Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review

New Downloads
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.5.2 WHQL download
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4382
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.1 Download
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v5.2
GeForce 535.98 WHQL driver download
CPU-Z download v2.06
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.5.1 WHQL download
GeForce 532.03 WHQL driver download
AMD Chipset Drivers Download 5.05.16.529
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.4


New Forum Topics
Review: Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 23.5.2 - Driver Download and Discussion Reference AMD RX 7600 to undergo modifications to ensure compatibility with all power cables German translation NVIDIA GeForce Game Ready 535.98 WHQL Download & Discussion Aliexpress "3070M" Desktop card driver NVIDIA GeForce Hotfix Driver 536.09 3060ti vs 6700xt a year later finally joined the 5800X3D club Amernime Zone AMD Software: Adrenalin / Pro Driver - Discovery Remix 23.4.2 WHQL [Omega 23.5.1 WIP]




Guru3D.com » News » AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed

AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/27/2017 04:28 PM | source: | 96 comment(s)
AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed

The game performance of Ryzen processors has been topic of much discussion ever since the CPUs have been released. The 8-core parts are 2x 4 cores clusters called a CCX each. In-between the two CCXes is an interconnect for caches and communication etc. 

The now commonly accepted thesis is that the bandwidth over that inter connect is limited. It clocks similar to your DDR4 memory, hence faster memory does have an effect on game performance. So with 8-cores, how would game performance be if you used just 4 cores on one CCX, or 2 cores per CCX? As in theory, if you shut down two cores per CCX, that interconnect would not be flooded so much and in theory that should increase CPU bound (lower resolution) game-performance. 

The guys over at Hardware Unboxed (a YouTube channel) put that to the test as the ASUS HERO motherboard allows to configure these setups in the BIOS. The end results are interesting, as really .. whatever configuration you choose, it just doesn’t matter that much. And that also tells a thing or two about upcoming 6 and 4 core processors from AMD.

Long story short, your best bet for faster game CPU bound game performance, remains to be overclocking the processor a bit and using fast high frequency memory. 

Source Hardware Unboxed (YouTube) via TPU. Have a peek at the game results below, you can click the thumbnails.



AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed




« Colorful iGAME GTX 1080 Ti Gets 16 GPU Power Phases · AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2+2 versus 4+0 Core Setups Analyzed · Intels Skylake-SP Xeon-processors will get metal based names »

Related Stories

AMD Ryzen Processor with 12 Cores and 24 Threads Spotted - 03/25/2017 08:11 PM
There's not a day that goes by with something Ryzen. We talked 32,16, 8, 6 and 4 core processors, we can now add a 12-core version as well.  ...

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 already selling - 03/23/2017 05:58 PM
It seems that some consumers already have been able to order Ryzen 5 processors, interesting as these should not be available for another three weeks. ...

AMD Ryzen 7 have a Temperature 20 Degree C Reporting Offset - 03/14/2017 08:57 AM
Alright, in the same blog post as mentioned in the previous item AMD also talks about a Temperature Reporting Offset. This one was new to us, but basically what they claim is the following. To keep a...

AMD Ryzen Gets Delidded - And It Is a Tricky Thing to Do - 03/10/2017 11:04 AM
We mentioned in our reviews that you should not delid AMD Ryzen processors for the sheer fact that even the heatspreader has sensors and that it is soldered. Next to that AMD did the cooling part rath...

Microsoft Windows Bug Is Holding Back AMD Ryzen - 03/10/2017 09:44 AM
We've been adressing the topic widely in our reviews, it makes little sense for Ryzen processors that are that powerful to not perform as well in games in CPU bound situations. Microsoft now sends wo...


20 pages « 2 3 4 5 > »


BlueRay
Senior Member



Posts: 278
Joined: 2015-11-18

#5412981 Posted on: 03/27/2017 05:18 PM
Intel may be advancing slowly and milking the market but they are still the top performer for gaming reasons.
As I see it Intel is the choice for gaming and AMD for everything else or a mix of those.
Those who use their PC strictly for gaming they are better off with Intel.

Camaxide
Member



Posts: 92
Joined: 2016-05-29

#5412984 Posted on: 03/27/2017 05:22 PM
Since when is 7700k 4.8ghz?


Did you even look at the test..?

eclap
Member



Posts: 31492
Joined: 2005-01-08

#5412987 Posted on: 03/27/2017 05:31 PM
Did you even look at the test..?


I watched the full video this morning.

Kaarme
Senior Member



Posts: 3405
Joined: 2013-03-10

#5412996 Posted on: 03/27/2017 05:52 PM
7700K is 4.8GHz and ryzen 4.0GHz so add another 20% for ryzen and compare clock to clock and situation changes in favor of ryzen so i think amd has done good job with ryzen.


Let's talk about clock to clock when AMD and GloFo manage to get the clocks up. Until that time, no Kaby Lake owner is going to downclock their expensive CPU.

so it's a 50% success (i am 50% happy for them but was expecting more).


100% successful at forcing Intel to finally consider 6-core mainstream.

Nature007
Junior Member



Posts: 3
Joined: 2017-03-27

#5413002 Posted on: 03/27/2017 06:06 PM
Test with mem 2666...hmmm

20 pages « 2 3 4 5 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023