Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - Official Benchmarks
Okay before we dive into this one, I have to state the following. The benchmarks that got posted yesterday, and are shown in the chart below, originate from the AMD reviewers guide. Someone posted them on-line, and he shouldn't have as benchmarks results are to be released next week.
Secondly, and I want to make a strong note about this, these benchmarks are made by AMD themselves, it's at 4K only and paints a very narrow picture. Please understand that when a company shows performance results in a guide or document, only the positive numbers are included. I mean its a marketing strategy to make 'the other guys' look bad. Yes, cherry picked results.
So I don't even know who leaked these (techreport I think) ? The embargo is a bit of a mess, any courtesy goes out to whoever that is.
So please do take these things with a grain of salt and just wait for the real-world numbers from media outlets like Guru3D.com before you draw any conclusions okay ? The Radeon R9 Fury X packs 4096 GCN cores and 8.9 billion transistors.
AMD Radeon Fury X doesn't have HDMI 2.0 support - 06/18/2015 07:49 AM
So if you had a peek about all everything presented in the past few days, one thing you will have noticed. The new architecture doesn't support HDMI 2.0, but instead uses HDMI 1.4a. This means with F...
AMD Radeon Fury X beats Titan X in OpenCL - 06/10/2015 05:47 PM
So the funny thing about people as that once they have hardware, they test stuff and sometimes forget that the results of a benchmark are inserted into a database, which is publicly available. AMD Rad...
AMD Radeon Graphics Channel Roadmap Surfaces - 06/10/2015 08:17 AM
Nothing is safe on the web it seems. A new roadmap leaked onto the web showing AMD's Radeon lineup for 2015. It is as discussed many times now, exactly what we told for a while now. Lots of respins a...
AMD Radeon R9 370 Reference Design Pictured - 06/09/2015 04:01 PM
Over at Alienware they are showing a photo of what seems to be the Radeon R9 370. The reference product has had a bit of a redesign alright. ...
AMD Radeon 300 Series Pricing Revealed - 06/09/2015 08:23 AM
The pricing for the AMD Radeon 300 Series pricing leaked onto the web, from Radeon R7 370 to R9 390 that is. ...
Megabiv
Senior Member
Posts: 798
Joined: 2006-09-14
Senior Member
Posts: 798
Joined: 2006-09-14
#5100658 Posted on: 06/19/2015 09:48 AM
This will be a direct competitor for the 980Ti in price/performance. The Titan X is very niche and already in direct competition with the far cheaper 980Ti (at least here in the UK its about £300 less). If the Fury X trades blows with the 980Ti then AMD have done themselves proud as far as I'm concerned, anything more is really bonus. Looking forward to the G3D review.
This will be a direct competitor for the 980Ti in price/performance. The Titan X is very niche and already in direct competition with the far cheaper 980Ti (at least here in the UK its about £300 less). If the Fury X trades blows with the 980Ti then AMD have done themselves proud as far as I'm concerned, anything more is really bonus. Looking forward to the G3D review.
Asgardi
Senior Member
Posts: 247
Joined: 2010-11-13
Senior Member
Posts: 247
Joined: 2010-11-13
#5100665 Posted on: 06/19/2015 09:59 AM
Hmm...
You are mixing Titan and Ti. Ti costs only $50-100 more than Fury X, and it doesnt have to. Nvidia is quite much free to do what ever they want with the price now that Fury is out. Cant wait to see what happens.
Hmm...
The Titan also costs $400 more. I'd sure hope it outperforms something for that price...
You are mixing Titan and Ti. Ti costs only $50-100 more than Fury X, and it doesnt have to. Nvidia is quite much free to do what ever they want with the price now that Fury is out. Cant wait to see what happens.
moab600
Senior Member
Posts: 6616
Joined: 2004-09-30
Senior Member
Posts: 6616
Joined: 2004-09-30
#5100669 Posted on: 06/19/2015 10:04 AM
Don't trust any amd or nvidia in house benchmarks, we will see next week what it capable of, but i got the feeling it's not gonna be impressive, GM200 and 204 already impressed us well.
Don't trust any amd or nvidia in house benchmarks, we will see next week what it capable of, but i got the feeling it's not gonna be impressive, GM200 and 204 already impressed us well.
Anarion
Senior Member
Posts: 13599
Joined: 2005-08-13
Senior Member
Posts: 13599
Joined: 2005-08-13
#5100670 Posted on: 06/19/2015 10:06 AM
Ouch... So cherry picked results are already that close. Pretty much any custom GTX 980 Ti is faster and you can squeeze out more by overclocking.
Ouch... So cherry picked results are already that close. Pretty much any custom GTX 980 Ti is faster and you can squeeze out more by overclocking.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 93
Joined: 2013-10-29
our wallets... ha-ha
...ha