Fractal Design Pop Air RGB Black TG review
Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, RX 6750 XT, and RX 6650 XT 3DMark Scores leak
3DMark results for AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, 6750 XT, and 6650 XT are now available. Wccftech already released the complete specs of this RX 6000 update.
The news leaked at Wccftech who reports that the three new AMD Radeon RX 6000 graphics cards were all tested on the very same same PC. This machine runs Windows 10 with an AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D CPU and DDR4-3600 RAM. 3DMark Time Spy, Fire Strike, Port Royal, and 3DMark 11 benchmarks were used. Time Spy scores 22,209 points on the Radeon RX 6950 XT. Wccftech reports that the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti scored 20,855 on the identical setup. The Radeon RX 6900 XT currently scores 18,463. The Radeon RX 6650 XT surpasses the RX 6600 XT by around 11% in the Time Spy test. Especially the RX 6950 XT seems to perform well, with up-to 20% performance increases seen from a reference 6900 XT. These AMD Radeon RX 6000 refresh cards are slated to be introduced on May 10.
| Benchmark Name | API | Benchmark | RX 6950 XT | RX 6750 XT | RX 6650 XT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time Spy | DX12 | Score | 19696 | 13640 | 10493 |
| Time Spy | DX12 | Graphics | 22209 | 13999 | 10262 |
| Time Spy | DX12 | CPU | 12003 | 11911 | 12029 |
| Time Spy Extreme | DX12 | Score | 9351 | 6271 | 4731 |
| Time Spy Extreme | DX12 | Graphics | 10743 | 6461 | 4634 |
| Time Spy Extreme | DX12 | CPU | 5397 | 5377 | 5375 |
| Port Royal | DXR | Score | 10824 | 6359 | 4697 |
| Port Royal | DXR | Graphics | 10824 | 6359 | 4697 |
| Port Royal | DXR | Test 1 | 50 | 29 | 21.75 |
| Fire Strike | DX11 | Score | 43823 | 32837 | 26594 |
| Fire Strike | DX11 | Graphics | 61950 | 38305 | 29520 |
| Fire Strike | DX11 | CPU | 29593 | 29715 | 29364 |
| Fire Strike | DX11 | Combined | 17655 | 17143 | 14045 |
| Fire Strike Extreme | DX11 | Score | 27575 | 17664 | 12828 |
| Fire Strike Extreme | DX11 | Graphics | 30380 | 18561 | 13559 |
| Fire Strike Extreme | DX11 | CPU | 29645 | 29640 | 29413 |
| Fire Strike Extreme | DX11 | Combined | 15334 | 8830 | 5690 |
| Fire Strike Ultra | DX11 | Score | 14862 | 9149 | 6802 |
| Fire Strike Ultra | DX11 | Graphics | 15159 | 9146 | 6735 |
| Fire Strike Ultra | DX11 | CPU | 29632 | 29702 | 29435 |
| Fire Strike Ultra | DX11 | Combined | 7847 | 4500 | 3272 |
| 3DMark 11 | DX11 | Score | 51196 | 40666 | 36496 |
| 3DMark 11 | DX11 | Graphics | 75479 | 49933 | 42496 |
| 3DMark 11 | DX11 | CPU | 27135 | 27280 | 26820 |
| 3DMark 11 | DX11 | Combined | 24605 | 24561 | 24157 |
GFXBench reveals AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT performance. - 04/25/2022 09:17 AM
Komachi SPOTTED an AMD Radeon RX 6750 ON gfxbENCH. We looked around and found a good comparison of the new Radeon RX 6750 XT against the well-known and well-reviewed RX 6700 XT....
ASUS has released AMD Radeon RX 6400 graphics cards - 04/21/2022 08:50 AM
ASUS has unveiled AMD Radeon RX 6400 graphics cards, which have been tuned to be a cost-effective and power-efficient option for common 1080p gaming systems....
Mpre AMD Radeon RX 6x50XT Cards gets listed - Pricing Italian Retailer - 04/18/2022 07:02 AM
AMD's revamped graphics cards aren't far off, Italian reseller Breakpoint has listed multiple Radeon RX 6x50XT cards with their related pricing on their website. ...
A Listing Indicates the Arrival of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT - 04/13/2022 10:34 AM
A file with South Korea's National Radio Research Agency (RRA), which certifies gear marketed globally, implies that AMD's Radeon RX 6750 XT may be on the way....
AMD Radeon software modifies CPU settings without the user permission. - 04/05/2022 09:00 AM
A German website researched a possible anomaly involving AMD's Adrenalin GPU software. According to current speculation, the inclusion of AMD's Ryzen Master module in Adrenalin version 22.3.1 or lat...
cucaulay malkin
Senior Member
Posts: 5065
Joined: 2020-08-03
Senior Member
Posts: 5065
Joined: 2020-08-03
#6014776 Posted on: 05/05/2022 04:19 PM
6800 with MPT,i'm sure if a 6900xt fell into my hands its numbers would probably be between 3080 / 3070ti.
11064 11063
different versions of the game
here's the same,more like between 3060ti and 3070ti for 6900xt and 2070 Super for 6800
it's playable,I ran rt 1440p on 3060ti,but 6900 is a 1000msrp/1400 retail card
11065
it's a massive gap even to 3080 non-ti
11066
6800 with MPT,i'm sure if a 6900xt fell into my hands its numbers would probably be between 3080 / 3070ti.
11064 11063
different versions of the game
here's the same,more like between 3060ti and 3070ti for 6900xt and 2070 Super for 6800
it's playable,I ran rt 1440p on 3060ti,but 6900 is a 1000msrp/1400 retail card
11065
it's a massive gap even to 3080 non-ti
11066
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 6570
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 6570
Joined: 2012-11-10
#6014787 Posted on: 05/05/2022 04:50 PM
Either these results are wrong, or there is more to this refresh, other than a small increase in core clock and memory.
An increase of 2Gbps in memory and a few extra Mhz on the core, can't account for an improvement of 20%.
Agreed. This performance increase is huge. Though, it also depends on how old the results for the non-50 cards are. Drivers alone could account for a 10% increase.
Either these results are wrong, or there is more to this refresh, other than a small increase in core clock and memory.
An increase of 2Gbps in memory and a few extra Mhz on the core, can't account for an improvement of 20%.
Agreed. This performance increase is huge. Though, it also depends on how old the results for the non-50 cards are. Drivers alone could account for a 10% increase.
Kool64
Senior Member
Posts: 1337
Joined: 2006-10-21
Senior Member
Posts: 1337
Joined: 2006-10-21
#6014795 Posted on: 05/05/2022 05:18 PM
wouldn't the drivers affect the older models too if true? I mean I'm not one to doubt AMD driver optimizations could help but they should reflect a similar increase percentage wise.
Agreed. This performance increase is huge. Though, it also depends on how old the results for the non-50 cards are. Drivers alone could account for a 10% increase.
wouldn't the drivers affect the older models too if true? I mean I'm not one to doubt AMD driver optimizations could help but they should reflect a similar increase percentage wise.
Horus-Anhur
Senior Member
Posts: 3762
Joined: 2013-02-05
Senior Member
Posts: 3762
Joined: 2013-02-05
#6014796 Posted on: 05/05/2022 05:19 PM
But a new driver would improve both the older cards and the refresh.
Unless there are new units or instructions in this refresh. A bit like what happened with the 9700 to 9800.
Agreed. This performance increase is huge. Though, it also depends on how old the results for the non-50 cards are. Drivers alone could account for a 10% increase.
But a new driver would improve both the older cards and the refresh.
Unless there are new units or instructions in this refresh. A bit like what happened with the 9700 to 9800.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3496
Joined: 2014-10-20
Impressive gains. Looking forward to the next MCM-based generation.