Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX White review
Cougar Terminator gaming chair review
G.Skill TridentZ5 RGB DDR5 7200 CL34 2x16 GB review
ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review

New Downloads
HWiNFO Download v7.42
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4257
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.0 Beta4 Download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.88
GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.2 WHQL download
GeForce 531.29 WHQL driver download
AMD Ryzen Master Utility Download 2.10.2.2367
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.1 WHQL download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.1


New Forum Topics
Amernime Zone AMD Software: Adrenalin / Pro Driver - Release Discovery 22.12.2 WHQL Is 7700 a big step down from 7700X ? Is 7700 a big step down from 7700X ? Mainstream GeForce RTX 4050 Graphics Card Launching in June 2023 New Details Emerge on AMDs A620 Chipset: What We Know So Far Impending 5800x3d purchase :) Entertainment Software Association (ESA) Cancels E3 2023 Event due to Lack of Industry Support Nvidia's CTO Believes Cryptocurrency Mining is Valueless for Society RTX 4080 Owner's Thread Kozary's Triple & Quad SLI Thread




Guru3D.com » News » Backblaze's 2022 SSD Edition Report: Comparing the Failure Rates and Temperature Performance of SSDs and HDDs

Backblaze's 2022 SSD Edition Report: Comparing the Failure Rates and Temperature Performance of SSDs and HDDs

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/15/2023 10:21 AM | source: backblaze | 10 comment(s)
Backblaze's 2022 SSD Edition Report: Comparing the Failure Rates and Temperature Performance of SSDs and HDDs

Blackblaze, a data storage provider, has released its 2022 SSD Edition report, which examines the failure rates of solid state drives (SSDs) used as boot drives for their cloud storage platform. The report reveals that the failure rates of SSDs and hard disk drives (HDDs) are similar in the first few years, contradicting the widely held belief that HDDs fail faster due to many moving parts and complicated functioning. 

The report indicates that the failure rate of both storage formats follow a nearly identical reliability trajectory, with statistically 1 and 1.85 percent of all SSDs and HDDs, respectively, failing in the fourth year of use.

The report also compares the temperature of SSDs and HDDs, revealing that SSDs do not necessarily run cooler. While the findings of the report are technically correct, Blackblaze suggests that the cost efficiency for cloud storage providers and consumers is not significantly impacted in the short term, and it remains to be seen whether SSDs can maintain their theoretical longer reliability in the long term. It's worth noting that the report's figures should be viewed with some caveats. Blackblaze acknowledges that many of the tested SSDs have not been in use long enough to provide a realistic view of the average failure rate over a longer period of time. Furthermore, the HDDs examined are getting quite old, with models already having an average usage period of more than 5 years and millions of drive days, while the number of SSDs examined is far lower.

Backblaze's findings show that the failure rates of SSDs and HDDs follow a similar trajectory. There are hardly any failures in the first year, considerably more in the second year, with a small drop in the third year. In the fourth year of use, statistically, 1 percent of all SSDs and 1.85 percent of all HDDs fail. After that, the failure rate of HDDs increases drastically, while it remains to be seen whether SSDs can maintain their theoretical longer reliability.

Overall, this report suggests that the failure rate of SSDs and HDDs are similar in the short term, but HDDs have a higher failure rate over the long term. However, this makes little difference to the cost efficiency for the cloud storage provider or to the consumer. Blackblaze's findings provide valuable insights into the lifespan of storage drives and can help users make informed decisions when choosing between SSDs and HDDs for their storage needs.



Backblaze's 2022 SSD Edition Report: Comparing the Failure Rates and Temperature Performance of SSDs and HDDs Backblaze's 2022 SSD Edition Report: Comparing the Failure Rates and Temperature Performance of SSDs and HDDs Backblaze's 2022 SSD Edition Report: Comparing the Failure Rates and Temperature Performance of SSDs and HDDs Backblaze's 2022 SSD Edition Report: Comparing the Failure Rates and Temperature Performance of SSDs and HDDs




« NETGEAR Introduces the World’s First WiFi 7 Router: The Nighthawk RS700S · Backblaze's 2022 SSD Edition Report: Comparing the Failure Rates and Temperature Performance of SSDs and HDDs · Microsoft March Patch Tuesday: Critical Zero-day Vulnerabilities Addressed in Latest Update for Windows 10/11 »

2 pages 1 2


WhiteLightning
Moderator



Posts: 30041
Joined: 2007-09-19

#6111846 Posted on: 03/15/2023 11:47 AM
It's lonely at the top for Seagate again , who would have known ? :D

fry178
Senior Member



Posts: 1932
Joined: 2012-04-30

#6111866 Posted on: 03/15/2023 12:43 PM
Not saying its related to a bad product, but all of the Seagate drives i bought for myself (in the beginning),
or others (against my advice), died within 1y or 2 (2 within 2 month of use).

TieSKey
Senior Member



Posts: 219
Joined: 2015-09-26

#6111900 Posted on: 03/15/2023 02:54 PM
It's lonely at the top for Seagate again , who would have known ? :D

Not saying its related to a bad product, but all of the Seagate drives i bought for myself (in the beginning),
or others (against my advice), died within 1y or 2 (2 within 2 month of use).

The number to pay attention here is the AFR, and seagate is not doing worse than others :shrug:
(Except for a model with only a handful or drives so it is not statistically relevant)

(I don't give a s.. about seagate, just pointing out the right way to read the info)

Reardan
Senior Member



Posts: 597
Joined: 2014-09-21

#6111902 Posted on: 03/15/2023 02:57 PM
The Seagates are in line with the others, what are you guys talking about? The Seagate outlier is because they only had 3 drives and one failed. Doesn't tell you anything. The 1104 count Seagate has an AFR of .66%. The 554 count Seagate has an AFR of .96%, which is perfectly normal and better than 3 of the 4 other manufacturers in the test (Crucial, MIcron, WDC). Four of the Seagate models literally had a 0% failure rate.

The only bad one is the outlier with 3 drives which is why their confidence interval for it is from .2-40.7.

Guru3d method of reading a chart:

*Stare blankly at it, out of focus, while considering your pre-existing beliefs*

*Post pre-existing beliefs and pretend the chart confirmed them*

*When someone challenges you, double down and act like they're a meanie*

Glottiz
Senior Member



Posts: 1019
Joined: 2006-11-18

#6111905 Posted on: 03/15/2023 03:05 PM
The Seagates are in line with the others, what are you guys talking about? The Seagate outlier is because they only had 3 drives and one failed. Doesn't tell you anything. The 1104 count Seagate has an AFR of .66%. The 554 count Seagate has an AFR of .96%, which is perfectly normal and better than 3 of the 4 other manufacturers in the test (Crucial, MIcron, WDC). Four of the Seagate models literally had a 0% failure rate.

The only bad one is the outlier with 3 drives which is why their confidence interval for it is from .2-40.7.

Guru3d method of reading a chart:

*Stare blankly at it, out of focus, while considering your pre-existing beliefs*

*Post pre-existing beliefs and pretend the chart confirmed them*

*When someone challenges you, double down and act like they're a meanie*
Nailed it. :cool:

2 pages 1 2


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023