Patriot Viper V765 Keyboard Review
Combo deal: Office 2016 Pro and W10 for $34
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: RTX and DLSS Update
ASUS RT-AX88U (AX6000) router review
The Division 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review
URCDkey Spring Sale(up to 86% off) Windows 10 Pro $11
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming X review
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 VENTUS XS 6G OC review
Palit GeForce GTX 1660 StormX OC review
Corsair Crystal 680X PC Chassis Review
Battlefield 5: Video - Graphics - No HUD 4K 60fps
Here's a video showing early footage of Battlefield V alpha. This is Battlefield V viewed as intended by its art team.
AMD Radeon Shows Strong performance with Battlefield V Closed Alpha - 07/05/2018 08:22 AM
From the looks of things AMD seems to be doing pretty well when looking at performance and the closed Alpha release for Battlefield V. In a quick test a GeForce GTX 1060 6GB was put up against a Ra...
Free to grab: Battlefield 4 Second Assault DLC - 06/28/2018 07:36 AM
Still running Battlefield 4 ? You can grab Battlefield 4 Second Assault DLC for free in a promo by EA. Second Assault brings back four fan-favorites that are more challenging....
Battlefield V Alpha begins on June 28th - System Recommendations - 06/28/2018 07:28 AM
Electronic Arts and DICE have revealed the official PC requirements for the upcoming closed alpha of Battlefield V. A Closed Alpha will begin on June 28 and will be available for a limited time only...
Grab for free: Battlefield 1 Turning Tides DLC - 06/27/2018 08:09 AM
Storm the beaches of Gallipoli with the Allied forces or defend the Ottoman Empire’s fortifications at Cape Helles. Continue the battle at the Achi Baba hilltop in an intense infantry-focuse...
E3 2018: Battlefield 5 Exclusive Grand Operations PC Gameplay Video - 06/11/2018 07:04 AM
Nvidia outted a video with battlefield V Grand Operations PC gameplay, captured on a GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, battling across the Narvik map. It's clear that Dive and Nvidia have teamed up for this year...
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1204
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1204
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5563666 Posted on: 07/10/2018 07:16 AM
Those graphics look great! The lighting and the way the snow interacted with vehicles felt realistic. Yep, looks good! I wonder how much graphics power you need to run it at 1080p at those same graphics settings - wondering if 144Hz 1080p maxed out is gonna be as easy to achieve as with BF1? With an overclocked GTX 1070 I run BF1 at pretty much 144 fps stable at max graphics settings apart from no AA, Lighting Quality High - wonder if this will be possible with BF5?
(In fact yesterday I overclocked my monitor and was running BF1 at 178fps on the same settings described above, but with the addition of reducing Post Processing to Low).
Those graphics look great! The lighting and the way the snow interacted with vehicles felt realistic. Yep, looks good! I wonder how much graphics power you need to run it at 1080p at those same graphics settings - wondering if 144Hz 1080p maxed out is gonna be as easy to achieve as with BF1? With an overclocked GTX 1070 I run BF1 at pretty much 144 fps stable at max graphics settings apart from no AA, Lighting Quality High - wonder if this will be possible with BF5?
(In fact yesterday I overclocked my monitor and was running BF1 at 178fps on the same settings described above, but with the addition of reducing Post Processing to Low).
Maddness
Senior Member
Posts: 875
Joined: 2014-10-24
Senior Member
Posts: 875
Joined: 2014-10-24
#5563668 Posted on: 07/10/2018 07:35 AM
I would love to know what hardware was used in that video. They said 4k and maxed settings. I watched it on my 65" 4K OLED and it looked amazing.
I would love to know what hardware was used in that video. They said 4k and maxed settings. I watched it on my 65" 4K OLED and it looked amazing.
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1204
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1204
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5563672 Posted on: 07/10/2018 07:56 AM
4K & maxed settings I'm thinking maybe a 1080ti sli or something! I think would need to be sli. Could probably get away with 1080 sli if it's the same as BF1. EDIT: Praps a heavily overclocked 1080ti could do it, as 1080ti stock is just shy of 60fps at 4K in BF1 according to Toms Hardware.
I would love to know what hardware was used in that video. They said 4k and maxed settings. I watched it on my 65" 4K OLED and it looked amazing.
4K & maxed settings I'm thinking maybe a 1080ti sli or something! I think would need to be sli. Could probably get away with 1080 sli if it's the same as BF1. EDIT: Praps a heavily overclocked 1080ti could do it, as 1080ti stock is just shy of 60fps at 4K in BF1 according to Toms Hardware.
DerSchniffles
Senior Member
Posts: 1521
Joined: 2009-01-21
Senior Member
Posts: 1521
Joined: 2009-01-21
#5563893 Posted on: 07/10/2018 10:11 PM
No way, my 1080ti holds 60fps at 4k pretty easily in BF1. On my 120hz ultrawide running 3440x1440 I hold 100-120 fps.
4K & maxed settings I'm thinking maybe a 1080ti sli or something! I think would need to be sli. Could probably get away with 1080 sli if it's the same as BF1. EDIT: Praps a heavily overclocked 1080ti could do it, as 1080ti stock is just shy of 60fps at 4K in BF1 according to Toms Hardware.
No way, my 1080ti holds 60fps at 4k pretty easily in BF1. On my 120hz ultrawide running 3440x1440 I hold 100-120 fps.
Dragam1337
Senior Member
Posts: 1027
Joined: 2017-11-23
Senior Member
Posts: 1027
Joined: 2017-11-23
#5563928 Posted on: 07/11/2018 02:21 AM
My 1080 sli setup does about 110 fps in bf1 at 4k 100% render res with ultra settings. As my display is 60 hz though, i instead bump up the render resolution to 130 %, and enjoy amazing graphics at locked 58 fps (g-sync display)
Bf5 is a bit more demanding though, judging from the alpha, but it should still be manageable
4K & maxed settings I'm thinking maybe a 1080ti sli or something! I think would need to be sli. Could probably get away with 1080 sli if it's the same as BF1. EDIT: Praps a heavily overclocked 1080ti could do it, as 1080ti stock is just shy of 60fps at 4K in BF1 according to Toms Hardware.
My 1080 sli setup does about 110 fps in bf1 at 4k 100% render res with ultra settings. As my display is 60 hz though, i instead bump up the render resolution to 130 %, and enjoy amazing graphics at locked 58 fps (g-sync display)
Bf5 is a bit more demanding though, judging from the alpha, but it should still be manageable
Maddness
Senior Member
Posts: 875
Joined: 2014-10-24
Senior Member
Posts: 875
Joined: 2014-10-24
#5563940 Posted on: 07/11/2018 03:18 AM
That's some impressive performance you're getting.
That's some impressive performance you're getting.
Dragam1337
Senior Member
Posts: 1027
Joined: 2017-11-23
Senior Member
Posts: 1027
Joined: 2017-11-23
#5563944 Posted on: 07/11/2018 03:41 AM
Dunno about that, it's just a very well optimized game engine.
Here is a screenie of my pc running bf1 amiens map at 4k 100% render res, ultra settings.
That's some impressive performance you're getting.
Dunno about that, it's just a very well optimized game engine.
Here is a screenie of my pc running bf1 amiens map at 4k 100% render res, ultra settings.
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1204
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1204
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5563963 Posted on: 07/11/2018 07:00 AM
My 1080 sli setup does about 110 fps in bf1 at 4k 100% render res with ultra settings. As my display is 60 hz though, i instead bump up the render resolution to 130 %, and enjoy amazing graphics at locked 58 fps (g-sync display)
Bf5 is a bit more demanding though, judging from the alpha, but it should still be manageable
Do you know how much fps you lose when compared to BF1, or the percentage peformance loss? (Just trying to predict how it will run on my setup).
My 1080 sli setup does about 110 fps in bf1 at 4k 100% render res with ultra settings. As my display is 60 hz though, i instead bump up the render resolution to 130 %, and enjoy amazing graphics at locked 58 fps (g-sync display)
Bf5 is a bit more demanding though, judging from the alpha, but it should still be manageable
Do you know how much fps you lose when compared to BF1, or the percentage peformance loss? (Just trying to predict how it will run on my setup).
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1204
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1204
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5563965 Posted on: 07/11/2018 07:06 AM
Well I'm going off the Toms Hardware review where I guess they have a Founders Edition GTX 1080ti, your Zotac would run substantially faster (especially if it's the AMP Extreme version) due to the better cooler, increased clocks & increased power limit.
No way, my 1080ti holds 60fps at 4k pretty easily in BF1. On my 120hz ultrawide running 3440x1440 I hold 100-120 fps.
Well I'm going off the Toms Hardware review where I guess they have a Founders Edition GTX 1080ti, your Zotac would run substantially faster (especially if it's the AMP Extreme version) due to the better cooler, increased clocks & increased power limit.
Dragam1337
Senior Member
Posts: 1027
Joined: 2017-11-23
Senior Member
Posts: 1027
Joined: 2017-11-23
#5564030 Posted on: 07/11/2018 12:05 PM
From what i've seen, it's like 10-20 % more demanding. A 1060 runs at sub 60 fps at 1080p ultra in bf5, where it runs at like 65 fps in bf1.
https://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/battlefield-1-vo-imya-tsarya-test-gpu-cpu
So it shouldn't be that much of a difference
Do you know how much fps you lose when compared to BF1, or the percentage peformance loss? (Just trying to predict how it will run on my setup).
From what i've seen, it's like 10-20 % more demanding. A 1060 runs at sub 60 fps at 1080p ultra in bf5, where it runs at like 65 fps in bf1.
https://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/battlefield-1-vo-imya-tsarya-test-gpu-cpu
So it shouldn't be that much of a difference
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1204
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1204
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5564046 Posted on: 07/11/2018 01:02 PM
From what i've seen, it's like 10-20 % more demanding. A 1060 runs at sub 60 fps at 1080p ultra in bf5, where it runs at like 65 fps in bf1.
https://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/battlefield-1-vo-imya-tsarya-test-gpu-cpu
So it shouldn't be that much of a difference
Cool, thanks, so I might have to turn down one or two more settings in comparison to BF1 to keep 142 fps then on my GTX 1070. The game looks good though graphically, and I don't expect a big drop in quality with a few lesser graphics options. Just need to decide whether or not to buy this game at launch or not!
From what i've seen, it's like 10-20 % more demanding. A 1060 runs at sub 60 fps at 1080p ultra in bf5, where it runs at like 65 fps in bf1.
https://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/battlefield-1-vo-imya-tsarya-test-gpu-cpu
So it shouldn't be that much of a difference
Cool, thanks, so I might have to turn down one or two more settings in comparison to BF1 to keep 142 fps then on my GTX 1070. The game looks good though graphically, and I don't expect a big drop in quality with a few lesser graphics options. Just need to decide whether or not to buy this game at launch or not!
Dragam1337
Senior Member
Posts: 1027
Joined: 2017-11-23
Senior Member
Posts: 1027
Joined: 2017-11-23
#5564050 Posted on: 07/11/2018 01:08 PM
Yeah, you should be fine with your 1070
I'm gonna decide wether or not to buy it during the beta.
Cool, thanks, so I might have to turn down one or two more settings in comparison to BF1 to keep 142 fps then on my GTX 1070. The game looks good though graphically, and I don't expect a big drop in quality with a few lesser graphics options. Just need to decide whether or not to buy this game at launch or not!
Yeah, you should be fine with your 1070
I'm gonna decide wether or not to buy it during the beta.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 8506
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 8506
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5564056 Posted on: 07/11/2018 01:30 PM
Dunno about that, it's just a very well optimized game engine.
Here is a screenie of my pc running bf1 amiens map at 4k 100% render res, ultra settings.
Shows clearly how poor per pixel IQ there is. While 4K delivers nice details for far away geometry. Close objects show that texturing and shaders are insufficient.
Gun looks like it either needs some good shader effect or at least 8x more detailed texture. As one texture pixel spans like 8 pixels on screen. It looks like some blurry dots transitions.
Even sidewalk textures which are already quite far show insufficient per pixel quality. Parallax maping on walls is nice in 4K.
But question is: Where did all the antialiasing work went on Ultra? I can see it on eaves bent on top of right building. But most of other geometry edges are jagged as hell.
It must definitely look better when you use 130% rendering.
Dunno about that, it's just a very well optimized game engine.
Here is a screenie of my pc running bf1 amiens map at 4k 100% render res, ultra settings.
Shows clearly how poor per pixel IQ there is. While 4K delivers nice details for far away geometry. Close objects show that texturing and shaders are insufficient.
Gun looks like it either needs some good shader effect or at least 8x more detailed texture. As one texture pixel spans like 8 pixels on screen. It looks like some blurry dots transitions.
Even sidewalk textures which are already quite far show insufficient per pixel quality. Parallax maping on walls is nice in 4K.
But question is: Where did all the antialiasing work went on Ultra? I can see it on eaves bent on top of right building. But most of other geometry edges are jagged as hell.
It must definitely look better when you use 130% rendering.
Dragam1337
Senior Member
Posts: 1027
Joined: 2017-11-23
Senior Member
Posts: 1027
Joined: 2017-11-23
#5564058 Posted on: 07/11/2018 01:34 PM
Shows clearly how poor per pixel IQ there is. While 4K delivers nice details for far away geometry. Close objects show that texturing and shaders are insufficient.
Gun looks like it either needs some good shader effect or at least 8x more detailed texture. As one texture pixel spans like 8 pixels on screen. It looks like some blurry dots transitions.
Even sidewalk textures which are already quite far show insufficient per pixel quality. Parallax maping on walls is nice in 4K.
But question is: Where did all the antialiasing work went on Ultra? I can see it on eaves bent on top of right building. But most of other geometry edges are jagged as hell.
It must definitely look better when you use 130% rendering.
TAA doesn't work when using sli, so that is disabled... so it is indeed alot more jagged, when i don't use downsampling.
While i agree about what you said about gun texture, i think everything else looks great tbh. Guns vary a whole lot in textures though - some have a much higher quality texture, such as this one
This is with 130% render res btw - as you can see, a whole lot less jaggies, and a much more clear, clean and detailed image.
Shows clearly how poor per pixel IQ there is. While 4K delivers nice details for far away geometry. Close objects show that texturing and shaders are insufficient.
Gun looks like it either needs some good shader effect or at least 8x more detailed texture. As one texture pixel spans like 8 pixels on screen. It looks like some blurry dots transitions.
Even sidewalk textures which are already quite far show insufficient per pixel quality. Parallax maping on walls is nice in 4K.
But question is: Where did all the antialiasing work went on Ultra? I can see it on eaves bent on top of right building. But most of other geometry edges are jagged as hell.
It must definitely look better when you use 130% rendering.
TAA doesn't work when using sli, so that is disabled... so it is indeed alot more jagged, when i don't use downsampling.
While i agree about what you said about gun texture, i think everything else looks great tbh. Guns vary a whole lot in textures though - some have a much higher quality texture, such as this one
This is with 130% render res btw - as you can see, a whole lot less jaggies, and a much more clear, clean and detailed image.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 875
Joined: 2014-10-24
Looks pretty sweet. Haven't played any MP Battlefield since 4.