MS Flight Simulator (2020): the 2021 PC graphics performance benchmark review
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
AMD to fab all 7nm chips at TSMC
This morning the news broke that AMD's chip fabrication partner Global Foundries is halting the 7, 5 and 3nm nodes for chip fabrication to gain more profitability on 12 and 14nm. While that might work short term, long term we think that could be a terrible decision for GloFo.
AMD is a big partner for among other upcoming things 7nm chips will be hit by this. However, from what we heard, AMD's current 7nm designs are already at TSMC. Also, all their console chips are fabbed at TSMC. AMD has released a small statement on what is happening, and have been anticipating their chip fabrication for 7nm with TSMC.
-- 7nm Update --
For the past several years we have been executing our multi-generational leadership product and architectural roadmap. Just in the last 18 months, we successfully introduced and ramped our strongest set of products in more than a decade and our business has grown dramatically as we gained market share across the PC, gaming and datacenter markets.
The industry is at a significant inflection point as the pace of Moore’s Law slows while the demand for computing and graphics performance continues to grow. This trend is fueling significant shifts throughout the industry and creating new opportunities for companies that can successfully bring together architectural, packaging, system and software innovations with leading-edge process technologies. That is why at AMD we have invested heavily in our architecture and product roadmaps, while also making the strategic decision to bet big on the 7nm process node. While it is still too early to provide more details on the architectural and product advances we have in store with our next wave of products, it is the right time to provide more detail on the flexible foundry sourcing strategy we put in place several years ago.
AMD’s next major milestone is the introduction of our upcoming 7nm product portfolio, including the initial products with our second generation “Zen 2” CPU core and our new “Navi” GPU architecture. We have already taped out multiple 7nm products at TSMC, including our first 7nm GPU planned to launch later this year and our first 7nm server CPU that we plan to launch in 2019. Our work with TSMC on their 7nm node has gone very well and we have seen excellent results from early silicon. To streamline our development and align our investments closely with each of our foundry partner’s investments, today we are announcing we intend to focus the breadth of our 7nm product portfolio on TSMC’s industry-leading 7nm process. We also continue to have a broad partnership with GLOBALFOUNDRIES spanning multiple process nodes and technologies. We will leverage the additional investments GLOBALFOUNDRIES is making in their robust 14nm and 12nm technologies at their New York fab to support the ongoing ramp of our AMD Ryzen, AMD Radeon and AMD EPYC processors. We do not expect any changes to our product roadmaps as a result of these changes.
We are proud of the long-standing and successful relationships we have built with our multiple foundry partners, and we will continue to strengthen these relationships to enable the manufacturing capacity required to support our product roadmaps. I look forward to providing more details on those innovations as we prepare to introduce the industry’s first 7nm GPU later this year and our first 7nm CPUs next year.
Jespi
Member
Posts: 22
Joined: 2017-03-02
Member
Posts: 22
Joined: 2017-03-02
#5578784 Posted on: 08/28/2018 01:10 PM
While I doubt TSMC can mass-produce all these products on 7nm, it's good news for consumers.
TSMC is considered superior to GloFo in terms of performance and density. my issue is if they can scale 7nm to bigger chips.
Those are not good news for consumers in a long therm.
In short therm, yeah probably 7nm Vega and Zen2 will rock, due to known cooperation between TSMC and NVIDIA, as we know what TSMC can do with their fabrication.
But in a long therm ? Let's go back in time, when GloFo had started. TSMC acted like monopol back then. Higher prices, lower invesments in new research, roadmaps for the new products were wider and wider. Then GloFo came with their 14nm and TSMC had to fight for their place in the market again.
So now 7nm is basically done, so it won't affect the end market that much. But what next? What in 3-5-7 yrs? Competition in any market is good for the customers, and saying that GloFo being in deep shit is good for us is a bold statement.
So to be a little sarcastic. Enjoy your TSMC's Vega and Zen2, how it's better than GloFo and then cry in next 4 year that we got overpriced products from AMD too.
While I doubt TSMC can mass-produce all these products on 7nm, it's good news for consumers.
TSMC is considered superior to GloFo in terms of performance and density. my issue is if they can scale 7nm to bigger chips.
Those are not good news for consumers in a long therm.
In short therm, yeah probably 7nm Vega and Zen2 will rock, due to known cooperation between TSMC and NVIDIA, as we know what TSMC can do with their fabrication.
But in a long therm ? Let's go back in time, when GloFo had started. TSMC acted like monopol back then. Higher prices, lower invesments in new research, roadmaps for the new products were wider and wider. Then GloFo came with their 14nm and TSMC had to fight for their place in the market again.
So now 7nm is basically done, so it won't affect the end market that much. But what next? What in 3-5-7 yrs? Competition in any market is good for the customers, and saying that GloFo being in deep shit is good for us is a bold statement.
So to be a little sarcastic. Enjoy your TSMC's Vega and Zen2, how it's better than GloFo and then cry in next 4 year that we got overpriced products from AMD too.
cowie
Senior Member
Posts: 13271
Joined: 2005-03-30
Senior Member
Posts: 13271
Joined: 2005-03-30
#5578790 Posted on: 08/28/2018 01:18 PM
I think they got what they wanted on both sides ...consoles
low power is np for them I bet but forget bigger chips.
plus the cost to make them is not worth it at this time
just a guess
I think they got what they wanted on both sides ...consoles
low power is np for them I bet but forget bigger chips.
plus the cost to make them is not worth it at this time
just a guess
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11528
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11528
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5578857 Posted on: 08/28/2018 03:29 PM
Tapeout has different meaning than full production, it means that they finalized those designs into exact form they'll have in those following 30M+ chips which AMD's clients will be able to purchase.
While it does not say that TSMC is ready for mass production, it means that AMD has chips which work way they are happy about. And that confirms that GloFo's decision to stop 7nm does not cause delay for AMD. From this we can presume that AMD is not behind their schedule.
And there is no reason to make some rumors and catastrophic scenarios someone here may want to make.
3 is significantly less than 30 million. Again, as said - production capacity is still very limited. And there is a huge queue for 7FF. Aside of Qualcomm and AMD there are also Nvidia, Apple, MediaTek, Huawei etc etc. Even now even probably IBM.
Tapeout has different meaning than full production, it means that they finalized those designs into exact form they'll have in those following 30M+ chips which AMD's clients will be able to purchase.
While it does not say that TSMC is ready for mass production, it means that AMD has chips which work way they are happy about. And that confirms that GloFo's decision to stop 7nm does not cause delay for AMD. From this we can presume that AMD is not behind their schedule.
And there is no reason to make some rumors and catastrophic scenarios someone here may want to make.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11528
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11528
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5578860 Posted on: 08/28/2018 03:33 PM
Those are not good news for consumers in a long therm.
In short therm, yeah probably 7nm Vega and Zen2 will rock, due to known cooperation between TSMC and NVIDIA, as we know what TSMC can do with their fabrication.
But in a long therm ? Let's go back in time, when GloFo had started. TSMC acted like monopol back then. Higher prices, lower invesments in new research, roadmaps for the new products were wider and wider. Then GloFo came with their 14nm and TSMC had to fight for their place in the market again.
So now 7nm is basically done, so it won't affect the end market that much. But what next? What in 3-5-7 yrs? Competition in any market is good for the customers, and saying that GloFo being in deep crap is good for us is a bold statement.
So to be a little sarcastic. Enjoy your TSMC's Vega and Zen2, how it's better than GloFo and then cry in next 4 year that we got overpriced products from AMD too.
Long term is not problem. Moment Samsung of someone who manages to get 7nm working in way GloFo considers it profitable enough, they'll jump on it. So now there is TSMC 7nm. From AMD's historical talk, they expected to be on 7nm, 7nm+, 7nm++, ... for quite some time. This means that even with 2 year delay on GloFo's side there's not going to be big pricing problem as Price gouging of 7nm+ vs 7nm is not something clients of forge will accept.
Those are not good news for consumers in a long therm.
In short therm, yeah probably 7nm Vega and Zen2 will rock, due to known cooperation between TSMC and NVIDIA, as we know what TSMC can do with their fabrication.
But in a long therm ? Let's go back in time, when GloFo had started. TSMC acted like monopol back then. Higher prices, lower invesments in new research, roadmaps for the new products were wider and wider. Then GloFo came with their 14nm and TSMC had to fight for their place in the market again.
So now 7nm is basically done, so it won't affect the end market that much. But what next? What in 3-5-7 yrs? Competition in any market is good for the customers, and saying that GloFo being in deep crap is good for us is a bold statement.
So to be a little sarcastic. Enjoy your TSMC's Vega and Zen2, how it's better than GloFo and then cry in next 4 year that we got overpriced products from AMD too.
Long term is not problem. Moment Samsung of someone who manages to get 7nm working in way GloFo considers it profitable enough, they'll jump on it. So now there is TSMC 7nm. From AMD's historical talk, they expected to be on 7nm, 7nm+, 7nm++, ... for quite some time. This means that even with 2 year delay on GloFo's side there's not going to be big pricing problem as Price gouging of 7nm+ vs 7nm is not something clients of forge will accept.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 483
Joined: 2005-02-23
Qualcomm believes that their 7nm made by TSMC will be here this year.
Then idea that AMD's already completed revision of Zen 2 would have to wait for 7nm... They would just rearange it for 14/12nm. 2020 is year for Zen 3.
And as AMD stated, they taped out MULTIPLE 7nm chip designs with TSMC. This means 3 or more products. And it means AMD knew about GloFo stopping their 7nm for quite some time.
I really wonder... There is Zen 2 core for all those EPYC CPUs. There is 7nm Vega. What is 3rd or more? Maybe TR core? Maybe there is more than 1 Vega on 7nm?
3 is significantly less than 30 million. Again, as said - production capacity is still very limited. And there is a huge queue for 7FF. Aside of Qualcomm and AMD there are also Nvidia, Apple, MediaTek, Huawei etc etc. Even now even probably IBM.