ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review
AOC Offers AG251FZ2 and AG271FZ2 Agon Gaming Monitors with 240Hz Refresh rate
AOC announced two Full HD gaming monitors that it has added to its AGON line of professional gaming monitors. The new 27-inch AG271FZ2 and the 24.5-inch AG251FZ2 are both LCD monitors with AMD FreeSync technology featuring 240Hz refresh rate and a 0.5 ms response time.
The new monitors feature the fastest refresh rate on the market at 240Hz, which brings unprecedented fluidity for every movement on the screen. Gamers can elevate their game with every detail brought sharply into focus with crystal clarity. The 0.5ms response time pairs fast-moving action and dramatic transitions with a super smooth experience without smearing or ghosting.
- AOC Agon AG271FZ2 27" Gaming Monitor, FHD 1920x1080, FreeSync, 240Hz, 0.5ms, DisplayPort/HDMIx2/DVI-D/VGA, QuickSwitch keypad, Ergonomic Stand
by AOC
AMD FreeSync technology delivers the highest frame rate and smoothest display possible without screen tearing or lag whether you're dashing through explosions or screeching around rain-slicked bends - leaving your opponents in the dust.
AOC has packed its new monitors with AOC technologies, including Shadow Control and Lowblue Light Mode. With Shadow Control, gamers can bring the battle out of the shadows by adjusting the levels to increase contrast for better dark areas without affecting the rest of the screen. The monitors also feature eye protecting Lowblue Light Mode, which protects gamers from harmful blue light which has been shown to cause eye strain, headaches, and sleeping disorders during long sessions. Lowblue Light Mode reduces the harmful wavelengths emitted without sacrificing color composition.
The AG251FZ2 and AG271FZ2 are both available for pre-order on Amazon now for $329.99 and $379.99, respectively.
AOC offers 31.5in IPS QHD monitor - 75 Hz, 5 ms GtG, FreeSync for 249 bucks - 07/17/2018 03:02 PM
AOC announces the new Q3279VWFD8, an affordable allrounder with a 31.5” IPS panel, highly detailed QHD resolution (2560x1440 pixels), 5 ms GtG response time, AMD FreeSync support and 75 Hz r...
AOC Offers C2789FH8 27-Inch Curved Full HD Monitor - 09/13/2017 09:07 AM
Another Full HD screen is released by AOC, the C2789FH8 is a 27-Inch Curved display. This ultra-slim 27-inch VA LED-backlight monitor (7.5mm thick / 1800R Curvature) supports a native resolution of ...
AOC Offers New I2475PXQU 23.8 Inch Full HD Monitor - 11/08/2016 10:15 AM
AOC released new 23.8-inch Full HD monitor ‘I2475PXQU’ on its product page. This model has an IPS screen and will cost just € 165,- It supports a native resolution of...
gx-x
Senior Member
Posts: 1521
Joined: 2007-03-18
Senior Member
Posts: 1521
Joined: 2007-03-18
#5688595 Posted on: 07/08/2019 12:28 AM
what image quality? It's TN panel. It lacks quality from every angle. It's like that Boba dude with 1200hp Golf 2. There isn't a shred of quality to speak of. Just speed.
what image quality? It's TN panel. It lacks quality from every angle. It's like that Boba dude with 1200hp Golf 2. There isn't a shred of quality to speak of. Just speed.
Neo Cyrus
Senior Member
Posts: 10489
Joined: 2006-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 10489
Joined: 2006-02-14
#5688615 Posted on: 07/08/2019 02:02 AM
Does anyone have any info on why the monitor market has been hard stuck on LCDs for the past 12.7 million years?
I just saw 1080p 27" 240Hz and thought to myself: "That's fine considering using a low res is probably necessary in a lot of games to go over 200 fps", then I realized of course it's a TN.
Does anyone have any info on why the monitor market has been hard stuck on LCDs for the past 12.7 million years?
I just saw 1080p 27" 240Hz and thought to myself: "That's fine considering using a low res is probably necessary in a lot of games to go over 200 fps", then I realized of course it's a TN.
gx-x
Senior Member
Posts: 1521
Joined: 2007-03-18
Senior Member
Posts: 1521
Joined: 2007-03-18
#5688629 Posted on: 07/08/2019 02:52 AM
one could ask why are people stuck thinking that 240Hz is better than 120Hz,, and they will think the same about 500Hz vs 240Hz, in reality, they will still suck at whatever they play and that dude that pwns them is going to continue doing it at whatever/Hz. But OLED and QLED displays at affordable prices are going to be here soon. And some people will still use TN...just like they use windows 7 or w/e.
one could ask why are people stuck thinking that 240Hz is better than 120Hz,, and they will think the same about 500Hz vs 240Hz, in reality, they will still suck at whatever they play and that dude that pwns them is going to continue doing it at whatever/Hz. But OLED and QLED displays at affordable prices are going to be here soon. And some people will still use TN...just like they use windows 7 or w/e.
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 8394
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 8394
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5688643 Posted on: 07/08/2019 04:16 AM
There's a large market for people who will not buy anything other then a TN, myself included.
IPS is nasty with its blacks, and VA, at least everyone i have seen, has horrible ghosting.
Now, i'm not saying there shouldn't be anything other then TN, people like what they like, but every time i see a comment like this, it's like people actually believe IPS or VA are the end-all......they are definitely not.
Hence why i'm quite interested to see what the Lenovo Y27gq-25 27" 0.5ms 1440p 240hz gsync TN monitor quality turns out to be
One of the more naive things i've ever heard. Someone who thinks there's not differences in qualities as well as high quality TN models have never actually paid attention to high quality models, or, puts way too much effort on viewing angels, even though most....logical people. sit in front of their monitor, not to the sides.....
But honestly, what is it you're even saying? Quality? What's your definition of quality at that point? Like, if you were to define "quality" when it comes to monitors what would it be? Because it clearly looks as though your definition of "quality" is simply personal preference, which is fine, you can have personal preference, but it's not a definition of quality. If i were to do as you'd do, i'd say ever IPS and VA panel out there is horrible quality. But i won't, because it's not the quality of those panels that i do not like, it's their negatives that i do not like. Has nothing to do with quality.....
then I realized of course it's a TN.
There's a large market for people who will not buy anything other then a TN, myself included.
IPS is nasty with its blacks, and VA, at least everyone i have seen, has horrible ghosting.
Now, i'm not saying there shouldn't be anything other then TN, people like what they like, but every time i see a comment like this, it's like people actually believe IPS or VA are the end-all......they are definitely not.
Hence why i'm quite interested to see what the Lenovo Y27gq-25 27" 0.5ms 1440p 240hz gsync TN monitor quality turns out to be
what image quality? It's TN panel. It lacks quality from every angle. It's like that Boba dude with 1200hp Golf 2. There isn't a shred of quality to speak of. Just speed.
One of the more naive things i've ever heard. Someone who thinks there's not differences in qualities as well as high quality TN models have never actually paid attention to high quality models, or, puts way too much effort on viewing angels, even though most....logical people. sit in front of their monitor, not to the sides.....
But honestly, what is it you're even saying? Quality? What's your definition of quality at that point? Like, if you were to define "quality" when it comes to monitors what would it be? Because it clearly looks as though your definition of "quality" is simply personal preference, which is fine, you can have personal preference, but it's not a definition of quality. If i were to do as you'd do, i'd say ever IPS and VA panel out there is horrible quality. But i won't, because it's not the quality of those panels that i do not like, it's their negatives that i do not like. Has nothing to do with quality.....
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
They are bit late to 240Hz party. But more the merrier. Stand looks OK (adjustment wise), and definitely takes less space than my AW.
Only issue is that it costs $50 more than quite older 240Hz AW2518HF while delivering comparable image quality. (And costs more than G-Sync variant too.)
AOC went for traditional edge around screen. I am still liking more thin 6mm flat edge on AW.
Back of the screen looks nice, but I rarely gets to see mine from behind.
For someone, their built-in speakers may be welcome. But I think that in most of cases, target audience uses good headphones or better desktop speakers than screen has.