MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti DUKE review
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2080 GAMING OC 8G review
MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
Asus GeForce RTX 2080 Ti RoG Strix review
GeForce RTX 2080 Founders review
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders review
HyperX Predator DDR4 RGB 32GB 2933 MHz review
Nvidia Turing GeForce 2080 (Ti) architecture review
Ballistix Sport AT Gaming DDR4 RGB 32GB 3000 MHz review
Seagate Barracuda Pro 14TB HDD review
AMD Ryzen 2600 Benchmark Spotted
As you guys know, AMD is to release the Ryzen 2000 or let's just call it Zen+ In April. In January the Ryzen 5 2600 already surfaced in the SiSoft Sandra database. The entry showed a processor called Ryzen 5 2600, which obviously is Zen+, the model listed is a six-core twelve threaded processor.
The very same processor once again has surfaced and seems to be the counterpart of the Ryzen 5 1600. The Ryzen 5 1600 shows Family 23 Model 1 Stepping 1, the new Ryzen 2600 reads out as Family 23 Model 8 Stepping 2.
The entry within the SiSoft database is:
- ZD2600BBM68AF_38/34_Y (6C 12T 3.4GHz, 1.1GHz IMC, 6x 512kB L2, 2x 8MB L3).
And yes you can deduct anything and pretty much everything from that, including a 3.4 GHz base clock and a 3.8 GHz turbo. The new leak was spotted at GeekBench and seem to be interesting as it shows that exact same product code, the single core score returns a 4269 points and the multicore score now sees 20102 points. So let's call that a ~10% performance increase. Obviously, we will still need to learn if the new Ryzen 2000 series can tweak higher compared to its predecessor.
Now I know, it's not much to look at and Geekbench most definitely is not definitive and all saying, but I made the following comparison. BTW I assume the Ryzen 2600 is a non 'X' model much like a Ryzen 1600, and as such compared based on that being the fairest baseline. Note, the L 1/2/3 caches on the original Ryzen 5 1600 entry seems to be messed up, for the Ryzen 5 2600 they seem spot on. Also, the Insyde Software BIOS for Ryzen 5 2600 might seem weird, but that is a UEFI Firmware & Engineering Services Provider, indicating this test was using an engineering sample motherboard.
Have a peek:
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G gets delidded and temperature tested - 02/16/2018 07:17 PM
AMD this week launched their Ryzen 2000G series of APUs. Guru3D yesterday already reported that the APUs have thermal paste in-between the die and heatspreader, opposed to being soldered. It's four c...
Review: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G APU - 02/12/2018 04:01 PM
In this review we peek at the new Vega enabled desktop APUs (Raven Ridge) from AMD, in this review we look at the Ryzen 5 2400G with its four cores and eight threads. AMD has been going strong with th...
Review: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G APU - 02/12/2018 04:01 PM
At a value price of 99 USD there is another APU released today, the four core Ryzen 3 2200G, this puppy is an integrated Radeon Vega based desktop APU (Raven Ridge) that is priced very competitively, ...
ASUS BIOS List for AMD Ryzen 2000 - Make your Motherboard compatible with Raven Ridge APUs - 02/09/2018 12:34 PM
AMD is soon to release their Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 2400G APUs. These are Ryzen based processors with an integrated Radeon VEGA graphics solution. Your 300 Series Chipset motherboard is compatible,...
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Spotted in Pre-order for 166 EURO - 02/06/2018 06:00 PM
The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is not exactly a secret, the Radeon Vega enabled APU has fully announced already and should be hitting the etailers by next week. Well, it already went up on preorder in the cz...
ZXRaziel
Member
Posts: 48
Joined: 2017-12-11
Member
Posts: 48
Joined: 2017-12-11
#5521154 Posted on: 02/19/2018 07:02 PM
As expected , nice little performance jump , not long to wait now .
As expected , nice little performance jump , not long to wait now .
Rakanoth
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: 2017-10-06
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: 2017-10-06
#5521160 Posted on: 02/19/2018 07:46 PM
I can't wait to see the fully confirmed results.
I can't wait to see the fully confirmed results.
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 6770
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 6770
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5521161 Posted on: 02/19/2018 07:49 PM
I just want the x470 motherboards to release, i'm tired of the nonsense i'm going through with my asus crosshair hero VI
I just want the x470 motherboards to release, i'm tired of the nonsense i'm going through with my asus crosshair hero VI
fl2015
Senior Member
Posts: 101
Joined: 2015-06-23
Senior Member
Posts: 101
Joined: 2015-06-23
#5521166 Posted on: 02/19/2018 08:06 PM
Here's what I get on my 1600 dropped down to 3.8 ghz https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7106573, if the 2600 uses a 3.8ghz single core turbo boost then the single core performance doesn't look too impressive.
Multicore on the other hand looks to be improved as it seems to be matching my OC'ed 1600 at stock... but isn't that kind of the opposite to what people were asking AMD for?
Of course if it's capable of 4.2ghz plus with ease then that's kind of a moot point but nothing's been confirmed for max achievable clock speeds & too much speculation/hype only leads to disappointment once the SKU's launch.
Here's what I get on my 1600 dropped down to 3.8 ghz https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7106573, if the 2600 uses a 3.8ghz single core turbo boost then the single core performance doesn't look too impressive.
Multicore on the other hand looks to be improved as it seems to be matching my OC'ed 1600 at stock... but isn't that kind of the opposite to what people were asking AMD for?
Of course if it's capable of 4.2ghz plus with ease then that's kind of a moot point but nothing's been confirmed for max achievable clock speeds & too much speculation/hype only leads to disappointment once the SKU's launch.
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1205
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1205
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5521198 Posted on: 02/19/2018 09:39 PM
After the results from the recent APU, I won't be expecting much OC progress at all.
After the results from the recent APU, I won't be expecting much OC progress at all.
FrostNixon
Senior Member
Posts: 123
Joined: 2016-04-15
Senior Member
Posts: 123
Joined: 2016-04-15
#5521203 Posted on: 02/19/2018 09:51 PM
So the IPC has increased. If the clocks can reach 4.5, this would put it on the same IPC and clocks as intel pretty much for a lower price, or am I mistaken?
So the IPC has increased. If the clocks can reach 4.5, this would put it on the same IPC and clocks as intel pretty much for a lower price, or am I mistaken?
butjer1010
Junior Member
Posts: 11
Joined: 2013-12-26
Junior Member
Posts: 11
Joined: 2013-12-26
#5521210 Posted on: 02/19/2018 10:37 PM
Ryzen 2600 vs 1600:
Single Core: 3,8 : 3,6 GHz = 1,055 The turbo core clock is about 5,5% higher.
Scores (Single Core) 4269 : 3636 Points = 1,174 The score is about 17,4% higher.
Multi Core: 3,4 : 3,2 GHz = 1,062 The base clock is about 6,25% higher.
Scores (Multi Core) 20102 : 17773 Points = 1,131 The score is about 11,3% higher.
if you count 17,4 - 5,5 you have about performance increase for the single core.
if you count 11,3 - 6,25 you have about 5,06% performance increase.
So were looking at 5-12% IPC increase and for all of us better overclockability, so with 4,2-4-4GHz we should look at about 8-15% performance increase with lower/or same wattage.
And I think if they optimize it a little bit more, we could even get a little bit more performance and higher clocks, so it could be a banger.^^
Scores (Multi Core) 20102 : 17773 Points = 1,131 The score is about 13,1% higher.
Ryzen 2600 vs 1600:
Single Core: 3,8 : 3,6 GHz = 1,055 The turbo core clock is about 5,5% higher.
Scores (Single Core) 4269 : 3636 Points = 1,174 The score is about 17,4% higher.
Multi Core: 3,4 : 3,2 GHz = 1,062 The base clock is about 6,25% higher.
Scores (Multi Core) 20102 : 17773 Points = 1,131 The score is about 11,3% higher.
if you count 17,4 - 5,5 you have about performance increase for the single core.
if you count 11,3 - 6,25 you have about 5,06% performance increase.
So were looking at 5-12% IPC increase and for all of us better overclockability, so with 4,2-4-4GHz we should look at about 8-15% performance increase with lower/or same wattage.
And I think if they optimize it a little bit more, we could even get a little bit more performance and higher clocks, so it could be a banger.^^
Scores (Multi Core) 20102 : 17773 Points = 1,131 The score is about 13,1% higher.
CPC_RedDawn
Senior Member
Posts: 7472
Joined: 2008-01-06
Senior Member
Posts: 7472
Joined: 2008-01-06
#5521211 Posted on: 02/19/2018 10:39 PM
What nonsense? I have this board and its fantastic.
I just want the x470 motherboards to release, i'm tired of the nonsense i'm going through with my asus crosshair hero VI
What nonsense? I have this board and its fantastic.
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 6770
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 6770
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5521220 Posted on: 02/19/2018 11:08 PM
No matter which bios i try, no matter what memory settings i do, i have had a constant issue with cold boot many times deciding to not boot the OS, of which i'll have to reset the PC, or shut it fully down again, and then it'll, hopefully, maybe boot up.
What nonsense? I have this board and its fantastic.
No matter which bios i try, no matter what memory settings i do, i have had a constant issue with cold boot many times deciding to not boot the OS, of which i'll have to reset the PC, or shut it fully down again, and then it'll, hopefully, maybe boot up.
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1205
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1205
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5521221 Posted on: 02/19/2018 11:10 PM
Oh. Then I stand corrected and will be more hopeful. Thanks for the correction!
The CPU cores are Summit Ridge on the APU (Basically 1st gen ryzen). The non APU chips are the first zen+ chips.
Oh. Then I stand corrected and will be more hopeful. Thanks for the correction!
RzrTrek
Senior Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: 2012-04-16
Senior Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: 2012-04-16
#5521222 Posted on: 02/19/2018 11:11 PM
Looks like I will be holding on to my i5 until Ryzen 3.
Looks like I will be holding on to my i5 until Ryzen 3.
kruno
Senior Member
Posts: 246
Joined: 2017-09-25
Senior Member
Posts: 246
Joined: 2017-09-25
#5521225 Posted on: 02/19/2018 11:31 PM
then it is something wrong with the board or any other component , you should test and investigate to find out what is causing problem and make RMA claim
No matter which bios i try, no matter what memory settings i do, i have had a constant issue with cold boot many times deciding to not boot the OS, of which i'll have to reset the PC, or shut it fully down again, and then it'll, hopefully, maybe boot up.
then it is something wrong with the board or any other component , you should test and investigate to find out what is causing problem and make RMA claim
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 6770
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 6770
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5521227 Posted on: 02/19/2018 11:32 PM
Other people have this issue as well, RMA never helps.
It's a fairly common issue.
then it is something wrong with the board or any other component , you should test and investigate to find out what is causing problem and make RMA claim
Other people have this issue as well, RMA never helps.
It's a fairly common issue.
Enticles
Senior Member
Posts: 224
Joined: 2012-06-28
Senior Member
Posts: 224
Joined: 2012-06-28
#5521230 Posted on: 02/19/2018 11:52 PM
it would certainly be nice if AMD can close the IPC gap to Intel, and ideally keeping the same pricing that they used with the 1st gen Ryzen.
it would certainly be nice if AMD can close the IPC gap to Intel, and ideally keeping the same pricing that they used with the 1st gen Ryzen.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 2018-01-22
Ryzen 2600 vs 1600:
Single Core: 3,8 : 3,6 GHz = 1,055 The turbo core clock is about 5,5% higher.
Scores (Single Core) 4269 : 3636 Points = 1,174 The score is about 17,4% higher.
Multi Core: 3,4 : 3,2 GHz = 1,062 The base clock is about 6,25% higher.
Scores (Multi Core) 20102 : 17773 Points = 1,131 The score is about 13,1% higher.
if you count 17,4 - 5,5 you have about performance increase for the single core.
if you count 11,3 - 6,25 you have about 5,06% performance increase.
So were looking at 5-13% IPC increase and for all of us better overclockability, so with 4,2-4,4GHz we should look at about 8-17% performance increase with lower/or same wattage.
And I think if they optimize it a little bit more, we could even get a little bit more performance and higher clocks, so it could be a banger.^^
Lets go AMD