Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Advanced OC review
ASRock Z390 Steel Legend review
Corsair M55 RGB PRO gaming mouse review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
Lexar NM600 NVMe M.2. SSD (480GB) review
Tech preview: Radeon RX 5700 and 5700 XT
Tech preview: AMD Ryzen 3000 - 7nm ZEN2
Patriot Viper VPN100 M2 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB NVMe M.2. SSD review
Battlefield 5 gets DLSS support starting 12th of February Patch
DICE released the full patch release notes for Battlefield 5’s February 12th update.The game is good news for NVIDIA GeForce RTS users as it brings further optimizations to DXR ray tracing performance and will include DLSS support.
Battlefield V - Tides of War Chapter 2: Lightning Strikes – Update #3
Hello Battlefield™ V players, and welcome to the February 12 update! The update adds four-player co-op to Battlefield V with Combined Arms. This experience lets you bring friends to challenge AI enemies and improve your skills before jumping into multiplayer. You can play solo or in a squad with up to three friends and tackle eight PvE missions set behind enemy lines, with four different objectives across four maps. Another part of the update, but one not available just yet, is the return of a fan-favorite multiplayer mode: Rush. Arriving in early March, Rush will appear for a limited time during Chapter 2: Lightning Strikes. We’re also focusing on improving the existing Battlefield V gameplay experience with this update. Netcode issues are being targeted, as well as general quality of life improvements on maps and ground vehicles.
PC-Specific Improvements
- This update includes further optimizations to DRX ray tracing performance and introduces NVIDIA DLSS to Battlefield V, which uses deep learning to improve game performance while maintaining visual quality.
- Rotterdam – The deploying screen has been improved when using a widescreen monitor, and no longer displays any low-resolution textures or unintended backdrop buildings.
- Spectator mode – added key bindings for increasing and decreasing field of view in free cam and player view director modes. Defaults are PAGE UP and PAGE DOWN.
Update: Battlefield V - Update notes - Please be aware that the update notes that have been spread on reddit are not fully final but almost and the date currently in them is not final either. We don’t have a set release date yet as we are not done with it yet.
NVIDIA to offer Battlefield V and/or Anthem Game Bundles with RTX series - 01/08/2019 09:26 AM
In case you missed it in our GeForce RTX 2060 review, NVIDIA announce a GeForce RTX Game On Bundle that offers a free copy of either Anthem or Battlefield V with the purchase of an eligible RTX 2070 ...
Battlefield 5 December 11th update has been released - 12/12/2018 09:37 AM
DICE has released a new update for Battlefield 5. This patch is 650MB in size and fixes an issue where high-level Recon players lost access to the Throwing Knife and adjusts the initial respawn coun...
December 4 Battlefield V Raytracing DXR performance patch released (benchmarks) - 12/05/2018 01:28 PM
DICE just released the new patch that will bring extra performance towards geFiorce RTX graphics with DXR (Raytracing enabled). While the patch was delayed one day, we now can show you some benchma...
Battlefield V to offer first free update, Chapter 1: Overture - 12/04/2018 09:13 AM
DICE will be releasing the first free update to Battlefield V, titled: Chapter 1: Overture, on Tuesday, December 4, 2018. This Chapter 1: Overture update brings a new map, War Story, practice range, a...
Upcoming DICE Battlefield V patch would get NVIDIA RTX 50% performance gains - 12/03/2018 05:01 PM
Alongside the Battlefield V Tides of War Chapter 1 release tomorrow on the 4th of December, DICE will bring an update towards Battlefield V. A new patch 'should' be good news for GeForce RTX owne...
metagamer
Senior Member
Posts: 1091
Joined: 2018-04-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1091
Joined: 2018-04-10
#5638227 Posted on: 02/11/2019 05:05 PM
Bye bye RVII's performance advantage. Ouch.
Improved DXR ray tracing performance will be nice too, with DLSS this should make quite a big difference.
Bye bye RVII's performance advantage. Ouch.
Improved DXR ray tracing performance will be nice too, with DLSS this should make quite a big difference.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12121
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12121
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5638229 Posted on: 02/11/2019 05:15 PM
There are like a million articles posted a day that don't get posted here - why do you think he's ignoring this specific one?
Arguable. DLSS in FFXV looked pretty average and introduced all kinds of weird visual artifacts. Hopefully it's better here but I'm not holding my breath.
@Hilbert Hagedoorn why do you have ignored this news?
There are like a million articles posted a day that don't get posted here - why do you think he's ignoring this specific one?
Bye bye RVII's performance advantage. Ouch.
Arguable. DLSS in FFXV looked pretty average and introduced all kinds of weird visual artifacts. Hopefully it's better here but I'm not holding my breath.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11061
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 11061
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5638230 Posted on: 02/11/2019 05:15 PM
Bye bye RVII's performance advantage. Ouch.
Improved DXR ray tracing performance will be nice too, with DLSS this should make quite a big difference.
And hello image quality degradation. Hah.
Bye bye RVII's performance advantage. Ouch.
Improved DXR ray tracing performance will be nice too, with DLSS this should make quite a big difference.
And hello image quality degradation. Hah.
metagamer
Senior Member
Posts: 1091
Joined: 2018-04-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1091
Joined: 2018-04-10
#5638233 Posted on: 02/11/2019 05:19 PM
quite the opposite.
And hello image quality degradation. Hah.
quite the opposite.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12121
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12121
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5638234 Posted on: 02/11/2019 05:19 PM
How is it the opposite when you haven't seen it in BF5 and the only game we've seen it in, it introduces a bunch of weird issues with?
quite the opposite.
How is it the opposite when you haven't seen it in BF5 and the only game we've seen it in, it introduces a bunch of weird issues with?
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9090
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 9090
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5638235 Posted on: 02/11/2019 05:21 PM
If you had 90fps in some repeatable place before (Spawn of test range), you can go there and increase internal render resolution till you have same 90fps again.
And at that point, you have better IQ at same fps than w/o DLSS. (Hopefully.)
And hello image quality degradation. Hah.
If you had 90fps in some repeatable place before (Spawn of test range), you can go there and increase internal render resolution till you have same 90fps again.
And at that point, you have better IQ at same fps than w/o DLSS. (Hopefully.)
metagamer
Senior Member
Posts: 1091
Joined: 2018-04-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1091
Joined: 2018-04-10
#5638240 Posted on: 02/11/2019 05:28 PM
Have you seen it in BFV?
From what we know, it has some niggles, shimmering is one. If it's too pronounced, I won't be using DLSS. But it has some pros, with producing a sharper image than TAA. It's early days for DLSS, things may start out rough, we'll have to wait and see.
How is it the opposite when you haven't seen it in BF5 and the only game we've seen it in, it introduces a bunch of weird issues with?
Have you seen it in BFV?
From what we know, it has some niggles, shimmering is one. If it's too pronounced, I won't be using DLSS. But it has some pros, with producing a sharper image than TAA. It's early days for DLSS, things may start out rough, we'll have to wait and see.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11061
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 11061
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5638241 Posted on: 02/11/2019 05:32 PM
There are like a million articles posted a day that don't get posted here - why do you think he's ignoring this specific one?
Arguable. DLSS in FFXV looked pretty average and introduced all kinds of weird visual artifacts. Hopefully it's better here but I'm not holding my breath.
From what i saw in DF test it degraded the imagine quality. All the sings on the car licence plates ware blurry using DLSS while TAA was sharp. Also goes for the wires/ropes/fences ware invisible if you are to far away from it, weird like you said.
Also that indoor scene with trader DLSS was a mess. Everything behind him was a blurry mess where again TAA was much sharper.
There are like a million articles posted a day that don't get posted here - why do you think he's ignoring this specific one?
Arguable. DLSS in FFXV looked pretty average and introduced all kinds of weird visual artifacts. Hopefully it's better here but I'm not holding my breath.
From what i saw in DF test it degraded the imagine quality. All the sings on the car licence plates ware blurry using DLSS while TAA was sharp. Also goes for the wires/ropes/fences ware invisible if you are to far away from it, weird like you said.
Also that indoor scene with trader DLSS was a mess. Everything behind him was a blurry mess where again TAA was much sharper.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35318
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35318
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5638242 Posted on: 02/11/2019 05:36 PM
Haven't ignored anything, I am just now reading this? Why do some of you guys automatically assume the negative
@Hilbert Hagedoorn why do you have ignored this news?
Haven't ignored anything, I am just now reading this? Why do some of you guys automatically assume the negative
warlord
Senior Member
Posts: 2137
Joined: 2012-10-22
Senior Member
Posts: 2137
Joined: 2012-10-22
#5638245 Posted on: 02/11/2019 05:47 PM
Why do you assume DLSS as a degrade out of the box? So DirectML, the hope of AMD is the omen? The perfection? The greatness? I find DLSS great, better than stuttering combined with low fps and inferior AA.
Why do you assume DLSS as a degrade out of the box? So DirectML, the hope of AMD is the omen? The perfection? The greatness? I find DLSS great, better than stuttering combined with low fps and inferior AA.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12121
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12121
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5638250 Posted on: 02/11/2019 05:57 PM
As already stated in the thread, the only example we have of DLSS is not great - arguably makes image quality worse and introduces a bunch of weird artifacts. That's not to say it will be bad here but taking the default stance of "quite the opposite of degrade" is kind of weird.
No one even mentioned DirectML in here and honestly no - any implementation on DirectML will have the same challenges, probably more considering AMD can't seem to get any of their technologies into more than a few games and I doubt AMD is going to pay to do the training like Nvidia is.
Why do you assume DLSS as a degrade out of the box? So DirectML, the hope of AMD is the omen? The perfection? The greatness? I find DLSS great, better than stuttering combined with low fps and inferior AA.
As already stated in the thread, the only example we have of DLSS is not great - arguably makes image quality worse and introduces a bunch of weird artifacts. That's not to say it will be bad here but taking the default stance of "quite the opposite of degrade" is kind of weird.
No one even mentioned DirectML in here and honestly no - any implementation on DirectML will have the same challenges, probably more considering AMD can't seem to get any of their technologies into more than a few games and I doubt AMD is going to pay to do the training like Nvidia is.
HardwareCaps
Senior Member
Posts: 452
Joined: 2018-05-03
Senior Member
Posts: 452
Joined: 2018-05-03
#5638263 Posted on: 02/11/2019 06:24 PM
Nice, finally will see some real dynamic comparison with an engine that can do other AA techniques properly.
still the time it takes for DLSS implementation seems way too long
If you had 90fps in some repeatable place before (Spawn of test range), you can go there and increase internal render resolution till you have same 90fps again.
And at that point, you have better IQ at same fps than w/o DLSS. (Hopefully.)
That's not how AI works.
There's the training part which requires massive computation and memory (rerunning the algorithms again and again changing massive amount of weights)
and there's the inferencing which is a compressed, summarized algorithm which uses a lot less memory and compute
meaning, the algorithm is a finished product once Nvidia has shipped it. it doesn't continue to learn on your machine
Nice, finally will see some real dynamic comparison with an engine that can do other AA techniques properly.
still the time it takes for DLSS implementation seems way too long
If you had 90fps in some repeatable place before (Spawn of test range), you can go there and increase internal render resolution till you have same 90fps again.
And at that point, you have better IQ at same fps than w/o DLSS. (Hopefully.)
That's not how AI works.
There's the training part which requires massive computation and memory (rerunning the algorithms again and again changing massive amount of weights)
and there's the inferencing which is a compressed, summarized algorithm which uses a lot less memory and compute
meaning, the algorithm is a finished product once Nvidia has shipped it. it doesn't continue to learn on your machine
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9090
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 9090
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5638267 Posted on: 02/11/2019 06:31 PM
That's not how AI works.
There's the training part which requires massive computation and memory (rerunning the algorithms again and again changing massive amount of weights)
and there's the inferencing which is a compressed, summarized algorithm which uses a lot less memory and compute
meaning, the algorithm is a finished product once Nvidia has shipped it. it doesn't continue to learn on your machine
Read text I wrote. Comprehend. Reiterate if you came to same conclusion as in your post above.
That's not how AI works.
There's the training part which requires massive computation and memory (rerunning the algorithms again and again changing massive amount of weights)
and there's the inferencing which is a compressed, summarized algorithm which uses a lot less memory and compute
meaning, the algorithm is a finished product once Nvidia has shipped it. it doesn't continue to learn on your machine
Read text I wrote. Comprehend. Reiterate if you came to same conclusion as in your post above.
HardwareCaps
Senior Member
Posts: 452
Joined: 2018-05-03
Senior Member
Posts: 452
Joined: 2018-05-03
#5638269 Posted on: 02/11/2019 06:34 PM
pretty obvious it was sarcastic
just wanted to clarify,I'm not a sarcastic guy myself....
Read text I wrote. Comprehend. Reiterate if you came to same conclusion as in your post above.
pretty obvious it was sarcastic
just wanted to clarify,I'm not a sarcastic guy myself....
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 253
Joined: 2014-05-07
@Hilbert Hagedoorn why do you have ignored this news?