Corsair QL120 and QL140 RGB fan review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
Corsair Void RGB Elite Wireless Headset review
Team Group PD400 Portable SSD review
AMD Athlon 3000G review
Team Group T-Force Delta Max 1 TB SSD review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - November 2019
ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme Encore review
Toshiba RC500 500GB NVMe M.2 SSD review
Promo: URcdkey Black Friday Windows 10 Pro for $12
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 CPU Benchmarks Surface
A set of photos and CPU-Z / Cinebench screenshots have leaked onto the web, the processor involves the cheapest 199 USD based Ryzen 5 3600. This is the slowest and most affordable SKU that AMD will release with six cores and twelve threads.
The Ryzen 5 3600 has a base clock of 3.6 GHz and can turbo to 4.2 GHz. From the looks of it, somebody has been able to grab a retail package as a photo of the box and proc has been included. Before we show you the stuff, we cannot vouch for its validity whatsoever okay?
The images below originate from Videocardz who posted these on twitter, so credits to him for that. As you will notice, Ryzen 5 3600 operates using 3200MHz DDR4 memory and offers 502.2 points in CPU-Z's single-threaded benchmark and 3989.4 points in CPU-Z's multi-threaded benchmark. For the slowest offering, that's actually not bad and on par with a Core i7 9700K. Multi-threaded perf seems good. Single threaded we'll have to wait and see, as we have little clue as to how this was tested and with what platform and firmware.
Also notice that the CB20 entry holds two 3600 scores, and the 10% slower one is highlighted. That might have been an OC run of some kind. Have a peek, and again please look at these with the usual disclaimers in mind.
Intel Might Drop Desktop processor Prices by 15% To Fight off AMD Ryzen 3000 - 06/21/2019 11:46 AM
Processors, the fun thing with the competition is that it has an effect on development rates and sure money. AMD soon will release Ryzen series 3000 and guess what? Intel is lowering prices on their p...
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X surfaces in Geekbench, performs roughly similar to Core i9 9900K - 06/21/2019 06:47 AM
It won't be more than a week or two before AMD will unleash its new Ryzen 3000 processors and the X570 platform. We're bound to see some accidental leaks beforehand I guess. The first one starts tod...
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X: Overclocked to 5 GHz Allcore faster than Intel Core i9 - 06/13/2019 08:01 AM
You've been able to read up on a lot of news and article about the pending Ryzon Series 3000 processors. The one proc that made a lot of news is, of course, the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X, however at the eve...
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X: 16 cores and 32 threads - Labeled as Gaming CPU - released in September - 06/11/2019 02:30 PM
So if you have not watched the live stream (hey I can't blame you as in the EUu that was midnight), and IF you skipped our preview articles, we do need to mention the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X in at least o...
Tech preview: AMD Ryzen 3000 - Incl Ryzen 9 3950X (16-core) - 06/11/2019 12:20 AM
Gen 3 aka Ryzen 3000 has received new announcements. You might have watched the live-stream, well that or you were asleep as that was nighttime in the EU, but in this preview article a deeper overview...
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11993
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 11993
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5682903 Posted on: 06/21/2019 12:39 PM
Singlethread cpuz score of 502 is very good. It beats the crap out of my overclocked 3930k.
Singlethread cpuz score of 502 is very good. It beats the crap out of my overclocked 3930k.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11993
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 11993
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5682909 Posted on: 06/21/2019 12:46 PM
Very good !? It's on par with 2700X...
I could like to see CB15 and CB20 single thread...
Well it is. I think even the 7700k scores 485. Only 9900k is above 500 in that list.
Very good !? It's on par with 2700X...
I could like to see CB15 and CB20 single thread...
Well it is. I think even the 7700k scores 485. Only 9900k is above 500 in that list.
SHS
Senior Member
Posts: 438
Joined: 2001-05-02
Senior Member
Posts: 438
Joined: 2001-05-02
#5682914 Posted on: 06/21/2019 12:55 PM
The Photo are Fake take look at the 3 in 3600
The Photo are Fake take look at the 3 in 3600
Kool64
Senior Member
Posts: 429
Joined: 2006-10-21
Senior Member
Posts: 429
Joined: 2006-10-21
#5682918 Posted on: 06/21/2019 01:15 PM
I definitely think something isn't quite right here.
I definitely think something isn't quite right here.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9762
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 9762
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5682919 Posted on: 06/21/2019 01:21 PM
Score is good for something that cheap running under 65W limits.
I definitely think something isn't quite right here.
Score is good for something that cheap running under 65W limits.
SHS
Senior Member
Posts: 438
Joined: 2001-05-02
Senior Member
Posts: 438
Joined: 2001-05-02
#5682922 Posted on: 06/21/2019 01:23 PM
That if it real I wait and see when all review come out
Score is good for something that cheap running under 65W limits.
That if it real I wait and see when all review come out
BReal85
Senior Member
Posts: 327
Joined: 2016-10-25
Senior Member
Posts: 327
Joined: 2016-10-25
#5682925 Posted on: 06/21/2019 01:25 PM
Very good !? It's on par with 2700X...
I could like to see CB15 and CB20 single thread...
Wow, we have our Intel-NV troll again.
3600 will sell like hotcakes.
Very good !? It's on par with 2700X...
I could like to see CB15 and CB20 single thread...
Wow, we have our Intel-NV troll again.
3600 will sell like hotcakes.
BReal85
Senior Member
Posts: 327
Joined: 2016-10-25
Senior Member
Posts: 327
Joined: 2016-10-25
#5682931 Posted on: 06/21/2019 01:30 PM
Troll? I'm a troll because you can't handle the truth?
3600 will sell just fine yes, just like 1600 and 2600 did.
Good value CPU's.
3600 will be a 400 series board to be decent value tho.
So you say that Hilbert is lying when he says it's on par with the 9700K?
Troll? I'm a troll because you can't handle the truth?
3600 will sell just fine yes, just like 1600 and 2600 did.
Good value CPU's.
3600 will be a 400 series board to be decent value tho.
So you say that Hilbert is lying when he says it's on par with the 9700K?
vbetts
Moderator
Posts: 14717
Joined: 2006-07-04
Moderator
Posts: 14717
Joined: 2006-07-04
#5682932 Posted on: 06/21/2019 01:32 PM
If we could stop with the going back and forth like 12 year olds, that'd be nice.
If we could stop with the going back and forth like 12 year olds, that'd be nice.
Kool64
Senior Member
Posts: 429
Joined: 2006-10-21
Senior Member
Posts: 429
Joined: 2006-10-21
#5682936 Posted on: 06/21/2019 01:34 PM
fair point. I didn't really think of that aspect.
Score is good for something that cheap running under 65W limits.
fair point. I didn't really think of that aspect.
BReal85
Senior Member
Posts: 327
Joined: 2016-10-25
Senior Member
Posts: 327
Joined: 2016-10-25
#5682939 Posted on: 06/21/2019 01:39 PM
No official testing has been done and Cinebench multithreaded scores has not much to do with real world performance and especially not gaming performance, we saw that on Ryzen 1000 and 2000 series.
Why do you think people always leave out the single thread score when testing Ryzen CPU's in Cinebench? This time too. Fully clocked 2700X barely break 180.
I will hope that AMD can atleast match Skylake perf when using newer arch and has node-advantage.
Even AMD had their comparison in FHD in the New Horizon event. They did it in 4K when Ryzen was revealed. I'm pretty sure they will be head-to-head.
"3600 will need a 400 series board to be good value tho."
And what is the problem with that? You can easily use a 400 series mobo for the new CPUs. You can even have a cheap B450. Absolutely trashing Intel in price-performance ratio.
No official testing has been done and Cinebench multithreaded scores has not much to do with real world performance and especially not gaming performance, we saw that on Ryzen 1000 and 2000 series.
Why do you think people always leave out the single thread score when testing Ryzen CPU's in Cinebench? This time too. Fully clocked 2700X barely break 180.
I will hope that AMD can atleast match Skylake perf when using newer arch and has node-advantage.
Even AMD had their comparison in FHD in the New Horizon event. They did it in 4K when Ryzen was revealed. I'm pretty sure they will be head-to-head.
"3600 will need a 400 series board to be good value tho."
And what is the problem with that? You can easily use a 400 series mobo for the new CPUs. You can even have a cheap B450. Absolutely trashing Intel in price-performance ratio.
vbetts
Moderator
Posts: 14717
Joined: 2006-07-04
Moderator
Posts: 14717
Joined: 2006-07-04
#5682940 Posted on: 06/21/2019 01:40 PM
You know what I said was not a suggestion.
Stop.
You know what I said was not a suggestion.
Stop.
Alessio1989
Senior Member
Posts: 1407
Joined: 2015-06-11
Senior Member
Posts: 1407
Joined: 2015-06-11
#5682942 Posted on: 06/21/2019 01:43 PM
this forum should be renamed into rantguru
this forum should be renamed into rantguru
DeskStar
Senior Member
Posts: 633
Joined: 2011-01-11
Senior Member
Posts: 633
Joined: 2011-01-11
#5682960 Posted on: 06/21/2019 02:32 PM
Exactly what I was thinking. At 4.7ghz at that as well...
Singlethread cpuz score of 502 is very good. It beats the crap out of my overclocked 3930k.
Exactly what I was thinking. At 4.7ghz at that as well...
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 172
Joined: 2005-08-31
The single-threaded score in CPU-Z is still slightly lower than what I get from my i7-6800 at the same clocks.
Anyway, that particular benchmark doesn't use any advanced SIMD code, so not much relevant.