MS Flight Simulator (2020): the 2021 PC graphics performance benchmark review
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
AMD Ryzen Threadripper actually has 32-cores under that heatspreader
So one thing I have been thinking about for a while now is that AMDs server platform EPYC offers 32-core processors. Realistically it would not make much sense to create separate and create alternate SKUs for the consumer given AMDs recent history (4 core procs are really 8-core parts).
Well, Roman Hartung aka Der8auer just confirmed some suspicions I had in a video. He got his hands on an engineering sample Ryzen Threadripper processor, the brave man that he is delidded it (while knowing the dies are soldered to the heatspreader) and noticed four dies under there. He also killed the Threadripper that way :( That would be 8-cores per die folks! And that means in the future Threadripper could even scale upwards to 32-cores and 64-threads LOL.
Count them - 4 dies - 8 CCXes each holding 4 cores
We are a bit puzzled as to how things are configured for the to be released 16-core Threadripper. Common sense dictates that two dies would be disabled, then again there could be four dies active with 2 disabled cores per CCX. But ergo, Threadripper seems to be the same part that is the 32-core EPYC. And that opens up so many question like is that 1 DRAM channel per die ? :) Likely though the processors are binned based on yiels. During fabrication one core or a die might not be properly functioning, you disable that die and if you have two dies left 100% working, you get your 16-core part. But with yields always getting better over time, i would not be surprized to see Threadripper processors in the future with more than 16 cores activated.
Check the video to get that smile on your face.
Review: AMD Ryzen 3 1200 and 1300X - Entry Level Going Quad Core - 07/27/2017 02:00 PM
Entry level processors, going quad-core. Yes AMD is at it again with their Ryzen 3 series processors, in this review we test their Ryzen 3 1200 and 1300X. That means you can gain a significant number ...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper might get AIO LCS Liquid cooling bundled - 07/17/2017 02:39 PM
Granted, it is a bit of a ling shot to call this news-item accurate. but on the web right now rumors are surfacing that the new Threadripper processor, which have a 180W TDP, will get a liquid cooling...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper procs will offer a lot of bang for buck - 07/13/2017 05:00 PM
Earlier today AMD announced the two launch Ryzen Threadripper processor, the 12c/24t 1920X and 16c/32t 1950X. The processors, despite its enthusiast price level, are going to offer terrific value. And...
ASUS Releases Prime A320M-E - AMD Ryzen A320 Motherboard - 07/04/2017 07:37 AM
Cute, tiny and it should be affordable. ASUS just released its Prime A320M-E, this is a AMD A320 chipset based motherboard for Ryzen processors (Socket AM4)....
AMD Ryzen DDR4 Speed barrier broken by overclocker newlife to DDR4-4079.2 - 07/03/2017 06:54 AM
AMD Ryzen DDR4 Speed barrier broken by Australian overclocker newlife bringing it to DDR4-4079.2Mhz ! Recent AGESA updates have given motherboard vendors the chance to pump out BIOS updates that of...
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 5646
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 5646
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5456232 Posted on: 07/27/2017 05:23 PM
I can't say this surprises me either. But hey, at least now we know delidding one of these things isn't a viable option.
"We are a bit puzzled as to how things are configured for the to be released 16-core threadripper. Common sense dictates that two dies would be disabled, then again there could be four dies active with 2 disabled cores per CCX. But ergo, Threadripper really is 32-core EPYC. And that opens up so many question like is that 1 DRAM channel per die ?"
I'm sure it's not as complicated as it might seem. Kind of the point of the CCXs and infinity fabric is to exchange data across the entire die. So it wouldn't surprise me if in some cases an entire CCX has no active cores, but the L3 cache, memory controller, and PCIe lanes are still available for the others to utilize. Maybe I'm way off, but how else would AMD account for defective cores in such a complex CPU? Perhaps this is why AMD never made any single-CCX Ryzens, because otherwise that might have forced it into single-channel memory.
I can't say this surprises me either. But hey, at least now we know delidding one of these things isn't a viable option.
"We are a bit puzzled as to how things are configured for the to be released 16-core threadripper. Common sense dictates that two dies would be disabled, then again there could be four dies active with 2 disabled cores per CCX. But ergo, Threadripper really is 32-core EPYC. And that opens up so many question like is that 1 DRAM channel per die ?"
I'm sure it's not as complicated as it might seem. Kind of the point of the CCXs and infinity fabric is to exchange data across the entire die. So it wouldn't surprise me if in some cases an entire CCX has no active cores, but the L3 cache, memory controller, and PCIe lanes are still available for the others to utilize. Maybe I'm way off, but how else would AMD account for defective cores in such a complex CPU? Perhaps this is why AMD never made any single-CCX Ryzens, because otherwise that might have forced it into single-channel memory.
SirDremor
Senior Member
Posts: 586
Joined: 2008-06-20
Senior Member
Posts: 586
Joined: 2008-06-20
#5456254 Posted on: 07/27/2017 05:54 PM
That means yields are not that great, that they use only "half" of cores.
Ok, let's pretend they are.
vbetts, is this comment also too flaming for you to tolerate my presence and refusal to love AMD?
That means yields are not that great, that they use only "half" of cores.
Ok, let's pretend they are.
vbetts, is this comment also too flaming for you to tolerate my presence and refusal to love AMD?
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 5646
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 5646
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5456258 Posted on: 07/27/2017 06:06 PM
I wouldn't say that so absolutely, but you're probably right. Keep in mind though that core count seems inversely proportionate to potential buyers. In other words, I'm sure more people have an interest in a 16 core than a 32 core. So ultimately, it works out for processor manufacturers. As with anything you manufacture, the more complex it is, the greater the chances of there being a defect. It's inevitable, and too expensive to just throw these things away, so they're limited in various ways. Take LCDs for example - manufacturers allow more headroom of dead pixels as panels get larger, because when you've got a 30" display with a dead pixel here and there, that's a lot of product that'd otherwise go to waste:
http://www.tested.com/tech/1337-we-uncover-the-dead-pixel-policies-for-every-major-lcd-maker/
For once, I'd say the first part wasn't. However, I'm not sure he's going to appreciate the 2nd half
That means yields are not that great, that they use only "half" of cores.
I wouldn't say that so absolutely, but you're probably right. Keep in mind though that core count seems inversely proportionate to potential buyers. In other words, I'm sure more people have an interest in a 16 core than a 32 core. So ultimately, it works out for processor manufacturers. As with anything you manufacture, the more complex it is, the greater the chances of there being a defect. It's inevitable, and too expensive to just throw these things away, so they're limited in various ways. Take LCDs for example - manufacturers allow more headroom of dead pixels as panels get larger, because when you've got a 30" display with a dead pixel here and there, that's a lot of product that'd otherwise go to waste:
http://www.tested.com/tech/1337-we-uncover-the-dead-pixel-policies-for-every-major-lcd-maker/
vbetts, is this comment also too flaming for you to tolerate my presence and refusal to love AMD?
For once, I'd say the first part wasn't. However, I'm not sure he's going to appreciate the 2nd half
wavetrex
Senior Member
Posts: 1371
Joined: 2008-07-16
Senior Member
Posts: 1371
Joined: 2008-07-16
#5456265 Posted on: 07/27/2017 06:31 PM
Holy mother of cores... !!
If they are able to build these at a decently low production cost, it means that they can compete with Intel's offerings indefinitely.
Sometime 2018:
Intel (finally) launches their 18-core uber-expensive 1999$ top of the line HEDT.
"We have moar corez !"
AMD:
"yawn" ... launches 24 cores TR
Intel ups the frequency 100Mhz in despair... TDP goes through the startosphere.
AMD:
"more yawn" ... launches 32 cores TR. BANG. BANG. Ur Dead.
Holy mother of cores... !!
If they are able to build these at a decently low production cost, it means that they can compete with Intel's offerings indefinitely.
Sometime 2018:
Intel (finally) launches their 18-core uber-expensive 1999$ top of the line HEDT.
"We have moar corez !"
AMD:
"yawn" ... launches 24 cores TR
Intel ups the frequency 100Mhz in despair... TDP goes through the startosphere.
AMD:
"more yawn" ... launches 32 cores TR. BANG. BANG. Ur Dead.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2068
Joined: 2017-03-10
Yeah, just saw the video by Der8auer. Quite interesting, although not too surprised. Perhaps Threadripper is just EPYC CPUs that didn't quite make it?