MSI Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming Z review
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5600 XT OC review
ASUS STRIX Radeon RX 5600 XT TOP review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming OC review
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 liquid cooler review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro licenses for under 10 USD
Team Group MP33 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
ADATA SE800 1TB Portable SSD review
Promo: Microsoft Office 2016 for $29.82
Corsair H100i RGB Pro XT liquid cooler review
ASUS teases Pascal mobile with a 3DMark 11 score
And that score is mighty good, maybe even too good for a single GPU ? On the ROG website they posted an entry called 'The Future of Gaming Laptops - A glimps'. Now nothing is confirmed, but that has to be Mobile Pascal.
And likely in some sort of SLI setup, or perhaps even external liquid cooled in the G series Notebooks? Anyhow they are showinng a score from 3DMark 11, topping even a Titan X and Radeon R9 295x2. Could there be a mobile GP104 based GPU after all in June/July ?
--
ROG is making such a leap as we speak, R&D has agreed to let us peek inside the secret labs to see what the future holds. Of the small bits of info we are allowed to disclose, we are already excited! What we can say is that one of the highlights from the lab is an overclockable gaming laptop that will rival even gaming desktops. We were told it is a concept machine and thus they are still in the process of making it even more powerful. The exclusive info about to be revealed is without overclocking but is already faster than any laptop on the planet (not including alternate futures or dimensions). Without overclocking this beast can score almost 21K (Performance) in 3DMark11, edging out even the mighty GTX Titan X in this benchmark!
nfortunately we are not allowed to reveal the specs, but we know you are very resourceful and capable of making good educated guesses! Overclocked performance on the latest benchmarks and specs will all come in due time. We will keep you updated, so stay tuned!
Here's something else to get you excited. COMPUTEX 2016 is coming up soon, you won't want to miss it!
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5276662 Posted on: 05/20/2016 05:06 PM
That graph axis. The marketing is so strong.
Honestly not that unbelievable. They managed to shove a full GTX980 into a laptop. A 1070 is supposedly faster then a Titan X and will probably come in at 145-150w, 15-20w lower then a 980. So if they shove that into a laptop, boom done.
All you need to do after that is make some graphs where bars are twice as long as others despite being less then a few % apart and you become ASUS.
We've been discussing this over on NotebookReview forums and we've come to the conclusion it's a GTX 1080 in there. The Graphics Score of 34000 suggests that it's the GTX 1080 (seems like it could even be a smidgeon faster than the GPU scores I've seen for the 1080 too, which is weird). That whole rubbish with that messed up graph cutting off the X-axis and also showing the P Score just confuses matters tremendously, I do hate it when reviews do both of those things - it's nonsense! That's why you think it's the 1070, I mistakenly thought the same thing at first.
That graph axis. The marketing is so strong.
Honestly not that unbelievable. They managed to shove a full GTX980 into a laptop. A 1070 is supposedly faster then a Titan X and will probably come in at 145-150w, 15-20w lower then a 980. So if they shove that into a laptop, boom done.
All you need to do after that is make some graphs where bars are twice as long as others despite being less then a few % apart and you become ASUS.
We've been discussing this over on NotebookReview forums and we've come to the conclusion it's a GTX 1080 in there. The Graphics Score of 34000 suggests that it's the GTX 1080 (seems like it could even be a smidgeon faster than the GPU scores I've seen for the 1080 too, which is weird). That whole rubbish with that messed up graph cutting off the X-axis and also showing the P Score just confuses matters tremendously, I do hate it when reviews do both of those things - it's nonsense! That's why you think it's the 1070, I mistakenly thought the same thing at first.
Phyxsyus
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: 2015-05-22
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: 2015-05-22
#5276667 Posted on: 05/20/2016 05:17 PM
Honestly I have no idead how you jumped to the conclusion that this is a pascal 11 GPU. Everything points to a GTX 1080m. I feel lost...
Honestly I have no idead how you jumped to the conclusion that this is a pascal 11 GPU. Everything points to a GTX 1080m. I feel lost...
MainFrame Alpha
Senior Member
Posts: 139
Joined: 2016-05-17
Senior Member
Posts: 139
Joined: 2016-05-17
#5276670 Posted on: 05/20/2016 05:24 PM
on the ROG page they mention new strix series Gaming line-up and a laptop under the name ROG Strix GL502.
check the PR all specs there except the GPU.
maybe this is it?
despite what you think about asus, if the benchmark is true and its actually got pascal in it is think its darn impressive.
maybe not the GL502VT it got the GTX 970M.
on the ROG page they mention new strix series Gaming line-up and a laptop under the name ROG Strix GL502.
check the PR all specs there except the GPU.
maybe this is it?
despite what you think about asus, if the benchmark is true and its actually got pascal in it is think its darn impressive.
maybe not the GL502VT it got the GTX 970M.
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5276671 Posted on: 05/20/2016 05:24 PM
"Pascal 11 GPU" you say, you're getting confused with Polaris 11? The 3DMark11 GPU score of 34000 is massive, the P score is a lot lower due to the laptop CPU - that's why the P-Score is only on the same level as that of the Titan X example in the graph, the desktop CPU is more powerful. They're a really confusing set of graphs that Asus have chosen, so it's confusing everyone. The Graphics score of 34000 as seen in the 3DMark11 screenshot is above or equal to that of the GTX 1080 - it's a GTX 1080 in that laptop, not a 1080M at any rate.
(Here's a link to a review of the GTX 1080 where you can see the Graphics Score in 3DMark11, it got 29418 points, whereas the Asus laptop got 34000, so it's at least a GTX 1080 in that laptop: http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/zardon/nvidia-gtx-1080-graphics-card-review/6/)
EDIT: or it could just be GTX 980 in sli in a laptop - but that would be VERY boring! (as it's been done before already & is not news).
Honestly I have no idead how you jumped to the conclusion that this is a pascal 11 GPU. Everything points to a GTX 1080m. I feel lost...
"Pascal 11 GPU" you say, you're getting confused with Polaris 11? The 3DMark11 GPU score of 34000 is massive, the P score is a lot lower due to the laptop CPU - that's why the P-Score is only on the same level as that of the Titan X example in the graph, the desktop CPU is more powerful. They're a really confusing set of graphs that Asus have chosen, so it's confusing everyone. The Graphics score of 34000 as seen in the 3DMark11 screenshot is above or equal to that of the GTX 1080 - it's a GTX 1080 in that laptop, not a 1080M at any rate.
(Here's a link to a review of the GTX 1080 where you can see the Graphics Score in 3DMark11, it got 29418 points, whereas the Asus laptop got 34000, so it's at least a GTX 1080 in that laptop: http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/zardon/nvidia-gtx-1080-graphics-card-review/6/)
EDIT: or it could just be GTX 980 in sli in a laptop - but that would be VERY boring! (as it's been done before already & is not news).
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1749
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1749
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5276712 Posted on: 05/20/2016 07:04 PM
Mobile, huh? It might even run long enough to get a 3DMark score before depleting the battery if you unplug it from the wall.
Mobile, huh? It might even run long enough to get a 3DMark score before depleting the battery if you unplug it from the wall.
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5276715 Posted on: 05/20/2016 07:09 PM
Haha, don't ever unplug it, not if you want the card to run at full clocks! Mobile gaming is more like static gaming in various places - AC required!
Mobile, huh? It might even run long enough to get a 3DMark score before depleting the battery if you unplug it from the wall.
Haha, don't ever unplug it, not if you want the card to run at full clocks! Mobile gaming is more like static gaming in various places - AC required!
sdamaged99
Senior Member
Posts: 2028
Joined: 2006-12-12
Senior Member
Posts: 2028
Joined: 2006-12-12
#5276723 Posted on: 05/20/2016 07:39 PM
That is not SLI, will be a single GPU
Definitely expect a mobile GPU as fast as a Titan-X
That is not SLI, will be a single GPU
Definitely expect a mobile GPU as fast as a Titan-X
Singleton99
Senior Member
Posts: 1027
Joined: 2012-04-18
Senior Member
Posts: 1027
Joined: 2012-04-18
#5276728 Posted on: 05/20/2016 08:00 PM
I've been wanting a good gaming laptop since the very start of my gaming life, but always been put off by the in-superior performance compared to a self built gaming desktop pc ,could something like this be the one ,it's not going to be cheap that i do know.
I will just have to tell the wife and kids sorry folks,, no holiday this year dad has blown his load on a nice lappie .
I've been wanting a good gaming laptop since the very start of my gaming life, but always been put off by the in-superior performance compared to a self built gaming desktop pc ,could something like this be the one ,it's not going to be cheap that i do know.
I will just have to tell the wife and kids sorry folks,, no holiday this year dad has blown his load on a nice lappie .
Phyxsyus
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: 2015-05-22
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: 2015-05-22
#5276806 Posted on: 05/20/2016 11:11 PM
"Pascal 11 GPU" you say, you're getting confused with Polaris 11? The 3DMark11 GPU score of 34000 is massive, the P score is a lot lower due to the laptop CPU - that's why the P-Score is only on the same level as that of the Titan X example in the graph, the desktop CPU is more powerful. They're a really confusing set of graphs that Asus have chosen, so it's confusing everyone. The Graphics score of 34000 as seen in the 3DMark11 screenshot is above or equal to that of the GTX 1080 - it's a GTX 1080 in that laptop, not a 1080M at any rate.
(Here's a link to a review of the GTX 1080 where you can see the Graphics Score in 3DMark11, it got 29418 points, whereas the Asus laptop got 34000, so it's at least a GTX 1080 in that laptop: http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/zardon/nvidia-gtx-1080-graphics-card-review/6/)
EDIT: or it could just be GTX 980 in sli in a laptop - but that would be VERY boring! (as it's been done before already & is not news).
Yeah... I still have no ideia how they jumped to a conclusion that it's pascal if even in the graph shows "GXXX" hinting a GTX... This article is pretty confusing to me since even polaris 10 is not supposed to trade jebs with high end nVidia cards but with mid range... Just wishfull thinking from the article writer I gues...
"Pascal 11 GPU" you say, you're getting confused with Polaris 11? The 3DMark11 GPU score of 34000 is massive, the P score is a lot lower due to the laptop CPU - that's why the P-Score is only on the same level as that of the Titan X example in the graph, the desktop CPU is more powerful. They're a really confusing set of graphs that Asus have chosen, so it's confusing everyone. The Graphics score of 34000 as seen in the 3DMark11 screenshot is above or equal to that of the GTX 1080 - it's a GTX 1080 in that laptop, not a 1080M at any rate.
(Here's a link to a review of the GTX 1080 where you can see the Graphics Score in 3DMark11, it got 29418 points, whereas the Asus laptop got 34000, so it's at least a GTX 1080 in that laptop: http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/zardon/nvidia-gtx-1080-graphics-card-review/6/)
EDIT: or it could just be GTX 980 in sli in a laptop - but that would be VERY boring! (as it's been done before already & is not news).
Yeah... I still have no ideia how they jumped to a conclusion that it's pascal if even in the graph shows "GXXX" hinting a GTX... This article is pretty confusing to me since even polaris 10 is not supposed to trade jebs with high end nVidia cards but with mid range... Just wishfull thinking from the article writer I gues...
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12491
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12491
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5276809 Posted on: 05/20/2016 11:35 PM
Huh? Pascal is GTX. Polaris is AMD. Pascal is Nvidia.
Yeah... I still have no ideia how they jumped to a conclusion that it's pascal if even in the graph shows "GXXX" hinting a GTX... This article is pretty confusing to me since even polaris 10 is not supposed to trade jebs with high end nVidia cards but with mid range... Just wishfull thinking from the article writer I gues...
Huh? Pascal is GTX. Polaris is AMD. Pascal is Nvidia.
Phyxsyus
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: 2015-05-22
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: 2015-05-22
#5276847 Posted on: 05/21/2016 02:01 AM
Sorry for the confusion, what I meant was...
It's really improbable that the GPU listed by asus is a polaris GPU... Most likely a 1080 or 1080m, I don't think we'll be seeing that kind of performance from AMD until the Vega launch.
Huh? Pascal is GTX. Polaris is AMD. Pascal is Nvidia.
Sorry for the confusion, what I meant was...
It's really improbable that the GPU listed by asus is a polaris GPU... Most likely a 1080 or 1080m, I don't think we'll be seeing that kind of performance from AMD until the Vega launch.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12491
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12491
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5276850 Posted on: 05/21/2016 02:15 AM
Sorry for the confusion, what I meant was...
It's really improbable that the GPU listed by asus is a polaris GPU... Most likely a 1080 or 1080m, I don't think we'll be seeing that kind of performance from AMD until the Vega launch.
? No one in the thread said it was Polaris. Nothing in the article said it was Polaris. You are the only person saying it's Polaris lol
Sorry for the confusion, what I meant was...
It's really improbable that the GPU listed by asus is a polaris GPU... Most likely a 1080 or 1080m, I don't think we'll be seeing that kind of performance from AMD until the Vega launch.
? No one in the thread said it was Polaris. Nothing in the article said it was Polaris. You are the only person saying it's Polaris lol
Phyxsyus
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: 2015-05-22
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: 2015-05-22
#5276851 Posted on: 05/21/2016 02:22 AM
Damn... I just realized that, my eyes fooled me. I'm not even high or drunk... Must be tired... LOL
Sry about that!
? No one in the thread said it was Polaris. Nothing in the article said it was Polaris. You are the only person saying it's Polaris lol
Damn... I just realized that, my eyes fooled me. I'm not even high or drunk... Must be tired... LOL
Sry about that!
Stormyandcold
Senior Member
Posts: 5265
Joined: 2003-09-15
Senior Member
Posts: 5265
Joined: 2003-09-15
#5276872 Posted on: 05/21/2016 04:02 AM
It's cool n all, but, this is probably new mxm slot only so us old mxm users are out.
I love laptop gaming, but, it's just too expensive for high-end atm. I'm going back to desktop.
It's cool n all, but, this is probably new mxm slot only so us old mxm users are out.
I love laptop gaming, but, it's just too expensive for high-end atm. I'm going back to desktop.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 12491
Joined: 2004-05-16
That graph axis. The marketing is so strong.
Honestly not that unbelievable. They managed to shove a full GTX980 into a laptop. A 1070 is supposedly faster then a Titan X and will probably come in at 145-150w, 15-20w lower then a 980. So if they shove that into a laptop, boom done.
All you need to do after that is make some graphs where bars are twice as long as others despite being less then a few % apart and you become ASUS.