CORSAIR iCUE LT100 Smart Lighting Towers Review
Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro review
Asus ROG Strix XG27UQ review
be quiet! Pure Rock 2 review
Fractal Design Define 7 Compact review
Lian Li Galahad 360 liquid cooler review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - July 2020
Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 3600 MHz (64GB) review
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited)
Kioxia Exceria 960 GB SATA3 SSD review
Benchmark show Probable Eight Core Ryzen Zen+ 12nm at 4.35 GHz
With each week that passes we hear a little more about the upcoming Zen+ 12nm Ryzern update. The biggest question, will AMD be able to achieve clock frequencies that are higher? Well, a new set of leaked stuff shows what seems to be a 12nm part, running 4.35 GHz.
It was website Hardware Battle (South Korean website) who had screenshots online but the post is now locked with a password. The web, however, has many caches and as such that info is derived easily. The processor did not get listed with a specific name, likely an engineering sample. It was listed as future processor, a SiSoft Sandra screenshot, however, am 8-core Ryzen processor 4.35GHz xfr 2.0 on a AMD F17 Ryzen HostBridge. .
The current Ryzen 7 1800X has a maximum turbo speed of 4.1 GHz with xfr. Ryzen 2000 are 12nm Zen+ optimized Ryzen processors, the 'refresh' SKUs so to say. 12nm Zen+ processors will work with your X370 chipset based motherboard, however, AMD will launch the new X470 chipset alongside the new Zen+ processors. The new chipset should offer small improvements and use less power. Details in specs are not yet known though. Earlier last week a Ryzen 7 2700X Proc was also spotted, it had 300 MHz extra on clocks frequencies.
Have a browse at the screenshot, this is pretty exciting stuff to see.
Benchmark review: Final Fantasy XV for Windows PC (Updated) - 03/06/2018 09:39 AM
We check out and benchmark the PC version of Final Fantasy XV / 15 (2018) for Windows relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics car...
AMD Ryzen 2600 Benchmark Spotted - 02/19/2018 06:17 PM
As you guys know, AMD is to release the Ryzen 2000 or let's just call it Zen+ In April. In January the Ryzen 5 2600 already surfaced in the SiSoft Sandra database. The entry showed a processor call...
Download: Final Fantasy 15 benchmark - 02/01/2018 09:13 PM
Square Enix offers you a new benchmark to grab, play and test with, the all-new Final Fantasy XV benchmark offers a test suite that outputs some result scores. Technologies like Ultra HD and HDR are...
AMD Raven Ridge: First benchmarks for Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 2400G - 01/31/2018 09:45 AM
AMD Raven Ridge is rumored to launch Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 2400G APUs by February 12th. However, in Asia, the first samples have shown up and have been tested with some benchmark results to show ...
Professional overclocker finds a way to cheat benchmarks like 3DMark TimeSpy - 01/25/2018 09:03 PM
Pro overclocker Ronaldo Buassali, working together with GALAX has published a video in which he shows a way to hide driver settings modifications. This results in false higher end scores. The issue i...
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 10527
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 10527
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5526210 Posted on: 03/07/2018 07:21 PM
That thing will have to suffer dual/triple boot Linux+Android_x86 or Linux+Android_x86+Windows. That's why I like that HP list. Because in the end, they brought last generation notebooks to limits.
In their configurator, you can remove Windows and add all sweet things without increasing price. Including 1080p touchscreen, backlit keyboard, NFC, fingerprint reader, ...
So with 30+ configurations I expect some will hit what I want.
Btw. In geekbench Lenovo with one memory stick has 13GB/s memory bandwith for both ST and MT tests.
Dual Channel HP has ST ~23GB/s and MT ~28GB/s.
Geekbench does not support SMT and Lenovo is already choking. Fully loaded with game, and difference will be drastic.
If you're looking for gaming on the go, I'd get a 2700U laptop, though definitely wait for one with dual channel memory - you are right in being turned off by single channel. If you just want a small system, maybe one you'd bring to a LAN party once in a while, I'd definitely vote for the 2400G.
That thing will have to suffer dual/triple boot Linux+Android_x86 or Linux+Android_x86+Windows. That's why I like that HP list. Because in the end, they brought last generation notebooks to limits.
In their configurator, you can remove Windows and add all sweet things without increasing price. Including 1080p touchscreen, backlit keyboard, NFC, fingerprint reader, ...
So with 30+ configurations I expect some will hit what I want.
Btw. In geekbench Lenovo with one memory stick has 13GB/s memory bandwith for both ST and MT tests.
Dual Channel HP has ST ~23GB/s and MT ~28GB/s.
Geekbench does not support SMT and Lenovo is already choking. Fully loaded with game, and difference will be drastic.
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 16882
Joined: 2012-05-18
Senior Member
Posts: 16882
Joined: 2012-05-18
#5526213 Posted on: 03/07/2018 07:30 PM
Ah so if this is the new 1800X then I guess maybe up to 4.5GHz max, thought there was another 2800X
Although didn't they leak 1700X too at first? I can't remember anymore..
Ah so if this is the new 1800X then I guess maybe up to 4.5GHz max, thought there was another 2800X
Although didn't they leak 1700X too at first? I can't remember anymore..
Neo Cyrus
Senior Member
Posts: 9436
Joined: 2006-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 9436
Joined: 2006-02-14
#5526395 Posted on: 03/08/2018 04:58 AM
Not sure if you're exaggerating, but I wouldn't bet on it, and even if they did it'd be at a stupid price as usual. So it wouldn't matter. What good is the high performing 8700K to me when it costs more than a Ryzen 5 1600 + a motherboard when games are GPU limited? Even with a 1080 Ti I'm still heavily GPU limited (at 1440p) even with an archaic 4770K. And for non-games, they're not as likely to be shit at using the available threads of Ryzen; you're going to get better performance than an 8700K at the same price with an AMD chip with more cores. Or am I remembering benchmarks?
By that time intel will have 6ghz lol!!
Not sure if you're exaggerating, but I wouldn't bet on it, and even if they did it'd be at a stupid price as usual. So it wouldn't matter. What good is the high performing 8700K to me when it costs more than a Ryzen 5 1600 + a motherboard when games are GPU limited? Even with a 1080 Ti I'm still heavily GPU limited (at 1440p) even with an archaic 4770K. And for non-games, they're not as likely to be shit at using the available threads of Ryzen; you're going to get better performance than an 8700K at the same price with an AMD chip with more cores. Or am I remembering benchmarks?
abula
Senior Member
Posts: 834
Joined: 2002-01-24
Senior Member
Posts: 834
Joined: 2002-01-24
#5526678 Posted on: 03/09/2018 03:53 AM
These are great news, its very likely to put more pressure to intel Z370 line, imo what intel is going to do is start rushing the 8 core on the future Z390 or maybe even the Z470. At last im happy that CPUs are getting better for each gen, not the crazy milking intel gave us for years.
These are great news, its very likely to put more pressure to intel Z370 line, imo what intel is going to do is start rushing the 8 core on the future Z390 or maybe even the Z470. At last im happy that CPUs are getting better for each gen, not the crazy milking intel gave us for years.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 5142
Joined: 2012-11-10
If you're looking for gaming on the go, I'd get a 2700U laptop, though definitely wait for one with dual channel memory - you are right in being turned off by single channel. If you just want a small system, maybe one you'd bring to a LAN party once in a while, I'd definitely vote for the 2400G.