Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review

New Downloads
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4255
GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.2 WHQL download
GeForce 531.29 WHQL driver download
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.0 Beta3 Download
AMD Ryzen Master Utility Download 2.10.2.2367
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.1 WHQL download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.1
CPU-Z download v2.05
AMD Chipset Drivers Download 5.02.19.2221


New Forum Topics
Diablo IV Beta Reportedly Causing Issues with GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Potentially Leading to Card Failure NVIDIA GeForce 531.29 WHQL driver Download & Discussion FSR Thread Afterburner - OSD "skin" NVIDIA GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver Download & Discussion RDNA3 RX7000 Seriess! Owners Thread, Tests, Benchmarks, Screenshots, Overclocks, & Tweaks! Review: ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 Windows power plan settings explorer utility 531.41 - Clean Version Need Help with my 3070 Gamerock RGB




Guru3D.com » News » AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed

AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/27/2017 04:28 PM | source: | 96 comment(s)
AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed

The game performance of Ryzen processors has been topic of much discussion ever since the CPUs have been released. The 8-core parts are 2x 4 cores clusters called a CCX each. In-between the two CCXes is an interconnect for caches and communication etc. 

The now commonly accepted thesis is that the bandwidth over that inter connect is limited. It clocks similar to your DDR4 memory, hence faster memory does have an effect on game performance. So with 8-cores, how would game performance be if you used just 4 cores on one CCX, or 2 cores per CCX? As in theory, if you shut down two cores per CCX, that interconnect would not be flooded so much and in theory that should increase CPU bound (lower resolution) game-performance. 

The guys over at Hardware Unboxed (a YouTube channel) put that to the test as the ASUS HERO motherboard allows to configure these setups in the BIOS. The end results are interesting, as really .. whatever configuration you choose, it just doesn’t matter that much. And that also tells a thing or two about upcoming 6 and 4 core processors from AMD.

Long story short, your best bet for faster game CPU bound game performance, remains to be overclocking the processor a bit and using fast high frequency memory. 

Source Hardware Unboxed (YouTube) via TPU. Have a peek at the game results below, you can click the thumbnails.



AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed




« Colorful iGAME GTX 1080 Ti Gets 16 GPU Power Phases · AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed · Intels Skylake-SP Xeon-processors will get metal based names »

Related Stories

AMD Ryzen Processor with 12 Cores and 24 Threads Spotted - 03/25/2017 08:11 PM
There's not a day that goes by with something Ryzen. We talked 32,16, 8, 6 and 4 core processors, we can now add a 12-core version as well.  ...

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 already selling - 03/23/2017 05:58 PM
It seems that some consumers already have been able to order Ryzen 5 processors, interesting as these should not be available for another three weeks. ...

AMD Ryzen 7 have a Temperature 20 Degree C Reporting Offset - 03/14/2017 08:57 AM
Alright, in the same blog post as mentioned in the previous item AMD also talks about a Temperature Reporting Offset. This one was new to us, but basically what they claim is the following. To keep a...

AMD Ryzen Gets Delidded - And It Is a Tricky Thing to Do - 03/10/2017 11:04 AM
We mentioned in our reviews that you should not delid AMD Ryzen processors for the sheer fact that even the heatspreader has sensors and that it is soldered. Next to that AMD did the cooling part rath...

Microsoft Windows Bug Is Holding Back AMD Ryzen - 03/10/2017 09:44 AM
We've been adressing the topic widely in our reviews, it makes little sense for Ryzen processors that are that powerful to not perform as well in games in CPU bound situations. Microsoft now sends wo...


20 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


Agent-A01
Senior Member



Posts: 11619
Joined: 2010-12-27

#5412955 Posted on: 03/27/2017 04:34 PM
So the poor gaming performance is due to another issue.

Maybe a game engine with 'proper' optimization will bring some improvements, if not poor game performance will continue on until Ryzen 2.

Toss3
Senior Member



Posts: 202
Joined: 2010-03-25

#5412962 Posted on: 03/27/2017 04:46 PM
Would be nice to know what is causing the bad performance in games if it isn't the CCX interconnect. AMD should get on this asap (or maybe they know it cannot be solved and are thus staying quite).

Dygaza
Senior Member



Posts: 536
Joined: 2015-05-18

#5412967 Posted on: 03/27/2017 04:53 PM
So the poor gaming performance is due to another issue.

Maybe a game engine with 'proper' optimization will bring some improvements, if not poor game performance will continue on until Ryzen 2.

Dunno what they changed in Dota2, but atleast there was quite big uprade atleast with game update (+25% roughly).

eclap
Senior Member



Posts: 31492
Joined: 2005-01-08

#5412970 Posted on: 03/27/2017 04:55 PM
Watched this video this morning. Most of the differences are within margin of error.

rl66
Senior Member



Posts: 3604
Joined: 2007-05-31

#5412971 Posted on: 03/27/2017 04:55 PM
So the poor gaming performance is due to another issue.

Maybe a game engine with 'proper' optimization will bring some improvements, if not poor game performance will continue on until Ryzen 2.

So exept in bench ryzen is not an Intel killer (with on top of that, price not so low as anounced).and with Intel mainstream with over 4 core (yay at last ) with new socket in a few.

so it's a 50% success (i am 50% happy for them but was expecting more).

20 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023