Battlefield 4 VGA graphics performance benchmarks review

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 11/01/2013 09:22 AM | source: | 106 comment(s)

We review Battlefield 4 with regular benchmarks, FCAT frametime results and have a look at Ultra HD gaming as well. Join us in this article where close to 30 graphics cards are being tested with the new Battlefield 4. After waiting way too long before the game to be unlocked we wanted bring you guys one of our traditional graphics and processor performance articles. As such we'll take a dozen of graphics cards today and have a look at DX11 performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies. The new and popular title is looking great from a graphics point of view. But as a result how will it perform on a selection of different graphics cards ? This review will cover all these basics and then more so you know what choice to make either graphics card or in-game settings wise.

Read our article right here.

Related Stories

Battlefield 4 - MP Launch Trailer - 10/30/2013 09:48 AM
While the game still has to unlock here in the Netherlands the reviews are starting to come in for DICE's latest shooter Battlefield 4: CVG: 9/10, Joystiq: 4.5/5, Shacknews: 7/10, Polygon: 7.5/10, Ga...

Kingston Bundles HyperX Memory and SSD with Battlefield 4 Mouse Pads from QPAD - 10/29/2013 09:27 AM
HyperX, a division of Kingston Technology Company, Inc., the independent world leader in memory products, today announced a HyperX memory and solid-state drive bundle with exclusive collector's editi...

VTX-3D Radeon R9 290X X-Edition and Battlefield 4 Edition - 10/24/2013 06:15 AM
VTX3D, today launched an unrivaled member into R9 series, VTX3D R9 290X X-Edition. The R9 290X X-Edition has the strongest specification and is equipped the latest AMD technologies, such as Graphics C...

Battlefield 4 - TV commercial 2 & Single Player Story - 10/23/2013 09:26 AM
Hmm, yam-yam-yam .. ...

Battlefield 4 - Running At 4K (4096x2160) - 10/16/2013 08:15 AM
Here's an interesting video, showcasing what Battlefield 4 looks like at 4K. Captured by Thirty IR, this video shows Battlefield running at a really high resolution (running at 4800*2560 and being do...

22 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »

AlexKidd5000
Senior Member

Posts: 110
Joined: 2013-08-12

#4689592 Posted on: 10/31/2013 07:50 PM

My card (HD 6870) does pretty decently.

miffywiffy
Senior Member

Posts: 558
Joined: 2007-10-29

#4689598 Posted on: 10/31/2013 08:03 PM

Shame BF is **** these days

alanm
Senior Member

Posts: 11681
Joined: 2004-05-10

#4689604 Posted on: 10/31/2013 08:05 PM

ah, only just noticed that. weird that the 770 also loses to 680.

Ah.. didnt notice the 680. In that case, maybe typo or glitch in the bench?

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone

Posts: 46368
Joined: 2000-02-22

#4689606 Posted on: 10/31/2013 08:05 PM

Ah.. didnt notice the 680. In that case, maybe typo or glitch in the bench?

I'll have a look at the 680 again tomorrow, could be a typo.

Update: there was a typo in the 770 result (which you compared the 680 to), that has been updated.

scoutingwraith
Senior Member

Posts: 9446
Joined: 2005-05-05

#4689620 Posted on: 10/31/2013 08:16 PM

ah, only just noticed that. weird that the 770 also loses to 680.

One thing. When the 7950 launched, it was roughly on par with the gtx 580. now look at it. the 580 scores 37fps and 7950 62. that's a big difference which happened purely in drivers. (1200p). People saying AMD drivers suck should think again.

Makes me wonder how much do both companies do in terms of driver support for cards that are out on the market and if they are accidentally nerfing them in future release of new cards.

22 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »

Post New Comment

Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.