Asus ROG Strix XG27UQ review
be quiet! Pure Rock 2 review
Fractal Design Define 7 Compact review
Lian Li Galahad 360 liquid cooler review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - July 2020
Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 3600 MHz (64GB) review
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited)
Kioxia Exceria 960 GB SATA3 SSD review
HP Portable P500 1TB Portable USB3 SSD review
EK-Quantum Magnitude WaterBlock Review
ASUS ROG Strix XG248Q Adaptive Sync 240 Hz Monitor
ASUS announced ROG Strix XG248Q, a high-speed gaming monitor with a panel diagonal of 23.8 inches. The display has a blazingly fast refresh rate of 240Hz combined with a response speed of 1ms.
The monitor has a 1ms anti-glare 1920x1080 TN LCD panel with a rated luminance of 400 cd/m2 and a contrast ratio of 1,000:1, viewing angles are rated at horizontal 170 ° / vertical 160 °, display color 16.7 million colors. Interface is HDMI 2.0 x 2, DisplayPort x 1, HDMI 1.4 x 1, 3.5 mm stereo mini jack x 1, USB 3.0 x 2.
- 23.8-inch Full HD gaming monitor with a 240Hz native refresh rate for fluid gameplays
- Ultra-fast 1ms response time and Adaptive-Sync(FreeSync™) to eliminate motion blur and tearing for super-smooth gameplay
- ROG Strix XG Series gaming monitors feature ASUS Aura Sync lighting on the back and a customizable light signature projection for gaming-inspired aesthetics
- VESA wall-mountable to save on desktop space plus ergonomically-designed stands with full tilt, swivel, pivot, and height adjustment
- Panel Size: Wide Screen 23.8"(60.5cm) 16:9
- Panel Backlight / Type : TN
- True Resolution : 1920x1080 *
- Display Viewing Area(HxV) : 543.7 x 302.6 mm
- Display Surface Non-glare
- Pixel Pitch : 0.2745 mm
- Brightness(Max) : 400 cd/㎡
- Contrast Ratio (Max) : 1000:1
- Viewing Angle (CR≧10) : 170°(H)/160°(V)
- Response Time : 1ms (Gray to Gray)
- Display Colors : 16.7M
- Flicker free
- Refresh Rate(max) : 240Hz
While FreeSync isn't mentioned on the box, the monitor does support VESA Adaptive Sync technology. On the back of the LCD ASUS embedded some RGB LED functionality compatible with ASUS "Aura Sync". Also on the 'bottom' of the stand is a signature function that can project "ROG" logo and customized logo.
Review: ASUS ROG Strix X470-F Gaming - 05/10/2018 01:17 PM
We review the ROG Strix X470-F Gaming, optimized for Ryzen 2000 / Zen+ on a motherboard with an ATX form factor. Alongside the release of Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X processors, AMD prepped the X4...
Review: ASUS ROG Strix X470-I Gaming (Mini-ITX) - Small is the new Sexy - 05/08/2018 08:33 AM
ASUS is back, at 17cm for this round, yes we review the all new ROG Strix X470-I Gaming, optimized for Ryzen 2000 / Zen+ on a motherboard that is 17x17cm. It has everything you want, including a ful...
EK releases X470 series monoblock for ASUS ROG STRIX X470-F - 04/23/2018 09:46 PM
EKis releasing its first X470 series monoblock that is tailor-made for the ASUS ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING motherboard. The EK-FB ASUS Strix X470 RGB Monoblock has an integrated 4-pin RGB LED strip which...
Review: ASUS ROG Crosshair VII HERO (Wifi) - A Proper Mobo For 2nd Gen Ryzen - 04/20/2018 08:03 PM
ASUS is ready for Ryzen 2000 / Zen+, this round they've released their ROG Crosshair VII HERO (Wifi), which we just have to review. Alongside the release of Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X processors...
Review: ASUS ROG STRIX B360-F Gaming - 04/10/2018 07:02 AM
We tested the H370, now we look at the nearly identical B360 model of the ASUS ROG STRIX B360-F Gaming. We'll again pair it with a six-core Core i7 8700K processor. Yes, this is the Coffee Lake platf...
FrostNixon
Senior Member
Posts: 225
Joined: 2016-04-15
Senior Member
Posts: 225
Joined: 2016-04-15
#5551978 Posted on: 05/31/2018 01:11 PM
That's true, however what makes it really pointless is that AOC and Dell already offer the exact same thing, however I am sure once Asus release it, it will be more expensive than the aoc and dell we've already had for the past half a year.
Pointless unless you have eyes like a fighter pilot
That's true, however what makes it really pointless is that AOC and Dell already offer the exact same thing, however I am sure once Asus release it, it will be more expensive than the aoc and dell we've already had for the past half a year.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 10502
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 10502
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5551984 Posted on: 05/31/2018 01:29 PM
You see difference between 144 and 240Hz even on desktop. It is same as 60~90Hz difference.
Many people claim that there is no difference. That's till they use higher refresh for some time and then go accidentally back to lower refresh rate settings.
Pointless unless you have eyes like a fighter pilot
You see difference between 144 and 240Hz even on desktop. It is same as 60~90Hz difference.
Many people claim that there is no difference. That's till they use higher refresh for some time and then go accidentally back to lower refresh rate settings.
anub1s18
Senior Member
Posts: 107
Joined: 2009-03-21
Senior Member
Posts: 107
Joined: 2009-03-21
#5552013 Posted on: 05/31/2018 02:54 PM
You see difference between 144 and 240Hz even on desktop. It is same as 60~90Hz difference.
Many people claim that there is no difference. That's till they use higher refresh for some time and then go accidentally back to lower refresh rate settings.
ow i'm sure you can see/notice it but paying for the hardware to run games on 144/240 with high/ultra settings is the reason i'm still rocking a old 60HZ monitor. pretty much a competative monitor, if your not making your money through it you better be very fanatic about css/CS:go cause thatss about the only thing that'll comfortably crunch out 240fps wile not looking like dirt.
You see difference between 144 and 240Hz even on desktop. It is same as 60~90Hz difference.
Many people claim that there is no difference. That's till they use higher refresh for some time and then go accidentally back to lower refresh rate settings.
ow i'm sure you can see/notice it but paying for the hardware to run games on 144/240 with high/ultra settings is the reason i'm still rocking a old 60HZ monitor. pretty much a competative monitor, if your not making your money through it you better be very fanatic about css/CS:go cause thatss about the only thing that'll comfortably crunch out 240fps wile not looking like dirt.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 10502
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 10502
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5552063 Posted on: 05/31/2018 05:49 PM
Ultra settings are mostly for fools today. Often you have hard time finding difference of each settings moved from High to Ultra even on screenshot. But drop in fps is noticeable.
In those heavier games, I go setting by setting and note impact on fps of each step.
Then I set step down all big offenders which make almost no visual difference and test one by one again to see if some of options did not become easier on GPU as result of change of other option.
ow i'm sure you can see/notice it but paying for the hardware to run games on 144/240 with high/ultra settings is the reason i'm still rocking a old 60HZ monitor. pretty much a competative monitor, if your not making your money through it you better be very fanatic about css/CS:go cause thatss about the only thing that'll comfortably crunch out 240fps wile not looking like dirt.
Ultra settings are mostly for fools today. Often you have hard time finding difference of each settings moved from High to Ultra even on screenshot. But drop in fps is noticeable.
In those heavier games, I go setting by setting and note impact on fps of each step.
Then I set step down all big offenders which make almost no visual difference and test one by one again to see if some of options did not become easier on GPU as result of change of other option.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 171
Joined: 2017-03-17
Pointless unless you have eyes like a fighter pilot