AMD retakes GPU sales Q2 2013
Jon Peddie Research released its Q2 2013 GPU market report and interestingly enough if you compare to the previous quarter, AMD shipped 10.9 percent more graphics chips, Intel increased 6.2 percent. NVIDIA However decreased by 8 percent. These numbers include all sorts of graphics product, including dedicated graphics cards and IGPs.
As a result AMD's marketshare now is 21.9 percent, NVIDIA 16.1 percent and the rest is Intel, the chip giant has 62 percent thanks to its enormous amount of processors with integrated graphics.
Jon Peddie Research (JPR), the industry's research and consulting firm for graphics and multimedia, announced estimated graphics chip shipments and suppliers’ market share for 2013 2Q. While the news was disappointing year-to-year, the news was encouraging quarter-to-quarter.
AMD overall unit shipments increased 10.9%, quarter-to-quarter, Intel increased 6.2%, and Nvidia decreased by 8%.
The overall PC market declined 2.5% quarter-to-quarter while the graphics market increased 4.6%. Overall this net 7.1% increase reflects an interest on the part of consumers for double-attach—the adding of a discrete GPU to a system with integrated processor graphics, and to a lesser extent dual AIBs in performance desktop machines.
On a year-to-year basis we found that total graphics shipments during Q2’13 dropped 6.8% while PC shipments which declined by at a faster rate of 11.2% overall. GPUs are traditionally a leading indicator of the market, since a GPU goes into every system before it is shipped and most of the PC vendors are guiding down to flat for Q3’13. The popularity of tablets and the persistent economic slowness are the most often mentioned reasons for the decline in the PC market and the CAGR for PC graphics from 2012 to 2016 is -1.4%; we expect the total shipments of graphics chips in 2016 to be 319 million units. The ten-year average change for graphics shipments for quarter-to-quarter is a growth of 7.2%. This quarter is below the average with a 4.6% increase.
Our findings include discrete and integrated graphics (CPU and chipset) for Desktops, Notebooks (and Netbooks), and PC-based commercial (i.e., POS) and industrial/scientific and embedded. This report does not include handhelds (i.e., mobile phones), x86 Servers or ARM-based Tablets (i.e. iPad and Android-based Tablets), Smartbooks, or ARM-based Servers. It does include x86-based tablets.
The quarter in general
- AMD’s shipments of desktop heterogeneous GPU/CPUs, i.e., APUs declined 9.6% from Q1 and increased an astounding 47.1% in notebooks. The company’s overall PC graphics shipments increased 10.9%.
- Intel’s desktop processor-graphics EPG shipments decreased from last quarter by 1.4%, and Notebooks increased by 12.13%. The company’s overall PC graphics shipments increased 6.2%.
- Nvidia’s desktop discrete shipments were down 8.9% from last quarter; and, the company’s mobile discrete shipments decreased 7.1%. The company’s overall PC graphics shipments declined 8.0%.
- Year-to-year this quarter AMD overall PC shipments declined 15.8%, Intel dropped 12.9%, Nvidia declined 5.1%, and VIA fell 12.4% from last year.
- Total discrete GPUs (desktop and notebook) were down 5.5% from the last quarter and were down 5.2% from last year for the same quarter due to the same problems plaguing the overall PC industry. Overall the trend for discrete GPUs is up with a CAGR to 2016 of -2.2%.
- Ninety nine percent of Intel’s non-server processors have graphics, and over 67% of AMD’s non-server processors contain integrated graphics; AMD still ships IGPs.
Year-to-year for the quarter the graphics market decreased. Shipments were down 16.1 million units from this quarter last year.
Graphics chips (GPUs) and chips with graphics (IGPs, APUs, and EPGs) are a leading indicator for the PC market. At least one and often two GPUs are present in every PC shipped. It can take the form of a discrete chip, a GPU integrated in the chipset or embedded in the CPU. The average has grown from 1.2 GPUs per PC in 2001 to almost 1.4 GPUs per PC.
Senior Member
Posts: 3712
Joined: 2010-09-15
This.
Also they piss on the people who buy cards at release, they always do a free game a month or so after release and never backdate them. I got **** all with my 680 and I paid 500+ quid for it at release.
same happened to 780/titan users.
Senior Member
Posts: 1233
Joined: 2012-05-22
Keep in mind that a huge portion of AMD's sales this last quarter were inexpensive chips with tiny profit margins for Sony and Microsoft's upcoming consoles. What really matters here is making money because last I checked, AMD is still running in the red and has been for a very long time.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=amd&ql=1
Also, I came across this article which I highly recommend you guys read. http://organizationalphysics.com/2013/04/25/a-scathing-portrait-of-the-innovator-leadership-style-at-amd/
Senior Member
Posts: 6572
Joined: 2012-11-10
I suppose AMD's Steamroller will make a big difference for them, especially with their APUs. If it's as good as it's supposed to be, AMD might start closing up the margin against intel.
I do find it rather sad that so many intel graphics chips are the most popular on steam. Its no wonder why PC gaming is so unpopular. I'm also surprised so many people own sandy bridge, ivy bridge, and haswell chips.
I wonder why Intel cares about making GPUs. Sure they get to charge a little bit extra, but their chips are overpriced anyway and I think including their GPUs is hurting the PC market more than helping. I don't see what intel ever gained when it came to making their own IGPs. Without a discrete solution, they were never obligated to supply graphics. They basically just pushed away companies that were never going to threaten their income in the first place, such as VIA or nvidia. Sure VIA makes x86 CPUs but they don't even stand a chance replacing AMD. AMD is the only company that would give intel an incentive to create IGPs, but that was only the case when they made their first APU.
Senior Member
Posts: 13605
Joined: 2005-08-13
Honestly, NVIDIA made big mistake with 700 series. They shouldn't have released those.
Senior Member
Posts: 16103
Joined: 2004-08-18
Very true. A £550 GTX 780 and an £850 GTX Titan as high end cards, even if they are faster than any single GPU AMD card, were never going to be flying off the shelves. It is disturbing to see the price of high-end cards going from £300 to £550 over the last few years. That's nearly doubled!!!
Although I personally don't like AMD's drivers (weak on features such as PhysX, mediocre OpenGL support and no editable custom AA/AO flags), I have to admit that they do generally make solid graphics cards at decent prices. They also tend to lead in terms of VRAM, with the HD 6950/6970 having 2 GB when NVIDIA's own GTX 570/580 had 1.25-1.5 GB and the HD 7950/7970 having 3 GB when NVIDIA's own GTX 670/680 had 2 GB. They've only just caught up with the GTX 780 offering 3 GB but I wouldn't be surprised if AMD's next high-end cards have 4 GB. Hopefully they will be priced at a more reasonable sub-£400 pricepoint.