G.Skill TridentZ5 RGB DDR5 7200 CL34 2x16 GB review
ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
ASUS 24-inch Full HD VG245H TN Monitor Available
As the title states, ASUS Releases a 24-inch full HD VG245H 75Hz TN display. It comes with Gamefast technology thanks to its 1ms response time and supports FreeSync.
The 24” ASUS VG245H Full HD gaming monitor features an ultra-fast 1ms response time and 75Hz refresh rate. It also has Instant Input Technology for lag-free experience along with two low input lag HDMI ports, so you can enjoy super smooth visuals, and keep it hooked up to two devices. In addition, AMD FreeSync™ technology helps eliminate image tearing for fast gameplay over HDMI input for smooth gameplay.
- 1920 x 1080 1ms (GTG)
- ASUS Eye Care technology
- FreeSync / Adaptive Sync technology with 75Hz refresh rate
- Exclusive GameVisual & GamePlus Function
- VESA Mountable 100 x 100mm
- D-Sub / 2 x HDMI
ASUS VG245H features two HDMI ports, which is available to connect your media player, allowing you to connect your game console and another HDMI device at the same time. So there's no need to frequently plug and change your connection.
At just over 200 bucks you can spot these monitors already.
Darkest
Senior Member
Posts: 10111
Joined: 2003-03-25
Senior Member
Posts: 10111
Joined: 2003-03-25
#5456036 Posted on: 07/27/2017 10:43 AM
Except the price IS budget....
Are people lost in 2017? Monitors below $250 are budget monitors, below $150 are ultra-budget monitors. Or have people forgotten the monitors people generally "want" (hence the non-budget monitors) are generally $400-1500.
I'm not sure I'd want to use terms like "ultra-budget" personally, I'm of a mind that once you're hitting $200-250 you should be able to get something more middle of the road.
I can understand preferences regarding panel types also, I get why some people dislike IPS and the reasons are totally valid for them. I was more addressing the "nuts" comment in honesty, it's fair enough if you prefer one over the other.
Except the price IS budget....
Are people lost in 2017? Monitors below $250 are budget monitors, below $150 are ultra-budget monitors. Or have people forgotten the monitors people generally "want" (hence the non-budget monitors) are generally $400-1500.
I'm not sure I'd want to use terms like "ultra-budget" personally, I'm of a mind that once you're hitting $200-250 you should be able to get something more middle of the road.
I can understand preferences regarding panel types also, I get why some people dislike IPS and the reasons are totally valid for them. I was more addressing the "nuts" comment in honesty, it's fair enough if you prefer one over the other.
Neo Cyrus
Senior Member
Posts: 10489
Joined: 2006-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 10489
Joined: 2006-02-14
#5456056 Posted on: 07/27/2017 11:44 AM
For one, you two are nuts. Specifically the 27 inch.
For two, not everyone wants the inferior IPS tech known as IPS glow central with horrid blacks. I would not touch an IPS screen with a 10 foot pole.
Why? I've seen 24" IPS monitors for $200 in Canada before, I'm sure there have to be options at $200 USD.
I'm pretty picky and I don't notice the IPS glow unless I look at the very edge of the corners on pure black. I honestly would never consider a TN as an option.
For one, you two are nuts. Specifically the 27 inch.
For two, not everyone wants the inferior IPS tech known as IPS glow central with horrid blacks. I would not touch an IPS screen with a 10 foot pole.
Why? I've seen 24" IPS monitors for $200 in Canada before, I'm sure there have to be options at $200 USD.
I'm pretty picky and I don't notice the IPS glow unless I look at the very edge of the corners on pure black. I honestly would never consider a TN as an option.
RealNC
Senior Member
Posts: 4150
Joined: 2011-11-24
Senior Member
Posts: 4150
Joined: 2011-11-24
#5456438 Posted on: 07/28/2017 08:30 AM
Except the price IS budget....
Are people lost in 2017? Monitors below $250 are budget monitors, below $150 are ultra-budget monitors.
Like this one. Looks like a typical low-budget monitor to me. It's 24", 1080p, 75Hz, 6-bit TN.
If that's not low-budget, I don't know what is :-/
Except the price IS budget....
Are people lost in 2017? Monitors below $250 are budget monitors, below $150 are ultra-budget monitors.
Like this one. Looks like a typical low-budget monitor to me. It's 24", 1080p, 75Hz, 6-bit TN.
If that's not low-budget, I don't know what is :-/
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 8397
Joined: 2008-07-31
(which this is, despite the price)
Except the price IS budget....
Are people lost in 2017? Monitors below $250 are budget monitors, below $150 are ultra-budget monitors. Or have people forgotten the monitors people generally "want" (hence the non-budget monitors) are generally $400-1500....
As for the 27" comment, I wouldn't touch a 1080p monitor above 24" personally. If you want bigger screen real estate you need to aim for a higher resolution, for 27" the sweet spot would be 1440p. You can get away with 1080p on larger TVs as you don't sit directly in front of them.
Agreed.
I'd take IPS over TN any day
Again, not everyone. I mean, it's completely fine that people do, but to expect all monitors to be IPS or bust is a bit nonsense, especially at $200. I have the original ROG swift monitor, and have been disappointed ever since that most monitors after it have been IPS, as i will absolutely not do that horrid IPS glow. For some people, like me, you have no idea how much of a problem it is. I will not use my wifes monitor, which is IPS. I will not use her PC, ever. If i had to, i would bring in my $150 from 2009 1080p TN 22" monitor to replace her 27" 1440p IPS if i had to use her PC. The IPS glow does not bother her, which is great, but nope, nope and absofrickenlutely no.