ASUS ROG Maximus XII Hero review
Intel Core i9-10900K processor review
Intel Core i5-10600K processor review
ASRock Z490 Taichi review
ASUS ROG Maximus XII Extreme review
MSI MEG Z490 ACE review
Z490 Aorus Master review
G.Skill TridentZ NEO DDR4 3600 MHz (2x32GB) review
Elgato Key Light Air review
Lexar NM610 NVMe M.2. SSD review
ASRock offers HYPER QUAD M.2 CARD as PCIe 4.0 compatible M.2 expansion card
ASRock released a M.2 SSD expansion card called HYPER QUAD M.2, compatible with PCI-Express 4.0 it will be available in the domestic market.
This expansion card that can mount four NVMe M.2 SSDs with PCI-Express4.0 (x4) connection. The connection interface is PCI-Express4.0 (x16), and the SSD form factor corresponds to M.2 2242/2260/2280/22110.
It includes a cooling system that combines a 50mm fan, a large aluminum cover, and a 110mm long thermal pad to cool the NVMe M.2 SSD that generates a lot of heat is used. The fan speed can be adjusted, and it can be used for systems that emphasize quiet acoustics.
The four M.2 slots are arranged at a 45° angle, not horizontally or vertically. This allows traces to be kept as short and linear as possible, increasing stability and minimizing performance degradation. Other features include a dip switch for simultaneous use of up to four cards, a dedicated utility for monitoring card information and adjusting the fan speed, and an "Activity LED" for checking SSD access status. The supported platforms are AMD TRX40 / X399 and Intel X299 (Gen 3.0), and the auxiliary power connector is 6pinx1.
ASRock Officially Launches Radeon RX 5700 XT Taichi X 8G OC+ - 09/12/2019 04:49 PM
ASRock is pleased to announce the launch of the new Taichi X series graphics cards –The Taichi X 8G OC+. The Taichi series is flagship-level graphics cards for Tech Geeks with the AMD 2nd Ge...
ASRock Officially Launches X570 Series Motherboards - 07/05/2019 07:36 AM
ASRock officially announces the launch of the new AMD X570 motherboard series. ASRock's X570 boards get the next generation PCIe 4.0 interface and from the newest, most powerful AM4 processors, inclu...
ASRock Outs Radeon VII Phantom Gaming X card - 02/08/2019 09:44 AM
The Phantom gaming X Radeon VII from ASRock has a base clock speed of 1400 MHz, which can reach up to 1750 MHz. The 16 GB memory is linked to a 4096-bit memory controller. The speed is set to 1 GHz. A...
ASRock offers ThunderBolt 3 Expansion card for ASRock 200 series - 06/23/2017 08:04 AM
ASRock is to release a more a affordable Thunderbolt 3 expansion card called, Thunderbolt 3 AIC. The anticipated selling price is around 7,380 yen excluding vat which is about 67 USD and 60 euros. T...
ASRock outs BIOS Patch To Fix Intel Skylake Bug - 01/25/2016 02:29 PM
Odds are you were never aware of Intel’s Skylake bug, which reveals itself only when executing complex workloads, such as Prime95. On the bright side, ASRock has already released BIOS update...
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 4867
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 4867
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5750270 Posted on: 01/13/2020 03:58 PM
I have an interest in these PCIe bifurcators, but, they're so weirdly expensive.
I have an interest in these PCIe bifurcators, but, they're so weirdly expensive.
tunaphish6
Member
Posts: 73
Joined: 2014-12-03
Member
Posts: 73
Joined: 2014-12-03
#5750343 Posted on: 01/13/2020 07:30 PM
I feel like the fan is novel at best.
I'm no expect in thermodynamics, but if the shroud is acting like a heatsink, the fan isn't going to do much because there isn't much variable surface area to cool, especially underneath the shroud.
I also can't imagine the shroud being all the high quality either--just a sheet of cheap, junk aluminum that's not even making direct contact with the thermal pads (the white material probably an electric insulator.) And then how much power does four m.2 drives really pull? Let's say hypthetically 10watts per drive--which is on the extreme end of the spectrum since high performance drives look to only pull 6 watts, you still have about 35 watts to play with from the possible 75 watts from the pcie lane. And these are PCIe 4.0 lanes, so I can't imagine have power issues, so why the need for external power?
Like, I get it, and I understand why people would buy this, but I feel like the overall design is underwhelming.
And if I'm grossly wrong about the power draw, please tell me. I honestly don't know how much PCIe 4.0 drives draw. For all I know, it might be astronomical compared to older SSD's.
IMO solid construction. Additional 6 pin power connector and fan to cool drives which can sometimes be too hot.
I feel like the fan is novel at best.
I'm no expect in thermodynamics, but if the shroud is acting like a heatsink, the fan isn't going to do much because there isn't much variable surface area to cool, especially underneath the shroud.
I also can't imagine the shroud being all the high quality either--just a sheet of cheap, junk aluminum that's not even making direct contact with the thermal pads (the white material probably an electric insulator.) And then how much power does four m.2 drives really pull? Let's say hypthetically 10watts per drive--which is on the extreme end of the spectrum since high performance drives look to only pull 6 watts, you still have about 35 watts to play with from the possible 75 watts from the pcie lane. And these are PCIe 4.0 lanes, so I can't imagine have power issues, so why the need for external power?
Like, I get it, and I understand why people would buy this, but I feel like the overall design is underwhelming.
And if I'm grossly wrong about the power draw, please tell me. I honestly don't know how much PCIe 4.0 drives draw. For all I know, it might be astronomical compared to older SSD's.
spectatorx
Senior Member
Posts: 796
Joined: 2012-05-24
Senior Member
Posts: 796
Joined: 2012-05-24
#5750356 Posted on: 01/13/2020 07:56 PM
I feel like the fan is novel at best.
I'm no expect in thermodynamics, but if the shroud is acting like a heatsink, the fan isn't going to do much because there isn't much variable surface area to cool, especially underneath the shroud.
I also can't imagine the shroud being all the high quality either--just a sheet of cheap, junk aluminum that's not even making direct contact with the thermal pads (the white material probably an electric insulator.) And then how much power does four m.2 drives really pull? Let's say hypthetically 10watts per drive--which is on the extreme end of the spectrum since high performance drives look to only pull 6 watts, you still have about 35 watts to play with from the possible 75 watts from the pcie lane. And these are PCIe 4.0 lanes, so I can't imagine have power issues, so why the need for external power?
Like, I get it, and I understand why people would buy this, but I feel like the overall design is underwhelming.
And if I'm grossly wrong about the power draw, please tell me. I honestly don't know how much PCIe 4.0 drives draw. For all I know, it might be astronomical compared to older SSD's.
You are correct on numbers. This thing is overengineered and that's not a bad thing. Yes, m.2 ssds consume 4-7W, so even if we exaggerate and say each drive takes up to 10W and this adapter card is fully filled with drives: 4x10W=40W. PCI-Express 3.0 slot can deliver up to 75W.
The only real problem in all that is temperature. SSDs can be hot and when they are running too hot their performance slows down a lot, some manufacturers made mistakes by putting hot rgb on ssds which basically killed performance of these drives making them flawed by design. This adapter card requires proper design in terms of cooling. Included fan may actually be doing more than you think, if everything under this cover is ok.
I feel like the fan is novel at best.
I'm no expect in thermodynamics, but if the shroud is acting like a heatsink, the fan isn't going to do much because there isn't much variable surface area to cool, especially underneath the shroud.
I also can't imagine the shroud being all the high quality either--just a sheet of cheap, junk aluminum that's not even making direct contact with the thermal pads (the white material probably an electric insulator.) And then how much power does four m.2 drives really pull? Let's say hypthetically 10watts per drive--which is on the extreme end of the spectrum since high performance drives look to only pull 6 watts, you still have about 35 watts to play with from the possible 75 watts from the pcie lane. And these are PCIe 4.0 lanes, so I can't imagine have power issues, so why the need for external power?
Like, I get it, and I understand why people would buy this, but I feel like the overall design is underwhelming.
And if I'm grossly wrong about the power draw, please tell me. I honestly don't know how much PCIe 4.0 drives draw. For all I know, it might be astronomical compared to older SSD's.
You are correct on numbers. This thing is overengineered and that's not a bad thing. Yes, m.2 ssds consume 4-7W, so even if we exaggerate and say each drive takes up to 10W and this adapter card is fully filled with drives: 4x10W=40W. PCI-Express 3.0 slot can deliver up to 75W.
The only real problem in all that is temperature. SSDs can be hot and when they are running too hot their performance slows down a lot, some manufacturers made mistakes by putting hot rgb on ssds which basically killed performance of these drives making them flawed by design. This adapter card requires proper design in terms of cooling. Included fan may actually be doing more than you think, if everything under this cover is ok.
JonasBeckman
Senior Member
Posts: 16388
Joined: 2009-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 16388
Joined: 2009-02-25
#5750379 Posted on: 01/13/2020 09:15 PM
Interesting, guessing the added speeds and possibly the controller would generate a bit more heat thus the additional cooling measures though from the discussion here it also sounds like there's some possible issues as well though I suppose a premium copper heatsink would take a fair bit of space although something like a PCI-E card even single slot might be able to manage if the contact surface and thermal material and coverage is good for the actual controller and memory chips into the heatsink.
Guess a fan could be helpful too short of having some side mounted case fan handling airflow though it might require additional power connectivity in turn although if the power consumption of the drive is that low the PCI-E itself might have enough to spare in terms of energy delivery for driving a smaller fan. (It might also generate a bit of extra noise.)
Suppose it's that or bigger metal blocks like what Corsair had for their MP600 however good it actually is short of looking like a LEGO piece from a slimmer stick to a bulkier block.
(Will have to look up results on it.)
Reviews would also slowly showcase how these newer PCI Express 4.0 devices are doing compared to PCI Express 3.0 in terms of thermals in addition to the overall performance advantage afforded so maybe heatsinks or some form of dissipation will be required for SSD's if the generated heat is increased even more. (Especially to avoid throttling which would negate the performance benefits if it would heat up to whatever the limit is on current SSD hardware.)
EDIT: Certainly seems to help, from a few articles some of these do get close to 60 Celsius so sustained workloads with less ideal cooling might hit the temperature limits fairly quickly without at least some heatsink or similar.
(Good to know just how much heat these devices can generate actually, was expecting it to be in the 50's at most but it looks like it goes higher than that.)
Interesting, guessing the added speeds and possibly the controller would generate a bit more heat thus the additional cooling measures though from the discussion here it also sounds like there's some possible issues as well though I suppose a premium copper heatsink would take a fair bit of space although something like a PCI-E card even single slot might be able to manage if the contact surface and thermal material and coverage is good for the actual controller and memory chips into the heatsink.
Guess a fan could be helpful too short of having some side mounted case fan handling airflow though it might require additional power connectivity in turn although if the power consumption of the drive is that low the PCI-E itself might have enough to spare in terms of energy delivery for driving a smaller fan. (It might also generate a bit of extra noise.)
Suppose it's that or bigger metal blocks like what Corsair had for their MP600 however good it actually is short of looking like a LEGO piece from a slimmer stick to a bulkier block.
(Will have to look up results on it.)
Reviews would also slowly showcase how these newer PCI Express 4.0 devices are doing compared to PCI Express 3.0 in terms of thermals in addition to the overall performance advantage afforded so maybe heatsinks or some form of dissipation will be required for SSD's if the generated heat is increased even more. (Especially to avoid throttling which would negate the performance benefits if it would heat up to whatever the limit is on current SSD hardware.)
EDIT: Certainly seems to help, from a few articles some of these do get close to 60 Celsius so sustained workloads with less ideal cooling might hit the temperature limits fairly quickly without at least some heatsink or similar.
(Good to know just how much heat these devices can generate actually, was expecting it to be in the 50's at most but it looks like it goes higher than that.)
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 796
Joined: 2012-05-24
IMO solid construction. Additional 6 pin power connector and fan to cool drives which can sometimes be too hot.