AMD Ryzen Chips 10% Smaller When Compared to Intel Skylake Dies
AMD states its upcoming Ryzen core fits into a 10 percent smaller die area than Intel’s currently shipping second-generation 14nm processor. Analysts and even Intel engineers in the session said the Zen core is clearly competitive though many confidential variables will determine whether the die advantage translates into lower cost for AMD reports eetimes.
EEtimes: The paper detailed techniques AMD used to reduce switching capacitance by 15 percent compared to its existing chips. For example, Zen marked AMD’s first use of a metal-insulator-metal capacitor which helped lower operating voltages and provide greater per-core voltage and frequency control.
Engineers tracked on a weekly basis power benchmarks on high activity regions for more than a year to reduce switching capacitance. The company now has two eight-core designs running with simultaneous multithreading at 3.4 GHz.
Hilbert: one thing they are not taking into account is the lacking integrated GPU. On Intels side it eats up nearly a third of the die space. For AMD, they do not use an IGP - the entire die size is thus used for the actual processors.
AMD Ryzen R7, R5 and R3 Processor Line-up listed - 02/04/2017 09:50 AM
Ah yes, a new day a new Ryzen related post! This one is fairly tasty and interesting though as website coolaler is listing the complete line up of AMD Ryzen processors ssors, including names. ...
AMD Ryzen CPU scores pop up in Ashes Of The Singularity Benchmark Database - 02/03/2017 07:03 PM
Oh man, there is no stopping this hype train is it ? Somebody posted a screenshots of Ashes of the Singularity showing a CPU benchmark run with you guessed it right, an AMD Ryzen entry. You’...
AMD Ryzen CPUs to support Windows 7 with drivers - 02/02/2017 06:54 PM
The lads at Computerbase noticed that AMD is hard at work with Ryzen drivers, Windows 7 is also getting fully supported opposed to what Intel is doing (Kaby lake only has full support starting at Wind...
Six Core AMD Ryzen Processors Might Still Possible - 02/02/2017 10:02 AM
So we have posted a thing or two already about Ryzen being released as 4 and 8 core processors. AMD will release an 4 and 8-core model with and without hyper-threading. ...
Noctua presents three special-edition AM4 CPU coolers for AMD Ryzen - 02/01/2017 04:18 PM
Noctua today presented three special-edition models of its award-winning quiet CPU coolers. The new SE-AM4 versions of the NH-D15, NH-U12S and NH-L9x65 are dedicated premium-quality solutions for the ...
Junior Member
Posts: 11
Joined: 2015-06-21
Also where is 2C and 2C/4T, where is mobile/ultramobile lineup?
If Zen cores are that capable why avoid attacking these more lucrative segments?t
AMD will be targeting mobile with Raven Ridge (4C/8T Zen-based APU with 1024 Stream Processors) shortly after Summit Ridge is released. We probably only hear about Summit Ridge lately because AMD and Hardware sites know that is what we have the most interest in.
Senior Member
Posts: 561
Joined: 2016-05-24
APu with 1024 stream processors would be simply Xbox one or PS4 - APU for CPU, i wonder why they didnt it 2 years ago, maybe some dont not attack deal with MS and Sony.
Senior Member
Posts: 762
Joined: 2014-02-23
No it's not - Intel's process is more dense, it shows the specifications of it in the graph in the article. AMD's architecture is clearly more "compact" requiring less transistors for (hopefully) the same performance. This probably also factors into the power being lower.
I think the bigger effect on heat dissipation is lack of iGPU - but big Zen is also 8/16 so those chips will probably be similar in size to Intel's 4/8 + iGPU (since Zen doesn't have an iGPU). This is only a 4mm2 difference and less transistors should mean lower power anyway. Either way I don't think it's going to be an issue - as long as AMD doesn't glue their headspreader on with a 30 meter gap like Intel does.
As far as the second paragraph - Intel uses more size for a core, it's unknown whether that core is faster or not though. Also both companies seem to have no problem fitting up to 16+ cores and whatnot, so I don't think the difference is going to factor much into the total core count.
Did Intel ever bother with an attempt rationalize their decision on that?