Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
MSI Clutch GM31 Lightweight​ (+Wireless) mice review
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 processor review
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 processor review

New Downloads
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.33.138
CPU-Z download v2.04
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4090
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.1.2 (RX 7900) download
GeForce 528.24 WHQL driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.0
Download Intel network driver package 27.8
ReShade download v5.6.0
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v2.0.0 Download
HWiNFO Download v7.36


New Forum Topics
MSI Interrupt Steering Causing Input Lag Windows 10 Rumor: Further GeForce RTX 4090 Ti specs emerge 7940HS engineering sample benchmarks (true, not true?) Info Zone - gEngines, Ray Tracing, DLSS, DLAA, TSR, FSR, XeSS, DLDSR etc. NVIDIA GeForce 528.24 WHQL driver download & Discussion Windows power plan settings explorer utility The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics performance benchmark analysis Nvidia Set to Unveil RTX 4060 and 4050 GPUs Ahead of Schedule? Resolution/DSR/DLDSR help Corsair Launches Innovative New RMx SHIFT ATX 3.0 PSUs




Guru3D.com » News » Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for 2017 - HGST HDDs Very Reliable

Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for 2017 - HGST HDDs Very Reliable

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 02/02/2018 10:13 AM | source: | 35 comment(s)
Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for 2017 - HGST HDDs Very Reliable

Backblaze has recorded and saved daily hard drive statistics from the drives in their data centers and released the statistics for the year 2017. At the end of 2017 they had 93,240 spinning hard drives. Of that number, there were 1,935 boot drives and 91,305 data drives

Below are the lifetime hard drive failure statistics for the hard drive models that were operational at the end of Q4 2017. As with the quarterly results above, Backblaze have removed any non-production drives and any models that had fewer than 45 drives. First the Q4 results:

 

 

The disks of with a large number in use and that have dropout a percentages above two percent, are the Seagate ST12000NM0007 with a failure rate of 2.01 percent, the Western Digital WD60EFRX, with a failure rate of 3.66 percent and the Seagate ST4000DM000, with a failure rate of 2.89 percent.

The failure rate for each year is calculated for just that year. In looking at the results the following observations can be made:

  • The failure rates for both of the 6 TB models, Seagate and WDC, have decreased over the years while the number of drives has stayed fairly consistent from year to year.
  • While it looks like the failure rates for the 3 TB WDC drives have also decreased, you’ll notice that we migrated out nearly 1,000 of these WDC drives in 2017. While the remaining 180 WDC 3 TB drives are performing very well, decreasing the data set that dramatically makes trend analysis suspect.
  • The Toshiba 5 TB model and the HGST 8 TB model had zero failures over the last year. That’s impressive, but with only 45 drives in use for each model, not statistically useful.
  • The HGST/Hitachi 4 TB models delivered sub 1.0% failure rates for each of the three years. Amazing.

A Few More Numbers

To save you countless hours of looking, we’ve culled through the data to uncover the following tidbits regarding our ever changing hard drive farm.

  • 116,833 — The number of hard drives for which we have data from April 2013 through the end of December 2017. Currently there are 91,305 drives (data drives) in operation. This means 25,528 drives have either failed or been removed from service due for some other reason — typically migration.
  • 29,844 — The number of hard drives that were installed in 2017. This includes new drives, migrations, and failure replacements.
  • 81.76 — The number of hard drives that were installed each day in 2017. This includes new drives, migrations, and failure replacements.
  • 95,638 — The number of drives installed since we started keeping records in April 2013 through the end of December 2017.
  • 55.41 — The average number of hard drives installed per day from April 2013 to the end of December 2017. The installations can be new drives, migration replacements, or failure replacements.
  • 1,508 — The number of hard drives that were replaced as failed in 2017.
  • 4.13 — The average number of hard drives that have failed each day in 2017.
  • 6,795 — The number of hard drives that have failed from April 2013 until the end of December 2017.
  • 3.94 — The average number of hard drives that have failed each day from April 2013 until the end of December 2017.


Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for 2017 - HGST HDDs Very Reliable Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for 2017 - HGST HDDs Very Reliable Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for 2017 - HGST HDDs Very Reliable




« Download: AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 18.2.1 Drivers WHQL · Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for 2017 - HGST HDDs Very Reliable · Red Dead Redemption 2 Delayed to October 26th, 2018 »

Related Stories

Backblaze on HAMR HDD Technology - 12/18/2017 10:07 AM
In Q4 Backblaze deployed 100 petabytes worth of Seagate hard drives to their data centers. The newly deployed Seagate 10 and 12 TB drives are doing well and will help with higher capacities...

Backblaze reports Q3 2017 HDD Failure results - includes 12 TB Drives as well - 11/01/2017 09:36 AM
Online and cloud service provider Backblaze released a new listing of HDD failure rates for Q3 2017. At the end of this quarter, they had 86,529 spinning hard drives. Q3 statistics that include our fi...

Backblaze report: 8-terabyte HDDs lasting a long time - HGST Most Reliable - 02/01/2017 10:02 AM
Online and cloud service provider Backblaze released a new listing of HDD failure rates for Q4 2017. At the end of 2016 they had 73,653 spinning hard drives. Of that number, there were 1,553 boot d...


7 pages « < 4 5 6 7


Neo Cyrus
Senior Member



Posts: 10390
Joined: 2006-02-14

#5516902 Posted on: 02/03/2018 08:09 PM
Looks like I dodged a bullet with the later 4TB Seagate drives... or maybe not. I got a 4TB SkyHawk, but that's not their bottom of the barrel one. I look forward to the day where everything is solid state or something else which is more reliable.

anticupidon
Senior Member



Posts: 7058
Joined: 2008-03-06

#5517042 Posted on: 02/04/2018 11:31 AM
When we will get the same chart, but with SSDs?

rl66
Senior Member



Posts: 3558
Joined: 2007-05-31

#5517060 Posted on: 02/04/2018 12:45 PM
Backblaze has ballz with tens of thousands of seagates in their data centers.

I was thinking like you until they goes Seagate for the server at work...
They are noisy with strange "tzzzzzt" sometime but more or less the same reliability than previous WD.

Hopefully they rise up the quality at each gen.

rl66
Senior Member



Posts: 3558
Joined: 2007-05-31

#5517062 Posted on: 02/04/2018 12:52 PM
When we will get the same chart, but with SSDs?

SSD are still lot less reliable than HDD, at home i am at my 3rd one (1 corsair and 2 samsung pro) while the HDD it's at 1/4 of it's expected life.

but one day it will happen, little by little SSD get Gig each year and get more secure even without raid.

b101uk
Senior Member



Posts: 222
Joined: 2003-10-29

#5517145 Posted on: 02/04/2018 07:10 PM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deskstar

http://goughlui.com/2013/03/01/hard-drive-disassembly-the-ibm-deathstar/

https://www.pcworld.com/article/125772/worst-products-ever.html?page=5

Ironic, no? lol "The line was continued by Hitachi when in 2003 it bought IBM's hard disk drive division and renamed it Hitachi Global Storage Technologies. In 2012 Hitachi sold the division to Western Digital who rebranded it as HGST."



Contrary to popular belief caused by sensationalist reporting and basic exaggeration, most IBM deskstars and ultrastars were extremely reliable, far more reliable than the crap many manufactures were putting out at the time.


e.g. I have old IBM IDE deskstars still in service, much like I have early Hitachi deskstars and ultrastar still in service, and granted they may now be secondary PC but up to March 2017 the IBM IDE deskstars were in my main PC and gave >16 years of faultless service.

7 pages « < 4 5 6 7


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023