Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
MS Flight Simulator (2020): the 2021 PC graphics performance benchmark review
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review

New Downloads
GeForce 461.81 hotfix driver download
ClockTuner for Ryzen (CTR) v2.0 RC4 Download
SiSoft Sandra 20/21 download v31.12
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH 27.20.100.9316
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5644 beta
FurMark Download v1.25
MSI Afterburner 4.6.3 Final Stable Download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.3.7
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.0 Final
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.10 Download


New Forum Topics
[Mod Driver] NimeZ Radeon Software - Signature Edition system handles interrupts only on core0 11700K Retail Review Ryzen 5 3600 AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 21.2.3 Download: Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server 7.3.0 Final 461.72 + Hotfix 461.81 - Clean Version GeForce Hotfix Driver Version 461.81 Is my Rtx 3090 dying? AMD confirms that Resident Evil Village will have Ray Tracing support on PC




Guru3D.com » News » Apollo 16 Lunar Mission Footage Upscaled To 4K 60 FPS is pretty amazing

Apollo 16 Lunar Mission Footage Upscaled To 4K 60 FPS is pretty amazing

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 07/13/2020 07:21 AM | source: | 11 comment(s)

Check this Apollo 16 Rover Traverse to Station 4 16mm footage interpolated from 12fps to 60fps with DAIN-AI. Colour corrected and synchronized with audio. This YouTuber took the 16 mm footage shot on the moon back in 1972 and through the magic of artificial intelligence made the quality look like you were right there with them.

  







« New Assassin Creed Valhalla in November, Far Cry in February (+ Screenshots) · Apollo 16 Lunar Mission Footage Upscaled To 4K 60 FPS is pretty amazing · NVIDIA prepares suspension of production GeForce RTX 20 series »

3 pages 1 2 3


Fox2232
Senior Member



Posts: 11528
Joined: 2012-07-20

#5808313 Posted on: 07/13/2020 07:46 AM
It is not bad, but it is not that much better than motion vector being cut in 5 parts to produce fluid image. They just take 2 consecutive (original) motion vectors and turn them into spline before cutting.
Image is not really 4K. More like 960x640 as no IQ is lost between 1080p and 720p, but there is some loss of IQ going 480p. It is nice for given resolution nonetheless.

Kaarme
Senior Member



Posts: 2270
Joined: 2013-03-10

#5808340 Posted on: 07/13/2020 09:55 AM
It's pretty funny that a computer game these days could produce better moon footage, rendered real time, than authentic recordings from the heydays of the space race.

Dribble
Senior Member



Posts: 190
Joined: 2019-01-18

#5808347 Posted on: 07/13/2020 10:20 AM
Game looks boring, no explosions, no aliens, boring dialog. Not sure about lighting, not enough lens flare, also ground textures looked a bit flat and I thought the shiny reflective thing at the front was a bit ott.

wavetrex
Senior Member



Posts: 1370
Joined: 2008-07-16

#5808360 Posted on: 07/13/2020 11:22 AM
For all those commenting about how bad the footage is... I'm sure your handy-cams back in the 60s were much better.

... oh wait.

NewTRUMP Order
Senior Member



Posts: 495
Joined: 2017-02-04

#5808411 Posted on: 07/13/2020 01:47 PM
Before the the proof reader police start with their smarter than thou nonsense, no Apollo 16 did not go to Mars. Yeah it's an error get over it. Moving on....What I find amazing is no one comments on how we actually, yes we did there is equipment on the moon that is still being used to measure the moon pulling away from the earth, went to the moon 50 something years ago! They should have made a split screen side by side with the original footage so you could appreciate the upscaling.

3 pages 1 2 3


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021