AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 6% faster in gaming than Core i9-13900K
If we can believe the reviewer's guide that got leaked today by HD technologica. The highly-anticipated AMD Ryzen 7000X3D processor has been leaked, revealing performance comparisons with the Core i9-13900K.
The leak includes data from a confidential review guide and shows that the flagship Ryzen 9 7950X3D model has been tested against the Core i9-13900K with both Radeon RX 7900 XTX and NVIDIA RTX 4090 GPUs. The new processor boasts an extended L3 cache and is being compared to the original 7950X model without the cache. Given the impressive results from the previous Ryzen 7 5800X3D with Zen3, expectations are high for the new Zen4 desktop processor. While these review guides tend to focus on optimized games and may not represent real-world performance, they offer an early glimpse into the upcoming CPU's capabilities.
The upcoming Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor, outperforms Intel's i9-13900K by 5.6% in 22 games when paired with the Radeon RX 7900 XT. The differences in performance range from 26.9% in Horizon Zero Down to Intel's superiority in games like Far Cry 6.
When paired with an RTX 4090, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 6% faster than the i9-13900K and up to 16% faster than the Ryzen 9 7950X. However, in multicore performance, Intel comes out on top in almost all tests, including popular ones like Cinebench R23 and Geekbench 5.4. The i9-13900K is also $90 cheaper and a better option for those prioritizing multicore performance. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D may be the better option for gamers with a high-end graphics card, although both the 7950X3D and the 13900K are pricey and not necessary for gaming when a more affordable i5 or Ryzen 5 can suffice. These are official AMD benchmarks, and reviews will provide more insight into the actual performance of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D and its younger sibling, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D.
Next week, Ryzen 9 7950X3D will go on sale for $699. This is how much the 7950X CPU cost when it first came out last year. However, that AMD CPU is now much cheaper and can be found for around $589. The Intel Core i9-13900K costs $569,-
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Now Also Spotted in benchmark - Geekbench - 02/17/2023 05:18 PM
AMD's upcoming Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor is set to be released later this month and has already been benchmarked using Geekbench. The processor was tested on an ASUS X670E Hero motherboard, paired wi...
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Spotted With RTX 4090 in Gaming Benchmark Leaks - 02/17/2023 10:15 AM
BenchLeaks recently published one of the first benchmarks for the Ryzen 9 7900X3D in the game Ashes of The Singularity (AoTS)....
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X sees price drop to $299 - 02/03/2023 09:38 AM
If you'd like to purchase a Ryzen 7 7700X 8-core/16-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, now might be a good time as you can spot it for $299...
AMD Ryzen 7000X3D is not overclockable, however will support for PBO 2 and the Curve Optimizer - 01/24/2023 07:58 PM
Over the weekend, AMD made an error on their product pages, suggesting that the upcoming X3D CPUs could be overclocked. That is not entirely correct....
Noctua Introduces NH-L9a-AM5 Low-Profile CPU Coolers for AMD Ryzen Processors - 01/24/2023 04:56 PM
Noctua announced today the next addition to their popular NH-L9 series of low-profile CPU coolers: The new NH-L9a-AM5 and NH-L9a-AM5 chromax.black, with a height of only 37 mm, are a perfect solution ...
Senior Member
Posts: 606
Joined: 2014-09-21
To people saying I missed the "Up to" part I would encourage you to read the fucking chart that is literally the OP of this thread. The 16% is the AVERAGE if you go with "UP TO" its actually 41% like jesus fucking christ read the fucking chart its not fucking hard
Senior Member
Posts: 475
Joined: 2019-07-07
complicated to use with more bios settings...
I have read it many times from many people but the reality is that AMD already gives the processors close to 100%, the 5 settings that I will change in the bios to "push" my processor are certainly much less than changing only the frequencies of Intel's P cores not to mention all the other changes that a 12/13k needs to become the "best".
Senior Member
Posts: 3105
Joined: 2016-08-01
I'm having a blast with my 13600k.
Running it without HT but with ecores enabled, thus 14 threads.
5.6GHz all core 5.8GHz dual core and 4.3GHz ecores.
The thing is really fast beating 13900k stock on single core and close to a 12900k multicore which for me is more than enough.
Games also run very very well on the P cores at that clock.
I doubt 7800x3D will convince me to switch especially that this was only 320bangs running on my old DDR4
You have a 13600 makes absolutely no sense to update to anything just for gaming! IMHO

Senior Member
Posts: 475
Joined: 2019-07-07
That 7950x3d was compared against a 13900k at stock clocks with low memory speeds of ddr5-6000Mhz. Now i wish they did the same test with the 13900k overclocked to 5.7~6.0Ghz and ddr5-7200~8200Mhz and i bet onced tuned and overclocked that 13900k will have the lead

It seems to me the one to get is the 7800x3d , that one the price will be more reasonable and a good cpu. Not bad for gaming for just adding 3D cache.
The proper reviews will be done as they have been done all this time with factory settings,JEDEK configurations,or "sweet spot" of each processor,and it is possible this time AMD will pay Intel with the same "currency",as for the high frequencies in the memories above 7400 you need an expensive motherboard 690,790 but even then such high frequencies will only be useful for cpu z,AIDA or if your system is idling,in games it is difficult to run these settings and it will always there is the instability factor,also spoils the logic that AMD systems are MORE EXPENSIVE.
Senior Member
Posts: 707
Joined: 2003-11-19
Guys correct me if I'm wrong but isn't there a BIOS update from Asus coming out shortly that will boost the X3D CPU's by prioritizing its operations.