AOC G2590FX: a mainstream 144 Hz monitor for 249 euros
AOC announced the availability of their G2590FX monitor, characterized by a high refresh rate and compatibility with the FreeSync technology. The AOC G2590FX is equipped with a TN panel with a diagonal of 24.5 "and a resolution of 1920x1080 pixels.
The refresh rate is 144 Hz, and FreeSync operates in a range of 30-144 Hz., it offers Low Framerate Compensation (LFC). The manufacturer states that the maximum display brightness is 400 cd/m2 and offers a contrast ratio of 1000: 1. Viewing angles are 170 degrees horizontally and 160 ° vertically. and a 1 ms (GtG) response time. The panel provides 100 percent coverage of sRGB and 81 percent for Adobe RGB. You get two HDMI 1.4 ports, one DisplayPort 1.2 and one D-Sub. The dimensions of the AOC monitor are 558.6 x 199.7 x 423.7 mm and its weight is 4.27 kg. The price is 249,- euros, but the screen has already been spotted in the 230 Euro range.
LCD Panel | TN (flat) |
Backlight | W-LED (flicker-free) |
Screen | 24.5 inches |
Resolution | 1,920 × 1,080 (144 Hz) |
Freesync / G-Sync | freesync |
aspect ratio | 16: 9 |
Contrast (static) | 1000: 1 |
Brightness max. | 400 cd / m² |
color depth | 8 bits (16.8 million colors, 6 bits + FRC?) |
color space | sRGB: 96%, Adobe RGB: 84% |
Viewing angle (horizontal / vertical) | 170 ° / 160 ° |
reaction time | 1 ms (gray-to-gray) |
video inputs | 2 × HDMI 1.4, DisplayPort 1.2, VGA / D-sub |
video outputs | - |
Audio | Speaker (2 × 2 W), audio in / out |
input | Operation: 28 W, standby: 0.5 W |
Others | Blue light filter |
Price (EIA) | 249 euros |
Member
Posts: 31
Joined: 2016-12-16
I like the diagonal, 24.5" sound great! (I’m sick of reading news about 32" monitors… I don’t have room for that!)
I like Freesync, 144Hz, and the reasonable price (sort of).
But I don’t like that it’s TN

Senior Member
Posts: 3227
Joined: 2014-07-28
Not sure why they keep releasing 1080p TN......
That is a bit of a silly comment.
I am going to stop there....and let you think about it.
Its almost as if some people prefer cheap, high refresh rate over panel quality.
Senior Member
Posts: 1696
Joined: 2008-07-16
I know people who still use 19" 4:3 monitors (think 1280x960) today, simply because their income is way too small for upgrading (living in failed economy countries)
When they eventually manage to gather enough money to change something, it's good that there are options !
Not so long ago a shitty 60hz FHD 21.5" TN was more expensive than this one... so it's great that now you can get 144Hz with Freesync for that money !
Senior Member
Posts: 628
Joined: 2002-03-22
Back in the day most people I knew would gladly sacrifice image quality for a higher framerate. I'm still of the opinion that high fps is better than image quality when it comes to conventional shooters. Of course, everyone would like both, but smoothness of motion definitely adds a feeling of realism that image quality alone can't provide.
Senior Member
Posts: 515
Joined: 2009-11-24
Not sure whey they keep releasing 1080p TN
Image quality so bad it hurts to look at
My father is not a Minister so not have a Black money