Intel Core i5 11400F processor review
Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro SL 3600 MHz 32GB review
ASRock Z590 Extreme review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC review
Corsair K70 RGB TKL keyboard review
Corsair RM650x (2021) power supply review
be quiet! Silent Loop 2 280mm review
Corsair K55 RGB PRO XT keyboard review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - March 2021
Intel Core i9-11900K processor review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Beats Intel Core i5-10600K
And before I continue the news item, that Core i5-10600K has a 125W TDP, the AMD one ... 65 Watts. Anyhow, meet the Ryzen 5 5600X CPU. TUM_APISAK stumbled into some entries at the SiSoftware Sandra benchmark.
The Ryzen CPU has six of Zen 3 cores with 12 threads, paired with 32 MB of level three (L3) cache. The proc is clocked at 3.7 GHz base frequency, while the boost speeds are reaching 4.6 GHz.
- The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X CPU has scored Processor Arithmetic and Processor Multi-Media scores of 255.22 GOPS and 904.38 Mpix/s.
- Intel Core i5-10600K CPU, which is likely its targeted competing category, it scores 224.07 GOPS and 662.33 Mpix/s for Processor Arithmetic and Processor Multi-Media tests each.
That's a good 14% more perf. Of course we need way more benchmarks than that, but considering my Wattage remark and these preliminary results, we'd say Ryzern 5000 is gonna be a hit.
Download: AMD Ryzen Chipset Driver 2.10.13.408 - 10/20/2020 08:40 AM
AMD offers updated drivers for its motherboard chipsets including B350, A320, X370, X399, B450, X470, X570, B550, and TRX40 Chipset. The drivers offer an updated power plan for AMD Ryzen CPUs that coo...
AMD Ryzen 5000 Mobile CPU Lineup Leaks, based on both Cezanne (Zen3) and Lucienne( Zen2) - 10/19/2020 08:51 AM
With Ryzen 5000 for Desktop now in line with the mobile part numbering, let's talk just that, the mobile parts. You'd think the Mobile 5000 series will be based on ZEN3 compete as well, as it turns ...
Synology Adds a 6-Bay AMD Ryzen DS1621+ NAS to its lineup - 10/16/2020 08:52 AM
Synology introduced the next generation 6-bay DiskStation NAS, the DS1621+, designed for high-performance data storage and management. A compact powerhouse, the DS1621+ enables content creators and bu...
Intel Could Fight off AMD Ryzen 5000 just based on lower prices - 10/13/2020 08:55 AM
You all will have noticed that AMD's Ryzen 5000 is seeing a pretty significant price premium, all processors have gotten an uplift of 50 USD per proc seen over the current generation. And that opens ...
AMD Ryzen 5000 ZEN3 CPU prices spotted in EU webshops - 10/11/2020 09:58 AM
It's not exactly a secret what the USD prices are for the new Ryzen 5000 series, as AMD announced these. But in the U it's always a little wait and tell what the final prices will be due to VAT and ...
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 15263
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 15263
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5844583 Posted on: 10/20/2020 11:26 AM
Yeah and 2gb vram is enough at 4k too.
And you can game at 4k with quad core 
Yeah and 2gb vram is enough at 4k too.
mitzi76
Senior Member
Posts: 8722
Joined: 2008-09-22
Senior Member
Posts: 8722
Joined: 2008-09-22
#5844590 Posted on: 10/20/2020 11:47 AM
8-10gb looks about enough. Spent hrs last night watching benchmarks saw a few games hit 9gb which means I think 3080 plus 4k the smart move as it stands. From what I saw, I'd love some feedback from Gurus.
Am considering now an Amd if can find a 6 core that saves me £100...then I dont mind getting the 3080. 12Gb looks perfect at 4k but how much are games affected when you go over the vram limit.
I havent seen any evidence how its overtly detrimental to your experience but could be wrong.
Yeah and 2gb vram is enough at 4k too.
8-10gb looks about enough. Spent hrs last night watching benchmarks saw a few games hit 9gb which means I think 3080 plus 4k the smart move as it stands. From what I saw, I'd love some feedback from Gurus.
Am considering now an Amd if can find a 6 core that saves me £100...then I dont mind getting the 3080. 12Gb looks perfect at 4k but how much are games affected when you go over the vram limit.
I havent seen any evidence how its overtly detrimental to your experience but could be wrong.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 15263
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 15263
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5844598 Posted on: 10/20/2020 12:06 PM
8-10gb looks about enough. Spent hrs last night watching benchmarks saw a few games hit 9gb which means I think 3080 plus 4k the smart move as it stands. From what I saw, I'd love some feedback from Gurus.
Am considering now an Amd if can find a 6 core that saves me £100...then I dont mind getting the 3080. 12Gb looks perfect at 4k but how much are games affected when you go over the vram limit.
I havent seen any evidence how its overtly detrimental to your experience but could be wrong.
10gb seems enough atm but its up there on the border of not being enough from what i've seen.
8gb is not enough and many reviewers already mention the doom eternal massive fps drops with the 2080. Even if one game shows actual vram usage exceedes 8gb i consider it not being enough especially when next gen games starts using raytracing that ups the vram usage exponentially.
8-10gb looks about enough. Spent hrs last night watching benchmarks saw a few games hit 9gb which means I think 3080 plus 4k the smart move as it stands. From what I saw, I'd love some feedback from Gurus.
Am considering now an Amd if can find a 6 core that saves me £100...then I dont mind getting the 3080. 12Gb looks perfect at 4k but how much are games affected when you go over the vram limit.
I havent seen any evidence how its overtly detrimental to your experience but could be wrong.
10gb seems enough atm but its up there on the border of not being enough from what i've seen.
8gb is not enough and many reviewers already mention the doom eternal massive fps drops with the 2080. Even if one game shows actual vram usage exceedes 8gb i consider it not being enough especially when next gen games starts using raytracing that ups the vram usage exponentially.
Turanis
Senior Member
Posts: 1771
Joined: 2014-08-15
Senior Member
Posts: 1771
Joined: 2014-08-15
#5844604 Posted on: 10/20/2020 12:13 PM
Synthetic 14% is not so much,but in gaming and the future proof AM4 design matter most of the time.
Intel is in trouble because they cannot change that monolithic design on the fly and that new socket of them is not so future proof as AM4 (when you can get like Ryzen 1xxx to 5xxx on the same socket).
Synthetic 14% is not so much,but in gaming and the future proof AM4 design matter most of the time.
Intel is in trouble because they cannot change that monolithic design on the fly and that new socket of them is not so future proof as AM4 (when you can get like Ryzen 1xxx to 5xxx on the same socket).
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 4654
Joined: 2006-12-22
I know I should be excited about this but I'm not that much.
For the price paid, and I'm not saying here just AMD , Intel is in the same boat, we're getting a very small percentage of performance increase.
2021, most of us will be gaming at 2k or 4k resolution.
The difference between a generation or two going back 2-3 years and this one (or the next intel) will be 5-15% at best.
To pay 700e +/- for that combo (cpu and mb) seems like a poor investment for the performance gain.
3 years ago I was still looking for a better multi core cpu that will reduce my video encoding time.
Today I use nvenc, 6 times faster than any cpu ....
So now I'd rather invest apx 7-800 in a gpu that will bring me at least 50% more performance in games compared to prev gen (and better encoding support).
And you can game at 4k with quad core