since multithread is what matters in 3D render, this 7700x gets literally destroyed by its counterpart the 13700k as well as 12700k.
But hey it finally beats i5 12600k!
12955
Lol.
Just because both products have a "7" in it's name, doesn't mean they are direct competitors.
We have to wait for official prices, to see where it they fall in.
Simple example. The 5700X costs around 299€. The 12700K costs around 450€.
Clearly they don't compete in the same range.
Since multithread is what matters in 3D render, this 7700x gets literally destroyed by its counterpart the 13700k as well as 12700k.
But hey it finally beats i5 12600k!
12955
Lol.
Just because both products have a "7" in it's name, doesn't mean they are direct competitors.
We have to wait for official prices, to see where it they fall in.
Simple example. The 5700X costs around 299€. The 12700K costs around 450€.
Clearly they don't compete in the same range.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1696
Joined: 2008-07-16
Some years ago when there were just 5% improvements gen to gen, the word around was that "all low hanging fruits have been picked", and there won't ever be large jumps in performance anymore.
Yet, somehow, these days, both companies manage to jump 15-20% gen to gen in both single and multithreaded.
Looks like there are plenty more fruits to be picked...