ASUS ROG Swift PG259QN 360Hz Monitor review
ASRock Z590 Taichi review
Zotac GeForce RTX 3070 Ti AMP Holo review
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gaming OC review
Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPRO review
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti founder edition review
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Suprim X review
Asus ROG Gladius III (wired and wireless) mouse review
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti founder edition review
Palit GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GameRock OC review
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Reaches 4.1 GHz With Liquid Cooling
And that is on all sixteen cores. As it seems a user on redddit called "callingthewolf" is showing off an AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X tweaked towards 4.1 GHz.
The proc normally has a base frequency of 3.4 GHz. He gets his Threadripper towards 4.0 GHz @ 1.25 V core already, yet needs 1.4 V on the core to reach 4.1 GHz. While spotted via wcctech, Callingthewolf used a Thermaltake Water 3.0 liquid cooler and an ASRock motherboard with all DIMM channels in use, that would be 8 x 8 GB running at 3066 MHz DIMMs. The scores then, a 4.0 GHz Threadripper 1950X reaches a nice 3337 points in Cinebench R15. At 4.1GHz 58391 points in Geekbench 3. Not bad for a "glued together" product.
The results are indicative that Threadripper will perform and tweak similar towards Ryzen. Yet now with 12 and 16 cores.
Cooler Master Announces Support for AMD Ryzen Threadripper and Socket TR4 - 08/05/2017 01:13 PM
Cooler Master announces support for AMD Ryzen Threadripper and Socket TR4 for its all-in-one liquid CPU coolers with a mounting kit (RL-TR4B-MLLS-R1). The list of coolers includes: MasterLiquid 240, M...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Review Kit Unboxing Leaked at SweClockers - 08/03/2017 09:17 AM
The guys at SweClockers made a bit of a booboo earlier today. Media has been receiving their Threadripper kits for review and are allowed to share a bit of un-boxing, however there is still an embargo...
NZXT Kraken X62, X52 and X61 compatible with AMD Ryzen Threadripper - 08/01/2017 12:21 PM
A short and sweet message from NZXT, they confirm the Kraken coolers mentioned below are officially compatible and approved for the new AMD platform. ...
ASRock announces AMD Ryzen Threadripper X399 Motherboards - 07/28/2017 10:23 AM
ASRock is pleased to announce the launch of motherboards for AMD's new Ryzen Threadripper socketTR4 CPUs. ASRock is supporting Threadripper and the X399 chipset with the new X399 Professional Gaming ...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper actually has 32-cores under that heatspreader - 07/27/2017 06:13 PM
So one thing I have been thinking about for a while now is that AMDs server platform EPYC has 32-core processors. Realistically is would not make much sense to create separate SKUs for the consumer gi...
Noisiv
Senior Member
Posts: 7885
Joined: 2010-11-16
Senior Member
Posts: 7885
Joined: 2010-11-16
#5460985 Posted on: 08/09/2017 01:18 PM
1.248 for 4.0 on 16 cores..
considering my 1700 wants 1.35 for 3.7 to be stable at LLC lvl 3
no wonder, because i think they already said they were harvesting parts for TR
1.248 for 4.0 on 16 cores..
considering my 1700 wants 1.35 for 3.7 to be stable at LLC lvl 3
no wonder, because i think they already said they were harvesting parts for TR
JamesSneed
Senior Member
Posts: 1168
Joined: 2017-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 1168
Joined: 2017-02-14
#5461002 Posted on: 08/09/2017 02:09 PM
Running 4.0 GHz @ 1.25 I would expect you could keep that cool with air. The reviews are going to be fun to read.
Running 4.0 GHz @ 1.25 I would expect you could keep that cool with air. The reviews are going to be fun to read.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 5902
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 5902
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5461007 Posted on: 08/09/2017 02:38 PM
On 16 cores, maybe, but you might have some loud fan issues.
Personally, I'd much rather stick with the 1.25v and lose the extra 100MHz. I'm at 3.9GHz myself because the power savings were so much greater.
Running 4.0 GHz @ 1.25 I would expect you could keep that cool with air. The reviews are going to be fun to read.
On 16 cores, maybe, but you might have some loud fan issues.
Personally, I'd much rather stick with the 1.25v and lose the extra 100MHz. I'm at 3.9GHz myself because the power savings were so much greater.
DARKSF
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 2005-03-08
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 2005-03-08
#5461008 Posted on: 08/09/2017 02:44 PM
As for the V-RAY Benchmark there are already 2 entries with Threadripper 1950X and one with 1920X and from all results the second place is held by 2xEPYC 7601 system with total of 128 threads just behind the crown winner with 4xE7-8890 v3 with 144 threads.EPYC Threadripping
AMD will just beat Intel like a dog in the workstation class.
https://benchmark.chaosgroup.com/cpu?page=9
As for the V-RAY Benchmark there are already 2 entries with Threadripper 1950X and one with 1920X and from all results the second place is held by 2xEPYC 7601 system with total of 128 threads just behind the crown winner with 4xE7-8890 v3 with 144 threads.EPYC Threadripping
AMD will just beat Intel like a dog in the workstation class.
https://benchmark.chaosgroup.com/cpu?page=9
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 766
Joined: 2013-04-08
1.248 for 4.0 on 16 cores..
considering my 1700 wants 1.35 for 3.7 to be stable at LLC lvl 3