Backblaze's 2022 SSD Edition Report: Comparing the Failure Rates and Temperature Performance of SSDs and HDDs
Blackblaze, a data storage provider, has released its 2022 SSD Edition report, which examines the failure rates of solid state drives (SSDs) used as boot drives for their cloud storage platform. The report reveals that the failure rates of SSDs and hard disk drives (HDDs) are similar in the first few years, contradicting the widely held belief that HDDs fail faster due to many moving parts and complicated functioning.
The report indicates that the failure rate of both storage formats follow a nearly identical reliability trajectory, with statistically 1 and 1.85 percent of all SSDs and HDDs, respectively, failing in the fourth year of use.
The report also compares the temperature of SSDs and HDDs, revealing that SSDs do not necessarily run cooler. While the findings of the report are technically correct, Blackblaze suggests that the cost efficiency for cloud storage providers and consumers is not significantly impacted in the short term, and it remains to be seen whether SSDs can maintain their theoretical longer reliability in the long term. It's worth noting that the report's figures should be viewed with some caveats. Blackblaze acknowledges that many of the tested SSDs have not been in use long enough to provide a realistic view of the average failure rate over a longer period of time. Furthermore, the HDDs examined are getting quite old, with models already having an average usage period of more than 5 years and millions of drive days, while the number of SSDs examined is far lower.
Backblaze's findings show that the failure rates of SSDs and HDDs follow a similar trajectory. There are hardly any failures in the first year, considerably more in the second year, with a small drop in the third year. In the fourth year of use, statistically, 1 percent of all SSDs and 1.85 percent of all HDDs fail. After that, the failure rate of HDDs increases drastically, while it remains to be seen whether SSDs can maintain their theoretical longer reliability.
Overall, this report suggests that the failure rate of SSDs and HDDs are similar in the short term, but HDDs have a higher failure rate over the long term. However, this makes little difference to the cost efficiency for the cloud storage provider or to the consumer. Blackblaze's findings provide valuable insights into the lifespan of storage drives and can help users make informed decisions when choosing between SSDs and HDDs for their storage needs.
Senior Member
Posts: 1932
Joined: 2012-04-30
Not saying its related to a bad product, but all of the Seagate drives i bought for myself (in the beginning),
or others (against my advice), died within 1y or 2 (2 within 2 month of use).
Senior Member
Posts: 219
Joined: 2015-09-26
It's lonely at the top for Seagate again , who would have known ?

Not saying its related to a bad product, but all of the Seagate drives i bought for myself (in the beginning),
or others (against my advice), died within 1y or 2 (2 within 2 month of use).
The number to pay attention here is the AFR, and seagate is not doing worse than others :shrug:
(Except for a model with only a handful or drives so it is not statistically relevant)
(I don't give a s.. about seagate, just pointing out the right way to read the info)
Senior Member
Posts: 597
Joined: 2014-09-21
The Seagates are in line with the others, what are you guys talking about? The Seagate outlier is because they only had 3 drives and one failed. Doesn't tell you anything. The 1104 count Seagate has an AFR of .66%. The 554 count Seagate has an AFR of .96%, which is perfectly normal and better than 3 of the 4 other manufacturers in the test (Crucial, MIcron, WDC). Four of the Seagate models literally had a 0% failure rate.
The only bad one is the outlier with 3 drives which is why their confidence interval for it is from .2-40.7.
Guru3d method of reading a chart:
*Stare blankly at it, out of focus, while considering your pre-existing beliefs*
*Post pre-existing beliefs and pretend the chart confirmed them*
*When someone challenges you, double down and act like they're a meanie*
Senior Member
Posts: 1019
Joined: 2006-11-18
The Seagates are in line with the others, what are you guys talking about? The Seagate outlier is because they only had 3 drives and one failed. Doesn't tell you anything. The 1104 count Seagate has an AFR of .66%. The 554 count Seagate has an AFR of .96%, which is perfectly normal and better than 3 of the 4 other manufacturers in the test (Crucial, MIcron, WDC). Four of the Seagate models literally had a 0% failure rate.
The only bad one is the outlier with 3 drives which is why their confidence interval for it is from .2-40.7.
Guru3d method of reading a chart:
*Stare blankly at it, out of focus, while considering your pre-existing beliefs*
*Post pre-existing beliefs and pretend the chart confirmed them*
*When someone challenges you, double down and act like they're a meanie*
Nailed it.

Moderator
Posts: 30041
Joined: 2007-09-19
It's lonely at the top for Seagate again , who would have known ?