Intel Core i5 11400F processor review
Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro SL 3600 MHz 32GB review
ASRock Z590 Extreme review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC review
Corsair K70 RGB TKL keyboard review
Corsair RM650x (2021) power supply review
be quiet! Silent Loop 2 280mm review
Corsair K55 RGB PRO XT keyboard review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - March 2021
Intel Core i9-11900K processor review
AMD will rename FreeSync 2 towards FreeSync 2 HDR
As the title states, AMD will be renaming FreeSync 2 towards FreeSync 2 HDR. Admittedly a good move. FreeSync (the original one) and FreeSync 2 often got confused, as what the revision 2 exactly means and does. FreeSync 2 really is LFR and HDR compatibility added to what FreeSync 1 offers.
During an interview with PC Perspective, a spokesperson of AMD made this news info public. If a monitor received a FreeSync 2 certification, it must support at least HDR600, 99 percent of BT.709 and 90 percent of the DCI P3 color spectrum. It is also mentioned there's a requirement on minimum response time, albeit a figure is not disclosed.
I think it is a good move to separate the two a bit more, FreeSync 2 HDR has little to do with variable refresh rates. Yesterday we reviewed a FreeSync 2 HDR monitor, check that article out right here.
AMD Will Release a Raven Ridge APU Graphics driver once each Three Months - 06/18/2018 09:03 AM
Those who have bought a Raven Ridge Based APU have been seeing a big of a hard time drivers wise. When the APUs first released, the driver set was separated from the Radeon Software branch. Later on,...
AMD will fix DX9 Game Related Adrenalin Driver Issues With a Hotfix - 01/02/2018 06:35 PM
Two days ago it was got reported on the web that AMD graphics card has had issues with certain older DX9 games. The issues started with the release of the new AMD Adrenalin drivers which offer some r...
AMD will keep pushing FX and A series processors in 2017 - 02/11/2017 10:49 AM
With the Ryzen launch pending, AMD initially is addressing the high-end and enthusiast gamers market. So what happens in the lower end and mainstream segment for the time being? Well, AMD will continu...
AMD Will Showcase Latest Technology During Computex 2016 - 05/20/2016 08:17 AM
AMD announced a press conference and live webcast during Computex 2016 in Taipei, Taiwan. The event will begin on Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 10:00 AM CST / 10:00 PM EDT. The event will feature launch ...
Looks like AMD will bundle GTA-V and DiRT Rally with Radeon 200 cards - 05/14/2015 09:03 AM
Interesting, it looks like AMD might soon add two new games to their game bundle, this has not been confirmed by AMD. But if you check this NewEgg link you will notice that a Radeon R9 290X graphics...
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 13294
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 13294
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5559273 Posted on: 06/21/2018 02:18 PM
How about this "Freesync 2 HDR LFR"?
Also, does anyone know how the performance (input lag) of LFR differs from old-school V-sync? Seems like each one would result in the same lag whether the previous frame is duplicated or next frame is delayed?
I imagine it adds some input lag but it only comes into play at framerates below 30fps.. at that point both G-Sync and Freesync turn the motion such into a mess without it that you'd probably accept significant input lag to prevent it. It's more of a like a "safety net" when the FPS dips below 30 to maintain smoothness than something you want to be running at all the time.
How about this "Freesync 2 HDR LFR"?
Also, does anyone know how the performance (input lag) of LFR differs from old-school V-sync? Seems like each one would result in the same lag whether the previous frame is duplicated or next frame is delayed?
I imagine it adds some input lag but it only comes into play at framerates below 30fps.. at that point both G-Sync and Freesync turn the motion such into a mess without it that you'd probably accept significant input lag to prevent it. It's more of a like a "safety net" when the FPS dips below 30 to maintain smoothness than something you want to be running at all the time.
JamesSneed
Senior Member
Posts: 1140
Joined: 2017-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 1140
Joined: 2017-02-14
#5559292 Posted on: 06/21/2018 03:04 PM
Why not keep it simple and just make it "FreeSync HDR". Companies love there version numbers.
Why not keep it simple and just make it "FreeSync HDR". Companies love there version numbers.
Silva
Senior Member
Posts: 1440
Joined: 2013-06-04
Senior Member
Posts: 1440
Joined: 2013-06-04
#5559309 Posted on: 06/21/2018 03:48 PM
I guess they think version 2 isn't enough to call attention to it.
So now it requires 600, not 400? That will make the monitors really expensive
I guess they think version 2 isn't enough to call attention to it.
So now it requires 600, not 400? That will make the monitors really expensive
ubercake
Senior Member
Posts: 214
Joined: 2014-06-11
Senior Member
Posts: 214
Joined: 2014-06-11
#5559327 Posted on: 06/21/2018 04:53 PM
For Freesync, the low-end is higher than for G-sync (30fps is the standard G-sync minimum) usually in the 40s but on some monitors even higher.
For example:
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/samsung-c32hg70-freesync-2-hdr-monitor-review,2.html
I imagine it adds some input lag but it only comes into play at framerates below 30fps.. at that point both G-Sync and Freesync turn the motion such into a mess without it that you'd probably accept significant input lag to prevent it. It's more of a like a "safety net" when the FPS dips below 30 to maintain smoothness than something you want to be running at all the time.
For Freesync, the low-end is higher than for G-sync (30fps is the standard G-sync minimum) usually in the 40s but on some monitors even higher.
For example:
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/samsung-c32hg70-freesync-2-hdr-monitor-review,2.html
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 214
Joined: 2014-06-11
How about this "Freesync 2 HDR LFR"?
Also, does anyone know how the performance (input lag) of LFR differs from old-school V-sync? Seems like each one would result in the same lag whether the previous frame is duplicated or next frame is delayed?