Team Group MP34 NVME SSD (512GB) review
Microsoft Office 2016 Pro and Windows 10 Pro for just $34
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Gaming OC review
Anno 1800: PC graphics performance benchmark review
NZXT H500 Overwatch Special Edition review
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Twin Fan 6 GB Review
Corsair Carbide 275Q review
Cooler Master MK850 keyboard review
WD Blue SN500 NVME SSD (250GB) Review
ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme Alpha review
AMD Radeon RX 590 Would Now launch 15 November
Over the past few weeks, we've talked a couple of times about a pending Radeon RX 590 from AMD. A Polaris based product that now is expected to be released on 15 November. It would be Polaris as you know it, yet fabbed on a smaller 12nm node and thus it'll get some extra frequency on the clocks.
Earlier on a leaked result set that surfaced online shows that RX 590 would be clocked at 1545 MHz clock, and that is higher than the RX 580 boost clock. Then again, we do not know if the results set is taken from an overclocked product. The memory clock of 2000 MHz seems reference based. Recently some documents have leaked onto the web, mentioning the RX 590 as product name, so, for now, we'll assume that is correct.
The suggested retail price would hover in the $299,- which is a good chunk more expensive than a RX 580 8GB at $229.
Download AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 18.10.2 Beta Driver - 10/25/2018 09:31 PM
You can now download the new AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin Edition 18.10.2 beta driver. This release contains updated support for Fallout®76 B.E.T.A. Download...
AMD Radeon RX 590 Spotted in 3DMark Time Spy? - 10/15/2018 02:35 PM
Man, what are the odds of that, an Alleged AMD Radeon RX 590 has surfaced in the 3DMark results browser 24 hours prior to an NVIDIA RTX 2070 Embargo? The 12nm Polaris is gossipped to be released soon...
Download: AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 18.9.3 WHQL Drivers - 10/09/2018 07:16 PM
AMD has a new set of drivers up for grabs today, Radeon Software Adrenalin Edition 18.9.3 (beta) has been optimized for "Assassin's Creed: Odyssey," offering up to 5% higher performanc...
Download: AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 18.9.2 Driver - 09/20/2018 09:08 AM
You can now download Download AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin Edition 18.9.2 Beta drivers for Windows 7, 8 and 10 in 32 adn 64-bit versions. This release contains updated support for F1 2018, Fortnit...
Download: AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 18.9.1 Driver - 09/13/2018 08:00 AM
You can now download the AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 18.9.1 Driver. This release contains support for Shadow of the Tomb Raider and Star Control: Origins. Download...
Enizax
Senior Member
Posts: 245
Joined: 2009-08-07
Senior Member
Posts: 245
Joined: 2009-08-07
#5601409 Posted on: 10/29/2018 09:50 PM
Seems like a miss to me, banking on higher clocks on the GPU to try and remain within the realm of relevance in the wake of a GDDR5X clad 1060...But considering that refreshed-Polaris and Pascal on on their last legs, I wouldn't expect much effort from either team in terms of RnD to bring a much better product in that market segment until the next gen's medium range products hit the shelves...
Seems like a miss to me, banking on higher clocks on the GPU to try and remain within the realm of relevance in the wake of a GDDR5X clad 1060...But considering that refreshed-Polaris and Pascal on on their last legs, I wouldn't expect much effort from either team in terms of RnD to bring a much better product in that market segment until the next gen's medium range products hit the shelves...
LEEc337
Member
Posts: 42
Joined: 2015-08-13
Member
Posts: 42
Joined: 2015-08-13
#5601434 Posted on: 10/29/2018 11:04 PM
Is it me or could the differences in scores be down to better cpu scores or even the difference in driver versions but for the next level the 590 has nothing more to offer to 580.
Is it me or could the differences in scores be down to better cpu scores or even the difference in driver versions but for the next level the 590 has nothing more to offer to 580.
warlord
Senior Member
Posts: 2110
Joined: 2012-10-22
Senior Member
Posts: 2110
Joined: 2012-10-22
#5601436 Posted on: 10/29/2018 11:12 PM
Fake results. We should wait for proper release and benchmarking.
Fake results. We should wait for proper release and benchmarking.
rl66
Senior Member
Posts: 1945
Joined: 2007-05-31
Senior Member
Posts: 1945
Joined: 2007-05-31
#5601456 Posted on: 10/30/2018 01:16 AM
as always...
Fake results. We should wait for proper release and benchmarking.
as always...
Killian38
Senior Member
Posts: 307
Joined: 2017-09-02
Senior Member
Posts: 307
Joined: 2017-09-02
#5601466 Posted on: 10/30/2018 02:04 AM
I'll wait and see what happens with the reviews. I really hope the 590 and 1060 are pretty good jumps over their predecessor. Not some 2% crap. All I will ever buy is mid range cards and if they want me to buy it, it better have a good price and get the job done. If this is what they are making for now it better fit into that small box.
I'll wait and see what happens with the reviews. I really hope the 590 and 1060 are pretty good jumps over their predecessor. Not some 2% crap. All I will ever buy is mid range cards and if they want me to buy it, it better have a good price and get the job done. If this is what they are making for now it better fit into that small box.
Killian38
Senior Member
Posts: 307
Joined: 2017-09-02
Senior Member
Posts: 307
Joined: 2017-09-02
#5601468 Posted on: 10/30/2018 02:14 AM
I'm thinking the 1060 with DDR5X will beat the 590 by 5% or more in every test. I'm with yeah for sure. Memory speed has always helped me more when clocking a GPU. Maybe AMD knows something we don't? I hope so. We need them to step up in this range.
Why on earth will AMD stay with the same memory on this card? Why not run faster DDR5X or atleast 9000Mhz DDR5??? Basically Nvidia will launch the GTX1060 with DDR5X and it will be once again on par with the new RX590... Why will AMD not push the boundaries???
I'm thinking the 1060 with DDR5X will beat the 590 by 5% or more in every test. I'm with yeah for sure. Memory speed has always helped me more when clocking a GPU. Maybe AMD knows something we don't? I hope so. We need them to step up in this range.
Astyanax
Senior Member
Posts: 1214
Joined: 2018-03-21
Senior Member
Posts: 1214
Joined: 2018-03-21
#5601481 Posted on: 10/30/2018 02:45 AM
only the diehard amd fanatics will get this, its just a product designed to milk that set of customers till Arcturus is competitive.
only the diehard amd fanatics will get this, its just a product designed to milk that set of customers till Arcturus is competitive.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 8612
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 8612
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5601501 Posted on: 10/30/2018 08:05 AM
I could see how you wrote 4 years ago:
"only the diehard amd fanatics will get this, its just a product designed to milk that set of customers till Polaris is competitive."
= = = =
If it is in your price range and performs better for your use case than competition in that price range,... you need to be fanatic for other camp to ignore it. (Yes, you basically said that no matter what RX-590 is bad card for stupid people. Reality is that possibilities exist till they are proven wrong. So, maybe AMD pushes performance per $ bar a bit higher... in contrast of nVidia which comfortably keeps same performance to price ratio and that's why you get super expensive cards people are unhappy about.)
And as for reality... is nVidia better in every price category out there to outsell AMD 3:1~4:1? No, so if you want to look for fanatics, you'll find more there. (But, hard to say what's difference between fanatic and individual brainwashed due to his herd mentality.)
only the diehard amd fanatics will get this, its just a product designed to milk that set of customers till Arcturus is competitive.
I could see how you wrote 4 years ago:
"only the diehard amd fanatics will get this, its just a product designed to milk that set of customers till Polaris is competitive."
= = = =
If it is in your price range and performs better for your use case than competition in that price range,... you need to be fanatic for other camp to ignore it. (Yes, you basically said that no matter what RX-590 is bad card for stupid people. Reality is that possibilities exist till they are proven wrong. So, maybe AMD pushes performance per $ bar a bit higher... in contrast of nVidia which comfortably keeps same performance to price ratio and that's why you get super expensive cards people are unhappy about.)
And as for reality... is nVidia better in every price category out there to outsell AMD 3:1~4:1? No, so if you want to look for fanatics, you'll find more there. (But, hard to say what's difference between fanatic and individual brainwashed due to his herd mentality.)
Astyanax
Senior Member
Posts: 1214
Joined: 2018-03-21
Senior Member
Posts: 1214
Joined: 2018-03-21
#5601509 Posted on: 10/30/2018 08:28 AM
Sorry, but you sound like the exact person im referring to. the same group that paid for and rewarded the non competitive amd for years letting them remain complacent on the cpu front :\
Sorry, but you sound like the exact person im referring to. the same group that paid for and rewarded the non competitive amd for years letting them remain complacent on the cpu front :\
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34851
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34851
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5601513 Posted on: 10/30/2018 08:40 AM
DDR5X is very expensive, probably too expensive in this product segment. Secondly, I very much doubt the memory controller is compatible with it.
Why not run faster DDR5X
DDR5X is very expensive, probably too expensive in this product segment. Secondly, I very much doubt the memory controller is compatible with it.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 8612
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 8612
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5601546 Posted on: 10/30/2018 11:03 AM
"You" who (are you refering to)? Use quote system. It's there to prevent me from lashing on you when you meant someone else. But if you would be referring to me. I can tell you that I did promote i5s over FX chips. I quite realistically say what's good or bad on nVidia's HW and AMD's.
While you clearly behave like you already had RX-590 in hand. Tested hell out of it and then threw it into garbage because you deemed it to be exactly that.
Sorry, but you sound like the exact person im referring to. the same group that paid for and rewarded the non competitive amd for years letting them remain complacent on the cpu front :\
"You" who (are you refering to)? Use quote system. It's there to prevent me from lashing on you when you meant someone else. But if you would be referring to me. I can tell you that I did promote i5s over FX chips. I quite realistically say what's good or bad on nVidia's HW and AMD's.
While you clearly behave like you already had RX-590 in hand. Tested hell out of it and then threw it into garbage because you deemed it to be exactly that.
Astyanax
Senior Member
Posts: 1214
Joined: 2018-03-21
Senior Member
Posts: 1214
Joined: 2018-03-21
#5601562 Posted on: 10/30/2018 11:59 AM
I don't need to test a rebrand.
I don't need to test a rebrand.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 11984
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 11984
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5601580 Posted on: 10/30/2018 12:49 PM
Yeah I'm sure complacency was the reason why AMD's CPU division suffered and not the multiple times Intel abused the f*ck out it's monopoly. Clearly you'd rather see no one support AMD - even at price points whey they are competitive, so they vanish - because Intel hasn't been complacent at all, right?
What a joke post.
Sorry, but you sound like the exact person im referring to. the same group that paid for and rewarded the non competitive amd for years letting them remain complacent on the cpu front :\
Yeah I'm sure complacency was the reason why AMD's CPU division suffered and not the multiple times Intel abused the f*ck out it's monopoly. Clearly you'd rather see no one support AMD - even at price points whey they are competitive, so they vanish - because Intel hasn't been complacent at all, right?
What a joke post.
warlord
Senior Member
Posts: 2110
Joined: 2012-10-22
Senior Member
Posts: 2110
Joined: 2012-10-22
#5601584 Posted on: 10/30/2018 12:53 PM
590 should be between Fury X and Vega 56. If not, it has better to not be released at all with that price it is a fool's choice.
590 should be between Fury X and Vega 56. If not, it has better to not be released at all with that price it is a fool's choice.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 338
Joined: 2016-06-08
Why on earth will AMD stay with the same memory on this card? Why not run faster DDR5X or atleast 9000Mhz DDR5??? Basically Nvidia will launch the GTX1060 with DDR5X and it will be once again on par with the new RX590... Why will AMD not push the boundaries???