AMD retakes GPU sales Q2 2013
Jon Peddie Research released its Q2 2013 GPU market report and interestingly enough if you compare to the previous quarter, AMD shipped 10.9 percent more graphics chips, Intel increased 6.2 percent. NVIDIA However decreased by 8 percent. These numbers include all sorts of graphics product, including dedicated graphics cards and IGPs.
As a result AMD's marketshare now is 21.9 percent, NVIDIA 16.1 percent and the rest is Intel, the chip giant has 62 percent thanks to its enormous amount of processors with integrated graphics.
Jon Peddie Research (JPR), the industry's research and consulting firm for graphics and multimedia, announced estimated graphics chip shipments and suppliers’ market share for 2013 2Q. While the news was disappointing year-to-year, the news was encouraging quarter-to-quarter.
AMD overall unit shipments increased 10.9%, quarter-to-quarter, Intel increased 6.2%, and Nvidia decreased by 8%.
The overall PC market declined 2.5% quarter-to-quarter while the graphics market increased 4.6%. Overall this net 7.1% increase reflects an interest on the part of consumers for double-attach—the adding of a discrete GPU to a system with integrated processor graphics, and to a lesser extent dual AIBs in performance desktop machines.
On a year-to-year basis we found that total graphics shipments during Q2’13 dropped 6.8% while PC shipments which declined by at a faster rate of 11.2% overall. GPUs are traditionally a leading indicator of the market, since a GPU goes into every system before it is shipped and most of the PC vendors are guiding down to flat for Q3’13. The popularity of tablets and the persistent economic slowness are the most often mentioned reasons for the decline in the PC market and the CAGR for PC graphics from 2012 to 2016 is -1.4%; we expect the total shipments of graphics chips in 2016 to be 319 million units. The ten-year average change for graphics shipments for quarter-to-quarter is a growth of 7.2%. This quarter is below the average with a 4.6% increase.
Our findings include discrete and integrated graphics (CPU and chipset) for Desktops, Notebooks (and Netbooks), and PC-based commercial (i.e., POS) and industrial/scientific and embedded. This report does not include handhelds (i.e., mobile phones), x86 Servers or ARM-based Tablets (i.e. iPad and Android-based Tablets), Smartbooks, or ARM-based Servers. It does include x86-based tablets.
The quarter in general
- AMD’s shipments of desktop heterogeneous GPU/CPUs, i.e., APUs declined 9.6% from Q1 and increased an astounding 47.1% in notebooks. The company’s overall PC graphics shipments increased 10.9%.
- Intel’s desktop processor-graphics EPG shipments decreased from last quarter by 1.4%, and Notebooks increased by 12.13%. The company’s overall PC graphics shipments increased 6.2%.
- Nvidia’s desktop discrete shipments were down 8.9% from last quarter; and, the company’s mobile discrete shipments decreased 7.1%. The company’s overall PC graphics shipments declined 8.0%.
- Year-to-year this quarter AMD overall PC shipments declined 15.8%, Intel dropped 12.9%, Nvidia declined 5.1%, and VIA fell 12.4% from last year.
- Total discrete GPUs (desktop and notebook) were down 5.5% from the last quarter and were down 5.2% from last year for the same quarter due to the same problems plaguing the overall PC industry. Overall the trend for discrete GPUs is up with a CAGR to 2016 of -2.2%.
- Ninety nine percent of Intel’s non-server processors have graphics, and over 67% of AMD’s non-server processors contain integrated graphics; AMD still ships IGPs.
Year-to-year for the quarter the graphics market decreased. Shipments were down 16.1 million units from this quarter last year.
Graphics chips (GPUs) and chips with graphics (IGPs, APUs, and EPGs) are a leading indicator for the PC market. At least one and often two GPUs are present in every PC shipped. It can take the form of a discrete chip, a GPU integrated in the chipset or embedded in the CPU. The average has grown from 1.2 GPUs per PC in 2001 to almost 1.4 GPUs per PC.
Moderator
Posts: 22107
Joined: 2008-07-14
The fact that not every gamer uses steam, proves only part of my point.
The second part, is that Steam has zero link to per quarter or per year sales. It's impossible to use Steam to track sales figures with any degree of accuracy at all. Market share figures are based on unit sales per quarter and unit sales per year. NVidia and AMD have sales exceeding 100M units each....whereas Steam has far fewer than 100M users. So, exactly how do you come to the conclusion that NVidia outsells AMD 2-1 based on Steam's "usage statistics"? You're only seeing a small portion of gamers. Also, how exactly do you relate "usage" with sales?
Steam users don't even account for 10% of NVidia's GPU sales.....
Senior Member
Posts: 3273
Joined: 2001-04-13
I think this is a clear reflection of AMD including great gaming bundles with their cards. NVIDIA just cannot compete with that atm.
Senior Member
Posts: 13605
Joined: 2005-08-13
There's nothing wrong with refreshing a product range, especially in the case of the GTX 760 and 770, which are faster but cheaper than their GTX 600 equivalents.
Also, while I'm very happy with my GTX 780, I do feel it was overpriced by about £150 (I paid £550 for mine). NVIDIA really should have released it as a replacement for the GTX 680 at the same pricepoint IMO, £420 at most, and then adjusted the range to fit the GTX 770 and GTX 760 in at appropriately lower prices. The Titan should have been the £550 card as well but, hey, what do I know about manufacturing and marketing graphics cards? Those cards would certainly have been more popular at lower prices but would they have been able to meet demands?
At least here in Finland GTX 680 is noticeably cheaper.
Moderator
Posts: 10696
Joined: 2008-11-01
It doesn't matter, statistically it's going to paint a fairly accurate picture. I'm happy to see AMD ahead, but keep in mind it's just for this particular quarter. Not to mention Nvidia's prices are just too high for what you get these days from them. A solid product, but not much else.
Also, trying to say more gamers avoid Steam than use it is a pretty hard sell, unless you're trying to say Zynga game players count as gamers.