Asus ROG STRIX XG43UQ monitor review
Netduma R2 router review
TerraMaster F5-422 NAS Review
Radeon RX 6600 (Sapphire Pulse) review
Radeon RX 6600 (Gigabyte Eagle 8G) review
PowerColor Radeon RX 6900 XT Red Devil review
Corsair Sabre RGB Pro Wireless mouse review
Far Cry 6: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 Bilibili 12G review
ACER Predator GM7000 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
AMD Ryzen 7 3750X Spotted - Has a TDP of 105 watts
Recently we have seen some OEM specific Ryzen 3000 announcements, there might be one more inbound as we do not see this one end up in retail, a Ryzen 7 3750X showed up in a recent product master list entry.
On Twitter Komachi highlighted the new entry and planet3dnow picked up on a master list holding the entry. It was then noticed that in many new OPNs (Ordering Part Number).
Ryzen 7 3750X has eight cores and a 105 Watt TDP
The processor will get 8 cores, according to the entry opposite the Ryzen 7 3700X, has a TDP increased from 65 to 105 watts and should clock higher. That's about all the info available on that though. Considering the TDP, we think this might be an OEM processor to power and spice up pre-built PCs.
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X Benchmarks - 10/11/2019 09:53 AM
Silently AMD expanded their Ryzen 3000 line-up this week, exclusively in Chinafor the time being. Ryzen 5 3500X has been benchmarked. The non SMT Ryzen 5 is compared with Intel's Core i5 9400F - who...
Team Group Outs Memory and PCI-E Gen4 x4 M.2 SSD for Supporting AMD Ryzen 3000 and X570 - 10/08/2019 11:52 AM
Team Group releases T-FORCE DARK Z α DDR4 Gaming Memory and CARDEA ZERO Z440 PCI-E Gen4 x4 M.2 Solid State Drive, which are specially made for AMD RYZEN 3000 processor series and the latest ...
Over 100 Improvements to be included in upcoming AMD Ryzen 3000: AGESA 1.0.0.4 - 10/04/2019 10:36 AM
While everybody is moving towards AGESA 1.0.0.3ABBA to squeeze out every last drop of performance from Ryzen 3000 processors, AMD is already at work on AGESA 1.0.0.4 as unreached boost frequencies is...
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 spotted: Six Cores but no SMT (updated) - 09/25/2019 08:39 AM
From the looks of things, AMD is to complement its Ryzen 3000 line-up with another six-core. The Ryzen 5 3500 is running 3.6 GHz for a base clock with a 4.1 Ghz Turbo, it, however, lacks Hyperthreadi...
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X Delayed to November, 24-core Threadripper 3000 Coming - 09/20/2019 07:27 PM
A communication from AMD just arrived. The AMD Ryzen 9 3950X (16-cores / 32 threads) that was supposed to launch this month has been delayed towards November. However during that timeframe AMD will a...
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 3407
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 3407
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5721311 Posted on: 10/17/2019 09:36 AM
Isn't the 3800X already a 3700X with 105W TDP?
I suppose it'll have lower clocks then 3800X because the silicon didn't cooperate.
It's a 3800x that didn't quite make it.
I bet the volume will be small, and they will sell it mainly to OEMs.
Isn't the 3800X already a 3700X with 105W TDP?
I suppose it'll have lower clocks then 3800X because the silicon didn't cooperate.
It's a 3800x that didn't quite make it.
I bet the volume will be small, and they will sell it mainly to OEMs.
bobblunderton
Senior Member
Posts: 408
Joined: 2017-02-15
Senior Member
Posts: 408
Joined: 2017-02-15
#5721312 Posted on: 10/17/2019 09:46 AM
Isn't the 3800X already a 3700X with 105W TDP?
I suppose it'll have lower clocks then 3800X because the silicon didn't cooperate.
It's just AMD making a cpu slightly better than 3700x but not quite the promise of a 3800x, to replace both SKU's. This is also because many of the good 8-core dies used on the 3800x will go now to the 3950x 16-core chip. So whatever doesn't quite go for the 3950x, and isn't bad enough to have to cut 2 cores & be a 6-core in the 3900x/3900-OEM or 3500/3600/3600x, will be 3750x, and likely you will stop seeing the 3800x and possibly the 3700x too.
But won't that over-saturate the market with too many product tiers too close?
No, it's not for that, it's because 'this is what the yields dictate' and since this is a new process, and they're trying to get them to market VERY quickly to satisfy very STRONG demand, this is what's resulted.
So it might be just a bit better than the 3700x, at a slightly higher TDP, without previous promises of 3700x or 3800x, so while not as power efficient, it can still put the clocks up at 105w. Good use of slightly less perfect dies than 3700x.
Don't get me wrong I love power efficiency; but if you have central AC even in the summer 105w isn't too bad when it gets done with what it needs to do quick enough.
Not enough dies to make 3700x class of chip at 65w, not quite good clocker enough (too 'leaky') for 3800x, but will do 3700x speeds or a little better at 105w, now you have 3750x. So to clarify, this is more yields dictating what chips we will get to satiate the market conditions, not just jamming products in places that aren't truly gaps in the first place.
I would happily buy a 105w chip no issue if it's the right price. My 3700x stomps all over the 4790k at 4.4ghz I used to use for FIVE years, overclocks itself fast enough without PBO. It's more then adequate, it's awesome, and it's a great price.
Thank-you AMD. I will purchase future Ryzen products and chip-sets without hesitation - one caveat however, let's just make sure we can put a 3750x on a 570/550A (B450 w/3000 series support OOB) board without a BIOS update.
*OOB = out of box (from 'OOBE' or Out Of Box Experience).
Isn't the 3800X already a 3700X with 105W TDP?
I suppose it'll have lower clocks then 3800X because the silicon didn't cooperate.
It's just AMD making a cpu slightly better than 3700x but not quite the promise of a 3800x, to replace both SKU's. This is also because many of the good 8-core dies used on the 3800x will go now to the 3950x 16-core chip. So whatever doesn't quite go for the 3950x, and isn't bad enough to have to cut 2 cores & be a 6-core in the 3900x/3900-OEM or 3500/3600/3600x, will be 3750x, and likely you will stop seeing the 3800x and possibly the 3700x too.
But won't that over-saturate the market with too many product tiers too close?
No, it's not for that, it's because 'this is what the yields dictate' and since this is a new process, and they're trying to get them to market VERY quickly to satisfy very STRONG demand, this is what's resulted.
So it might be just a bit better than the 3700x, at a slightly higher TDP, without previous promises of 3700x or 3800x, so while not as power efficient, it can still put the clocks up at 105w. Good use of slightly less perfect dies than 3700x.
Don't get me wrong I love power efficiency; but if you have central AC even in the summer 105w isn't too bad when it gets done with what it needs to do quick enough.
Not enough dies to make 3700x class of chip at 65w, not quite good clocker enough (too 'leaky') for 3800x, but will do 3700x speeds or a little better at 105w, now you have 3750x. So to clarify, this is more yields dictating what chips we will get to satiate the market conditions, not just jamming products in places that aren't truly gaps in the first place.
I would happily buy a 105w chip no issue if it's the right price. My 3700x stomps all over the 4790k at 4.4ghz I used to use for FIVE years, overclocks itself fast enough without PBO. It's more then adequate, it's awesome, and it's a great price.
Thank-you AMD. I will purchase future Ryzen products and chip-sets without hesitation - one caveat however, let's just make sure we can put a 3750x on a 570/550A (B450 w/3000 series support OOB) board without a BIOS update.
*OOB = out of box (from 'OOBE' or Out Of Box Experience).
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5721316 Posted on: 10/17/2019 09:56 AM
It's just AMD making a cpu slightly better than 3700x but not quite the promise of a 3800x, to replace both SKU's. This is also because many of the good 8-core dies used on the 3800x will go now to the 3950x 16-core chip. So whatever doesn't quite go for the 3950x, and isn't bad enough to have to cut 2 cores & be a 6-core in the 3900x/3900-OEM or 3500/3600/3600x, will be 3750x, and likely you will stop seeing the 3800x and possibly the 3700x too.
But won't that over-saturate the market with too many product tiers too close?
No, it's not for that, it's because 'this is what the yields dictate' and since this is a new process, and they're trying to get them to market VERY quickly to satisfy very STRONG demand, this is what's resulted.
So it might be just a bit better than the 3700x, at a slightly higher TDP, without previous promises of 3700x or 3800x, so while not as power efficient, it can still put the clocks up at 105w. Good use of slightly less perfect dies than 3700x.
Don't get me wrong I love power efficiency; but if you have central AC even in the summer 105w isn't too bad when it gets done with what it needs to do quick enough.
Not enough dies to make 3700x class of chip at 65w, not quite good clocker enough (too 'leaky') for 3800x, but will do 3700x speeds or a little better at 105w, now you have 3750x. So to clarify, this is more yields dictating what chips we will get to satiate the market conditions, not just jamming products in places that aren't truly gaps in the first place.
I would happily buy a 105w chip no issue if it's the right price. My 3700x stomps all over the 4790k at 4.4ghz I used to use for FIVE years, overclocks itself fast enough without PBO. It's more then adequate, it's awesome, and it's a great price.
Thank-you AMD. I will purchase future Ryzen products and chip-sets without hesitation - one caveat however, let's just make sure we can put a 3750x on a 570/550A (B450 w/3000 series support OOB) board without a BIOS update.
*OOB = out of box (from 'OOBE' or Out Of Box Experience).
There is market for 65W desktop CPUs. Even for 45W. I am sure AMD will not abandon 3700X without replacement.
AMD is just making product name under which they can sell chips that are not fitting under other product names. (Exactly as you wrote.)
It's just AMD making a cpu slightly better than 3700x but not quite the promise of a 3800x, to replace both SKU's. This is also because many of the good 8-core dies used on the 3800x will go now to the 3950x 16-core chip. So whatever doesn't quite go for the 3950x, and isn't bad enough to have to cut 2 cores & be a 6-core in the 3900x/3900-OEM or 3500/3600/3600x, will be 3750x, and likely you will stop seeing the 3800x and possibly the 3700x too.
But won't that over-saturate the market with too many product tiers too close?
No, it's not for that, it's because 'this is what the yields dictate' and since this is a new process, and they're trying to get them to market VERY quickly to satisfy very STRONG demand, this is what's resulted.
So it might be just a bit better than the 3700x, at a slightly higher TDP, without previous promises of 3700x or 3800x, so while not as power efficient, it can still put the clocks up at 105w. Good use of slightly less perfect dies than 3700x.
Don't get me wrong I love power efficiency; but if you have central AC even in the summer 105w isn't too bad when it gets done with what it needs to do quick enough.
Not enough dies to make 3700x class of chip at 65w, not quite good clocker enough (too 'leaky') for 3800x, but will do 3700x speeds or a little better at 105w, now you have 3750x. So to clarify, this is more yields dictating what chips we will get to satiate the market conditions, not just jamming products in places that aren't truly gaps in the first place.
I would happily buy a 105w chip no issue if it's the right price. My 3700x stomps all over the 4790k at 4.4ghz I used to use for FIVE years, overclocks itself fast enough without PBO. It's more then adequate, it's awesome, and it's a great price.
Thank-you AMD. I will purchase future Ryzen products and chip-sets without hesitation - one caveat however, let's just make sure we can put a 3750x on a 570/550A (B450 w/3000 series support OOB) board without a BIOS update.
*OOB = out of box (from 'OOBE' or Out Of Box Experience).
There is market for 65W desktop CPUs. Even for 45W. I am sure AMD will not abandon 3700X without replacement.
AMD is just making product name under which they can sell chips that are not fitting under other product names. (Exactly as you wrote.)
JamesSneed
Senior Member
Posts: 1267
Joined: 2017-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 1267
Joined: 2017-02-14
#5721419 Posted on: 10/17/2019 03:27 PM
All these lower clock skews are telling me we won't see a thin bin competitor to the 9900KS this generation ie no 3850x. All signs pointing to TSMC's process immaturity but hey at least they can make chips. So my 1800x will live on until I snag a Zen3 CPU next year. My assumption is the 7nm+ process will allow substantially higher clocks along with all the tweaks AMD made for Zen3 we should finally have a chip that can beat the 9900KS across the board. Oh well here's to hoping Zen3 gets x370 BIOS support which I know is unlikely.
All these lower clock skews are telling me we won't see a thin bin competitor to the 9900KS this generation ie no 3850x. All signs pointing to TSMC's process immaturity but hey at least they can make chips. So my 1800x will live on until I snag a Zen3 CPU next year. My assumption is the 7nm+ process will allow substantially higher clocks along with all the tweaks AMD made for Zen3 we should finally have a chip that can beat the 9900KS across the board. Oh well here's to hoping Zen3 gets x370 BIOS support which I know is unlikely.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 781
Joined: 2015-05-19
Isn't the 3800X already a 3700X with 105W TDP?
I suppose it'll have lower clocks then 3800X because the silicon didn't cooperate.