AMD Readies Ryzen 5 Series and will offer six- and four-core processors starting April 11
AMD today is announcing more Ryzen processors. As you guys know AMD made a promise to release the Ryzen 5 series in Q2 this year. Well, they have been able to meet that time slot and as such we can shed some light on Ryzen 5 processors that are to be released April 11th.
First off I wanted to write a quick apology to the AMD team, a handful of you might have noticed this news-item yesterday morning already. Ye ol' Hilbert here converted the embargo time wrong, which was initially set at March 15th 11pm CT. Once you convert CT to CET that reads 5am CET (central european standard time). However, that would be on the next day, and not the current day for Europe. So all info that you all have been able to read widely on the web yesterday is a result of a time conversion error from our side. In the minutes the news-item was only all content including full screenshots got posted and plastered onto the web everywhere. That is so how we not roll. That said, it's 4 and 6-core Ryzen time you guys. Ryzen 5 will be a handful of 6-core processors as well as 4-core processors, priced attractively I must say. Both the 6 and 4 core models all are SMT thus you may double up the cores into threads 4:8 and 6:12.
AMD will release four new models:
- Ryzen 5 1600X
This is a six-core part with 12-threads. The base frequency will be 3.6 GHz with a nice 4.0 Ghz boost frequency. This processor will cost 249 USD. - Ryzen 5 1600
This is a six-core part with 12-threads. The base frequency will be 3.2 GHz with a nice 3.6 GHz boost aka turbo frequency. This processor will cost 219 USD. - Ryzen 5 1500X
This is a four-core part with 8-threads. The base frequency will be 3.5 GHz with a 3.7 GHz boost aka turbo frequency. This processor will cost 189 USD. - Ryzen 5 1400
The 1400 is again a four-core part with 8-threads. The base frequency will be 3.2 GHz with a 3.4 GHz boost aka turbo frequency. This processor will cost 169 USD.
As stated before these processors are priced competitive alright. The flagship units will have a 95 Watt TDP, the lower SKUs settle for 65 Watts. These value are indicative that the processors are all 8-core models with a CCX or two cores disabled, this is yet to be confirmed though.
Update: The six-core parts will configured into a strict 3+3 combination, while the four-core parts will use 2+2. This confirms that both core clusters are in use and indeed these are 8-core parts with cores disabled. That also means for the 4-core enabled parts, the CCX clusters will run into the very same CPU bound game performance challenges. Then again with less cores enabled there's also less load and thus there should be less latency in-between the two CCXes.
AMD is going to make SKUs available with a stock coolers, these will be the Wraith Stealth for the Ryzen 5 1400 and the Wraith Spire for the 1600 and 1600X. These stock coolers do not have LED lighting enabled.
Improved XFR ranges - Ryzen 5 1500X also has support for an extended XFR frequency range of up to 3.9GHz (+200MHz over the max, all-core turbo frequency), XFR details for the other processors in the line-up have not been detailed. The four Ryzen 5 processors will be available starting April 11th. Ryzen series 3 you will see in the 2nd Half of 2017.
|
|||||||
Processor model |
Cores/Threads |
L3 Cache |
TDP |
Base |
Turbo |
Unlocked |
Price |
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X |
8/16 |
16 MB |
95 W |
3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz |
Yes |
$499 |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
8/16 |
16 MB |
95 W |
3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz |
Yes |
$399 |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
8/16 |
16 MB |
65 W |
3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz |
Yes |
$349 |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
6/12 |
16 MB |
95 W |
3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz |
Yes |
$249 |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
6/12 |
16 MB |
95 W |
3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz |
Yes |
$219 |
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X |
4/8 |
TBA |
65 W |
3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz |
Yes |
$189 |
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
4/8 |
TBA |
65 W |
3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz |
Yes |
$169 |
In the above table you can see the launch SKUs as well as an overview of what to expect in the coming months processor wise, it is going to be a busy year with AMD processor reviews alright. Have a browse below at the media deck for some more details.
AMD Announces FreeSync 2.0 with enhanced features - 01/03/2017 04:00 PM
AMD today announces FreeSync 2, and added a feature or two. Ever since the launch of FreeSync, the new adaptive sync technology has become a popular to market feature for AMD. Many monitors these day...
AMD Announces Radeon Instinct Including VEGA GPU powered MI25 Accelerator - 12/12/2016 04:00 PM
AMD today unveiled its strategy to accelerate the machine intelligence era in server computing, alongside the products announced is the MI25 which seems to be offering 25 TFLOPs (16-bit) of performanc...
AMD Announces Radeon Pro WX4100, WX5100 and WX7100 Graphics Cards - 11/07/2016 04:14 PM
AMD today announced the availability of the Radeon Pro WX Series of graphics cards, the company's powerful, new workstation graphics solutions designed to meet the evolving needs of creative professi...
AMD Announces Desktops Featuring 7th Generation AMD PRO Processors - 10/04/2016 11:38 AM
AMD announced the first PCs featuring 7th Generation AMD PRO APUs (formerly codenamed “Bristol Ridge PRO”). Built for business, AMD PRO APUs deliver increased computing and graphic...
AMD announced Embedded Radeon E9260 and E9550 graphics processing units - 09/28/2016 09:56 AM
AMD announced the AMD Embedded Radeon E9260 and E9550 graphics processing units (GPUs), the industry's first discrete embedded graphics cards leveraging the new AMD Polaris architecture. ...
Senior Member
Posts: 22421
Joined: 2008-07-14
I've got a bad feeling that fewer cores will equate to more performance impact.... AMD is already showing multi-threaded Cinebench results that show the Ryzen 5 1600X only being 69% faster than the i5 7600k....which isn't very promising considering there's 8 more logical cores.
Ryzen 5 1600X has 12 logical cores (6c/12t)
Core i5 7600K has 4 logical cores (4c/4t)
Senior Member
Posts: 315
Joined: 2007-06-29

Senior Member
Posts: 1390
Joined: 2003-04-26
16 core 32 thread, 200W plz
Senior Member
Posts: 2974
Joined: 2016-08-01
I've got a bad feeling that fewer cores will equate to more performance impact.... AMD is already showing multi-threaded Cinebench results that show the Ryzen 5 1600X only being 69% faster than the i5 7600k....which isn't very promising considering there's 8 more logical cores.
Ryzen 5 1600X has 12 logical cores (6c/12t)
Core i5 7600K has 4 logical cores (4c/4t)
i am not sure if 69% it is "only" if the cores where as strong 1:1 with intel skylake 4 cores vs 6 is 50% extra power but the zen core is just slightly slower in ipc and the 1600x i think it also has lower clock speeds no then? you factor in the the smt so when you sum those up and get 169% performance comparing hyperthreading gives about 30% better score on cine-bench right ? so considering clock speeds and the small ipc difference 169% seems about right
Senior Member
Posts: 2974
Joined: 2016-08-01
i was hopping the 4 core ones would be 1 full ccx unit i thought he yields on the ryzen where good ....unless .... core unlocking ? my brother has my old phenom 2 720 unlocked to 4 cores ((although when the 4th core is on the temperature reading is corrupted other than that it is stable for years !)) he wants to update , he is not really an enthusiast so for the 500 euros budget that he set me i was planning to build him a 4core 8 thread ryzen + 470 4gb and 8gb ram with b350 board and see if i can throw in an evo 212 and get it to got 3.8 ghz or so .... but i still have a dream of unlocking cpu's again !
to get back on topic i was expecting the 4 core parts to fair a bit better in games mostly because i was thinking they will have 1 ccx ...now i can already see people all over the internet bashing em for their gaming performance except if there is a fix (if possible) of some short till then