ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 WIFI6E router review
Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
AMD Zen 4 CPU with 5.2 GHz Boost and RDNA 2 iGPU surfaces
AMD's upcoming Ryzen 7000 (Raphael) processor is exposed. On Twitter Petykemano discovered the unknown 5nm chip in the OpenBenchmarking database.
The Ryzen 7000 processor has eight Zen 4 cores with simultaneous multithreading (100-000000666-20 Y) (SMT). A Zen 4 chip with a similar identification was seen in January. The eight-core, 16-thread portion should be the Ryzen 7 7800X, the successor to the popular Ryzen 7 5800X. For Halo Infinite, AMD teased a Ryzen 7000 CPU with an all-core boost rate exceeding 5 GHz.
The OpenBenchmarking Zen 4 processor is an engineering prototype, but its 5.21 GHz boost clock is outstanding. It outperforms any AMD mainstream chip currently available. For example, the Ryzen 9 5950X tops out at 4.9 GHz, whereas the Ryzen 7 5800X tops out at 4.7 GHz. Raphael also shows what AMD can do with Zen 4 on TSMC's 5nm technology. The N5 node, according to the Taiwanese foundry, is 30% more power efficient or 15% faster than the 7nm node utilized for AMD's current Ryzen 5000 (Vermeer) series.
AMD's next-generation Ryzen processors may include integrated graphics, notably RDNA 2 graphics. The Zen 4 processor contains a graphics engine dubbed "GFX1036" that runs between 1,000 and 2,000 MHz. The clock speed appears reasonable, with potential for improvement. The Radeon 680M used in Ryzen 6000 reaches 2,400 MHz.
AMD's RDNA 2 graphics engine is used in the Radeon RX 6000-series (Big Navi) graphics cards and the Ryzen 6000 (Rembrandt) processors. GFX1036 clearly belongs to the RDNA 2 family. AMD just added the GFX1036 and GFX1037 graphics IP blocks to the RadeonSI Linux driver, according to Phoronix. AMD's Van Gogh APUs, Navi 24 (Beige Goby), and Rembrandt (Yellow Carp) mobile CPUs all get the same treatment. Splinter-RPL (WS22427N000 BIOS) could be the codename for the reference AM5 platform. Sadly, the story just mentioned 16GB. Various sources say the AM5 platform will only support DDR5 memory, making it a premium platform given the high cost of early DDR5 memory kits. With its 12th Generation Alder Lake CPUs, Intel allows users to choose between DDR4 and DDR5.
AMD's recent roadmap announced the Ryzen 7000 for late-year release. But Raphael's mobile counterpart, Dragon Range, won't arrive until 2023.
AMD Zen 4 Based Genoa CPUs Get 1 MB L2 Cache per Core - 03/28/2022 03:47 PM
And that's a lot. In Geekbench some scores leaked, and while we don't trust geekbench scores, the specs however are listed in great detail. ...
AMD Zen 3 processors with 3D V-Cache in early 2022, then Zen 4 later that year with PCIe 5.0 and DDR5. - 10/12/2021 07:11 PM
It's been five years that the first Ryzen processors have been released. AMD posted an interview containing some nice details, AMD confirms that the first Zen 3 CPUs with stacked 3D V-Cache will be ...
AMD Zen 4 (AM5 ) processors look to get an IGP as default and double L2 caches - 08/23/2021 06:33 PM
AMD's future generation Ryzen processors based on the Zen 4 might come equipped with integrated graphics. Details leaked, from the ransomware attack on Gigabyte with files being leaked indicate this....
Gigabyte-hack Discloses AMD Zen 3 Threadripper 5000-cpu codenamed Chagall - 08/17/2021 06:50 PM
The recent Gigabyte hack revealed AMD's next Threadripper CPU series codenamed 'Chagall' in the pipeline. The processors would be based on the Zen 3 architecture and dubbed Threadripper 5000. ...
Renders of AM5 socket for AMD Zen 4 processors - 07/30/2021 08:45 AM
Zen 4 processors will use a land grid array (LGA) socket, according to Twitterer ExecutableFix. Raphael chips would also reportedly have a heat spreader with recesses to accommodate more capacitors....
kanenas
Senior Member
Posts: 379
Joined: 2019-07-07
Senior Member
Posts: 379
Joined: 2019-07-07
#6016844 Posted on: 05/13/2022 01:00 PM
Hope AMD can reach even higher speed, though IPC and architecture improvement are the best...
Intel probably gonna reach 5.8GHZ and 6.0GHZ with 300W+...
Very likely to do so as this is ES
Hope AMD can reach even higher speed, though IPC and architecture improvement are the best...
Intel probably gonna reach 5.8GHZ and 6.0GHZ with 300W+...
Very likely to do so as this is ES
AuerX
Senior Member
Posts: 498
Joined: 2018-12-12
Senior Member
Posts: 498
Joined: 2018-12-12
#6016851 Posted on: 05/13/2022 01:31 PM
So will computers eventually turn in to time machines once we break the speed of light?
speed of light = 299.792.458 m/s 6ghz is 6 000 000 000 hz ....so by the time a nand gate switches from 0 to 1 in 1 cycle (1hz ) the electricity that for the shake of simplicity we assume is equal to the speed of light had time to travel only 5cm .... ! Even if we overcome the friction and tunneling and be able to push past 10ghz or something we will hit a barrier with the speed of light ! random thought i had XD
So will computers eventually turn in to time machines once we break the speed of light?
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 12996
Joined: 2014-07-21
Senior Member
Posts: 12996
Joined: 2014-07-21
#6016852 Posted on: 05/13/2022 01:32 PM
Depends on the medium it travels through, and it could be faster under certain conditions (especially lower temperature). What they're trying to do with super conductivity.
This is true, but pardon my noob question, aren't we still way ahead of the barrier you described?
Let's assume lightspeed, for the simplicity, was the maximum for our electron / energy to travel, or say, put a 0 to a 1 inside that switch / gate. I'm 100% sure that this is not how to name it, but let's just humor those who really are pros on this
Light speed's 3 x 10^8 m?
A gateway's width is about 15nm for DDR5, right? Which is roughly 1,5 x 10^-8 m ?
So theoretically, as the electron would have to "travel" 15nm, it would only take it 5 x 10^-17s?
Wouldn't that technically, very, very simplified, mean that we're talking about a barrier in the range of about 10 Peta Hertz? So about 1 million times more than a GHz?
Sorry, asking this not because I want to discredit you, but because I think that barrier's way further ahead than the limitations of our resources to construct said hardware, which brings us further, further away from reaching that perfect speed of light and closer to what k3vst3r said, and probably below this. Even if we consider 1/100th the speed of light for electrons to travel, we're still about 10.000 (ten thousand) times ahead of a GHz until we reach that limit?
Sorry guys, I'm just bored at work.
Thought electricity was 1/100th speed of light through electrical wires.
Depends on the medium it travels through, and it could be faster under certain conditions (especially lower temperature). What they're trying to do with super conductivity.
speed of light = 299.792.458 m/s 6ghz is 6 000 000 000 hz ....so by the time a nand gate switches from 0 to 1 in 1 cycle (1hz ) the electricity that for the shake of simplicity we assume is equal to the speed of light had time to travel only 5cm .... ! Even if we overcome the friction and tunneling and be able to push past 10ghz or something we will hit a barrier with the speed of light ! random thought i had XD
This is true, but pardon my noob question, aren't we still way ahead of the barrier you described?
Let's assume lightspeed, for the simplicity, was the maximum for our electron / energy to travel, or say, put a 0 to a 1 inside that switch / gate. I'm 100% sure that this is not how to name it, but let's just humor those who really are pros on this
Light speed's 3 x 10^8 m?
A gateway's width is about 15nm for DDR5, right? Which is roughly 1,5 x 10^-8 m ?
So theoretically, as the electron would have to "travel" 15nm, it would only take it 5 x 10^-17s?
Wouldn't that technically, very, very simplified, mean that we're talking about a barrier in the range of about 10 Peta Hertz? So about 1 million times more than a GHz?
Sorry, asking this not because I want to discredit you, but because I think that barrier's way further ahead than the limitations of our resources to construct said hardware, which brings us further, further away from reaching that perfect speed of light and closer to what k3vst3r said, and probably below this. Even if we consider 1/100th the speed of light for electrons to travel, we're still about 10.000 (ten thousand) times ahead of a GHz until we reach that limit?
Sorry guys, I'm just bored at work.
Mpampis
Senior Member
Posts: 193
Joined: 2018-04-12
Senior Member
Posts: 193
Joined: 2018-04-12
#6016863 Posted on: 05/13/2022 02:20 PM
We're nowhere near the speed of light barrier guys, measurement units do play an important role you know.
We're nowhere near the speed of light barrier guys, measurement units do play an important role you know.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3374
Joined: 2007-05-31
Then unbeatable plaid speed...