Fractal Design ION+ Platinum 660 and 860W PSU review
Silverstone Permafrost PF240 liquid cooler review
Intel Core i9 9900KS processor review
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
ASUS PRIME X570 Pro review
ASUS ROG STRIX Scope keyboard review
GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 Super WTF review
ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB NVMe M.2 SSD review
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X beats Intel i9-10980XE in 3DMark Firestrike by almost 25%
As releases dates are getting closer, we'll see more and more infor leak somehow. New is a 3DMark Firestrike for the Ryzen 9 3950X, which can be compared with Cascade Lake-X. Guess who won?
We assume the obvious being that we assume these benchmarks are genuine – as provided by the ever-present CPU leaker TUM_APISAK.
The AMD Ryzen 9 3950X (16-core) result which we see here was run on a X570 motherboard and shows a Firestrike test, shows a score of 32082. The maximum turbo clock shows just over 3,700MHz and the stock clock of 3,500MHz. The AMD rig was outfitted with 16GB of Kingston DDR4 at 3,200MHz and 16 cores with 32 threads active. An Core i9-10980XE (18-core) result with 32GB of 2,666MHz Samsung DDR4 scored 25,838, is great but substantially less.
Firestrike is heavily threaded limited though, ergo compared is the CPU tied Physics score.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X, 3970X and 3990X Launch Dates Leak - 10/18/2019 06:04 PM
news reaches the web today that AMD will release three Threadripper 3000 SKUs: 3960X, 3970X and 3990X. The first two would be unveiled on November 5th, the embargo on sales and reviews would be lifted...
AMD Ryzen 7 3750X Spotted - Has a TDP of 105 watts - 10/17/2019 08:03 AM
Recently we have seen some OEM specific Ryzen 3000 announcements, there might be one more inbound as we do not see this one end up in retail, a Ryzen 7 3750X showed up in a recent product master list...
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X Benchmarks - 10/11/2019 08:53 AM
Silently AMD expanded their Ryzen 3000 line-up this week, exclusively in Chinafor the time being. Ryzen 5 3500X has been benchmarked. The non SMT Ryzen 5 is compared with Intel's Core i5 9400F - who...
Team Group Outs Memory and PCI-E Gen4 x4 M.2 SSD for Supporting AMD Ryzen 3000 and X570 - 10/08/2019 10:52 AM
Team Group releases T-FORCE DARK Z α DDR4 Gaming Memory and CARDEA ZERO Z440 PCI-E Gen4 x4 M.2 Solid State Drive, which are specially made for AMD RYZEN 3000 processor series and the latest ...
Over 100 Improvements to be included in upcoming AMD Ryzen 3000: AGESA 1.0.0.4 - 10/04/2019 09:36 AM
While everybody is moving towards AGESA 1.0.0.3ABBA to squeeze out every last drop of performance from Ryzen 3000 processors, AMD is already at work on AGESA 1.0.0.4 as unreached boost frequencies is...
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 2715
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 2715
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5722507 Posted on: 10/21/2019 09:09 AM
Really impressive.
Really impressive.
Karel Dvořák
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 2019-10-21
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 2019-10-21
#5722513 Posted on: 10/21/2019 09:40 AM
It seems another type of GPU was used... 2080 ti vs. 2070??? No surprise Ryzen is faster then...
It seems another type of GPU was used... 2080 ti vs. 2070??? No surprise Ryzen is faster then...
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11867
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 11867
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5722515 Posted on: 10/21/2019 09:46 AM
No wonder Intel dropped prices by half, they knew.
No wonder Intel dropped prices by half, they knew.
Crazy Joe
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: 2016-11-29
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: 2016-11-29
#5722517 Posted on: 10/21/2019 09:53 AM
I'll wait for some independent reviews by sources I trust before jumping to conclusions. These sorts of leaks always seem fishy to me.
I'll wait for some independent reviews by sources I trust before jumping to conclusions. These sorts of leaks always seem fishy to me.
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 10947
Joined: 2014-07-21
Senior Member
Posts: 10947
Joined: 2014-07-21
#5722520 Posted on: 10/21/2019 09:59 AM
You know, I agree but... any company that can cut a products price by half and still make a profit is raising questions about their practices.
No wonder Intel dropped prices by half, they knew.
You know, I agree but... any company that can cut a products price by half and still make a profit is raising questions about their practices.
Typhoon2097
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2018-09-29
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2018-09-29
#5722522 Posted on: 10/21/2019 10:02 AM
Wait... Intel with GTX 2070 and slower RAM vs AMD with 2080Ti and faster RAM in GPU heavy test... And how is this comparison relevant ??
Wait... Intel with GTX 2070 and slower RAM vs AMD with 2080Ti and faster RAM in GPU heavy test... And how is this comparison relevant ??
tty8k
Member
Posts: 75
Joined: 2011-05-02
Member
Posts: 75
Joined: 2011-05-02
#5722524 Posted on: 10/21/2019 10:11 AM
Many of those links broken, a comparison with different graphic cards etc. Unreliable.
Many of those links broken, a comparison with different graphic cards etc. Unreliable.
wavetrex
Senior Member
Posts: 644
Joined: 2008-07-16
Senior Member
Posts: 644
Joined: 2008-07-16
#5722526 Posted on: 10/21/2019 10:13 AM
How about this (my 3700X vs 3950X):
https://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/20721349/fs/19987389
32% higher Physics score ... I'm not impressed.
What I am impressed though is the Maximum turbo core clock on 3950X, which is 4.7 Ghz !!! This will be a beast in gaming and most likely beat 9900K, KF or whatever anything else and become the top dog gaming GPU (of all CPUs in existence, not even 5.1 Ghz will be enough on Intel side to beat that)
p.s.
Intel Result has already been taken down, I expect the AMD one to disappear quickly as well.
Saved details from it:
3DMark Score
29663
Graphics Score
33698
Physics Score
32082
Combined Score
14750
Graphics Test 1
164.71 fps
Graphics Test 2
131.94 fps
Physics Test
101.85 fps
Combined Test
68.61 fps
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core Processor
Reported stock core clock
3,500 MHz
Maximum turbo core clock
4,715 MHz
Physical / logical processors
1 / 32
# of cores
16
Memory
16,384 MB
Module 1
8,192 MB Kingston DDR4 @ 3,194 MHz
Module 2
8,192 MB Kingston DDR4 @ 3,194 MHz
... and that's quite low speed RAM.
I'm guessing it can be quite faster with tuned 3733 MT/s !
How about this (my 3700X vs 3950X):
https://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/20721349/fs/19987389
32% higher Physics score ... I'm not impressed.
What I am impressed though is the Maximum turbo core clock on 3950X, which is 4.7 Ghz !!! This will be a beast in gaming and most likely beat 9900K, KF or whatever anything else and become the top dog gaming GPU (of all CPUs in existence, not even 5.1 Ghz will be enough on Intel side to beat that)
p.s.
Intel Result has already been taken down, I expect the AMD one to disappear quickly as well.
Saved details from it:
3DMark Score
29663
Graphics Score
33698
Physics Score
32082
Combined Score
14750
Graphics Test 1
164.71 fps
Graphics Test 2
131.94 fps
Physics Test
101.85 fps
Combined Test
68.61 fps
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core Processor
Reported stock core clock
3,500 MHz
Maximum turbo core clock
4,715 MHz
Physical / logical processors
1 / 32
# of cores
16
Memory
16,384 MB
Module 1
8,192 MB Kingston DDR4 @ 3,194 MHz
Module 2
8,192 MB Kingston DDR4 @ 3,194 MHz
... and that's quite low speed RAM.
I'm guessing it can be quite faster with tuned 3733 MT/s !
kanenas
Junior Member
Posts: 15
Joined: 2019-07-07
Junior Member
Posts: 15
Joined: 2019-07-07
#5722539 Posted on: 10/21/2019 10:55 AM
ergo compared is the CPU tied Physics score.
It seems another type of GPU was used... 2080 ti vs. 2070??? No surprise Ryzen is faster then...
ergo compared is the CPU tied Physics score.
nizzen
Senior Member
Posts: 793
Joined: 2005-08-05
Senior Member
Posts: 793
Joined: 2005-08-05
#5722549 Posted on: 10/21/2019 11:21 AM
My old 7980xe overclocked is getting 38k in 3dmark physics. Memory does impact the score bigtime.
10980xe will go over 40k easy when overclocking cpu and memory. Looks like they nerfed 10980xe to get 25k points LOL
My old 7980xe overclocked is getting 38k in 3dmark physics. Memory does impact the score bigtime.
10980xe will go over 40k easy when overclocking cpu and memory. Looks like they nerfed 10980xe to get 25k points LOL
asturur
Senior Member
Posts: 407
Joined: 2010-05-12
Senior Member
Posts: 407
Joined: 2010-05-12
#5722564 Posted on: 10/21/2019 12:01 PM
Not all benchmarks are about overclocking. Most of the people do not overclock.
I think the reason of 2666Mhz ddr and 3200 for AMD is because those are the highest officially supported as today?
Everything above i think is still considered overclock.
Not all benchmarks are about overclocking. Most of the people do not overclock.
I think the reason of 2666Mhz ddr and 3200 for AMD is because those are the highest officially supported as today?
Everything above i think is still considered overclock.
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1670
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1670
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5722569 Posted on: 10/21/2019 12:20 PM
The Intel score seems pretty low. It ought to be at least 30k in a reasonable system, I imagine. If compared to the ridiculously overprised 7980xe (the price of that CPU alone would allow building the entire 16 core Ryzen PC with good components), it should get in the same neighbourhood, surely. Talking about non-OC.
The Intel score seems pretty low. It ought to be at least 30k in a reasonable system, I imagine. If compared to the ridiculously overprised 7980xe (the price of that CPU alone would allow building the entire 16 core Ryzen PC with good components), it should get in the same neighbourhood, surely. Talking about non-OC.
Silva
Senior Member
Posts: 952
Joined: 2013-06-04
Senior Member
Posts: 952
Joined: 2013-06-04
#5722580 Posted on: 10/21/2019 01:00 PM
If you study economics you'll learn a company's sole objective is profit. You'll learn also that any company will try to have some kind of advantage and will use it to crush/buy any rivals in pursuit of monopoly. By that time, they can charge anything they want as long their production is sold. So, in recap, no questions raised anywhere, as AMD would/will do the same given the opportunity. Competition and choice is healthy for the market, monopoly is not.
You know, I agree but... any company that can cut a products price by half and still make a profit is raising questions about their practices.
If you study economics you'll learn a company's sole objective is profit. You'll learn also that any company will try to have some kind of advantage and will use it to crush/buy any rivals in pursuit of monopoly. By that time, they can charge anything they want as long their production is sold. So, in recap, no questions raised anywhere, as AMD would/will do the same given the opportunity. Competition and choice is healthy for the market, monopoly is not.
Typhoon2097
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2018-09-29
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2018-09-29
#5722584 Posted on: 10/21/2019 01:07 PM
Edit: Sorry, I was looking at the screenshots, not the text in the article
That is impressive...
Edit: Sorry, I was looking at the screenshots, not the text in the article
That is impressive...
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 115
Joined: 2012-06-24
If this is true, then this is massive news. Hopefully similar in other benchmarks. All we need now is the chip...