Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 WIFI6E router review
Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review

New Downloads
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.24.193
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1994
GeForce 512.95 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.2 driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.70
FurMark Download v1.30
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.1
Download Samsung Magician v7.1.1.820
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1732
HWiNFO Download v7.24


New Forum Topics
AMD reaffirms that the 5.5+ GHz of the Ryzen 7000 in the presentations was achieved without overclocking NVSlimmer - NVIDIA driver slimming utility AMD Announces Ryzen 7000 - passing 5.5 GHz 15% Single Thread perf Increase - RDNA2 Nvidia Shadercache setting. The AMD Ryzen All In One Thread /Overclocking/Memory Speeds & Timings/Tweaking/Cooling Part 2 MSI will debut the MEG 342C based on a QD-OLED (3440x1440) display AMD changes its statements, Ryzen 7000 will consume up to 230W 512.95 - Clean Version Review: ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC [3rd-Party Driver] Amernime Zone Radeon Insight 22.5.1 WHQL Driver Pack (Released)




Guru3D.com » News » Battlefield 2042 will get DLSS and Nvidia Reflex support (but not raytracing?)

Battlefield 2042 will get DLSS and Nvidia Reflex support (but not raytracing?)

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 06/30/2021 09:01 AM | source: | 42 comment(s)
Battlefield 2042 will get DLSS and Nvidia Reflex support (but not raytracing?)

EA announced that Nvidia will be their PC launch partner for Battlefield 2042, thus supporting DLSS and Nvidia Reflex, which would significantly improve the gaming experience for GeForce RTX graphics card users.

DLSS technology allows the image to be rendered in a resolution lower than the target resolution and then rescaled by artificial intelligence using the Tensor Cores of GeForce RTX graphics cards, increasing FPS rates for a greater advantage in competitive games.

Nvidia Reflex allows you to speed up the rendering process of each frame, helping to reduce latency to half the latency normally obtained, allowing you to see your enemies faster and register your movements faster.

Kinda weird but neither of the companies mentioned Ray-Tracing, so it appears that the new Battlefield installment will not include this technology.

EA has also announced the Microsoft alliance as a console partner, which offers Xbox series S/X exclusive improvement. The advantages compared to the Playstation 5 were not detailed, although the next EA Live on July 22 may know this information. Battlefield 2042 is coming October 22 to PC, Playstation 4/4 Pro, Playstation 5, Xbox One / One X, and Xbox Series S / X. 



Battlefield 2042 will get DLSS and Nvidia Reflex support (but not raytracing?)




« Doom Eternal receives support for Ray-Tracing and DLSS, offering up to 75% more performance · Battlefield 2042 will get DLSS and Nvidia Reflex support (but not raytracing?) · Advertorial: Great Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Deal with URcdkey »

Related Stories

Battlefield 6 is Battlefield 2042 (updated & announced) - 06/10/2021 09:53 AM
Stemming from a leak on the Discord of the well-known leaker Tom Henderson, the next game developed by DICE and EA will be called Battlefield 2042 , moving in between 1942 and the futuristic title of ...

Free to grab: Battlefield 4 through Amazon Prime - 06/03/2021 08:40 AM
Electronic Arts is giving away the base version of Battlefield 4 to those users who are part of Amazon's Prime Gaming service . From today until June 21, you can access this link to get a redeemable ...

Battlefield 6 to be announced on June 9 - 06/02/2021 08:15 AM
It seems the trailer of the next installment Battlefield 6 got leaked.  Electronic Arts only suggested a few weeks ago that the reveal would be in June, without commenting on the repeated leaks....

Battlefield Demo imminent this week (updated) - 05/11/2021 10:16 AM
It's not a secret that later this year Battlefield 6 will make its entrance. So the viral and marketing campaigns are already waring up.  2 images of the expected trailer got 'leaked' on Reddit....

EA confirms Battlefield 6 to arrive end of the year in an unprecedented scale - 02/04/2021 10:33 AM
The marketing hype has already begun. During Electronic Arts' fiscal 2021 third-quarter earnings call, Andrew Wilson CEO of EAm shared some news about the upcoming Battlefield and revealed that the n...


9 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »


Reddoguk
Senior Member



Posts: 2324
Joined: 2010-05-26

#5925542 Posted on: 06/30/2021 04:23 PM
There is a single player part to it as long as they still give XP out for doing bot matches. You can set many different modes then just jump in and play vs bots. So OK there's no campaign but other options are there for single player persons. BF1942 was a fun game against bots too. Plus playing with bots usually means there's plenty of tanks/planes/heli's to jump in and no spammers to worry about. As long as they get the AI right that is but i've read since it's 128 player bots will be used in online games too so hopefully they aren't super dumb.

Dazzzzm8
Junior Member



Posts: 8
Joined: 2018-01-04

#5925549 Posted on: 06/30/2021 05:35 PM
Time will tell for bf2042, but bf5 had the servers running at 60 hz, while bf4 had the option for having servers run all the way up to 144 hz.


But the hitreg a lot of the time was still questionable at best.

In BF1 and onwards it's far more reliable.

Dragam1337
Senior Member



Posts: 3910
Joined: 2017-11-23

#5925558 Posted on: 06/30/2021 06:05 PM
But the hitreg a lot of the time was still questionable at best.

In BF1 and onwards it's far more reliable.

Most bf4 servers were only running at 30 hz, as ea charged more for renting high hz servers, thus most opted not to. In other words you had to manually select a 60 hz (or 120 hz or 144 hz) server.

Loobyluggs
Senior Member



Posts: 4707
Joined: 2008-09-07

#5925620 Posted on: 06/30/2021 09:15 PM
Translation:

-Frostbite sucks
-MS wrote a big check to cover the 'continual improvement' that will be required to run Frostbite
-Frostbite sucks

nizzen
Senior Member



Posts: 1903
Joined: 2005-08-05

#5925636 Posted on: 06/30/2021 10:20 PM
Translation:

-Frostbite sucks
-MS wrote a big check to cover the 'continual improvement' that will be required to run Frostbite
-Frostbite sucks

Frostbite is THE best game engine IF you have the hardware to drive it. Frostbite sucks for poor people ;)

Cpu and memoryperformance (latency) is the most important for high fps in frostbite.

9 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022