Asrock B550 PG Riptide review
be quiet! Dark Rock TF2 review
Basemark GPU v1.2 benchmarks with 36 GPUs
Corsair MP600 Pro XT PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Teamgroup MP34Q 2TB NVMe SSD review
Lian Li SP750 (750W PSU) review
Teamgroup Cardea Z44Q 4TB NVMe SSD review
Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX monitor review
Plextor M10P 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
ASRock RX 6600 XT Phantom Gaming D 8GB OC review
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X Benchmarks
Silently AMD expanded their Ryzen 3000 line-up this week, exclusively in Chinafor the time being. Ryzen 5 3500X has been benchmarked. The non SMT Ryzen 5 is compared with Intel's Core i5 9400F - who is in the lead in the price range up to 150 Euro?
The setup used is an MSI B450M Mortar Titanium (AMD), an MSI B360M Mortar Titanium (Intel) and both got 2x8 GB DDR4-3200. In all tested office workloads, the six-core (six threads, no virtual core doubling, AMD SMT) is ahead of the i5 9400F, which also has six cores and no Intel Hyper-Threading. Have a peek below and click on the thumbnails, they also threw in a Ryxen 5 3600 to compare with.
| Proc | Cores/Threads | base/Boost | L3 cache | PCI-E | PCI-E line | DDR4 | TDP | Cooler |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 9 3950X | 16/32 | 4.7/3.5GHz | 64MB | 4.0 | 16+4+4 | 3200MHz | 105W | Prism |
| Ryzen 9 3900X | 12/24 | 4.6/3.8GHz | 64MB | 4.0 | 16+4+4 | 3200MHz | 105W | Prism |
| Ryzen 7 3800X | 8/16 | 4.5/3.9GHz | 32MB | 4.0 | 16+4+4 | 3200MHz | 105W | Prism |
| Ryzen 7 3700X | 8/16 | 4.4/3.6GHz | 32MB | 4.0 | 16+4+4 | 3200MHz | 65W | Prism |
| Ryzen 5 3600X | 6/12 | 4.4/3.8GHz | 32MB | 4.0 | 16+4+4 | 3200MHz | 95W | Spire |
| Ryzen 5 3600 | 6/12 | 4.2/3.6GHz | 32MB | 4.0 | 16+4+4 | 3200MHz | 65W | Stealth |
| Ryzen 5 3500X | 6/6 | 4.1/3.6GHz | 32MB | 4.0 | 16+4+4 | 3200MHz | 65W | Stealth |
| Ryzen 5 3400G | 4/8 | 4.2/3.7GHz | 4MB | 3.0 | 8+4+4 | 2933MHz | 65W | Spire |
| Ryzen 3 3200G | 4/4 | 4.0/3.6GHz | 4MB | 3.0 | 8+4+4 | 2933MHz | 65W | Stealth |
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 6083
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 6083
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5719550 Posted on: 10/11/2019 05:37 PM
I agree. The 2600 has SMT, but, Zen2 is also a noticeably faster architecture. I'd also really like to see the 8600K thrown in the mix.
Not bad but the 2600 is 20 Euro less expensive, it might be interesting to compare old gen 2600 6/12 versus new gen 3500X 6/6 as they are in same price range (and they have a huge stock of 2600 to sell) ...
I agree. The 2600 has SMT, but, Zen2 is also a noticeably faster architecture. I'd also really like to see the 8600K thrown in the mix.
FordLynx07
Senior Member
Posts: 200
Joined: 2008-12-02
Senior Member
Posts: 200
Joined: 2008-12-02
#5719559 Posted on: 10/11/2019 06:11 PM
That huge L3 cache really does help.
That huge L3 cache really does help.
Deleted member 213629
Unregistered
Unregistered
#5719665 Posted on: 10/11/2019 10:59 PM
Seems a bit of a test-market concept for now...
Seems a bit of a test-market concept for now...
wavetrex
Senior Member
Posts: 1442
Joined: 2008-07-16
Senior Member
Posts: 1442
Joined: 2008-07-16
#5719682 Posted on: 10/12/2019 12:24 AM
An unnecessary part.
Have they hit rock bottom in salvageable Zen 2 7nm dies ? Or we'll see something even worse in the future...
An unnecessary part.
Have they hit rock bottom in salvageable Zen 2 7nm dies ? Or we'll see something even worse in the future...
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3026
Joined: 2007-05-31
Not bad but the 2600 is 20 Euro less expensive, it might be interesting to compare old gen 2600 6/12 versus new gen 3500X 6/6 as they are in same price range (and they have a huge stock of 2600 to sell) ...