Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASRock Z590 Extreme review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC review
Corsair K70 RGB TKL keyboard review
Corsair RM650x (2021) power supply review
be quiet! Silent Loop 2 280mm review
Corsair K55 RGB PRO XT keyboard review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - March 2021
Intel Core i9-11900K processor review
Intel Core i5-11600K processor review
ASUS ROG Maximus XIII HERO review

New Downloads
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.2 Beta 2
MSI Afterburner 4.6.4 Beta 2 Download
HWiNFO Download v7.02
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH 27.20.100.9316
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.9.350
Quake II RTX Download 1.5.0
GeForce 465.89 WHQL driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.33
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.3.2 driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.3.8


New Forum Topics
AMD Radeon Software - UWP - v27.20.21001.7005 Windows 10 20H2 (Build 19042.508) Resizeable BAR support issues AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.3.2 driver download & discussion Need ppl with 1440p 144hz+ and Warhammertotalwar 2 to troubleshoot microstutter issue PC sales have risen significantly in Q1 of 2021, despite all shortages ClockTuner 2.0 for Ryzen (CTR) Guide and download 3090 Owner's thread Asus to release resizable BAR update for Z370 and Z390 motherboards in May RTX 3060 with 470.05 not hashrate restricted




Guru3D.com » News » Backblaze Published Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2019

Backblaze Published Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2019

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 04/30/2019 06:40 PM | source: backblaze | 15 comment(s)
Backblaze Published Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2019

As of March 31, 2019, Backblaze had 106,238 spinning hard drives in our cloud storage ecosystem spread across three data centers. Of that number, there were 1,913 boot drives and 104,325 data drives. 

This review looks at the Q1 2019 and lifetime hard drive failure rates of the data drive models currently in operation in our data centers and provides a handful of insights and observations along the way.

Hard Drive Failure Stats for Q1 2019
At the end of Q1 2019, Backblaze was using 104,325 hard drives to store data. For our evaluation we remove from consideration those drives that were used for testing purposes and those drive models for which we did not have at least 45 drives (see why below). This leaves us with 104,130 hard drives. The table below covers what happened in Q1 2019.

 

 

Notes and Observations
If a drive model has a failure rate of 0%, it means there were no drive failures of that model during Q1 2019. The two drives listed with zero failures in Q1 were the 4 TB and 5 TB Toshiba models. Neither has a large enough number of drive days to be statistically significant, but in the case of the 5 TB model, you have to go back to Q2 2016 to find the last drive failure we had of that model.

There were 195 drives (104,325 minus 104,130) that were not included in the list above because they were used as testing drives or we did not have at least 45 of a given drive model. We use 45 drives of the same model as the minimum number when we report quarterly, yearly, and lifetime drive statistics. The use of 45 drives is historical in nature as that was the number of drives in our original Storage Pods. Beginning next quarter that threshold will change; we'll get to that shortly.

The Annualized Failure Rate (AFR) for Q1 is 1.56%. That's as high as the quarterly rate has been since Q4 2017 and its part of an overall upward trend we've seen in the quarterly failure rates over the last few quarters. Let's take a closer look.


Quarterly Trends
We noted in previous reports that using the quarterly reports is useful in spotting trends about a particular drive or even a manufacturer. Still, you need to have enough data (drive count and drive days) in each observed period (quarter) to make any analysis valid. To that end the chart below uses quarterly data from Seagate and HGST drives while leaving out Toshiba and WDC drives as we don't have enough drives from those manufacturers over the course of the last three years.

 

 

Over the last three years, the trend for both Seagate and HGST annualized failure rates had improved, i.e. gone down. While Seagate has reduced their failure rate over 50% during that time, the upward trend over the last three quarters requires some consideration. We'll take a look at this and let you know if we find anything interesting in a future post.
Changing the Qualification Threshold

As reported over the last several quarters, we've been migrating from lower density drives, 2, 3, and 4 TB drives, to larger 10, 12, and 14 TB hard drives. At the same time, we have been replacing our stand-alone 45-drive Storage Pods with 60-drive Storage Pods arranged into the Backblaze Vault configuration of 20 Storage Pods per vault. In Q1, the last stand-alone 45-drive Storage Pod was retired. Therefore, using 45 drives as the threshold for qualification to our quarterly report seems antiquated. This is a good time to switch to using Drive Days as the qualification criteria. In reviewing our data, we have decided to use 5,000 Drive Days as the threshold going forward. The exception, any current drives we are reporting, such as the Toshiba 5 TB model with about 4,000 hours each quarter, will continue to be included in our Hard Drive Stats reports.
Fewer Drives = More Data

Those of you who follow our quarterly reports might have observed that the total number of hard drives in service decreased in Q1 by 648 drives compared to Q4 2018, yet we added nearly 60 petabytes of storage. You can see what changed in the chart below.

 

 

Lifetime Hard Drive Stats
The table below shows the lifetime failure rates for the hard drive models we had in service as of March 31, 2019. This is over the period beginning in April 2013 and ending March 31, 2019.

 

 



Backblaze Published Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2019 Backblaze Published Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2019 Backblaze Published Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2019 Backblaze Published Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2019




« ASRock seems to support new AMD Ryzen 3000 chips for its A320 motherboards · Backblaze Published Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2019 · AMD Reports First Quarter 2019 Financial Results »

Related Stories

2018 HDD Failure rates report from Backblaze - 01/24/2019 08:58 AM
Backblaze has published its annual hard drive statistics in which the company shares numbers on failure rates of the nearly 105,000 the company has in its data centers. The company publishes the annua...

Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for Q3 2018 - 10/18/2018 08:48 AM
As of September 30, 2018 Backblaze had 99,636 spinning hard drives. Of that number, there were 1,866 boot drives and 97,770 data drives. This review looks at the quarterly and lifetime statistics for ...

BACKBLAZE Releases HDD Stats for Q2 2018 - 07/25/2018 04:49 PM
As of June 30, 2018 they had 100,254 spinning hard drives in Backblaze’s data centers. Of that number, there were 1,989 boot drives and 98,265 data drives. This review looks at the quarterly...

Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2018 Have Been published - 4TB HGST HDDs Very Reliable - 05/03/2018 07:37 AM
It is always fun to check this list out, as of March 31, 2018 they had 100,110 spinning hard drives. Of that number, there were 1,922 boot drives and 98,188 data drives. This review looks at the quar...

Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for 2017 - HGST HDDs Very Reliable - 02/02/2018 10:13 AM
Backblaze has recorded and saved daily hard drive statistics from the drives in their data centers and released the statistics for the year 2017. At the end of 2017 they had 93,240 spinning hard driv...


3 pages 1 2 3


Noisiv
Senior Member



Posts: 7705
Joined: 2010-11-16

#5665004 Posted on: 05/01/2019 07:45 PM
Damn... those HGST drives still pulling ahead

Anyway what happened with Western Digital phasing out HGST brand? They came to their senses it seems...

SHS
Senior Member



Posts: 474
Joined: 2001-05-02

#5665020 Posted on: 05/01/2019 08:33 PM
Damn... those HGST drives still pulling ahead

Anyway what happened with Western Digital phasing out HGST brand? They came to their senses it seems...
That maybe so but you also be pay out nose for them too for HGST brand and is also being phasing out under WDC Ultrastar line.
Beware the 4tb that are being listed on internet they are now all used (Renewed) drive and no longer being made some are refurbished as for new one will set you back $230 and there only in consumer grade not enterprise model and be very beware of 3rd party seller.

Aura89
Senior Member



Posts: 8156
Joined: 2008-07-31

#5665035 Posted on: 05/01/2019 09:38 PM
12TB drives are not consumer grade and that's what they are migrating to based on this report. Consumer grade are more like 2 and 3TB, maybe 4 at the most.


12TB are "consumer grade", you can find them everywhere.

I feel like you are mistaking "likely to be in a pre-built computer" and "consumer grade" definitions. As yes, pre-built computers generally have 1TB HDDs in them, MAYBE 2TB, and can usually be customized towards 4TB for the masses, but that is not the definition of "consumer grade"

Seagate has their Exos Enterprise HDDs and their Barracuda consumer-grade HDDs (when it comes to 8TB+ HDDs)

Barracudas go to 14TB

Now, i don't see any consumer-grade 12TB HDDs in this list, i will grant you that, but 12TB, by itself, is not a definition of "consumer grade" or "not consumer grade"

schmidtbag
Senior Member



Posts: 5744
Joined: 2012-11-10

#5665228 Posted on: 05/02/2019 04:04 PM
12TB are "consumer grade", you can find them everywhere.

Now, i don't see any consumer-grade 12TB HDDs in this list, i will grant you that, but 12TB, by itself, is not a definition of "consumer grade" or "not consumer grade"
How are you defining as consumer grade? Because doing a quick newegg search, 10TB seems to be the point at which I would say drives aren't consumer-grade:
https://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100167523 4814 601192404 600376738 601322010&IsNodeId=1&bop=And&Order=PRICE&PageSize=36
None of those drives really seems particularly consumer-friendly, because they either:
* Use SAS instead of SATA
* Marketed/built for things like surveillance, NAS, or enterprise. One of the key features of enterprise hardware is 24/7 reliability.
* Are somewhat expensive for the average consumer to consider (especially once you get to 12TB)
These drives are kinda the equivalent of Xeons or Quadros - the average consumer has access to them and can use them as though they were generic consumer-grade products without noticing, but that doesn't mean they're consumer-grade.

nizzen
Senior Member



Posts: 1324
Joined: 2005-08-05

#5665230 Posted on: 05/02/2019 04:20 PM
Hgst Deskstar is consumer
Hgst Ultrastar is enteprise

3 pages 1 2 3


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021