PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon review
GALAX HOF Pro PCIe 4.0 NVMe review
How to: Firmware Update the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSI Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming Z review
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5600 XT OC review
ASUS STRIX Radeon RX 5600 XT TOP review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming OC review
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 liquid cooler review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro licenses for under 10 USD
Team Group MP33 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
ASUS Offers ROG Strix XG32VQ 32-Inch WQHD Curved Gaming Monitor
ASUS unleashed its 32-inch WQHD curved gaming monitor tagged ROG Strix XG32VQ. The Adaptive-Sync (FreeSync) ready display has been fitted with a 32-inch VA LED-backlight monitor (1800R Curvature) and has a native resolution of 2560x1440 pixels at a 144Hz refresh rate.
The monitor has a 3000:1 contrast ratio, 300 cd/m2 brightness, 4ms (GTG) response time and 178/178 degree viewing angles. Featuring ASUS Aura Sync lighting on the back and a customizable light signature projection for gaming-inspired aesthetics, the ROG Strix XG32VQ comes with 2x USB 3.0 ports, 1x HDMI 2.0 port, 1x mini DisplayPort and 1x DisplayPort 1.2 input ports. Unfortunately, there’s no word on pricing yet.
- 32 inch 1800R curved gaming monitor with ultra-fast 144Hz refresh rate designed for professional gamers and immersive gameplay
- 125% sRGB color space gamut for a wider range of lifelike, vibrant colors and Adaptive-Sync (FreeSync) technology for no-tearing visuals
- ROG Strix XG Series gaming monitors feature ASUS Aura Sync lighting on the back and a customizable light signature projection for gaming-inspired aesthetics
- Features an ergonomically designed stand to offer extensive swivel, tilt, and height adjustment
Gaming-inspired aesthetics
Integrated ASUS Aura Sync lighting technology simplifies the process of connecting ROG Strix XG32VQ or XG35VQ to other Aura-enabled components and peripherals, and also makes it easier to synchronize the lights with music or game sound effects. Synchronization is now easily achieved by installing the Aura Sync software on a laptop or desktop.
Additionally, the exclusive Light Signature projection kit allows for the creation and customization of light-projection effects. It includes two ROG logo covers and one blank cover for creating customized light projections that show each gamer’s unique style.
Seamless gameplay
ROG Strix XG35VQ has a 100Hz refresh rate to give the player the upper hand in first-person-shooters, racers, real-time strategy, role-playing and sports titles. And for fast-paced games played at the highest visual settings, ROG Strix XG32VQ has an astounding 144Hz refresh rate, ensuring that everything looks buttery smooth and completely lag-free.
Both models feature Adaptive-Sync (FreeSync™) technology that minimizes screen tearing, choppy frame rates, display stutter and input lag. Additionally, ROG Strix XG35VQ features exclusive ASUS Extreme Low Motion Blur technology makes objects in motion look sharper, delivering more fluid and responsive gameplay.
Gamer-centric enhancements
ROG Strix XG32VQ and XG35VQ feature ASUS-exclusive game-enhancing features developed with input from professional gamers. The GamePlus hotkey provides instant access to different crosshair options, an onscreen timer, a frames-per-second counter, and a display alignment feature. GameVisual provides up to seven preset display modes to optimize visuals for different types of games. The DisplayWidget utility software lets users easily and quickly tweak settings or configure ASUS GameVisual, App Sync™ and blue light filters.
The price is £549, 629 Euro and 599 USD.
ASUS Offers MicroATX TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING - 08/31/2017 08:00 AM
In a nice compact form factor, ASUS has added the TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING motherboard for the AMD Ryzen series processors. The TUF motherboard is based on the AMD B350 chipset for Socket AM4....
ASUS Offers 1734 Mbps Router With M2 SSD Functionality - 08/11/2017 07:31 AM
ASUS recently released a new wireless LAN router called BRT-AC828, the AC (IEEE 802.11ac compatible) router can be fitted with M2 SSD storage units after which you get some NAS functionality as well....
ASUS Offers 3GB GeForce GTX 1060 Phoenix Mini-ITX - 07/27/2017 07:34 AM
ASUS has added their PH-GTX1060-3G, a 3GB GeForce GTX 1060 that fits a Mini-ITX form factor. The card is 18.3 cm in length and can be used in very compact builds....
ASUS Offers 27-Inch VG275Q Full HD Gaming Monitor - 05/15/2017 07:00 AM
ASUS added their latest 27-inch Full HD gaming monitor, the VG275Q. Utilizing the AMD FreeSync technology to eliminate screen tearing and choppy frame rates, this new 27-inch TN LED-backlight gaming m...
ASUS officially introduces its GeForce GTX 1080 Ti - 03/17/2017 08:48 PM
ASUS Republic of Gamers (ROG) today officially announced its Strix GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. Powered by the latest NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti graphics processing unit (GPU) the ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 T...
Prometheus336
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: 2015-07-29
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: 2015-07-29
#5493954 Posted on: 11/20/2017 09:41 AM
Completely agree, I would have bought it for Christmas XD
Would be great if there will be G-sync variants.
Completely agree, I would have bought it for Christmas XD
Solfaur
Senior Member
Posts: 7210
Joined: 2005-08-10
Senior Member
Posts: 7210
Joined: 2005-08-10
#5494098 Posted on: 11/20/2017 05:10 PM
I'm not a fan at all of curved displays with 16:9 aspect ratio... also, the size is a bit too big too for that resolution. 1440p is best at 27", or maybe 30 (though I believe only 1600p displays came with this size).
I'm not a fan at all of curved displays with 16:9 aspect ratio... also, the size is a bit too big too for that resolution. 1440p is best at 27", or maybe 30 (though I believe only 1600p displays came with this size).
Abc666
Member
Posts: 91
Joined: 2007-05-28
Member
Posts: 91
Joined: 2007-05-28
#5494122 Posted on: 11/20/2017 06:30 PM
Na, Gsync isnt needed at 144hz or above. I've had gsync on my previous display, now i have 144hz freesync with a gtx1070, i see no difference in tearing at all, as in i dont see the tearing at 144hz. The bonus of not having Gsync, less cost, better image quality on desktop(no scanlines) and no weird blinking of buttons and stuff in games.
If you ask me, gsync is obsolete, unless you use displays at 100hz or below i dont see the idea of sync tech like freesync or gsync.
At 144 and above, no sync tech please.
Would be great if there will be G-sync variants.
Na, Gsync isnt needed at 144hz or above. I've had gsync on my previous display, now i have 144hz freesync with a gtx1070, i see no difference in tearing at all, as in i dont see the tearing at 144hz. The bonus of not having Gsync, less cost, better image quality on desktop(no scanlines) and no weird blinking of buttons and stuff in games.
If you ask me, gsync is obsolete, unless you use displays at 100hz or below i dont see the idea of sync tech like freesync or gsync.
At 144 and above, no sync tech please.
ChisChas
Member
Posts: 94
Joined: 2013-08-27
Member
Posts: 94
Joined: 2013-08-27
#5494151 Posted on: 11/20/2017 08:15 PM
My Dell U2711 is 2560 x 1440 60Hz and 7 years old. Dell also sold a U3011 which was the 30" version which was 2560 x 1600. I'm not seeing any exciting progress with the NVidia card & monitor scenario.
I'm not a fan at all of curved displays with 16:9 aspect ratio... also, the size is a bit too big too for that resolution. 1440p is best at 27", or maybe 30 (though I believe only 1600p displays came with this size).
My Dell U2711 is 2560 x 1440 60Hz and 7 years old. Dell also sold a U3011 which was the 30" version which was 2560 x 1600. I'm not seeing any exciting progress with the NVidia card & monitor scenario.
Solfaur
Senior Member
Posts: 7210
Joined: 2005-08-10
Senior Member
Posts: 7210
Joined: 2005-08-10
#5494166 Posted on: 11/20/2017 09:08 PM
I too have a U2711 for the same time as you and was thinking precisely about the U3011
... fantastic IPS (not the backlight bleeding messes that are out nowadays), it just sucks that it doesn't have higher refresh, that is pretty much the only reason why I want to upgrade.
My Dell U2711 is 2560 x 1440 60Hz and 7 years old. Dell also sold a U3011 which was the 30" version which was 2560 x 1600. I'm not seeing any exciting progress with the NVidia card & monitor scenario.
I too have a U2711 for the same time as you and was thinking precisely about the U3011
... fantastic IPS (not the backlight bleeding messes that are out nowadays), it just sucks that it doesn't have higher refresh, that is pretty much the only reason why I want to upgrade.
xrodney
Senior Member
Posts: 329
Joined: 2015-06-18
Senior Member
Posts: 329
Joined: 2015-06-18
#5494175 Posted on: 11/20/2017 09:39 PM
My Dell U2711 is 2560 x 1440 60Hz and 7 years old. Dell also sold a U3011 which was the 30" version which was 2560 x 1600. I'm not seeing any exciting progress with the NVidia card & monitor scenario.
I was using DELL UWP3008 10 years ago,so I fully agree with you that we are lacking progress in monitor development.
Na, Gsync isnt needed at 144hz or above. I've had gsync on my previous display, now i have 144hz freesync with a gtx1070, i see no difference in tearing at all, as in i dont see the tearing at 144hz. The bonus of not having Gsync, less cost, better image quality on desktop(no scanlines) and no weird blinking of buttons and stuff in games.
If you ask me, gsync is obsolete, unless you use displays at 100hz or below i dont see the idea of sync tech like freesync or gsync.
At 144 and above, no sync tech please.
You are forgeting one very important thing, and thats freesync/gsync main advantage is for FPS bellow set monitor refresh rates. Even 1080Ti is not able handle new games at WQHD and 144 Hz.
My Dell U2711 is 2560 x 1440 60Hz and 7 years old. Dell also sold a U3011 which was the 30" version which was 2560 x 1600. I'm not seeing any exciting progress with the NVidia card & monitor scenario.
I was using DELL UWP3008 10 years ago,so I fully agree with you that we are lacking progress in monitor development.
Na, Gsync isnt needed at 144hz or above. I've had gsync on my previous display, now i have 144hz freesync with a gtx1070, i see no difference in tearing at all, as in i dont see the tearing at 144hz. The bonus of not having Gsync, less cost, better image quality on desktop(no scanlines) and no weird blinking of buttons and stuff in games.
If you ask me, gsync is obsolete, unless you use displays at 100hz or below i dont see the idea of sync tech like freesync or gsync.
At 144 and above, no sync tech please.
You are forgeting one very important thing, and thats freesync/gsync main advantage is for FPS bellow set monitor refresh rates. Even 1080Ti is not able handle new games at WQHD and 144 Hz.
Angushades
Senior Member
Posts: 210
Joined: 2007-06-11
Senior Member
Posts: 210
Joined: 2007-06-11
#5494205 Posted on: 11/20/2017 11:34 PM
Na, Gsync isnt needed at 144hz or above. I've had gsync on my previous display, now i have 144hz freesync with a gtx1070, i see no difference in tearing at all, as in i dont see the tearing at 144hz. The bonus of not having Gsync, less cost, better image quality on desktop(no scanlines) and no weird blinking of buttons and stuff in games.
If you ask me, gsync is obsolete, unless you use displays at 100hz or below i dont see the idea of sync tech like freesync or gsync.
At 144 and above, no sync tech please.
You mate are as dumb as they come. You either can't afford a g-sync lcd or need glasses.Once again you read about people that can't afford a good LCD and have no idea about what they are talking about.
Na, Gsync isnt needed at 144hz or above. I've had gsync on my previous display, now i have 144hz freesync with a gtx1070, i see no difference in tearing at all, as in i dont see the tearing at 144hz. The bonus of not having Gsync, less cost, better image quality on desktop(no scanlines) and no weird blinking of buttons and stuff in games.
If you ask me, gsync is obsolete, unless you use displays at 100hz or below i dont see the idea of sync tech like freesync or gsync.
At 144 and above, no sync tech please.
You mate are as dumb as they come. You either can't afford a g-sync lcd or need glasses.Once again you read about people that can't afford a good LCD and have no idea about what they are talking about.
Angushades
Senior Member
Posts: 210
Joined: 2007-06-11
Senior Member
Posts: 210
Joined: 2007-06-11
#5494206 Posted on: 11/20/2017 11:40 PM
I was using DELL UWP3008 10 years ago,so I fully agree with you that we are lacking progress in monitor development.
You are forgeting one very important thing, and thats freesync/gsync main advantage is for FPS bellow set monitor refresh rates. Even 1080Ti is not able handle new games at WQHD and 144 Hz.
Wrong wrong wrong . 100Hz is the minimum you should be playing at with adaptive sync , even at 144 no sync is noticeable and it shows stuttering,tearing and jitters. I'd wager that anyone who has seriously spent some time on an adaptive sync LCD will not talk so my BS as you guys have.
I was using DELL UWP3008 10 years ago,so I fully agree with you that we are lacking progress in monitor development.
You are forgeting one very important thing, and thats freesync/gsync main advantage is for FPS bellow set monitor refresh rates. Even 1080Ti is not able handle new games at WQHD and 144 Hz.
Wrong wrong wrong . 100Hz is the minimum you should be playing at with adaptive sync , even at 144 no sync is noticeable and it shows stuttering,tearing and jitters. I'd wager that anyone who has seriously spent some time on an adaptive sync LCD will not talk so my BS as you guys have.
Agonist
Senior Member
Posts: 2763
Joined: 2008-10-13
Senior Member
Posts: 2763
Joined: 2008-10-13
#5494208 Posted on: 11/20/2017 11:57 PM
Exactly. Any 16:9 monitor curved is just stupid personally.
I'm not a fan at all of curved displays with 16:9 aspect ratio... also, the size is a bit too big too for that resolution. 1440p is best at 27", or maybe 30 (though I believe only 1600p displays came with this size).
Exactly. Any 16:9 monitor curved is just stupid personally.
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11361
Joined: 2010-12-27
Senior Member
Posts: 11361
Joined: 2010-12-27
#5494209 Posted on: 11/21/2017 12:20 AM
Na, Gsync isnt needed at 144hz or above. I've had gsync on my previous display, now i have 144hz freesync with a gtx1070, i see no difference in tearing at all, as in i dont see the tearing at 144hz. The bonus of not having Gsync, less cost, better image quality on desktop(no scanlines) and no weird blinking of buttons and stuff in games.
If you ask me, gsync is obsolete, unless you use displays at 100hz or below i dont see the idea of sync tech like freesync or gsync.
At 144 and above, no sync tech please.
Just because you can't see a difference doesn't mean I can't.
You still get noticeable tearing even at 144hz.
Just as you can see tearing, you'll also see 'microstuttering'.
As for the rest of those issues you listed like better iq and weird blinking, that's a monitor specific issue with no relation to gsync
Na, Gsync isnt needed at 144hz or above. I've had gsync on my previous display, now i have 144hz freesync with a gtx1070, i see no difference in tearing at all, as in i dont see the tearing at 144hz. The bonus of not having Gsync, less cost, better image quality on desktop(no scanlines) and no weird blinking of buttons and stuff in games.
If you ask me, gsync is obsolete, unless you use displays at 100hz or below i dont see the idea of sync tech like freesync or gsync.
At 144 and above, no sync tech please.
Just because you can't see a difference doesn't mean I can't.
You still get noticeable tearing even at 144hz.
Just as you can see tearing, you'll also see 'microstuttering'.
As for the rest of those issues you listed like better iq and weird blinking, that's a monitor specific issue with no relation to gsync
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 242
Joined: 2011-02-12
Would be great if there will be G-sync variants.