Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 OLED monitor review
ASUS Radeon RX 7600 STRIX OC review
Corsair RM1200X SHIFT 1200W PSU Review
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G Cezanne benchmark find their way to the web
And it seems to be substantially faster than its predecessor. A Ryzen 7 5700G (Cezanne ) was spotted and tested, the successor of the Ryzen 4000G (Renoir) as abenchmark leaked of the 8-core APU based on Zen 3 architecture.
The listing was posted by Patrick Schur. The Ryzen 7 5700G revealed product code OPN 100-000000263-30_Y and runs upwards to 4.55 GHz on single-core and reveleals multi-core averages of 4.45 GHz. Ryzen 7 5700G is expected to be an 8-core CPU with 16 threads. The base clock speed is 3.8 GHz with a boost to 4.6 GHz. The processor has 16MB L3 cache and 4MB L2 cache. The TDP is set at 65W. It has an integrated graphics solution based on Vega architecture with 8 compute units (CUs) =512 shading processors that run at up-to 2.1 GHz.
The APU scored a healthy 614 points in the single-core benchmark CPU-Z, 6229 in the multi-core test in CPU-Z. Cinebench R20 on its end shows a good 569 points in single-core and 5280 in multi-core.
Meanwhile well-informed Twitter user @momomo_us has now leaked the specifications of the upcoming Ryzen 5000G APUs, which had apparently leaked through HP Mexico. When the Cezanne desktop APUs based on Zen 3 will appear has not yet been communicated.
| Processor | Cores / Threads | Base / Boost clock (GHz) | L3 cache | TDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 5700G | 8/16 | 3.8 / 4.6 | 16MB | 65 W |
| Ryzen 7 4700G | 8/16 | 3.6 / 4.4 | 2x 4MB | 65 W |
| Ryzen 5 5600G | 6/12 | 3.9 / 4.4 | 16MB | 65 W |
| Ryzen 5 4600G | 6/12 | 3.7 / 4.2 | 2x 4MB | 65 W |
| Ryzen 3 5300G | 4/8 | 4.0 / 4.2 | 8MB | 65 W |
| Ryzen 3 4300G | 4/8 | 3.8 / 4.0 | 4MB | 65 W |
Leaked Benchmarks Indicate IPC Rocket Lake-S to be slower than AMD Ryzen 5000 - 03/22/2021 09:41 AM
One of the primary benefits of the pending Rocket Lake-S series is the fact they're based on new architecture, and that architecture will deliver better IPC. A Chinese website now has fired off a num...
ASUS ZenBook 13 OLED now available with an AMD Ryzen processor - 03/17/2021 09:06 AM
The new ASUS ZenBook 13 OLED with AMD processor is now available. With an AMD Ryzen processor of the 5000 series (up to Ryzen 7-5800U) and an almost frameless OLED display with full HD resolution, the...
AMD Ryzen 5 5300G Engineering Sample Sold on Ebay and Benchmarked - 03/15/2021 09:08 AM
There are still a few things pending in the ZEN3 line of products, APUs for example. Among the line, a Ryzen 5 5300G, and that one has been sighted as an engineering sample, and tested. ...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (non-X) Spotted - 02/22/2021 08:33 AM
Dell is listing an unannounced processor from AMD. For the ZEN3 AMD only has launched the X model, however, system builder Dell is now listing a Ryzen 7 5800....
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G desktop apu doing rounds - 02/15/2021 09:11 AM
An AMD Ryzen 7 5000G APU has surfaced on the web, with CPU-Z screenshots and everything. This ZEN3 desktop APU has eight Zen 3 cores with sixteen threads and an integrated Vega GPU. A product that AMD...
heffeque
Senior Member
Posts: 4334
Joined: 2003-03-03
Senior Member
Posts: 4334
Joined: 2003-03-03
#5902320 Posted on: 04/05/2021 02:51 PM
Quite a bit faster than an i9... nice!
Hopefully next gen ditches Vega once and for all.
It would be nice to see if this 5700G has an updated HW video decoder for AV1 support (AV1 != AVI) so that it can run quietly when playing those videos.
My i7 "U" can't keep up with 1080p 10bit of AV1 on complex scenes, so even though this 5700G probably can, I'm fairly certain that 4K HDR 10bit is not possible, and if it is, it will surely make the CPU's fan work like crazy.
Quite a bit faster than an i9... nice!
Hopefully next gen ditches Vega once and for all.
It would be nice to see if this 5700G has an updated HW video decoder for AV1 support (AV1 != AVI) so that it can run quietly when playing those videos.
My i7 "U" can't keep up with 1080p 10bit of AV1 on complex scenes, so even though this 5700G probably can, I'm fairly certain that 4K HDR 10bit is not possible, and if it is, it will surely make the CPU's fan work like crazy.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 7442
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 7442
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5902325 Posted on: 04/05/2021 03:29 PM
Yeah, I don't think you're really going to be missing out on much. If you can wait for the 5000G series, you might as well wait until they transition to either RDNA2 or DDR5 (likely both). For previous generation APUs, they don't seem to go any higher than Vega 11. The GPU is too starved for memory bandwidth, so it just doesn't make sense to add more processing power when you're not going to see any difference.
Zen3 is better with caching and seems to be less memory intensive, but I suspect it won't make that big of a difference for the iGPU.
Lowering your texture detail would likely have a bigger impact. Anything you can do to reduce VRAM will make a noticeable impact on the iGPU performance.
god damn it, I just got a PRO 4650G off ebay for a little ITX build. Ah well I doubt the iGPU is much different, seems to just be CPU that has changed from Zen2 to Zen3.
Yeah, I don't think you're really going to be missing out on much. If you can wait for the 5000G series, you might as well wait until they transition to either RDNA2 or DDR5 (likely both). For previous generation APUs, they don't seem to go any higher than Vega 11. The GPU is too starved for memory bandwidth, so it just doesn't make sense to add more processing power when you're not going to see any difference.
Zen3 is better with caching and seems to be less memory intensive, but I suspect it won't make that big of a difference for the iGPU.
Lowering your texture detail would likely have a bigger impact. Anything you can do to reduce VRAM will make a noticeable impact on the iGPU performance.
CPC_RedDawn
Senior Member
Posts: 9924
Joined: 2008-01-06
Senior Member
Posts: 9924
Joined: 2008-01-06
#5902371 Posted on: 04/05/2021 06:33 PM
Yeah, I don't think you're really going to be missing out on much. If you can wait for the 5000G series, you might as well wait until they transition to either RDNA2 or DDR5 (likely both). For previous generation APUs, they don't seem to go any higher than Vega 11. The GPU is too starved for memory bandwidth, so it just doesn't make sense to add more processing power when you're not going to see any difference.
Zen3 is better with caching and seems to be less memory intensive, but I suspect it won't make that big of a difference for the iGPU.
Lowering your texture detail would likely have a bigger impact. Anything you can do to reduce VRAM will make a noticeable impact on the iGPU performance.
Yea I was just joking really, the 4650G for the moment is perfect for what I have it doing.
Just in the process of putting the system inside a INWIN Chopin ITX case with a Noctua low profile cooler. I have it all setup and running outside the case on a makeshift test bench. Was testing if Resize BAR would work on the iGPU but it seems to giving weird results with random driver crashes, once disabled those issues go away.
Also I have it paired with 16GB 3200MHz CL14 memory so its got decent bandwidth, but this isn't really for demanding games and I only need to allocate 2-4GB for VRAM for what I need anyway.
Yeah, I don't think you're really going to be missing out on much. If you can wait for the 5000G series, you might as well wait until they transition to either RDNA2 or DDR5 (likely both). For previous generation APUs, they don't seem to go any higher than Vega 11. The GPU is too starved for memory bandwidth, so it just doesn't make sense to add more processing power when you're not going to see any difference.
Zen3 is better with caching and seems to be less memory intensive, but I suspect it won't make that big of a difference for the iGPU.
Lowering your texture detail would likely have a bigger impact. Anything you can do to reduce VRAM will make a noticeable impact on the iGPU performance.
Yea I was just joking really, the 4650G for the moment is perfect for what I have it doing.
Just in the process of putting the system inside a INWIN Chopin ITX case with a Noctua low profile cooler. I have it all setup and running outside the case on a makeshift test bench. Was testing if Resize BAR would work on the iGPU but it seems to giving weird results with random driver crashes, once disabled those issues go away.
Also I have it paired with 16GB 3200MHz CL14 memory so its got decent bandwidth, but this isn't really for demanding games and I only need to allocate 2-4GB for VRAM for what I need anyway.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 7442
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 7442
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5902393 Posted on: 04/05/2021 07:44 PM
Just in the process of putting the system inside a INWIN Chopin ITX case with a Noctua low profile cooler. I have it all setup and running outside the case on a makeshift test bench. Was testing if Resize BAR would work on the iGPU but it seems to giving weird results with random driver crashes, once disabled those issues go away.
Also I have it paired with 16GB 3200MHz CL14 memory so its got decent bandwidth, but this isn't really for demanding games and I only need to allocate 2-4GB for VRAM for what I need anyway.
BAR wouldn't really do anything for an iGPU, because you're just using system memory anyway. The whole point of BAR is so more VRAM is exposed and accessible, but, it's all exposed anyway for an iGPU. That being said, you also don't need to allocate any more memory to the GPU than 64MB or whatever the lowest your motherboard allows. Some games and applications might freak out about there not being enough, but otherwise, your OS will use system memory as needed, and there's no performance loss because it's all coming from the same source and memory controller anyway.
If you can, see if you can OC your RAM a little bit. 3200MHz is plenty sufficient for the CPU but the GPU demands more bandwidth than that.
Just in the process of putting the system inside a INWIN Chopin ITX case with a Noctua low profile cooler. I have it all setup and running outside the case on a makeshift test bench. Was testing if Resize BAR would work on the iGPU but it seems to giving weird results with random driver crashes, once disabled those issues go away.
Also I have it paired with 16GB 3200MHz CL14 memory so its got decent bandwidth, but this isn't really for demanding games and I only need to allocate 2-4GB for VRAM for what I need anyway.
BAR wouldn't really do anything for an iGPU, because you're just using system memory anyway. The whole point of BAR is so more VRAM is exposed and accessible, but, it's all exposed anyway for an iGPU. That being said, you also don't need to allocate any more memory to the GPU than 64MB or whatever the lowest your motherboard allows. Some games and applications might freak out about there not being enough, but otherwise, your OS will use system memory as needed, and there's no performance loss because it's all coming from the same source and memory controller anyway.
If you can, see if you can OC your RAM a little bit. 3200MHz is plenty sufficient for the CPU but the GPU demands more bandwidth than that.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 9924
Joined: 2008-01-06
god damn it, I just got a PRO 4650G off ebay for a little ITX build. Ah well I doubt the iGPU is much different, seems to just be CPU that has changed from Zen2 to Zen3.