Asus Announces ProArt PQ22UC 21.6in Ultra HD HDR OLED monitor
Asus just announced their ProArt PQ22UC, a 21.6" OLED monitor with a massive 3840x2160 pixels resolution, it's HDR compatible as well. The screen is intended as a portable monitor and weighs about one kilogram.
The ASUS ProArt PQ22UC takes no-compromise content editing and creating on the road with a professional-grade 4K OLED boasting HDR support. And you can leave outlets behind with the battery-powered ZenScreen Go MB16AP, which stashes in a laptop bag and hooks up to computers or phones to provide maximum versatility for anyone who travels.
Measuring an expansive 21.6”, the PQ22UC bucks the trend for portable monitors by providing a canvas that almost matches the size of a desktop monitor but is still light enough to carry between client meetings all day. Thanks to its thin-and-light OLED panel, the display weighs in at just 2.2 lbs; that’s less than our premium ZenBook 3 Deluxe ultrabook, making the PQ22UC a great alternative to a hefty portfolio filled with hard copies of your best work.
While most mobile screens focus on adding a second display for multitasking and general productivity, the ProArt ups the ante with a professional-grade package designed for photo and video editing. This display is an absolute dream for content creators. Its Ultra HD 3840×2160 resolution allows you to preview 4K video on the road without losing detail, and its 0.1-ms pixel response time maintains a sharp picture with fast-moving scenes that blur on lesser screens. The 21.6″ panel packs 204 pixels per inch, which offers plenty of detail for editing large photos that usually have to wait until you get back to the office. With true 10-bit color and 99% coverage of the DCI-P3 color space, you see a wider range of colors as you edit, with smoother gradients between hues for natural-looking images. And you can be assured the colors are accurate, because each ProArt PQ22UC is pre-calibrated to achieve ∆E < 2 for a true-to-life viewing experience.
The vast palette of vivid colors is complemented by phenomenal contrast that stretches from perfect blacks to brilliant whites. OLEDs are known for their range, and this one boasts a contrast ratio of 1,000,000:1. The dynamic range is wide enough to support the HDR10 standard, allowing you to produce and enjoy HDR content in all its glory.
The PQ22UC accepts video input over USB Type-C or micro HDMI to minimize the number of dongles you need to pack based on the device you’re bringing. The angled stand provides desktop ergonomics wherever you set up shop, but it detaches and twists flat to easily slip into the included carrying case along with the display and power adapter.
The ZenScreen Go MB16AP is untethered and Android-ready
The smaller 15.6” ZenScreen Go is a Full HD display that runs on battery power, so you don’t spend your time on the road looking for outlets. It’s capable of connecting to either your laptop or your phone, which means it can do double duty for work and play while you’re traveling. Getting up and running is easy regardless of what device you’re hooking up: just connect via the USB Type-C port on the side, and you’re all set.
At just 1.9 lbs, this slim slate is supremely portable, slipping into your bag next to your laptop without adding much in the way of bulk or weight. Narrow bezels not only reduce overall footprint, but also give the illusion of a larger screen. The wide viewing angles of the IPS-type panel ensure colors stay vivid and bright whether you’re watching a videos side-by-side with a friend or presenting slides to a larger group. Audiences can comfortably watch the screen for hours thanks to ASUS Eye Care Technology, which uses a flicker-free backlight and adjustable blue light filter to make long days and late nights easier on your eyes.
With a 7,800mAh battery onboard, the ZenScreen Go lasts up to four hours on a single charge. There’s enough juice to get through a series of meetings without plugging in. Support for reverse charging means it can also top up your phone and other mobile devices in a pinch. If you don’t want to run down the battery, the screen can be powered by the same Type-C connection supplying the video feed, keeping your desk free of unnecessary clutter. It also works with Type-A USB 3.0 ports, extending compatibility to most modern laptops.
The integrated battery is the primary difference between the new MB16AP and our existing ZenScreen MB16AC, which relies exclusively on USB power. Both come with the same smart cover that doubles as a stand; it folds back to prop up the display in either landscape or portrait modes. If you prefer to go case-free, a neat little cutout in the frame allows you to use a pen or pencil to prop up the screen.
ASUS Announces XG Station Pro External GPU enclosure - 01/04/2018 04:00 PM
ASUS just announced their XG Station Pro, an external GPU enclosure based on Thunderbolt 3 port with 40Gbps bandwidth. The unit is based on a a stylish aluminum jacket and is feeding your external gr...
ASUS Announces AiMesh Whole-Home Wi-Fi for ASUS Routers - 01/04/2018 11:14 AM
ASUS today announced AiMesh, an innovative feature upgrade for ASUS routers that allows users to easily create a flexible and powerful whole-home Wi-Fi system using any compatible ASUS models....
ASUS Announces WS X299 Series workstation-class motherboards - 11/14/2017 09:26 AM
ASUS today announced WS X299 SAGE, WS X299 PRO and WS X299 PRO/SE, a trio of workstation-class motherboards based on the Intel® X299 platform and designed to blend powerful performance and tuning opt...
ASUS Announces GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Series Gaming Graphics Cards - 10/26/2017 03:24 PM
ASUS today announced the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Series, an all-new lineup of gaming graphics cards powered by the latest NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti GPU....
ASUS Announces ROG Prime and TUF Z370 Series Motherboards - 09/29/2017 10:46 AM
New CPUs require new motherboards, ASUS has developed a deep lineup to meet different needs. The diverse cast of 15 models covers a range of priorities, budgets, and form factors spanning Republic of...
Member
Posts: 51
Joined: 2015-08-08
So glad I went with the Acer 4K 32" Gsync IPS last year. I'd rather wait a few years for OLED prices to drop and HDR to mature rather than settling for the current VA/IPS HDR monitors or sitting in front of a VA based 43"/49" HDR TV that would burn my retinas. That aside is there really any point in having a 4K resolution on anything smaller than 32"? Your eyeballs would have to be millimeters away from the screen to perceive the detail.
20" - 23" = 1080p
24" - 27" = 1440p
32" upwards = 2160p
Since the PPI density of the screen per resolution table you came up with is all over the place (from 96 to 138+), I'm assuming those are just some nice numbers you felt like throwing around, rather than having them backed by anything. Quite frankly, I'm getting a bit tired of debunking this BS about "ideal" pixel density, but here we go.
The problem with defining the ideal pixel density (ratio between display size and display resolution - PPI) is that people forget about the viewing distance. The general rule of thumb is to keep the distance to your monitor within your arms length. That means below 1m for most people. With that said if you want ergonomic environment - you can only go so big with your screen. Otherwise you end up moving and straining your eyes and head too much.
You can make the monitor-viewer distance bigger, but then your eyes are loosing the ability to perceive the detail. But then what are those missed details you are talking about here? Discerning individual pixels? Is that something somebody is looking for? Never heard about anyone actually needing that.
When dealing with pixel art or anything else on pixel level you always zoom in to make the pixels bigger than your monitor resolution anyway, so there is no problem in that.
When playing games - you get the same amount of details on your screen as someone playing with the lower resolution, but you don't need AA, because the pixels are too small and the overall picture clarity is way better.
When working with graphics (and btw - these monitors always aim at the gfx audience) - you get the best possible color representation.
If you can't understand it, than maybe simple glance at this can help with that: (If not, I don't have much else to say)
https://imgur.com/a/gXNY6
So at the end of the day you can either:
1) have low PPI monitor in moderate size and sit close to it and see individual pixels and have overall poor picture quality
2) have high PPI monitor in moderate size and sit close to it and have a good picture quality
3) have low PPI monitor in big size and sit close to it and see individual pixels and have same picture quality as in 1) and actually actively hampering your health
4) have low PPI monitor in big size and sit further away and perceive the same amount (or even less) of details compared to 2)
I have years of experience working with high PPI monitors. Don't try to fool me or others with some BS tables about "ideal" resolutions and display sizes if you don't want to take the viewers distance into account.
Senior Member
Posts: 13878
Joined: 2003-05-24
4k on 40" will look much nicer then on 50" 60" and 70"
They have smart phone with 4k displays now and there 6" at best? Higher PPI is always perferable and the bigger the screen get the higher PPI need to be
I have seen 65" 4k Sony XBR TV and 40" samsung 4K TV and i perfer the 40" over 65" simpley cause higher PPI
Just like i perfer 1080p on my 24" monitor vs my 32" HDTV and perfer 1080p on my 32" tv vs 60" tv.
Senior Member
Posts: 11684
Joined: 2004-05-10
So glad I went with the Acer 4K 32" Gsync IPS last year. I'd rather wait a few years for OLED prices to drop and HDR to mature rather than settling for the current VA/IPS HDR monitors or sitting in front of a VA based 43"/49" HDR TV that would burn my retinas. That aside is there really any point in having a 4K resolution on anything smaller than 32"? Your eyeballs would have to be millimeters away from the screen to perceive the detail.
20" - 23" = 1080p
24" - 27" = 1440p
32" upwards = 2160p
Agreed.
Senior Member
Posts: 11684
Joined: 2004-05-10
4k on 40" will look much nicer then on 50" 60" and 70"
They have smart phone with 4k displays now and there 6" at best? Higher PPI is always perferable and the bigger the screen get the higher PPI need to be
I have seen 65" 4k Sony XBR TV and 40" samsung 4K TV and i perfer the 40" over 65" simpley cause higher PPI
Just like i perfer 1080p on my 24" monitor vs my 32" HDTV and perfer 1080p on my 32" tv vs 60" tv.
Generally agree, but depends on viewing distance as well. I have 40" 4k and sit about 24" away and have grown fully acclimatized to that size, res, distance. For watching movies, would definitely prefer larger screen, ie, 65", but dont care much for 4k since cant tell much of a difference at 4 meters away than 1080p.
Member
Posts: 34
Joined: 2016-10-03
So glad I went with the Acer 4K 32" Gsync IPS last year. I'd rather wait a few years for OLED prices to drop and HDR to mature rather than settling for the current VA/IPS HDR monitors or sitting in front of a VA based 43"/49" HDR TV that would burn my retinas. That aside is there really any point in having a 4K resolution on anything smaller than 32"? Your eyeballs would have to be millimeters away from the screen to perceive the detail.
20" - 23" = 1080p
24" - 27" = 1440p
32" upwards = 2160p