Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
MSI Clutch GM31 Lightweight​ (+Wireless) mice review
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 processor review
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 processor review
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 processor review

New Downloads
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4090
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.1.2 (RX 7900) download
GeForce 528.24 WHQL driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.0
Download Intel network driver package 27.8
ReShade download v5.6.0
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v2.0.0 Download
HWiNFO Download v7.36
MSI Afterburner 4.6.5 (Beta 4) Download
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.32.129


New Forum Topics
NVIDIA GeForce 528.02 WHQL driver download & Discussion AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 23.1.2 for AMD Radeon™ RX 7900 Series Info Zone - gEngines, Ray Tracing, DLSS, DLAA, TSR, FSR, XeSS, DLDSR etc. NVIDIA GeForce 528.24 WHQL driver download & Discussion AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 22.11.2 - Driver download and discussion Crypto miners paint GDDR memory chips to hide wear and make them look better Windows power plan settings explorer utility The Samsung Galaxy S23 is rumored to cost an additional 150 Euros (+specs) Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 43inch Mini-LED Flat Gaming Monitor AMD Ryzen 7000X3D is not overclockable, however will support for PBO 2 and the Curve Optimizer




Guru3D.com » News » Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Benchmark performance review delayed

Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Benchmark performance review delayed

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 11/06/2015 02:01 PM | source: | 24 comment(s)
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Benchmark performance review delayed

Each year whenever Call of Duty is released traditionally we publish a nice VGA graphics performance review. This year I am delaying that article until there are better drivers / game patches available. For 6 hours straight I have been trying to retrieve reliable FPS numbers from the game, but as it stands it is a bit of a mess.

Framerates fly up and down per mission / scene and are all over the place. Sometimes 30 FPS, and the next second 60 FPS. Sometimes measuring 1902x1080 and 2560x1440 will retrieve the very same FPS (while VSYNC is off), and next to that the Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 executable often crashes during start-up of the game. Selecting the AA modes does not have a performance impact whatsoever, which makes me wonder if they actually work as configured.

At this moment we feel that no article that will be published on Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 could be reliable enough, other then outting number that are not representative and reliable enough.

The game is not bad when is works, much like the colleagues from TPU also noticed at 8GB RAM memory systems you will get full RAM utilization as if the game is caching to the max. We did not get many stutters though. With our 16GB system things definitely felt and ran a notch better. From a graphics point of view the game digs DEEPLY into your framerate when you open up all graphics quality settings, it will have an adverse effect on game performance. The problem however remains, the game looks good ... but remains to be just that -- nothing excels in PC graphics quality to a level that amazes.

Given the problems we ran into at this point I made the decision to delay the performance review until there are better drivers and likely a game-patch or two have passed. When it works the game does run smooth enough on pretty much any modern age graphics card. However at this point in time, there's no way we can objectively measure game performance to something you guys can relate and match your results to.

Below a couple of screen-shots I took.



Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Benchmark performance review delayed Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Benchmark performance review delayed Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Benchmark performance review delayed Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Benchmark performance review delayed Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Benchmark performance review delayed Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Benchmark performance review delayed Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Benchmark performance review delayed Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Benchmark performance review delayed Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Benchmark performance review delayed Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Benchmark performance review delayed Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Benchmark performance review delayed




« AMD faces Lawsuit over Core Count on Bulldozer · Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Benchmark performance review delayed · AMD Bundles DiRT Rally With Radeon R9 390 or R9 390X graphics cards »

Related Stories

Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Leaks - Screenshots - 11/05/2015 02:55 PM
So when I look to my left I see our graphics card test rig pre-loading COD: Black Ops 3. However on the web games are not safe, over at Reddit a user called EzzOmen apparently already can play the ga...

Call of Duty: Black Ops III - Cybercore: Chaos Trailer - 10/08/2015 02:04 PM
In the Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 campaign, your soldier can access cybernetic modifications on the battlefield. ...

Call of Duty: Black Ops III - Story Overview - 10/06/2015 09:23 AM
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 presents the most ambitious campaign yet. Treyarch discusses their vision of the Black Ops 3 world, shedding a bit more light on just how far down the rabbit hole goes. ...

Call of Duty:Black Ops III Official Story Trailer - 10/01/2015 08:34 AM
Activision released the story trailer for Call of Duty: Black Ops III. Black Ops III engrosses players in a dark and gritty future, where a new breed of Black Ops soldier has emerged, and the lines b...

Call of Duty Black Ops 3 - Combat Gameplay Trailer - 08/14/2015 08:22 AM
Activision Just released a new trailer of Call of Duty: Black Ops III's upcoming beta, featuring a glimpse on the combat movement you'll be able to use while fragging other specialists on the field....


5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


Mechwarrior419
Member



Posts: 56
Joined: 2015-10-26

#5184289 Posted on: 11/06/2015 03:39 PM
Just spent an hour with it. Checked out a little campaign, multi, and zombies.

And honestly, I'm getting great performance. I think the trick is to bring the shadow textures and regular textures down from extra to high. When I set them on extra the framerate is fine, but I get half second long pauses pretty frequently, which I expected given how memory hungry this game is.

The other half is to to use the games frame limiter to limit the frame rate to one which you can always keep. I have a 1080p 144hz monitor so I limit to around 110 and things are buttery smooth.

Now I do have to mention that I have a G-Sync monitor but even if I turned G-Sync off I think performance would remain the same, I would just have to deal with some tearing.

Another tip, watch what you have running in the background. I had started the game with precision on and the first campaign scene was stuttering. I turned precision off and all of a sudden the game was buttery smooth.

I honestly think treyarch will have this all sorted pretty quickly, the question is weather or not the game was worth the money I payed for it, which is still very much up for debate considering I've only had about an hour with it. But I will say this I didn't fall in love with the multiplayer immediately like I did with Halo 5 ( so what I love Halo ).

vbetts
Moderator



Posts: 15142
Joined: 2006-07-04

#5184290 Posted on: 11/06/2015 03:42 PM
Just spent an hour with it. Checked out a little campaign, multi, and zombies.

And honestly, I'm getting great performance. I think the trick is to bring the shadow textures and regular textures down from extra to high. When I set them on extra the framerate is fine, but I get half second long pauses pretty frequently, which I expected given how memory hungry this game is.

The other half is to to use the games frame limiter to limit the frame rate to one which you can always keep. I have a 1080p 144hz monitor so I limit to around 110 and things are buttery smooth.

Now I do have to mention that I have a G-Sync monitor but even if I turned G-Sync off I think performance would remain the same, I would just have to deal with some tearing.

Another tip, watch what you have running in the background. I had started the game with precision on and the first campaign scene was stuttering. I turned precision off and all of a sudden the game was buttery smooth.

I honestly think treyarch will have this all sorted pretty quickly, the question is weather or not the game was worth the money I payed for it, which is still very much up for debate considering I've only had about an hour with it. But I will say this I didn't fall in love with the multiplayer immediately like I did with Halo 5 ( so what I love Halo ).

That's the problem with the game, for some people it runs great. For others, it runs like crap even though they have comparable systems.

My brother got the game and he has a FX6300, 16gb ram, and a 285. Runs like crap and actually had same problems Hilbert had. We're gonna put his steam account on my computer and see if it has that problem.

Fox2232
Senior Member



Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20

#5184292 Posted on: 11/06/2015 03:42 PM
HH, your honest write-up is as good as full benchmark with dozens of cards.

Only thing which remains is to say if AMD or nVidia or both have this bad performance atm.
I guess, that both have troubles, probably memory leak, and some dead threads eating CPU before they are put out of misery.
(but it is only guess)

Illnino
Senior Member



Posts: 603
Joined: 2007-09-07

#5184299 Posted on: 11/06/2015 04:07 PM
Well I haven't touched CoD since it went all futuristic. Get back to reality like what the game was built on (Minus the zombies) otherwise we may as well play star wars battlefront.

Blackfyre
Senior Member



Posts: 1183
Joined: 2007-01-17

#5184301 Posted on: 11/06/2015 04:13 PM
This game was so smooth and played amazingly when it was in BETA, even with my HD7970. I don't understand these days how games lose optimization and performance as they move towards the final build. Rather than the other way around. Pathetic!

I didn't purchase the game, but reports are it's not running great or consistent for many people as Hilbert suggested in the OP.

5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023