Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review

New Downloads
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.5.2 WHQL download
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4382
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.1 Download
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v5.2
GeForce 535.98 WHQL driver download
CPU-Z download v2.06
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.5.1 WHQL download
GeForce 532.03 WHQL driver download
AMD Chipset Drivers Download 5.05.16.529
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.4


New Forum Topics
Amernime Zone AMD Software: Adrenalin / Pro Driver - Discovery Remix 23.4.2 WHQL [Omega 23.5.1 WIP] Radeon MiniTool - alternative control panel Wrappers, fix Low FPS AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 23.5.2 - Driver Download and Discussion Gigabyte Motherboards Affected by Firmware Backdoor, Over 250 Models Impacted Lian Li presents new cases at Computex 2023 and a fan with an embedded diaplay G.SKILL DDR5 8800 Memory Kits Overclocking Demonstrations at Computex As per home page NV chat bot. AMD Software: 23.Q2.1 iCafe edition - Driver Download and Discussion AI drone tried to remove its human operator from commanding - under simulation




Guru3D.com » News » AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - Official Benchmarks

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - Official Benchmarks

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 06/19/2015 09:18 AM | source: | 208 comment(s)
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - Official Benchmarks

Okay before we dive into this one, I have to state the following. The benchmarks that got posted yesterday, and are shown in the chart below, originate from the AMD reviewers guide. Someone posted them on-line, and he shouldn't have as benchmarks results are to be released next week.

Secondly, and I want to make a strong note about this, these benchmarks are made by AMD themselves, it's at 4K only and paints a very narrow picture. Please understand that when a company shows performance results in a guide or document, only the positive numbers are included. I mean its a marketing strategy to make 'the other guys' look bad. Yes, cherry picked results.

So I don't even know who leaked these (techreport I think) ? The embargo is a bit of a mess, any courtesy goes out to whoever that is.

 


So please do take these things with a grain of salt and just wait for the real-world numbers from media outlets like Guru3D.com before you draw any conclusions okay ? The Radeon R9 Fury X packs 4096 GCN cores and 8.9 billion transistors. 
 



AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - Official Benchmarks	AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - Official Benchmarks




« AMD Releases Radeon R9 Fury X details + exclusive photos · AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - Official Benchmarks · Intel Skylake to debut In August at Gamescom »

Related Stories

AMD Radeon Fury X doesn't have HDMI 2.0 support - 06/18/2015 07:49 AM
So if you had a peek about all everything presented in the past few days, one thing you will have noticed. The new architecture doesn't support HDMI 2.0, but instead uses HDMI 1.4a. This means with F...

AMD Radeon Fury X beats Titan X in OpenCL - 06/10/2015 05:47 PM
So the funny thing about people as that once they have hardware, they test stuff and sometimes forget that the results of a benchmark are inserted into a database, which is publicly available. AMD Rad...

AMD Radeon Graphics Channel Roadmap Surfaces - 06/10/2015 08:17 AM
Nothing is safe on the web it seems. A new roadmap leaked onto the web showing AMD's Radeon lineup for 2015. It is as discussed many times now, exactly what we told for a while now. Lots of respins a...

AMD Radeon R9 370 Reference Design Pictured - 06/09/2015 04:01 PM
Over at Alienware they are showing a photo of what seems to be the Radeon R9 370. The reference product has had a bit of a redesign alright. ...

AMD Radeon 300 Series Pricing Revealed - 06/09/2015 08:23 AM
The pricing for the AMD Radeon 300 Series pricing leaked onto the web, from Radeon R7 370 to R9 390 that is. ...


42 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


Asgardi
Senior Member



Posts: 247
Joined: 2010-11-13

#5100645 Posted on: 06/19/2015 09:29 AM
Hmm...

If Hilbert is saying these are cherry picked and take witha grain of salt then I reckon the fury x is not as good as these benchies show. Its either equal to Ti in some games and below it in other games. That is my prediction. Titan will still beat it in all games.


I was waiting for something much more impressive since AMD claimed Fury X to be the "fastest GPU in the world". If these are true and AMDs own benchmarks it will probably not beat the TI, especially those models having 30 % factory overclock. But I will wait for the real benchmarks before judging.

Btw, notice how games that take more than 4Gb memory in 4K are missing, including GTA V ;)

Steppzor
Senior Member



Posts: 829
Joined: 2006-02-05

#5100647 Posted on: 06/19/2015 09:32 AM
I was waiting for something much more impressive since AMD claimed Fury X to be the "fastest GPU in the world". If these are true and AMDs own benchmarks it will probably not beat the TI, especially those models having 30 % factory overclock. But I will wait for the real benchmarks before judging.

Btw, notice how games that take more than 4Gb memory in 4K are missing, including GTA V ;)

Shadow of Mordor is in there. Isnt that one of the most VRAM intensive games out there?

Fox2232
Senior Member



Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20

#5100648 Posted on: 06/19/2015 09:33 AM
I am pretty sure there are games where 980Ti does better. But looking at Bioshock Infinite where AMD's equivalent HW usually scores like 20% worse, and seeing it here at same level...
And being better in Witcher 3 which is crippled on anything but maxwell...

And it is true that 4k is nice, but this card alone is best for 1440p or higher refresh rate 1080p/21:9 screens.

So lets calmly wait for Hilbert's test suite which is unbiased.

Adil0n
Member



Posts: 96
Joined: 2015-05-19

#5100650 Posted on: 06/19/2015 09:37 AM
Dear HH,

We need one of your OCD benchmarks about this, doubts, expectations and speculations are killing us!

Cartman372
Senior Member



Posts: 1469
Joined: 2008-01-13

#5100651 Posted on: 06/19/2015 09:37 AM
If Hilbert is saying these are cherry picked and take witha grain of salt then I reckon the fury x is not as good as these benchies show. Its either equal to Ti in some games and below it in other games. That is my prediction. Titan will still beat it in all games.


The Titan also costs $400 more. I'd sure hope it outperforms something for that price...

42 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023